Skip to main content

Developing Inclusive Learning Environments – When Collaboration Is (Not) the Answer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Special Education in the Early Years

Abstract

This chapter focuses on how collaboration within special education needs (SEN) and inclusionary practices in broader early years education takes place in—and across—early education and early care (ECEC). Recently, there has been a focus on how collaboration between professionals can have an impact on the development of pedagogical inclusionary practice. The purpose of this chapter is to argue that collaboration in and of itself does not solve the challenges of developing inclusive environments but that it requires more focus on how to collaborate to develop inclusionary practices. Our research shows that the traditional understanding of SEN is dominate in collaborative processes, that the general understanding of professional work related to SEN is mainly directed at strategies targeting and compensating for the needs of the individual child and that these strategies seldom involve changes in the actual professional practice of educators and social workers, including their collaborative methods. Unintended collaborative processes may result in an exclusion process rather than inclusive one if collaboration is understand as a harmonic and resourceful place for consensus and not a place for negotiations and conflicting perspectives that can develop practice. Based on the findings from the research project ‘Approaching Inclusion’ (2016–2020) (Hansen et al., Samarbejdsprocesser om inklusion og eksklusion [Collaboration processes on inclusion and exclusion]. NUBU (National Research Center for Children and Youth at High Risk), 2020b), we propose an understanding of collaboration that succeeds in creating new spaces and places for all children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aabro, C. (Ed.) (2019). Den styrkede pædagogiske læreplan: Baggrund, perspektiver og dilemmaer. [The strengthened pedagogical curriculum: Background, perspectives and dilemmas]. Samfundslitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J. (2008). Rethinking inclusive education—The philosophers of difference in practice. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2017). Building state capability - Evidence, analysis, action. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baviskar, S., Dyssegaard, C., Egelund, N., Lausten, M., Lynggaard, M., & Tetler, S. (2013). Dokumentationsprojektet: Kommunernes omstilling til øget inklusion. [The documentation project: The municipalities’ transition to increased inclusion]. Institut for Uddannelse og Pædagogik (DPU), Aarhus University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerre, J. (2015). Inklusion: Fra Sociologisk Begreb til Performativ Selvmodsigelse. [Inclusion: From a sociological concept to a performative contradiction in terms]. Cursiv, 15, 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • BUPL. (2010). Gråzonebørn - Undersøgelse af vilkårene i de almene daginstitutioner om arbejdet med børn og unge, der har særlige behov. [Children in the grey zone – A study of the conditions in daycare with the work on children with special needs]. BUPL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. (2005). Situational analysis. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. (2018). Situational analysis, grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ejrnæs, M., & Moesby-Jensen, C. K. (2019). Fagprofessionelles arbejde med inklusionsfremmende tiltag på børne- og ungeområdet. [Professionals’ work with inclusion-promoting initiatives in the area of children and young people]. In K. E. Petersen & J. Hedegaard Hansen. Inklusion og ekslusion – en grundbog. [Inclusion and exclusion a basic book. Hans Reiztels forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • EVA. (2014). Inklusion i dagtilbud - Kortlægning af arbejdet med inklusion i daginstitutioner og dagpleje. [Inclusion in day care - Mapping of the work with inclusion in day care institutions and day care]. EVA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. S. (2003). A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(4), 727–752. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/12.4.727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (2014). Stigma. Samfundslitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J. H. (2012). Limits to inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(1), 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J. H. (2016). Social imaginaries and inclusion. In Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J., Jensen, C., Lassen, M., Molbæk, M., & Schmidt, M. C. (2018). Approaching inclusion as social practice: Processes of inclusion and exclusion. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 8(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J. H., Carrington, S., Jensen, C. R., Molbæk, M., & Schmidt, M. C. S. (2020a). The collaborative practice of inclusion and exclusion. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J. H., Jensen, C. R., Molbæk, M., & Schmidt, M. C. S. (2020b). Samarbejdsprocesser om inklusion og eksklusion [Collaboration processes on inclusion and exclusion]. NUBU (National Research Center for Children and Youth at High Risk).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M. T. (2018). Collaborative professionalism: When teaching together means learning for all. Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, C. R. (2017). Vejledning af lærere – En samskabende proces. Når lærere støttes i at udvikle inkluderende læringsmiljøer [Supervision with teachers – A collaborative process: When teachers are supported to develop inclusive learning environments] [Doctoral dissertation, Aarhus University].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjær, B. (2007). Børn med behov for en særlig pædagogisk indsats. [Children with special educational needs]. In J. Olsen (Ed.), Når loven møder børns institutioner [When the law meets the institutions of children]. Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitets Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjær, B. (2009). Basispladspædagogik og institutionskultur: om god praksis i pædagogisk arbejde med børn i psykosociale vanskeligheder i Københavns Kommune. [Basic place pedagogy and institutional culture: On good practice in pedagogical work with children in psychosocial difficulties in the city of Copenhagen]. Municipality of Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjær, B. (2010). Inkluderende Pædagogik. God praksis og gode praktikere. [Inclusive pedagogy. Good practice and good practitioners]. Akademisk forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjær, B. (2013). Pedagogic learning plans and children with special needs: Transforming and anchoring - Or maintaining and negotiating? Arv: Nordic yearbook of folklore, 69, 61–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • KL. (2013). Pejlemærker for kompetenceudviklingen i folkeskolen UVM [Benchmarks for competence development in primary and lower secondary school]. Ministry of Children and Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1996). Deconstruction, pragmatism, hegemony. In C. Mouffe (Ed.), Deconstruction and pragmatism (pp. 47–67). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social – An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Children and Education. (2017). Den styrkede pædagogiske læreplan. [The strengthened pedagogical curriculum] https://www.uvm.dk/dagtilbud/paedagogiske-redskaber-og-rammer/den-styrkede-paedagogiske-laereplan

  • Molbæk, M. (2016). Inkluderende klasse- og læringsledelse [Inclusive teaching strategies] [Doctoral dissertation, Aarhus University].

    Google Scholar 

  • Molbæk, M., Hansen, J. H., Jensen, C. R., & Schmidt, M. C. S. (2019). Samarbejde i skolen: Når forandring forsvinder i en konsensuskultur [Collaboration in schools: When development disappears in a culture of consensus]. Forskning & Forandring, 2(2), 44–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, T. H., & Næsby, T. (2018). Den styrkede pædagogiske læreplan. Grundbog til dagtilbudspædagogik. [The strengthened pedagogical curriculum. Basic book for day care pedagogy]. Dafolo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. C. S. (2016). Dyscalculia ≠ maths difficulties: An analysis of conflicting positions at a time that calls for inclusive practices. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 31(3), 407–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. C. S., Hedegaard, J., Jensen, C. R., & Molbæk, M. (2018). Skal eleven forpligte sig på fællesskabet eller fællesskabet forpligte sig på eleven [Should the student commit to the community or the community commit to the student]. Unge Pædagoger, 4, 38–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundqvist, C., & Ström, K. (2015). Special education teachers as consultants: Perspectives of Finnish teachers. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 25(4), 314–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundqvist, C., von Ahlefeld Nisser, D., & Ström, K. (2014). Consultation in special needs education in Sweden and Finland: A comparative approach. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(3), 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takala, M., & Uusitalo-Malmivaara, L. (2012). A one-year study of the development of co-teaching in four Finnish schools. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 27(3), 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UVM. (2012). Regler om inklusion [Rules on inclusion]. The Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • UVM. (2020). The day care law. The Ministry of Education, LBK nr 2, 06/01/2020. https://www.uvm.dk/dagtilbud/love-og-regler%2D%2Dformaal-og-aftaler/dagtilbudsloven-og-bekendtgoerelser

  • von Ahlefeld Nisser, D. (2017). Can collaborative consultation, based on communicative theory, promote an inclusive school culture? Educational Research, 4, 874–891.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlotte Riis Jensen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jensen, C.R., Molbæk, M., Schmidt, M.C.S., Hedegaard, J. (2022). Developing Inclusive Learning Environments – When Collaboration Is (Not) the Answer. In: Harju-Luukkainen, H., Hanssen, N.B., Sundqvist, C. (eds) Special Education in the Early Years. International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91297-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91297-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91296-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91297-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics