Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental Economics and the Theory of Finance

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Finance

  • 87 Accesses

Abstract

Experimental findings and in particular Prospect Theory and Cumulative Prospect Theory contradict Expected Utility Theory, which in turn may have a direct implication to theoretical models in finance and economics. We show growing evidence against Cumulative Prospect Theory. Moreover, even if one accepts the experimental results of Cumulative Prospect Theory, we show that most theoretical models in finance are robust. In particular, the CAPM is intact even if investors make decisions based on change of wealth, employ decision weights, and are risk-seeking in the negative domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allais, M. 1953. Le Comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulates et axioms de l’école Americaine. Econometrica 21: 503–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. 1965. Aspects of the theory of risk bearing. Helsinki: Yrjo Jahnssonin Sattio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. 1971. Essays in the theory of risk bearing. Chicago: Markham Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benartzi, S., and R. Thaler. 1995. Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (1): 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Risk aversion or myopia? Choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments. Management Science 45 (3): 364–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Naive diversification strategies in retirement savings plans. American Economic Review 91 (1): 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, M.H. 1997. Violations of monotonicity in judgment and decision making. In Choice, decision, and measurement: Essays in honor of R. Duncan Luce, ed. A.A.J. Marley, 73–100. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, M.H., and W.R. McIntosh. 1996. Violations of branch independence in choices between gambles. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67: 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, F., and M. Scholes. 1973. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy 81: 637–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W. 1955. The prediction of decisions among bets. Journal of Experimental Psychology 50: 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1962. Subjective probabilities inferred from decisions. Psychology Review 69: 109–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton, E.J., and M.J. Gruber. 1984. Modern portfolio theory and investment analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F. 1965. The behavior of stock market prices. Journal of Business 38: 34–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Efficient capital markets: II. Journal of Finance 46: 1575–1617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. 1978. On Handa’s “new theory of cardinal utility” and the maximization of expected return. Journal of Political Economy 86: 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., and L.J. Savage. 1948. The utility analysis of choices involving risk. Journal of Political Economy 56: 279–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funk, S.G., A. Rapoport, and L.V. Jones. 1979. Investing capital on safe and risky alternatives: An experimental study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 108: 415–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M.J., G.E. Paradis, and C.H. Rorke. 1972. Experimental evidence on alternative portfolio decision rules. American Economic Review 52: 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadar, J., and W. Russell. 1969. Rules for ordering uncertain prospects. American Economic Review 59: 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanoch, G., and H. Levy. 1969. The efficiency analysis of choices involving risk. Review of Economic Studies 36: 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory of decisions under risk. Econometrica 47 (2): 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, Y., and H. Levy. 1992. Further tests of separation theorem and the capital asset pricing model. American Economic Review 82: 664–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, Y., H. Levy, and A. Rapoport. 1988a. Experimental tests of mean-variance model for portfolio selection. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 42: 388–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988b. Experimental tests of the separation theorem and the capital asset pricing model. American Economic Review 78: 500–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leshno, M., and H. Levy. 2002. Preferred by “All” and preferred by “Most” decision makers: Almost stochastic dominance. Management Science 48: 1074–1085.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, H. 1992. Stochastic dominance and expected utility: Survey and analysis. Management Science 38 (4): 555–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Risk and return: An experimental analysis. International Economic Review 38: 119–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Stochastic dominance: Investment decision making under uncertainty. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, M., and H. Levy. 2001. Testing the risk-aversion: A stochastic dominance approach. Economics Letters 71: 233–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002a. Prospect theory: Much ado about nothing? Management Science 48: 1334–1349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002b. Experimental test of prospect theory value function. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 89: 1058–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, H., and M. Levy. 2002c. Arrow-Pratt risk aversion, risk premium and decision weights. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 25: 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Prospect theory and mean-variance analysis. Review of Financial Studies 17: 1015–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, H., and Z. Wiener. 1998. Stochastic dominance and prospect dominance with subjective weighting functions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 16: 147–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, M., H. Levy, and S. Solomon. 2000. Microscopic simulation of financial markets: From investor behavior to market phenomena. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintner, J. 1965. Security prices, risk, and maximal gains from diversification. Journal of Finance 20: 587–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M.J. 1994. Review of generalized expected utility theory: The rank-dependent model. Journal of Economic Literature 32: 1237–1238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H.M. 1952a. Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance 7: 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1952b. The utility of wealth. Journal of Political Economy 60: 151–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1959. Portfolio selection. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. Mean variance analysis, portfolio choice and capital markets. New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F., and M.H. Miller. 1958. The cost of capital corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review 48: 261–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odean, T. 1998. Are investors reluctant to realize their losses. Journal of Finance 53: 1775–1798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C.R. 1979. The application of laboratory experimental methods to public choice. In Collective decision making, ed. C.S. Russell. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J.W. 1964. Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32: 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prelec, D. 1998. The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66: 497–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, M.G., and P. Baratta. 1948. An experimental study of the auction-value of uncertain outcomes. American Journal of Psychology 61: 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J. 1982. A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Generalized expected utility theory: The rank dependent model. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. 1984. Effects of wealth on portfolio under various investment conditions. Acta Psychologica 55: 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S.A. 1976. The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Econometrica 32: 122–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A. 1994. The long term case for equities. Journal of Portfolio Management 21: 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W.F. 1964. Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance 19: 425–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V.L. 1976. Experimental economics: Induced value theory. American Economic Review Proceedings 66: 274–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1982. Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. American Economic Review 72: 923–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swalm, R.O. 1966. Utility theory – Insights into risk taking. Harvard Business Review 44: 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, H. 1993. Advances in behavioral finance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R.H. 1999. The end of behavioral finance. Financial Analysts Journal 55 (6): 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. 1958. Liquidity preferences as behavior toward risk. Review of Economic Studies 25: 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211: 453–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5: 297–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W.K. 1989. Prospective reference theory: Toward an explanation of the paradoxes. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2: 235–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Neuman, J., and O. Morgenstern. 1944. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakker, P.P. 2003. The data of Levy and Levy, “Prospect theory: Much ado about nothing?”Actually support prospect theory. Management Science 48: 1334–1349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakker, P.P., I. Erev, and E.U. Weber. 1994. Comonotonic independence: The critical test between classical and rank-dependent utility theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 9: 195–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, L. 1980. In the case of laboratory experiments in economics. In The philosophy of economics, ed. J. Pitt. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaari, M. 1987. The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55 (1): 95–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges the financial support of the Krueger Center of Finance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

    Haim Levy

Authors
  1. Haim Levy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haim Levy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Finance & Economics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA

    Cheng-Few Lee

  2. Center for PBBEF Research, Phoenix, AZ, USA

    Alice C. Lee

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Levy, H. (2022). Experimental Economics and the Theory of Finance. In: Lee, CF., Lee, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Finance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91231-4_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation