Abstract
For human factors researchers and practitioners, mental workload remains both a crucial concept and a nebulous one. After decades of work in this field, there is still no real consensus on the construct of mental workload, although there is wide agreement about its multidimensional nature and the main ways to measure it. With increasing automation in many domains, the issue of underload has attracted a considerable proportion of research effort. This paper summarises work to propose a theory of underload based on the notion of malleable attentional resources, but also raises challenges that this theory – and, perhaps, underload in general – may be specific to automation. The paper goes on to discuss the elusive ‘redlines’ of overload and underload, and concludes by considering both theoretical and applied challenges for current research into mental workload.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Collet, C., Guillot, A., Petit, C.: Phoning while driving I: a review of epidemiological, psychological, behavioural and physiological studies. Ergonomics 53(5), 589–601 (2010)
de Winter, J.C.F., Happee, R., Martens, M.H., Stanton, N.A.: Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: a review of the empirical evidence. Transp. Res. Part F 27, 196–217 (2014)
Endsley, M.R., Kiris, E.O.: The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Hum. Factors 37(2), 381–394 (1995)
Gershon, P., Ronen, A., Oron-Gilad, T., Shinar, D.: The effects of an interactive cognitive task (ICT) in suppressing fatigue symptoms in driving. Transp. Res. Part F 12, 21–28 (2009)
Haigney, D.E., Taylor, R.G., Westerman, S.J.: Concurrent mobile (cellular) phone use and driving performance: task demand characteristics and compensatory processes. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 3(3), 113–121 (2000)
Hancock, P. A.: Whither workload? Mapping a path for its future development. In: Longo, L., Leva, M.C. (eds.) H-WORKLOAD 2017. CCIS, vol. 726, pp. 3–17. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61061-0_1
Hancock, P.A., Caird, J.K.: Experimental evaluation of a model of mental workload. Hum. Factors 35, 413–429 (1993)
Hancock, G.M., Longo, L., Young, M.S., Hancock, P.A.: Mental workload. In: Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 203–226 (2021)
Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock, P.A., Meshkati, N. (eds.) Human Mental Workload, pp. 138–183. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988)
Kahneman, D.: Attention and Effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1973)
Lashley, K.S.: In search of the engram. In: Symposium of the Society of Experimental Biology, vol. 4, pp. 454–482. Academic Press (1950)
Lee, J.D., Regan, M.A., Horrey, W.J.: Workload, distraction, and automation. In: Fisher, D.L., Horrey, W.J., Lee, J.D., Regan, M.A. (eds.) Handbook of Human Factors for Automated, Connected, and Intelligent Vehicles, pp. 107–125. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2020)
Liu, Y.: Effects of Taiwan in-vehicle cellular audio phone system on driving performance. Saf. Sci. 41, 531–542 (2003)
Longo, L., Leva, M.C.: Human Mental Workload: Models and Applications: First International Symposium, H-WORKLOAD 2017, Dublin, Ireland, 28–30 June 2017, Revised Selected Papers, vol. 726. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61061-0
Mehta, R.K., Parasuraman, R.: Neuroergonomics: a review of applications to physical and cognitive work. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 889 (2013)
Molloy, R., Parasuraman, R.: Monitoring an automated system for a single failure: vigilance and task complexity effects. Hum. Factors 38(2), 311–322 (1996)
Perrey, S., Thedon, T., Rupp, T.: NIRS in ergonomics: its application in industry for promotion of health and human performance at work. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 40(2), 185–189 (2010)
Singleton, W.T.: The Mind at Work: Psychological Ergonomics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)
Shaw, T.H., Satterfield, K., Ramirez, R., Finomore, V.: Using cerebral hemovelocity to measure workload during a spatialised auditory vigilance task in novice and experienced observers. Ergonomics 56(8), 1251–1263 (2013)
Underwood, G., Everatt, J.: Automatic and controlled information processing: the role of attention in the processing of novelty. In: Neumann, O., Sanders, A.F. (eds.) Handbook of Perception and Action, pp. 185–227. Academic Press, London (1996)
Victor, T.W., Tivesten, E., Gustavsson, P., Johansson, J., Sangberg, F., Ljung Aust, M.: Automation expectation mismatch: Incorrect prediction despite eyes on threat and hands on wheel. Hum. Factors 60(8), 1095–1116 (2018)
Welford, A.T.: Mental work-load as a function of demand, capacity, strategy and skill. Ergonomics 21, 151–167 (1978)
Wilson, J.R., Rajan, J.A.: Human-machine interfaces for systems control. In: Wilson, J.R., Corlett, E.N. (eds.) Evaluation of Human Work: A Practical Ergonomics Methodology, pp. 357–405. Taylor & Francis, London (1995)
Yerkes, R.M., Dodson, J.D.: The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. J. Comp. Neurol. Psychol. 18, 459–482 (1908)
Young, M.S., Birrell, S.A., Davidsson, S.: Task pre-loading: designing adaptive systems to counteract mental underload. In: Anderson, M. (ed.) Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors 2011, pp. 168–175. Taylor & Francis, London (2011)
Young, M.S., Brookhuis, K.A., Wickens, C.D., Hancock, P.A.: State of science: mental workload in ergonomics. Ergonomics 58(1), 1–17 (2015)
Young, M.S., Bunce, D.: Driving into the sunset: supporting cognitive functioning in older drivers. J. Aging Res. 2011, 6 pages (2011). Article ID 918782
Young, M.S., Clynick, G.F.: A test flight for malleable attentional resources theory. In: Bust, P., McCabe, P. (eds.) Contemporary Ergonomics 2005, pp. 548–552. Taylor & Francis, London (2005)
Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A.: Mental workload: theory, measurement, and application. In: Karwowski, W. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, vol. 1, pp. 507–509. Taylor & Francis, London (2001)
Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A.: Size matters. the role of attentional capacity in explaining the effects of mental underload on performance. In: Harris, D. (ed.) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics: Vol. 5 – Aerospace and Transportation Systems (Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, Edinburgh, 25–27 October 2000), pp. 357–364. Ashgate, Aldershot (2001b)
Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A.: Attention and automation: new perspectives on mental underload and performance. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 3(2), 178–194 (2002)
Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A.: Malleable Attentional Resources Theory: a new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance. Hum. Factors 44(3), 365–375 (2002)
Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A.: The decay of Malleable Attentional Resources Theory. In: Bust, P.D. (ed.) Contemporary Ergonomics 2006, pp. 253–257. Taylor & Francis, London (2006)
Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A., Walker, G.H., Jenkins, D.P., Salmon, P.M.: Mental workload in command and control teams: musings on the outputs of EAST and WESTT. In: Harris, D. (ed.) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics – HCII2007, pp. 455–464. Springer, Berlin (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73331-7_50
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Young, M.S. (2021). In Search of the Redline: Perspectives on Mental Workload and the ‘Underload Problem’. In: Longo, L., Leva, M.C. (eds) Human Mental Workload: Models and Applications. H-WORKLOAD 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1493. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91408-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91408-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91407-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91408-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)