Abstract
This chapter deals with new class of 3D woven structures, which is also known as non-crimp preform because the warp and weft yarns are not interlaced. The structure is formed from three yarn systems x-, y-, and z-yarns (or weft, warp, and binding yarns or through the thickness yarns) that are orthogonal to each other. The structure can be formed with desired thickness by controlling the number of x- and y-layers and yarns linear density to form fairly thick structure that is suitable as preforms for composite. These unique structures can be formed using recently invented 3D orthogonal weaving or traditional weaving technology. The 3D orthogonal weaving process and its structures possess numerous advantages over traditional 3D structures that are formed using traditional single phase weaving (referred here as 2D weaving) and those formed by stacking layers of 2D woven preforms. The features (advantages and drawbacks) of the 3D orthogonal weaving process and structures are covered. Additionally, applications of 3D orthogonal structures in composites are addressed. The chapter also covers innovative dobby and Jacquard shedding systems that are capable of forming 3D orthogonal woven preform with greater flexibility compared to traditional 2D weaving process. Part of the chapter is devoted for the development of a generalized geometric model to predict analytical (thickness, areal density, x-, y-, z-yarns fiber volume fraction) and mechanical properties. The models predict the properties of jammed and non-jammed 3D orthogonal woven preforms from flat and circular yarns in terms of their construction parameters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bogdanovich, A. E., & Mohamed, M. H. (2009). Three-dimensional reinforcements for composites. SAMPE Journal, 45(6), 8–28.
Mohamed, M. H., & Zhang, Z. H. (1992). North Carolina State University, Method of forming variable cross-sectional shaped three-dimensional fabrics. U.S. Patent 5,085,252.
Ince, M.E. (2013). Performance of composites from 3D orthogonal woven preforms in terms of architecture and sample location during resin infusion. Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Eldeeb, H. (2020). Modeling tensile behavior of 3D orthogonal woven composites from high performance natural fibers. Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Claunch, E. L. C. (2019). Smart composites: Optic sensors embedded in 3D orthogonal woven fabric for structural health monitoring applications. Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Seyam, A. M. (2012). Weaving and weaving preparation at ITMA 2011. Textile World, 34–37.
Ko, F. K. (2000). 3D textile reinforcements in composite materials. 3-D textile reinforcements in composite materials (pp. 9–42). CRC Press.
Ko, F. K., & Du, G. W. (1997). Processing of textile preforms. In: Advanced composites manufacturing (pp. 157–205). Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Brown, D., & Wu, Z. J. (2000). Stiffness properties of 3D orthogonally woven fabric composites. In: The Proceedings of Advances in Composite Materials & Structures VII; Southampton, WIT Press, pp. 377–386.
Cox, B. N., & Dadkhah, M. S. (1995). The macroscopic elasticity of 3D woven composites. Journal of Composite Materials, 29(6), 785–819.
Cox, B. N., & Flanagan, G. (1997). Handbook of analytical methods for textile composites. Hampton: NASA
Gu, P. (1994). Analysis of 3D woven preforms and their composite properties. Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Mohamed, M. H., Zhang, Z., & Dickinson, L. (1988). Manufacture of multi-layer woven preforms. In: T.H. Tsiang & R.A. Taylor (Eds.), The proceedings of the advanced composites and processing technology (pp. 81–89). Chicago, US.
Quinn, J. P., Hill, B. J., & McIlhagger, R. (2001). An integrated design system for the manufacture and analysis of 3D woven preforms. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 32(7), 911–914.
Quinn, J., Mcilhagger, R., & McIlhagger, A. T. (2003). A modified system for design and analysis of 3D woven preforms. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 34(6), 503–509.
Brown, D., & Wu, Z. J. (2001). Geometric modelling of orthogonal 3D woven textiles. In: The Proceedings of ICMAC-International Conference for Manufacturing of Advanced Composites, London, pp. 52–65.
Hill, B. J., & McIlhagger, R. (1996). The development and appraisal of 3D interlinked woven structures for textile reinforced composites. Polymers & Polymer Composites, 4(8), 535–539.
Wu, Z. (2009). Three-dimensional exact modeling of geometric and mechanical properties of woven composites. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 22(5), 479–486.
Ince, M. E., Seyam, A. M., & Mohamed, M. H. (2014). Generalized Geometric modeling of 3D orthogonal woven preforms: The rectangular cross section case. In: The Proceeding of the Future Technical Textiles Conference, Istanbul, Turkey.
Midani, M. S. (2016). The influence of weave and structural parameters on the performance of composites from 3D orthogonal woven preforms. Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Midani, M., Seyam, A. F., & Pankow, M. (2018). A generalized analytical model for predicting the tensile behavior of 3D orthogonal woven composites using finite deformation approach. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 109(11), 1465–1476.
Kawabata, S., Niwa, M., & Kawai, H. (1973). The finite-deformation theory of plain-weave fabrics part I: The biaxial-deformation theory. Journal of the Textile Institute, 64(1), 21–46.
Kawabata, S., Niwa, M., & Kawai, H. (1973). The finite-deformation theory of plain-weave fabrics. Part II: The uniaxial-deformation theory. Journal of the Textile Institute, 64(2), 47–61.
Kawabata, S., & Niwa, M. (1979). A finite-deformation theory of the 2/2-twill weave under biaxial extension. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 70(10), 417–426.
Sun, F., Seyam, A. M., & Gupta, B. S. (1997). A generalized model for predicting load-extension properties of woven fabrics. Textile Research Journal, 67(12), 866–874.
Seyam, A. M., & Ince, M. E. (2013). Generalized geometric modeling of three-dimensional orthogonal woven preforms from spun yarns. Journal of the Textile Institute, 104(9), 914–928.
Gupta, A. (2019). Composites from natural fibers: hemp fiber reinforced composites from 3D orthogonal woven preforms and their potential applications in the US. Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Kabir, S. F., Mathur, K., & Seyam, A. F. M. (2019). A critical review on 3D printed continuous fiber-reinforced composites: History, mechanism, materials and properties. Composite Structures, 232, 111476.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seyam, AF.M. (2022). 3D Orthogonal Woven Fabric Formation, Structure, and Their Composites. In: Kyosev, Y., Boussu, F. (eds) Advanced Weaving Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91515-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91515-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91514-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91515-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)