Abstract
The information needed for capital budgeting is generally not known with certainty. The sources of uncertainty may be the net cash inflows, the life of the project, or the discount rate. We propose a capital budgeting model under uncertainty environment in which the concept of probability is employed in describing fuzzy events and cash flow information can be specified as a special type of fuzzy numbers. The present worth of each fuzzy project cash flow can be subsequently estimated. At the same time, to select fuzzy projects and determine the optimal decision time under limited capital budget, we offer an example to analyze the results of the capital budgeting problem under uncertainty using a fuzzy real option valuation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amram, M., and N. Kulatilaka. 1999. Real options managing strategic investments in an uncertain world. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Bellman, R.E., and L.A. Zadeh. 1970. Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science 17 (4): 141–164.
Bowman, E.H., and D. Hurry. 1993. Strategy through the option lens: an integrated view of resource investments and incremental-choice process. Academy of Management Review 18: 760–842.
Cabrer, F.J., S. Alonso, and E. Herrera-Viedma. 2009. A consensus model for group decision making problems with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 8 (1): 109–131.
Carlsson, C., and R. Fuller. 2002. Fuzzy reasoning in decision making and optimization. Heidelberg: Physica Verlag.
———. 2003. A fuzzy approach to real option valuation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 139: 297–312.
Copeland, T., and V. Antikarov. 2001. Real options: a practitioner’s guide, 179–190. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Dahlberg, K., and R.S. Porter. 2000. Get real. Anderson Consulting Outlook Journal 2: 33–40.
Dai, H., T. Sun, and W. Guo. 2016. Brownfield redevelopment evaluation based on Fuzzy Real option. Sustainability 8 (2): 170–179.
Dixit, A.K., and R.S. Pindyck. 1994. Investment under uncertainty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dubois, D., and H. Prade. 1988. Possibility theory. New York: Plenum Press.
Ho, S.H., and S.H. Liao. 2011. A Fuzzy Real option approach for investment project valuation. Expert Systems with Applications 38 (12): 15296–15302.
Hu, C., and S. Li. 2009. Two-phase interactive satisfying method of fuzzy multiple objective optimization with linguistic preference. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 8 (3): 427–443.
Hu, Y.-C., and F.-M. Tseng. 2009. Mining simplified fuzzy if-then rules for pattern classification. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 8 (3): 473–489.
Kulatilaka, N. 1993. The value of flexibility: the case of a dual-fuel industrial steam boiler. Financial Management 22 (3): 271.
Kulatilaka, N., and A.J. Marcus. 1988. General formulation of corporate real options. Research in Finance 7: 183–282.
Lee, C.F., G.H. Tzeng, and S.Y. Wang. 2005a. A new application of Fuzzy set theory to the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expert Systems with Applications 29 (2): 330–342.
———. 2005b. A Fuzzy Set approach to generalize CRR model: An empirical analysis of S&P 500 index option. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 25 (3): 255–275.
Luehrman, T. 1998. Strategy as a portfolio of real options. Harvard Business Review 76: 89–99.
Mao, Y., and W. Wu. 2011. Fuzzy Real Option evaluation of real estate project based on risk analysis. Systems Engineering Procedia 1: 228–235.
Micalizzi, A. 1999. Timing to invest and value of managerial flexibility. Schering Plough case study (The 3rd Annual International Conference on Real Options, Wassenaar/Leiden).
Myers, S.C., and S.M. Turnbull. 1977. Capital budgeting and the capital-asset pricing model: Good news and bad news. Journal of Finance 32: 321–333.
Nichols, N.A. 1994. Scientific management at Merck. Harvard Business Review 72: 88–99.
Peng, Y., G. Kou, Y. Shi, and Z. Chen. 2008. A descriptive framework for the field of data mining and knowledge discovery. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 7 (4): 639–682.
Rao, C., and J. Peng. 2009. Fuzzy group decision making model based on credibility theory and gray relative degree. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 8 (3): 515–527.
Robichek, A.A., and S.C. Myers. 1966. Conceptual problems in the use of risk-adjusted discount rates. Journal of Finance 12: 727–730.
Su, C.S., T.Y. Chen, S.Y. Wang, and H.L. Wu. 2019. A study on alternative methods of real estate valuation: Fuzzy Real option model. Journal of Housing Studies 28 (1): 51–81.
Tanaka, H., and K. Asai. 1984. Fuzzy linear programming problems with fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 13 (1): 1–10.
Trigeorgis, L. 1995. Real options in capital investment: models, strategies and applications. Westport: Praeger.
Wang, S.Y., and C.C. Hwang. 2010. An Application of Fuzzy Set theory to the weighted average cost of capital structure decision. Technology and Investment 1: 248–256.
Wang, S.Y., and C.F. Lee. 2010. A Fuzzy Real option valuation approach to capital budgeting under uncertainty environment. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 9 (2): 695–713.
Zadeh, L.A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8 (3): 338–353.
———. 1968. Probability measure of fuzzy events. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 23 (3): 421–427.
Zeng, S., and S. Zhang. 2011. Real options literature review. Scientific Research iBusiness 3 (1): 43–48.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix Supplementary Explanation for Fuzzy Set
Appendix Supplementary Explanation for Fuzzy Set
The Definition of Fuzzy Set
Fuzzy sets have been introduced byZadeh (1965). What Zadeh proposed is very much a paradigm shift that first gained acceptance in the Far East, and its successful application has ensured its adoption around the world. Fuzzy sets are an extension of classical set theory and are used in fuzzy logic. In classical set theory, the membership of elements in relation to a set is assessed in binary terms according to a crisp condition – an element either belongs or does not belong to the set. By contrast, fuzzy set theory permits the gradual assessment of the membership of elements in relation to a set; this is described with the aid of a membership function valued in the real unit interval [0, 1]. Fuzzy sets are an extension of classical set theory since, for a certain universe, a membership function may act as an indicator function, mapping all elements to either 1 or 0, as in the classical notion. Specifically, a fuzzy set is any set that allows its members to have different grades of membership (membership function) in the interval [0,1]. A fuzzy set on a classical set Χ is defined as follows:
Membership Function
The membership function μA(x) quantifies the grade of membership of the elements x to the fundamental set Χ. An element mapping to the value 0 means that the member is not included in the given set; 1 describes a fully included member. Values strictly between 0 and 1 characterize the fuzzy members.
Fuzzy Logic
Fuzzy logic is a superset of conventional (Boolean) logic that has been extended to handle the concept of partial truth values between “completely true” and “completely false.” As its name suggests, it is the logic underlying modes of reasoning which are approximate rather than exact. The importance of fuzzy logic derives from the fact that most modes of human reasoning and especially common sense reasoning are approximate in nature.
The Operations of Fuzzy Set
After knowing about the characteristic of fuzzy set, we will introduce the operations of fuzzy set. A fuzzy number is a convex, normalized fuzzy set whose membership function is at least segmental continuous and has the functional value μA(x) = 1 at precisely one element. This can be likened to the funfair game “guess your weight,” where someone guesses the contestants weight, with closer guesses being more correct, and where the guesser “wins” if they guess near enough to the contestant’s weight, with the actual weight being completely correct (mapping to 1 by the membership function). A fuzzy interval is an uncertain set with a mean interval whose elements possess the membership function value μA(x) = 1. As in fuzzy numbers, the membership function must be convex, normalized, and at least segmental continuous.
Defuzzify
When we are through the operations of fuzzy set to get the fuzzy interval, we will convert the fuzzy value into the crisp value. Below are some methods that convert a fuzzy set back into a single crisp (nonfuzzy) value. This is something that is normally done after a fuzzy decision has been made, and the fuzzy result must be used in the real world. For example, if the final fuzzy decision were to adjust the temperature setting on the thermostat a “little higher,” then it would be necessary to convert this “little higher” fuzzy value to the “best” crisp value to actually move the thermostat setting by some real amount.
Fuzzy Decision
After the process of defuzzifying, the next step is to make a fuzzy decision. Fuzzy decision is a model for decision-making in a fuzzy environment, and the object function and constraints are characterized as their membership functions, the intersection of fuzzy constraints, and fuzzy objection function.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Wang, SY., Lee, CF. (2022). A Fuzzy Real Option Valuation Approach To Capital Budgeting Under Uncertainty Environment. In: Lee, CF., Lee, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Finance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91231-4_112
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91231-4_112
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91230-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91231-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences