Skip to main content

Marxism and Islamism in Egypt: A Re-Examination of the Muslim Brotherhood—Introduction and Overview of the Muslim Brotherhood

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Marxism, Religion, and Emancipatory Politics

Part of the book series: Marx, Engels, and Marxisms ((MAENMA))

  • 385 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter analyses the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt to show that, despite superficial resemblances to emancipatory movements, the Brotherhood never warranted the kind of optimistic investments placed in it by some Marxist or Marx-inspired scholars. As an apparently oppositional bloc with deep cultural roots in Egyptian society, the Brotherhood’s emergence as a leading political force in the wake of the 2011 uprisings led some to interpret it in Marxist terms as a Gramscian bloc fighting a war of position, building on what appeared to be a counterhegemonic legacy. In fact, as Mirshak’s analysis shows, the Brotherhood’s version was never anything more than a Zombie-Gramscianism and its political success was merely ‘passive-revolutionary’ in character.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An earlier version of this chapter has been published as Mirshak N (2021) The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt: A Gramscian reexamination.Current Sociology, Epub Ahead of Print 17 September 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921211039273.

  2. 2.

    The term ‘Islamism’ refers to different forms of organisations and movements that advocate that public and political life should be guided by Islamic principles (Poljarevic 2015). These groups can utilise a variety of tactics to achieve this aim ranging from violence (e.g. Egyptian Islamic Jihad and al-Jama ‘ah al-Islamiyah) to more gradual and reformist approaches such as the Muslim Brotherhood, which is the main focus of this chapter. In other words, Islamism is far from monolithic. Its political impact ‘has been reactionary, conservative, democratic, revolutionary, conspirational—depending on the specific and changing national and international contexts in which Islamism has developed over a period of several generations’ (Buck-Morss 2006, p. 3).

  3. 3.

    This decree ‘fired the prosecutor general, made the president immune from judicial oversight, and immunised the Shura Council and the Constituent Assembly from dissolution by court order’ (Lesch 2017, p. 142).

  4. 4.

    Gramsci’s notion of hegemony can be traced back to Marx’s preface to A Contribution to a Critique of Political Economy which Gramsci himself had translated (Boothman 2008).

  5. 5.

    A war of manoeuvre (war of movement) refers to the possibility of overthrowing ruling elites and the subsequent takeover of the state through conducting a violent revolution or a ‘frontal attack’.

  6. 6.

    Sayyid Qutb (1906–1966) was an Egyptian educator, thinker and leading member of the Muslim Brotherhood throughout the 1950s and 1960s. Qutb is considered to be a major influence on the development of Radical Islamism.

  7. 7.

    Jahiliyya—as God describes it and His Qur’an defines it—is the rule of humans by humans because it involves making some humans servants of others, rebelling against service to God, rejecting God’s divinity (uluhiyya) and, in view of this rejection, ascribing divinity to some humans and serving them apart from God (Qutb cited in Shepard 2003, p. 524).

References

  • Abdel Meguid A and Faruqi D (2017) The truncated debate: Egyptian liberals, Islamists, and ideological statism. In Fahmy DF and Faruqi D (eds) Egypt and the Contradictions of Liberalism: Illiberal Intelligentsia and the Future of Egyptian Democracy. London: One World Publications, pp. 253–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdelrahman M (2004) Civil Society Exposed: The Politics of NGOs in Egypt. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdelrahman M (2009) ‘With the Islamists? – Sometimes. With the State? – Never!’ Cooperation between the Left and Islamists in Egypt. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 36(1): 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdelrahman M (2014) Egypt’s Long Revolution: Protest Movements and Uprisings. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Abul-Magd Z (2018) Militarizing the Nation: The Army, Business, and Revolution in Egypt. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achcar G (2006) The Clash of Barbarisms: The Making of the New World Disorder. London: Saqi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achcar G (2013) Marxism, Orientalism, Cosmopolitanism. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Anani K (2019) Rethinking the repression-dissent nexus: assessing Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood’s response to repression since the coup of 2013. Democratization, 26(8): 1329–1341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Anani K (2020) Inside the Muslim Brotherhood. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arafat AA (2017) The Rise of Islamism in Egypt. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Asik MO (2012) Contesting religious educational discourses and institutions in contemporary Egypt. Social Compass, 59: 84–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayat A (2007) Making Islam Democratic: Social Movements and the Post-Islamist Turn. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bayat A (2017) Revolution without Revolutionaries: Making Sense of the Arab Spring. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beinin J (2005) Political Islam and the new global economy. The New Centennial Review, 5(1): 111–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beinin J (2014) Civil society, NGOs, and Egypt’s 2011 popular uprising. South Atlantic Quarterly, 113(2): 396–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boothman D (2008) The sources for Gramsci’s concept of hegemony. Rethinking Marxism, 20(2): 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boothman D (2012) Islam in Gramsci’s journalism and Prison Notebooks: the shifting patterns of hegemony. Historical Materialism, 20(4): 115–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown N (2012) When Victory Is Not an Option: Islamist Movements in Arab Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buck-Morss S (2006) Thinking Past Terror: Islamism and Critical Theory on the Left. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butko TJ (2004) Revelation or revolution: a Gramscian approach to the rise of political Islam. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 31(1): 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook BJ (2000) Egypt’s national education debate. Comparative Education, 36(4): 477–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Smet B (2015) A Dialectical Pedagogy of Revolt: Gramsci, Vygotsky, and the Egyptian Revolution. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Smet B (2016) Gramsci on Tahrir: Revolution and Counter-Revolution in Egypt. London: Pluto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Smet B (2020) ‘Authoritarian resilience’ as passive revolution: a Gramscian interpretation of counter-revolution in Egypt. The Journal of North African Studies. Epub ahead of print 6 August 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2020.1801266.

  • Egan D (2018) The Dialectic of Position and Maneuver: Understanding Gramsci’s Military Metaphor. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Ghobashy M (2005) The Metamorphosis of the Egyptian Muslim Brothers. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 37(3): 373–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Femia JV (1975) Hegemony and consciousness in the thought of Antonio Gramsci. Political Studies, 23(1): 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Femia JV (1981) Gramsci’s Political Thought: Hegemony, Consciousness and the Revolutionary Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana B (2010) Political space and hegemonic power in Gramsci. Journal of Power, 3(3): 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerges F (2018) Making the Arab World: Nasser, Qutb and the Clash That Shaped the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci A (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci A (1992) Prison Notebooks. Vol. 1. Ed. and intro. by JA Buttigieg, trans. by JA Buttigieg and A Callari. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci A (1994) Pre-Prison Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci A (2007) Prison Notebooks. Vol. 3. Ed. and trans. by JA Buttigieg. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green ME (2019) Gramsci’s concept of the “simple”: religion, common sense, and the philosophy of praxis. Rethinking Marxism, 30(4): 525–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman C (1999) The Prophet and the Proletariat. London: Socialist Workers Party.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatina M (2006) Restoring a lost identity: models of education in modern Islamic thought. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 33(2): 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera L (2006) Islamization and education: between politics, profit and pluralism. In Herrera L and Torres CA (eds) Cultures of Arab Schooling: Critical Ethnographies from Egypt. New York, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 25–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch (2014) All According to Plan: The Rab’a Massacre and Mass Killings of Protestors in Egypt. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/report/2014/08/12/all-according-plan/raba-massacre-and-mass-killings-protesters-egypt (Accessed 10 December 2020).

  • Kandil H (2011) Islamizing Egypt? Testing the limits of Gramscian counterhegemonic strategies. Theory and Society, 40(1): 37–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandil H (2015) Inside the Brotherhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy G (2017) From Independence to Revolution: Egypt’s Islamists and the Contest for Power. London: Hurst Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesch AM (2017) The authoritarian state’s power over civil society. In Fahmy DF and Faruqi D (eds) Egypt and the Contradictions of Liberalism: Illiberal Intelligentsia and the Future of Egyptian Democracy. London: One World Publications, pp. 121–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letourneau J-F (2016) Explaining the Muslim Brotherhood’s rise and fall in Egypt. Mediterranean Politics, 21(2): 300–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maduro O (1977) New Marxist approaches to the relative autonomy of religion. Sociological Analysis, 39(4): 359–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manduchi P (2020a) Antonio Gramsci in the Arab World: The ongoing debate. In Dainotto RM and Jameson F (eds) Gramsci in the World. Durham and London: Duke University Press, pp. 224–239.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Manduchi P (2020b) Between old and new epistemological paradigms: Gramscian readings of revolutionary processes in Egypt and Tunisia. The Journal of North African Studies. Epub ahead of print 6 August 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2020.1801265

  • Marx K (1970) Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merone F (2020) Analysing revolutionary Islamism: Ansar al-Sharia Tunisia according to Gramsci. The Journal of North African Studies. Epub ahead of print 28 July 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2020.1801268.

  • Mirshak N (2019) Rethinking resistance under authoritarianism: civil society and non-contentious forms of contestation in post-uprisings Egypt. Social Movement Studies, 18(6): 702–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirshak N (2020a) Authoritarianism, education, and the limits of political socialisation in Egypt. Power and Education, 12(1): 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirshak N (2020b) Education as resistance: Egyptian civil society and rethinking political education under authoritarian contexts. Critical Sociology, 46(6): 915–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naguib S (2009) The Muslim Brotherhood: Contradictions and transformations. In Hopkins, NS (ed) Political and Social Protest in Egypt. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press, pp. 155–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill CM (2006) Islam in Egyptian education: grades K-12. Religious Education, 10(4): 481–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pioppi D (2013) Playing with Fire: The Muslim Brotherhood and the Egyptian Leviathan. International Spectator, 48(4): 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poljarevic E (2015) Islamism. In Shahin EE (ed) Oxford Encyclopaedia of Islam and Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodinson M (2015) Marxism and the Muslim World. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard WE (2003) Sayyid Qutb’s Doctrine of “Jahiliyya”. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 35(4): 521–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simms R (2002) ‘Islam is our politics’: a Gramscian analysis of the Muslim Brotherhood (1928–1953). Social Compass, 49(4): 563–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starrett G (1998) Putting Islam to Work: Education, Politics and Religious Transformation in Egypt. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham CR (2002) Mobilizing Islam: Religion, Activism, and Political Change in Egypt. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham CR (2013) The Muslim Brotherhood: Evolution of an Islamist Movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiktorowicz Q (2000) Civil society as social control: state power in Jordan. Comparative Politics, 33(1): 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmot J (2015) A commitment to politics: the trajectory of the Muslim Brotherhood during Egypt’s 2011-13 political opening. Contemporary Arab Affairs, 8(3): 379–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadim Mirshak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mirshak, N. (2022). Marxism and Islamism in Egypt: A Re-Examination of the Muslim Brotherhood—Introduction and Overview of the Muslim Brotherhood. In: Kirkpatrick, G., McMylor, P., Fadaee, S. (eds) Marxism, Religion, and Emancipatory Politics. Marx, Engels, and Marxisms. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91642-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics