Skip to main content

Ethical Issues: Patients, Providers, and Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nursing Informatics

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

  • 1814 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of ethics in biomedicine and healthcare while particularly focusing on the digital environments of care and research. An introduction to the four ethical principles of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice in biomedicine is presented. Ethical questions referring to digitally supported healthcare are discussed along with three perspectives. The first perspective emphasizes the technology investigating ethical issues raised by big data, artificial intelligence and machine learning, smart assistive technologies, and social media. The second perspective pertains to covering informed consent and the risks regarding privacy and confidentiality for the patients. The third and final perspective refers to the healthcare providers and their relationship with the patients.

Information technology is neither good nor bad. It is the way how it is intended, implemented, and practically technology is neither good nor bad. It is the way how used by people that makes all the difference. Therefore, assessments and evaluation studies of health IT regarding its ethical impact are required.

The case study finally yields an example of what standardized data elements of code status should be implemented in electronic health records in order to improve the current practice of ensuring that the patient’s preferences are respected during their end-of-life situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Floridi L. Soft ethics, the governance of the digital and the General Data Protection Regulation. Philos Trans R Soc. 2018;A 376:20180081. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. World Medical Association. Declaration of Geneva. Most recent version of 2006. Available from: https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-geneva/. Accessed June 16, 2021.

  3. International Council of Nurses. Code of Ethics for Nurses. 2012. Available from: https://www.icn.ch/sites/default/files/inline-files/2012_ICN_Codeofethicsfornurses_%20eng.pdf Accessed June 16, 2021.

  4. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 8th ed. Oxford University Press; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  5. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report – Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. April 18, 1979. Available from https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/the-belmont-report-508c_FINAL.pdf. Accessed June 16, 2021.

  7. Floridi L, Taddeo M. What is data ethics? Phil Trans R Soc A. 2016;374:20160360. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0360.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cahan EM, Hernandez-Boussard T, Thadaney-Israni S, Rubin DL. Putting the data before the algorithm in big data addressing personalized healthcare. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:78. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0157-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ienca M, Wangmo T, Jotterand F, Kressig RW, Elger B. Ethical design of intelligent technologies for dementia: a descriptive review. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24:1035–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rubeis G. The disruptive power of artificial intelligence. Ethical aspects of gerontechnology in elderly care. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104186.

  11. Robillard JM, Cleland I, Hoey J, Nugent C. Ethical adoption: a new imperative in the development of technology for dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(9):1104–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. World Economic Forum. Ethics by Design: An organizational approach to responsible use of technology. White Paper. December 2020. Available from: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Ethics_by_Design_2020.pdf. Accessed June 16, 2021.

  13. Sussman N, DeJong SM. Ethical considerations for mental health clinicians working with adolescents in the digital age. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018;20(12):113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. LaBarge G, Broom M. Social media in primary care. Mo Med. 2019;116(2):106–10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zimba O, Radchenko O, Strilchuk L. Social media for research, education and practice in rheumatology. Rheumatol Int 2019 Dec 20.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hübner UH, Egbert N, Schulte G. Clinical information systems - seen through the ethics lens. Yearb Med Inform. 2020;29(1):104–14. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701996.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Mittelstadt BD, Floridi L. The ethics of big data: current and foreseeable issues in biomedical contexts. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016;22(2):303–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9652-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dankar FK, Gergely M, Dankar SK. Informed consent in biomedical research. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2019;17:463–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2019.03.010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. European Commission. General data protection regulation. Available from: https://gdpr-info.eu/. Accessed June 16, 2021.

  20. Beier K, Schweda M, Schicktanz S. Taking patient involvement seriously: a critical ethical analysis of participatory approaches in data-intensive medical research. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19(1):90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0799-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Adams SA, Petersen C. Precision medicine: opportunities, possibilities, and challenges for patients and providers. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23(4):787–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Laurie GT. Cross-sectoral big data: the application of an ethics framework for big data in health and research. Asian Bioeth Rev. 2019;11(3):327–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stockdale J, Cassell J, Ford E. “Giving something back”: a systematic review and ethical enquiry into public views on the use of patient data for research in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. Wellcome Open Res. 2019;3:6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hall A, Brown Wilson C, Stanmore E, Todd C. Moving beyond “safety” versus “autonomy”: a qualitative exploration of the ethics of using monitoring technologies in long-term dementia care. BMC Geriatr. 2017;19:145. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1155-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Meredith J, McCarthy S, Hemsley B. Legal and ethical issues surrounding the use of older children’s electronic personal health records. J Law Med. 2018;25(4):1042–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jaremko JL, Azar M, Bromwich R, Lum A, Alicia Cheong LH, Giber M, et al. Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Artificial Intelligence Working Group. Canadian association of radiologists white paper on ethical and legal issues related to artificial intelligence in radiology. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2019;70(2):107–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rubeis G, Schochow M, Steger F. Patient autonomy and quality of care in telehealthcare. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24(1):93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Geis JR, Brady AP, Wu CC, Spencer J, Ranschaert E, Jaremko JL, et al. Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American Multisociety Statement. Radiology. 2019;293(2):436–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ho CWL, Soon D, Caals K, Kapur J. Governance of automated image analysis and artificial intelligence analytics in healthcare. Clin Radiol. 2019;74(5):329–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2019.02.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of The European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No. 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No. 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/745/2017-05-05. Accessed June 16, 2021.

  31. US Food and Drug Administration. Software as a Medical Device (SaMD). https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health-center-excellence/software-medical-device-samd. Accessed June 16, 2021.

  32. Lee MS, Nambudiri VE. Electronic consultations and clinician burnout: an antidote to our emotional pandemic? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(5):1038–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dymek C, Kim B, Melton GB, Payne TH, Singh H, Hsiao CJ. Building the evidence-base to reduce electronic health record-related clinician burden. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(5):1057–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Weir CR, Taber P, Taft T, Reese TJ, Jones B, Del Fiol G. Feeling and thinking: can theories of human motivation explain how EHR design impacts clinician burnout? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(5):1042–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rubeis G. Guardians of humanity. The challenging role of nursing professionals in the digital age. Nurs Philos 2021;22(2):e12331. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12331.

  36. Robichaux C, Tietze M, Stokes F, McBride S. Reconceptualizing the electronic health record for a new decade: a caring technology? ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2019;42(3):193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Veazie S, Winchell K, Gilbert J, Paynter R, Ivlev I, Eden KB, Nussbaum K, Weiskopf N, Guise JM, Helfand M. Rapid evidence review of mobile applications for self-management of diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(7):1167–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4410-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Mars M, Morris C, Scott RE. Selfie telemedicine – what are the legal and regulatory issues? Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;254:53–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kuhnel L. TTaPP: together take a pause and ponder: a critical thinking tool for exploring the public/private lives of patients. J Clin Ethics. 2018;29(2):102–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ho A, Quick O. Leaving patients to their own devices? Smart technology, safety and therapeutic relationships. BMC Med Ethics. 2018;19(1):18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Goodman KW. Health information technology as a universal donor to bioethics education. Camb Quarterly Healthc Ethics. 2017;26:341–7.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kidholm K, Jensen LK, Kjølhede T, Nielsen E, Horup MB. Validity of the model for assessment of telemedicine: a Delphi study. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(2):118–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X16686553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Manzeschke A, Weber K, Rother E, Fangerau H. Results of the study “Ethical questions in the area of age appropriate assisting systems”. Berlin: VDI; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Reijers W, Wright D, Brey P, Weber K, Rodrigues R, O'Sullivan D, Gordijn B. Methods for practising ethics in research and innovation: a literature review, critical analysis and recommendations. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24(5):1437–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9961-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lehmann CU, Petersen C, Bhatia H, Berner ES, Goodman KW. Advance directives and code status information exchange: a consensus proposal for a minimum set of attributes. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2019 Jan;28(1):178–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S096318011800052X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ursula H. Hübner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Answers to Review Questions

Appendix: Answers to Review Questions

  1. 1.

    What is ethics?

    Ethics or moral philosophy is a scientific discipline that studies moral behavior and beliefs. Ethical studies can be broken down into nonnormative ethics and normative ethics.

  2. 2.

    What are the major internationally relevant declarations and their scope?

    Declaration of Geneva: Ethical principles of the medical profession

    Code of Ethics for Nurses: Ethical principles of the nursing profession

    Declaration of Helsinki: Medical research involving human subjects

    Belmont Report: Biomedical and behavioral research involving human subjects.

  3. 3.

    Please sketch the four ethical principles in biomedicine according to Beauchamp and Childress.

    Autonomy is the capacity to decide and act on your own in accordance with your beliefs and values. Decisions and actions are made intentionally based on a plan with an understanding about the decision and action and are made free from control by external forces or internal conditions that counteract the self-directedness of the person.

    Nonmaleficence means that interventions in medicine and patient care shall not harm the patient. Related activities are often expressed as “do not do a certain action.”

    Beneficence, the complementary principle to nonmaleficence, is defined as all activities benefiting people and contributing to their well-being. It includes the protection of others, the prevention and removal of harm as well as helping and rescuing.

    Justice is understood by many philosophers as “a fair, equitable, and appropriate treatment in light of what is due or owed to affected individuals or groups.” Theories of justice may be classified as utilitarian, egalitarian, libertarian, communitarian in addition to theories specifically related to health.

  4. 4.

    Please describe and discuss three ethical challenges of big data analysis and artificial intelligence.

    Ethics of data referring to generating and recording, curing, processing, and disseminating data addresses the challenge to provide unbiased, relevant and meaningful, representative data of high quality that include minorities, are gender-balanced and truthful because they constitute the primary basis for the algorithms.

    Ethics of algorithms embraces the explicability of statistical and all other mathematical, and computer science methods for analyzing the data. These methods should demonstrate how they arrived at their result. Otherwise, clinicians cannot justify the use of these findings toward themselves and decisions based on these findings toward their patients.

    Ethics of practice is related to defining responsibilities and duties, for example, within the framework of professional ethics code ensuring amongst other the respect for privacy and confidentiality. Ethics of practice is also concerned with the balancing of conflicting ethical values.

  5. 5.

    Please describe and discuss three ethically relevant goals of smart assistive technologies.

    Smart assistive technologies are designed and developed with the intention to help and support persons with self-care problems often the elderly. Ethically relevant goals referring to ethical principles are autonomy including independence (e.g., smart home technologies for ensuring independent living), beneficence and nonmaleficence intended to enhance the quality of life, establishing well-being, improving self-esteem and protecting the dignity of the users, reducing risk (e.g., increased mobility through intelligent walkers).

  6. 6.

    What is informed consent and what problems arise when data are to be reused?

    Informed consent of the data subject means any freely given, specific, and unambiguous indication of the data subject’s wishes that signifies agreement to the processing of personal data relating to him or her. Informed consent rests on information, understanding, and voluntariness. It is related to a single instance and a particular purpose. The problems that arise in the case of secondary use are based on these two requirements because secondary use typically goes beyond that specific purpose and is often connected with multiple analyses.

  7. 7.

    Please describe and discuss three cases of threats to privacy and confidentiality due to health IT.

    Ensuring privacy that is closely connected to the anonymization of personal data is jeopardized by the possibility of cross-referencing with other data set and thus reversing the de-identification. It is also challenged when data from different sectors including settings from outside of health care, e. g. from fitness and well-being are linked and thus attain distinction that was not previously extractable. Privacy is also at stake when technologies intrude into the personal and living environment as is often the case with smart assistive technologies when they are monitoring persons via video cameras and or tracking them via GPS. Privacy and confidentiality could be compromised when parents access personal electronic health records of their adolescent children who wished that this information is only retrievable by their provider.

  8. 8.

    How are care providers themselves concerned regarding the use of artificial intelligence tools and electronic health records?

    Care providers using intelligent autonomous tools and decision support systems, e.g., for automatic image analysis and lesion detection, are facing the threat that their professional decisions are not independent any longer and that their clinical judgment might be replaced by a machine generated diagnosis.

    Another issue arises when poor electronic workflows and bad usability of electronic health record systems consume much of the clinicians’ time and energy that they experience a feeling of burnout.

  9. 9.

    Please illustrate (one example) how the patient–provider relationship can be affected through digital media.

    One example of a misdirected manner of communication between patients and providers is unsolicited data sent to the provider. They are particularly problematic if no prior personal contact had been established. Questions are: What should the provider do with regard to accepting/rejecting this request, checking the identity of the person, ensuring the quality of the data, storing the data, and giving a clinical judgment. What rules should be defined once a personal relationship between the patient and the provider has been established?

  10. 10.

    Please briefly describe the dimensions captured in the MEESTAR model and the three time points when assessment and evaluation can take place.

    The ethical dimensions described by the MEESTAR model embrace.

    • Care, in the sense of taking care of someone in need.

    • Autonomy.

    • Safety, in a wide meaning of the term including security and prevention of harm.

    • Justice, here particularly social justice.

    • Privacy, defined as the inviolable zone around a person.

    • Participation, in the meaning of living together with others in a society and opposed to exclusion.

    • Self-conception, meaning the way a person perceives and understands him- or herself.

      They could be captured ex ante, intra, or ex post regarding product or system development and implementation. The dimensions concern evaluations at the level of the individual person, the organization and the society. Such evaluation would require a statement to be made according to the four stages from “harmless” to “has to be opposed.”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hübner, U.H., Egbert, N., Schulte, G. (2022). Ethical Issues: Patients, Providers, and Systems. In: Hübner, U.H., Mustata Wilson, G., Morawski, T.S., Ball, M.J. (eds) Nursing Informatics . Health Informatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91237-6_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91237-6_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91236-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91237-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics