Skip to main content

Quality and Safety of Health Mobile Applications: Are They an Issue?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nursing Informatics

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

  • 1597 Accesses

Abstract

mHealth is a huge market that provides users the opportunity to have better health and healthcare quality. Health apps support citizen’s empowerment through self-management, health promotion, disease prevention, providing personalized health advice and care. However, the rapid development of the mHealth sector raises concerns about the potential risk of health functions apps providing transmission of health data, the capture of these data via sensors, self-diagnoses, disease management or diagnosis and appropriate processing of the data collected. Since mHealth solutions and devices can collect large quantities of personal information, including personal health information, they can process them as well.

The mHONcode is a set of ethical, honesty, transparency, quality, and security standards covering various aspects of health apps, including the disclosure of the qualifications of the authors, the funding sources, references, when the content was created and last updated, what the privacy policy is, and how data is stored and transmitted over the internet. The mHONcode motivates health apps editors to be transparent in the production process and in the way to use user’s data. The commitment of a health information provider to implement or comply with the HON code of conduct for health apps is shown by the displaying of a quality label (logo or HONcode seal) on the website.

As the adaptation of an already proven trustworthy code of conduct of health websites (the HONcode), the mHONcode is well placed to provide guidance for the next generation of health information providers—mobile apps in this case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Internet Live Stats (2020). Total number of websites. URL: http://www.internetlivestats.com/total-number-of-websites/#trend [Accessed 05 June 2020].

  2. 2.

    http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-394_en.htm

  3. 3.

    https://www.hon.ch/en/guidelines-mhoncode.html

  4. 4.

    https://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/justice-and-fundamental-rights/data-protection/

  5. 5.

    https://mitmproxy.org/

  6. 6.

    https://www.immuniweb.com/mobile/#about

References

  1. IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science. 2017 The growing value of digital health evidence and impact on human health and the healthcare system. https://www.iqvia.com/insights/the-iqvia-institute/reports/the-growing-value-of-digital-health [Accessed July 2020].

  2. Research 2 Guidance. mHealth App Economics 2017/2018 Current Status and Future Trends in Mobile Health Research2Guidance report. USA, 2017, pp 10. https://research2guidance.com/product/mhealth-economics-2017-current-status-and-future-trends-in-mobile-health/ [Accessed May 2019].

  3. Business Insider. 10 Ways Mobile Is Transforming Health Care https://www.businessinsider.fr/us/10-ways-mobile-is-transforming-health-care-2014-6 [Accessed August 2020].

  4. Zhang C, Zhang X, Halstead-Nussloch R. Assessment metrics, challenges and strategies for mobile health apps. Issues Inform Syst. 2014;15(2).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Day S, Zweig M. Rock health beyond wellness for the healthy: digital health consumer adoption 2018, 2019. https://rockhealth.com/reports/beyond-wellness-for-the-healthy-digital-health-consumer-adoption-2018/

  6. Martínez-Pérez B, De La Torre-Díez I, López-Coronado M. Privacy and security in mobile health apps: a review and recommendations. J Med Syst. 2015;39(1):181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schechner S, Secada M. Feb 2019 You Give Apps Sensitive Personal Information. Then They Tell Facebook. Wall Street J. https://www.wsj.com/articles/you-give-apps-sensitive-personal-information-then-they-tell-facebook-11550851636 [Accessed August 2020].

  8. McKay FH, et al. Evaluating mobile phone applications for health behaviour change: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(1):22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carroll JK, et al. Who uses mobile phone health apps and does use matter? A secondary data analytics approach. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(4):e125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huckvale K, et al. Unaddressed privacy risks in accredited health and wellness apps: a cross-sectional systematic assessment. BMC Med. 2015a;13:214.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huckvale K, Adomaviciute S, et al. Smartphone apps for calculating insulin dose: a systematic assessment. BMC Med. 2015b;13(1):106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Plante TB, Urrea B, et al. Validation of the instant blood pressure smartphone app. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(5):700–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wisniewski H, Liu G, Henson P, Vaidyam A, Hajratalli NK, Onnela JP, Torous J. Understanding the quality, effectiveness and attributes of top-rated smartphone health apps. Evid Based Ment Health. 2019;22(1):4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grundy Q, Chiu K, Held F, Continella A, Bero L, Holz R. Data sharing practices of medicines related apps and the mobile ecosystem: traffic, content, and network analysis. BMJ. 2019;364:l920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huckvale K, Torous J, Larsen ME. Assessment of the data sharing and privacy practices of smartphone apps for depression and smoking cessation. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(4):–e192542.

    Google Scholar 

  16. DG CONNECT. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/mhealth [Accessed August 2020].

  17. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2017 Mobile medical applications: guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff. URL: goo.gl/oZGjNE [Accessed August 2020].

    Google Scholar 

  18. European Commission. Code of Conduct on privacy for mobile health applications. URL:goo.gl/mFbK47. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/code-conduct-privacy-mhealth-apps-has-been-finalised [Accessed August 2020].

  19. Levine DM, Co Z, Newmark LP, et al. Design and testing of a mobile health application rating tool. npj Digit Med. 2020;3:74. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0268-9.

  20. The United States Department of Commerce. Code of Conduct for mobile application (“app”) short notices on Application Transparency, 2013. Accessed: 2017-11-14. URL: https://goo.gl/eAKKcf

  21. Kumar N, Khunger M, Gupta A, Garg N. A content analysis of smartphone-based applications for hypertension management. J Am Soc Hypertens JASH. 2015;9:130–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Boyer C, Gaudinat A, Hanbury A, Appel RD, Ball MJ, Geissbühler A, et al. Accessing reliable health information on the web: a review of the HON approach. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:1004–8. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-830-3-1004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ranasinghe M, Cabrera A, Postel-Vinay N, Boyer C. Transparency and quality of health apps: the HON approach. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;247:656–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Postel-Vinay N, Jouhaud P, Bobrie G, Boyer C. Home blood pressure measurement and mobile health app for pregnant and postpartum. J Hypertens. 2019;37:e280. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000573576.89014.cb.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Research 2 Guidance 2018 mHealth Economics – How mHealth App Publishers Are Monetizing Their Apps https://research2guidance.com/product/mhealth-economics-how-mhealth-app-publishers-are-monetizing-their-apps/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix: Answers to Review Questions

  1. 1.

    What kind of special risks arise from apps on mobile devices compared to websites?

    Websites display the data as they are part of the content of this site which is therefore easy to check also in terms of how they are produced. In apps, the algorithms used to analyze the data are kept secret and are not disclosed because they belong to the business model of the app. The privacy and security of transmission and storage is very difficult to test and assess in apps as well. Apps play the role of a “medical device” even if by definition of the relevant laws they are not which is unlike health websites. They do not play a diagnostic role but only an informational role.

  2. 2.

    Why is it a problem to assess many features of the app as different frameworks suggest?

    Too many criteria to be assessed may lead to a situation in which developers are reluctant to have their app assessed due to potentially high costs and inefficient practices. This in turn entails a low number of apps being actually assessed. In contrast, transparency and honesty in the production of the apps will engage developers to disclose what is behind the scene and be responsible to what health app it develops. Furthermore, not all apps need the same attention as they do not imply the same potential risk to consumers. For example, health apps with calculators and algorithms intended to recommend an action or medications may directly impact the user’s health and must be scrutinized thoroughly, while diary apps just used for documentation are less critical.

  3. 3.

    What are the eight principles of the mHONcode?

    1. 1.

      Authority.

    2. 2.

      Complementarity.

    3. 3.

      Confidentiality.

    4. 4.

      Validity.

    5. 5.

      Justifiability & Objectivity.

    6. 6.

      User’s practice.

    7. 7.

      Financial disclosure.

    8. 8.

      Advertisement policy

  4. 4.

    Please describe the mHONcode certification process!

    Step 1: The health app owner voluntarily applies via the HON website for the mHONcode certification for manual evaluation by an expert medical team and a security officer according to the mHON principles and associated published guidelines.

    Step 2: The health app editor needs to fill in a self-reporting mHONcode questionnaire with 34 questions related to the mHONcode guidelines.

    Step 3: The HON’s reviewer analyzes the content of the health app and assesses if it conforms or not to the given principle.

    Step 4: For any principles that have not been respected, the HONcode reviewer delivers a detailed report at the end of the process with recommendations on how to improve the health app. This resulting evaluation report helps the health app editor to render content that is HONcode compliant and transparent.

Appendix: Definitions of Terms in the Text

Digital engagement: Anything that involves a conversation online.

Digital care: An evidence-based software intervention (a program, application, or the like) that is intended to prevent or treat a disease and carries the attributes below.

Data security: Protective digital privacy measures that are applied to prevent unauthorized access to computers, databases, and websites.

e-Health: e-Health is a broad term, and refers to the use of information and communications technologies in healthcare.

Digital health technology: Digital health, which includes digital care programs, is the convergence of digital technologies with health, healthcare, living, and society to enhance the efficiency of healthcare delivery and make medicine more personalized and precise.

Population health: The health outcomes of a group of individuals, including the distribution of such outcomes within the group.

Encryption: The process of converting information or data into a code, especially to prevent unauthorized access.

Algorithms: A process or set of rules to be followed in calculations or other problem-solving operations, especially by a computer.

Cryptography: A method of protecting information and communications through the use of codes, so that only those for whom the information is intended can read and process it.

Data minimization: The principle of data minimization involves limiting data collection to only what is required to fulfill a specific purpose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boyer, C. (2022). Quality and Safety of Health Mobile Applications: Are They an Issue?. In: Hübner, U.H., Mustata Wilson, G., Morawski, T.S., Ball, M.J. (eds) Nursing Informatics . Health Informatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91237-6_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91237-6_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91236-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91237-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics