Skip to main content

Language and Radiological Reporting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Structured Reporting in Radiology

Part of the book series: Imaging Informatics for Healthcare Professionals ((IIHP))

Abstract

Radiology reporting, long a free-text based exercise, is evolving into a more structured form. This enhances standardisation of report language and structure and enables report comparison, multi-centre research, data mining and radiomics development and many other benefits. This chapter focuses on the evolution of standardisation of radiology report language, from early advice on careful language use, through the development of standard terminological sets for use in specific situations, to current developments in inter-linked medical and radiological ontologies and reporting systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wikipedia: Primate. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primate. Accessed 6 May 2020.

  2. Wikipedia:Language.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language#Distinctive_features_of_human_language. Accessed 6 May 2020.

  3. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. https://www.ethnologue.com/about. Accessed 6 May 2020.

  4. Wikipedia: List of languages by number of native speakers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_languages_by_number_of_native_speakers. Accessed 6 May 2020.

  5. Wikipedia: Esperanto. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esperanto. Accessed 6 May 2020.

  6. European Society of Radiology: The Esperanto booklet. https://www.myesr.org/quality-safety/clinical-audit. Accessed 6 May 2020.

  7. European Society of Radiology (ESR). The ESR Audit Tool (Esperanto): genesis, contents & pilot. Insights Imaging. 2018;9:899–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0651-0.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wikipedia: Chinese whispers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_whispers. Accessed 6 May 2020.

  9. Brady AP. Radiology reporting—from Hemingway to HAL? Insights Imaging. 2018;9:237–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0596-.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Brady AP. Error and discrepancy in radiology—inevitable or avoidable? Insights Imaging. 2017;8:171–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-016-0534-1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wallis A, McCoubrie P. The radiology report—are we getting the message across? Clin Radiol. 2011;66:1015–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Murray J. The early formative years in Irish Radiology. In: Carr JC, editor. A century of medical radiation in ireland—an anthology. Dublin: Anniversary Press; 1995. p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Langlotz CP. The radiology report. Stanford, CA: Langlotz; 2015. ISBN 978-1515174080.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Armas RR. Letter: qualities of a good radiology report. AJR. 1998;170:1110.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Friedman PJ. Radiologic reporting: structure. AJR. 1983;140:171–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hall FM. Language of the radiology report; Primer for residents and wayward radiologists. AJR. 2000;175:1239–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rubin DL. Creating and curating a terminology for radiology: ontology modeling and analysis. J Digit Imaging. 2008;21(4):355–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Janower ML. A brief history of the Fleischner Society. J Thorac Imaging. 2010;25:27–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0b013e3181cc4cee.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tuddenham WJ. Glossary of terms for thoracic radiology: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984;143:509–17. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.143.3.509.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Austin JH, Müller NL, Friedman PJ, et al. Glossary of terms for CT of the lungs: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 1996;200:327–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, et al. Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology. 2008;246:697–722. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2462070712.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fardon DF, Milette PC. Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology: recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine. 2001;26:E93–113.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fardon DF, Williams AL, Dohring EJ, Murtagh FR, Gabriel Rothman SL, Sze GK. Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc. 2014;14:2525–45.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Atkinson RP, et al. Reporting terminology for brain arteriovenous malformation clinical and radiographic features for use in clinical trials. Stroke. 2001;32:1430–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Caggiati A, et al. Nomenclature of the veins of the lower limbs: an international; interdisciplinary consensus statement. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:416–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Burnside ES, Sickles EA, Bassett LW, Rublin DL, Lee CH, Ikeda DM, Mendelson EB, Wilcox PA, Butler PF, D’Orsi CJ. The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history. J Am Coll Radiol. 2009;6:851–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2009.07.023.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. American College of Radiology. ACR practice guideline for the performance of screening and diagnostic mammography. In: Practice guidelines and technical standards. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2008. p. 525–34.

    Google Scholar 

  28. D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA, et al. ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  29. American College of Radiology: The American College of Radiology BI-RADS Atlas 5th Edition: Frequently asked questions. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/RADS/BI-RADS/BIRADSFAQ.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2020.

  30. Mitchell DG, Bruix J, Sherman M, Sirlin CB. LI-RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System): summary, discussion and consensus of the LI_RADS management working group and future directions. Hepatology. 2015;61:1056–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. American College of Radiology: Liver Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS). https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/LI-RADS. Accessed 9 June 2020.

  32. American College of Radiology: CT Colonography Reporting and Data System (C-RADS). https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/C-Rads. Accessed 18 June 2020.

  33. American College of Radiology: Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System. https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/Cad-Rads. Accessed 9 June 2020.

  34. American College of Radiology: Head Injury Imaging Reporting and Data System (HI-RADS). https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/HI-RADS. Accessed 9 June 2020.

  35. American College of Radiology: Lung Cancer Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS). https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/Lung-Rads. Accessed 9 June 2020.

  36. American College of Radiology: Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS). https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/NI-RADs. Accessed 9 June 2020.

  37. American College of Radiology: Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS). https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/O-Rads. Accessed 9 June 2020.

  38. American College of Radiology: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/PI-RADS. Accessed 9 June 2020.

  39. American College of Radiology: Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS). https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/TI-RADS. Accessed 9 June 2020.

  40. Barentsz JO, et al. Prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:746–57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang KC. Standard lexicons, coding systems and ontologies for interoperability and semantic computation in imaging. J Digit Imaging. 2018;31:353–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-018-0069-8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Rubin DL, Kahn CE. Common data elements in radiology. Radiology. 2017;283:837–44. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016161553.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. McDonald CJ, Huff SM, Suico JG, et al. LOINC, a universal standard for identifying laboratory observations: a 5-year update. Clin Chem. 2003;49(4):624–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Awaysheh A, Wilcke J, Elvinger F, Rees L, Fan W, Zimmerman K. A review of medical terminology standards and structured reporting. J Vet Diagn Investig. 2018;30:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638717738276.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bodenreider O, Cornet R, Freeman DJ. Recent developments in clinical terminologies—SNOMED CT, LOINC, and RxNorm. Yearb Med Inform. 2018:129–39. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1667077.

  46. SNOMED International. https://www.snomed.org. Accessed 18 June 2020.

  47. DICOM: Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine. https://www.dicomstandard.org. Accessed 17 June 2020.

  48. European Society of Radiology. ESR paper on Structured Reporting in Radiology. Insights Imaging. 2018;9:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-017-0588-8.

    Google Scholar 

  49. ACR Index: American College of Radiology. Index for radiological diagnoses. 4th ed. Reston, VA; 1992, ISBN 1-55903-134-4.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Langlotz CR. RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. Radiographics. 2006;26:1595–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. National Primate Research Center: BrainInfo. http://braininfo.rprc.washington.edu/copyright.aspx. Accessed 18 June 2020.

  52. Radiological Society of North America: RadLex radiology lexicon. https://www.rsna.org/en/practice-tools/data-tools-and-standards/radlex-radiology-lexicon. Accessed 18 June 2020.

  53. Bozkurt S, Kahn CE Jr. An open-standards grammar for outline-style radiology report templates. J Digit Imaging. 2012;25:359–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10278-012-9456-8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics (EuSoMII)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brady, A. (2022). Language and Radiological Reporting. In: Fatehi, M., Pinto dos Santos, D. (eds) Structured Reporting in Radiology. Imaging Informatics for Healthcare Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91349-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91349-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91348-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91349-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics