Skip to main content

A Fuzzy Real Option Valuation Approach To Capital Budgeting Under Uncertainty Environment

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Finance
  • 82 Accesses

Abstract

The information needed for capital budgeting is generally not known with certainty. The sources of uncertainty may be the net cash inflows, the life of the project, or the discount rate. We propose a capital budgeting model under uncertainty environment in which the concept of probability is employed in describing fuzzy events and cash flow information can be specified as a special type of fuzzy numbers. The present worth of each fuzzy project cash flow can be subsequently estimated. At the same time, to select fuzzy projects and determine the optimal decision time under limited capital budget, we offer an example to analyze the results of the capital budgeting problem under uncertainty using a fuzzy real option valuation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amram, M., and N. Kulatilaka. 1999. Real options managing strategic investments in an uncertain world. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, R.E., and L.A. Zadeh. 1970. Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science 17 (4): 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, E.H., and D. Hurry. 1993. Strategy through the option lens: an integrated view of resource investments and incremental-choice process. Academy of Management Review 18: 760–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrer, F.J., S. Alonso, and E. Herrera-Viedma. 2009. A consensus model for group decision making problems with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 8 (1): 109–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, C., and R. Fuller. 2002. Fuzzy reasoning in decision making and optimization. Heidelberg: Physica Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. A fuzzy approach to real option valuation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 139: 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, T., and V. Antikarov. 2001. Real options: a practitioner’s guide, 179–190. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, K., and R.S. Porter. 2000. Get real. Anderson Consulting Outlook Journal 2: 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, H., T. Sun, and W. Guo. 2016. Brownfield redevelopment evaluation based on Fuzzy Real option. Sustainability 8 (2): 170–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A.K., and R.S. Pindyck. 1994. Investment under uncertainty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D., and H. Prade. 1988. Possibility theory. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S.H., and S.H. Liao. 2011. A Fuzzy Real option approach for investment project valuation. Expert Systems with Applications 38 (12): 15296–15302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, C., and S. Li. 2009. Two-phase interactive satisfying method of fuzzy multiple objective optimization with linguistic preference. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 8 (3): 427–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y.-C., and F.-M. Tseng. 2009. Mining simplified fuzzy if-then rules for pattern classification. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 8 (3): 473–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilaka, N. 1993. The value of flexibility: the case of a dual-fuel industrial steam boiler. Financial Management 22 (3): 271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilaka, N., and A.J. Marcus. 1988. General formulation of corporate real options. Research in Finance 7: 183–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.F., G.H. Tzeng, and S.Y. Wang. 2005a. A new application of Fuzzy set theory to the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expert Systems with Applications 29 (2): 330–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005b. A Fuzzy Set approach to generalize CRR model: An empirical analysis of S&P 500 index option. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 25 (3): 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luehrman, T. 1998. Strategy as a portfolio of real options. Harvard Business Review 76: 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, Y., and W. Wu. 2011. Fuzzy Real Option evaluation of real estate project based on risk analysis. Systems Engineering Procedia 1: 228–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micalizzi, A. 1999. Timing to invest and value of managerial flexibility. Schering Plough case study (The 3rd Annual International Conference on Real Options, Wassenaar/Leiden).

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S.C., and S.M. Turnbull. 1977. Capital budgeting and the capital-asset pricing model: Good news and bad news. Journal of Finance 32: 321–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, N.A. 1994. Scientific management at Merck. Harvard Business Review 72: 88–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Y., G. Kou, Y. Shi, and Z. Chen. 2008. A descriptive framework for the field of data mining and knowledge discovery. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 7 (4): 639–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C., and J. Peng. 2009. Fuzzy group decision making model based on credibility theory and gray relative degree. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 8 (3): 515–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robichek, A.A., and S.C. Myers. 1966. Conceptual problems in the use of risk-adjusted discount rates. Journal of Finance 12: 727–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, C.S., T.Y. Chen, S.Y. Wang, and H.L. Wu. 2019. A study on alternative methods of real estate valuation: Fuzzy Real option model. Journal of Housing Studies 28 (1): 51–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, H., and K. Asai. 1984. Fuzzy linear programming problems with fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 13 (1): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, L. 1995. Real options in capital investment: models, strategies and applications. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S.Y., and C.C. Hwang. 2010. An Application of Fuzzy Set theory to the weighted average cost of capital structure decision. Technology and Investment 1: 248–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S.Y., and C.F. Lee. 2010. A Fuzzy Real option valuation approach to capital budgeting under uncertainty environment. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 9 (2): 695–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8 (3): 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1968. Probability measure of fuzzy events. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 23 (3): 421–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, S., and S. Zhang. 2011. Real options literature review. Scientific Research iBusiness 3 (1): 43–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shin-Yun Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix Supplementary Explanation for Fuzzy Set

Appendix Supplementary Explanation for Fuzzy Set

The Definition of Fuzzy Set

Fuzzy sets have been introduced byZadeh (1965). What Zadeh proposed is very much a paradigm shift that first gained acceptance in the Far East, and its successful application has ensured its adoption around the world. Fuzzy sets are an extension of classical set theory and are used in fuzzy logic. In classical set theory, the membership of elements in relation to a set is assessed in binary terms according to a crisp condition – an element either belongs or does not belong to the set. By contrast, fuzzy set theory permits the gradual assessment of the membership of elements in relation to a set; this is described with the aid of a membership function valued in the real unit interval [0, 1]. Fuzzy sets are an extension of classical set theory since, for a certain universe, a membership function may act as an indicator function, mapping all elements to either 1 or 0, as in the classical notion. Specifically, a fuzzy set is any set that allows its members to have different grades of membership (membership function) in the interval [0,1]. A fuzzy set on a classical set Χ is defined as follows:

$$ \tilde{A}=\left\{\Big(x,{\mu}_A(x)\Big)|x\in X\right\}. $$

Membership Function

The membership function μA(x) quantifies the grade of membership of the elements x to the fundamental set Χ. An element mapping to the value 0 means that the member is not included in the given set; 1 describes a fully included member. Values strictly between 0 and 1 characterize the fuzzy members.

figure afigure a

Fuzzy Logic

Fuzzy logic is a superset of conventional (Boolean) logic that has been extended to handle the concept of partial truth values between “completely true” and “completely false.” As its name suggests, it is the logic underlying modes of reasoning which are approximate rather than exact. The importance of fuzzy logic derives from the fact that most modes of human reasoning and especially common sense reasoning are approximate in nature.

The Operations of Fuzzy Set

After knowing about the characteristic of fuzzy set, we will introduce the operations of fuzzy set. A fuzzy number is a convex, normalized fuzzy set whose membership function is at least segmental continuous and has the functional value μA(x) = 1 at precisely one element. This can be likened to the funfair game “guess your weight,” where someone guesses the contestants weight, with closer guesses being more correct, and where the guesser “wins” if they guess near enough to the contestant’s weight, with the actual weight being completely correct (mapping to 1 by the membership function). A fuzzy interval is an uncertain set with a mean interval whose elements possess the membership function value μA(x) = 1. As in fuzzy numbers, the membership function must be convex, normalized, and at least segmental continuous.

Defuzzify

When we are through the operations of fuzzy set to get the fuzzy interval, we will convert the fuzzy value into the crisp value. Below are some methods that convert a fuzzy set back into a single crisp (nonfuzzy) value. This is something that is normally done after a fuzzy decision has been made, and the fuzzy result must be used in the real world. For example, if the final fuzzy decision were to adjust the temperature setting on the thermostat a “little higher,” then it would be necessary to convert this “little higher” fuzzy value to the “best” crisp value to actually move the thermostat setting by some real amount.

Fuzzy Decision

After the process of defuzzifying, the next step is to make a fuzzy decision. Fuzzy decision is a model for decision-making in a fuzzy environment, and the object function and constraints are characterized as their membership functions, the intersection of fuzzy constraints, and fuzzy objection function.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Wang, SY., Lee, CF. (2022). A Fuzzy Real Option Valuation Approach To Capital Budgeting Under Uncertainty Environment. In: Lee, CF., Lee, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Finance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91231-4_112

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics