Abstract
This chapter uses the example of an action by Fridays for Future Denmark in front of the Danish parliament to discuss in which ways human bodies might be involved in the transition from a well-known human-centred way of relating to the world to an unknown anthropocene way. Theoretically the focus is on a reconceptualization of the notion of aesthetic learning processes (ALPs) as this has been employed in Scandinavian discourses of arts and environmental education since the early 1990s. Following object-oriented conceptions of aesthetic experience as attunement, aesthetic learning processes are imagined to unfold at the moment when the FFF activists lie down and their bodies tune to the granite sets of the square. In order to relate these speculative ideas to concrete educational practices, the text offers an educational proposition able to connect the explicit environmental political intentions of the activists with the more implicit political intentions of reconceptualizing ALP for a pedagogy of the Anthropocene. The chapter is divided into three sections: (I) Aesthetic Learning Processes in Scandinavian Education, (II) Aesthetic Learning Processes as Attunement: Lying on the Ground, (III) Proposition for Aesthetic Learning Processes in the Anthropocene.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
All translations from texts in Scandinavian languages are by the author.
- 2.
In the Future of Humanity-survey on the most important issues facing the world, conducted in 2019 by Ipsos MORI on behalf of Amnesty International with 10.000 informants aged 18–25 from 27 countries, 41% respondents selected climate change, followed by pollution (36%) and terrorism (31%). Among environmental issues, global warming ranked highest, at 57%. (Amnesty International, 2019).
- 3.
By Scandinavia, I intend Denmark, Norway and Sweden.
- 4.
Speculative realism is a contemporary philosophical current that aims to think reality in itself, independent of the habitual ‘correlationism’ of most modern philosophical thought (see also Harman, 2018b).
- 5.
It should be noted that Harman (2011, Chap. 8) avoids the binary of withdrawn and sensual object through the construction of his own quadruple object diagram with twelve sets of relations between real and sensuous objects and real and sensuous qualities.
References
Abram, D. (1997). The spell of the sensuous. Vintage Books.
Amnesty International. (2019, December 10). Climate change ranks highest as vital issue of our time—Generation Z survey. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2019/12/climate-change-ranks-highest-as-vital-issue-of-our-time/
Austring, B. D., & Sørensen, M. (2006). Æstetik og læring. Grundbog om æstetiske læreprocesser [Aesthetics and learning: Manual on aesthetic learning processes]. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Barbiroglio, E. (2019, December 9). Generation Z fears climate change more than anything else. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/emanuelabarbiroglio/2019/12/09/generation-z-fears-climate-change-more-than-anything-else/?sh=70685b2a501b
Bengtsson, S. (2019). Death. In J. A. Lysgaard, S. Bengtsson, & M. H.-L. Laugesen (Eds.), Dark pedagogy. Education, horror and the anthropocene (pp. 63–83). Palgrave Macmillan.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge.
Butler, J. (2015). Precarious life. The powers of mourning and violence. Verso.
Colebrook, C. (2017). We have always been post-anthropocene. The anthropocene counterfactual. In R. Grusin (Ed.), Anthropocene feminism. University of Minnesota Press.
Danske Landskabsarkitekter. (2019, October 15). Cirkulær Økonomi på Christiansborg Slotsplads [Circular economy at the square of Christiansborg castle]. https://www.landskabsarkitekter.dk/Aktuelt/cirkulaer-okonomi-pa-christiansborg-slotsplads/
Davis, H., & Turpin, E. (2015). Art & death: Lives between the fifth assessment & the sixth extinction. In H. Davis & E. Turpin (Eds.), Art in the Anthropocene. Encounters among aesthetics, politics, environments and epistemologies (pp. 3–30). Open Humanities Press.
Edlev, L. T. (2009). Naturoplevelse og naturfaglig interesse. Hvad er forholdet mellem æstetiske læreprocesser og naturfaglig undervisning? [Nature experience and environmental interest. How is the relation between aesthetic learning processes and environmental education?]. In K. Fink-Jensen & A. M. Nielsen (Eds.), Æstetiske læreprocesser i teori og praksis [Aesthetic learning processes in theory and practice] (pp. 13–18). Billesø og Balzer.
Fink-Jensen, K., & Nielsen, A. M. (2009). Æstetiske læreprocesser i teori og praksis. [Aesthetic learning processes in theory and practice]. Billesø og Balzer.
Harman, G. (2011). The quadruple object. Zero Books.
Harman, G. (2018a). Object-oriented ontology. A new theory of everything. Pelican Books.
Harman, G. (2018b). Speculative realism. An introduction. Polity Press.
Hohr, H. (2002). Does beauty matter in education? Friedrich Schiller’s neo-humanistic approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(1), 59–75.
Hohr, H., & Pedersen, K. (1996). Perspektiver på æstetiske læreprocesser [Perspectives on aesthetic learning processes]. Dansklærerforeningen.
Illeris, H. (2012). Aesthetic learning processes for the 21st century: Epistemology, didactics, performance. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 16(1), 10–19.
Illeris, H. (2016). Adult education in art galleries: Inhabiting social criticism and change through transformative artistic practices. In D. E. Clover, K. Sanford, L. Bell, & K. Johnson (Eds.), Museums and adult education: Animating social and cultural change (pp. 229–242). Sense Publishers.
Illeris, H. (2020). Intimacy, solidarity, fragility. Everyday objects and ecological awareness in arts and crafts education. In K. Bergaust, R. Smite, & D. Silina (Eds.), Oslofjord ecologies. Artistic research on environmental and social sustainability (pp. 153–168). RIXC Center for New Media Culture.
Illeris, H., Knudsen, K. N., & Skregelid, S. (2022). A/r/tografi som tilgang til udvikling af en sanselig bæredygtighedsdidaktik i kunstfagene [A/r/tography as approach to the development of a sensory sustainability education in the arts]. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Johansen, M. B. (Ed.). (2018). Æstetik og pædagogik [Aesthetics and pedagogy]. Akademisk forlag.
Kant, I. (1991). What is enlightenment? In H. S. Reiss (Ed.), Kant: Political writing. Cambridge University Press. (Originally published 1798).
Krogh, M. A. (2020, October 6). Unge klimaaktivister: Vi er nødt til at se sorgen i øjnene [Young climate activists: we have to face our grief]. Information. https://www.information.dk/indland/2020/10/unge-klimaaktivister-noedt-se-sorgen-oejnene?lst_tag
Langer, S. (1960). Philosophy in a new key. A study in the symbolism of reason, rite and art (3rd ed.). Harvard University Press.
LeBlanc, N. & Irwin, R. L. (2019). A/r/tography. In Noblit, G. (Ed.). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education (n.p.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.393
Lindstrand, F., & Selander, S. (Eds.) (2009). Estetiska lärprocesser: Upplevelser, praktiker och kunskapsformer [Aesthetic learning processes: experiences, practices and forms of knowing]. Studentlitteratur.
Lorenzer, A. (1972). Zur Begründung einer materialistischen Sozialisationstheorie [On the necessity of a materialist socialisation theory]. Suhrkamp.
Løvlie, L. (1990). Den estetiske erfaring [The Aesthetic Experience]. Nordisk Pedagogik, 1990(1–2), 1–18.
Lysgaard, J. A., Bengtsson, S., & Laugesen, M. H.-L. (2019). Dark pedagogy. Education, horror and the Anthropocene. Palgrave Macmillan.
Manning, E. & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the Act: Passages in the Ecology of Experience. University of Minnesota Press
Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2020). For a whiteheadian laboratory. How do you make yourself a proposition? In R. Faber, M. Halewood, & A. M. Davies (Eds.), Propositions in the making: Experiments in a whiteheadian laboratory. Lexington Books.
McMaster, G. (2020, January 28). Millennials and Gen Z are more anxious than previous generations: here’s why. Folio. University of Alberta. https://www.ualberta.ca/folio/2020/01/millennials-and-gen-z-are-more-anxious-than-previous-generations-heres-why.html
Morton, T. (2013). Realist magic: Objects, ontology, causality. Open Humanities Press.
Morton, T. (2016). Dark ecology. For a logic of future coexistence. Columbia University Press.
Morton, T. (2018). Being ecological. Pelican Books.
Pahuus, M. (1988). Naturen og den menneskelige natur [Nature and human nature]. Philosophia.
Rousell, D., Cutcher, A. L., Cook, P. J., & Irwin, R. (2018). Propositions for an environmental arts pedagogy: A/r/tographic experimentations with movement and materiality. In A. Cutter-Mackenzie et al. (Eds.), Research handbook on childhoodnature. Springer.
Schou, L. R. (1990). Undervisningens æstetiske dimension [The aesthetic dimension of teaching]. Nordisk Pedagogik, 1990(1–2), 19–29.
Skoleelever i over 170 timers uafbrudt aktion for klimaet [Students in more than 170 hours of demonstration for the climate]. (2020, October 6). Arbejderen. https://arkiv.arbejderen.dk/indland/skoleelever-i-over-170-timers-uafbrudt-aktion-klimaet
Tavin, K. (2007). Eyes wide shut. The use and uselessness of the discourse of aesthetics in art education. Art Education, 60(2), 40–45.
von Schiller, J. C. F. (2004): On the aesthetic education of man (R. Snell, Trans.). Dover Publications. (Original work published 1795).
Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality (corrected ed.). The Free Press. (Originally published 1929)
Wickman, P.-O., & Jakobson, B. (2009). Estetiska lärprocesser i naturvetenskap—att behandla en förgiftning [Aesthetic learning processes in science education: To treat a poisoning]. In F. Lindstrand & S. Selander (Eds.), Estetiska lärprocesser: upplevelser, praktiker och kunskapsformer [Aesthetic learning processes: Experiences, practices and forms of knowing]. Studentlitteratur.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Illeris, H. (2022). Lying on the Ground: Aesthetic Learning Processes in the Anthropocene. In: Paulsen, M., jagodzinski, j., M. Hawke, S. (eds) Pedagogy in the Anthropocene . Palgrave Studies in Educational Futures. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90980-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90980-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90979-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90980-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)