Abstract
Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus is a novel by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley (née Godwin; 1797–1851), published in 1818 and revised in 1831. It tells the story of Victor Frankenstein, who constructs and animates a sentient and sapient creature in a scientific experiment, only for the experiment to end in disaster as, rejected by Frankenstein, the creature revenges himself upon his creator.
Frankenstein is considered one of the earliest examples of science fiction, and, inspiring countless theatrical and cinematic adaptations, the scientist and his creature have evolved into cultural icons. As such they are important cultural metaphors and have been helping us think about questions partaking to our conceptions of humanity, and opening up new possibilities as to how we view our past, present, and future, for over two centuries.
This entry begins by explaining the background to Frankenstein’s composition, publication, and its cultural impact since, before outlining the novel’s plot. It then focuses on some of the novel’s central thematic preoccupations to do with the possibilities of human sympathy and science. These questions have been central in literary critical interpretations of Shelley’s novel, as well as being integral to the importance of the story of Frankenstein as a cultural myth.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baldick, C. (1987). In Frankenstein’s shadow: Myth, monstrosity, and nineteenth-century writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barnett, S. L. (2018). Romantic Prometheis and the molding of Frankenstein. In J. Weiner, B. Eldon Stevens, & B. M. Rogers (Eds.), Frankenstein and its classics: The modern Prometheus from antiquity science fiction (pp. 76–90). London: Bloomsbury.
Clayton, J. (2003). Frankenstein’s futurity: Replicants and robots. In E. Schor (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Mary Shelley (pp. 84–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cutchins, D. R., & Perry, D. R. (2018). Introduction: The Frankenstein complex: when the text is more than a text. In D. R. Cutchins & D. R. Perry (Eds.), Adapting Frankenstein: The Monster’s eternal lives in popular culture (pp. 1–22). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Forry, S. E. (1990). Hideous progenies: Dramatizations of Frankenstein from Mary Shelley to the present. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Friedman, L. D., & Kavey, A. B. (2016). Monstrous progeny: A history of the Frankenstein narratives. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Gilbert, S., & Gubar, S. (1979). The madwoman in the attic: The woman writer and the nineteenth-century literary imagination. Yale: Yale University Press.
Goodall, J., & Knellwolf, C. (2008). Introduction. In J. Goodall & C. Knellwolf (Eds.), Frankenstein’s science: Experimentation and discovery in romantic culture, 1780–1830 (pp. 1–16). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Helman, C. (1992). The body of Frankenstein's monster: Essays in myth and medicine. New York: Norton.
Johnson, B. (1982). My monster/my self. Diacritics, 12(2), 2–10.
Knoepflmacher, U. C. (1974). Thoughts on the aggression of daughters. In G. Levine & U. C. Knoepflmacher (Eds.), The endurance of Frankenstein: Essays on Mary Shelley’s novel (pp. 88–122). Berkley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
Liveley, G. (2018). Patchwork paratexts and monstrous metapoetics: ‘After tea M reads Ovid’. In J. Weiner, B. Eldon Stevens, & B. M. Rogers (Eds.), Frankenstein and its classics: The modern Prometheus from antiquity to science fiction (pp. 25–41). London: Bloomsbury.
Long Hoeveler, D. (2003). Frankenstein, feminism and literary theory. In E. Schor (Ed.) The Cambridge companion to Mary Shelley (pp. 45–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Malchow, H. L. (1996). Gothic images of race in nineteenth-century Britain. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Marshall, D. (1988). The surprising effects of sympathy: Marivaux, Diderot, Rousseau, and Mary Shelley. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marshall, T. (1995). Murdering to dissect: Grave-robbing, Frankenstein and the anatomy literature. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
McLarren Caldwell, J. (2004). Literature and medicine in nineteenth-century Britain: From Mary Shelley to George Eliot. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mellor, A. K. (1988). Mary Shelley: Her life, her fiction, her monsters. London, New York: Routledge.
Mellor, A. K. (1990). Choosing a text of Frankenstein to teach. In S. Behrendt (Ed.), Approaches to teaching Shelley’s Frankenstein (pp. 31–37). New York: The Modern Languages Association of America.
Mellor, A. K. (2001). Frankenstein, racial science, and the yellow peril. Nineteenth Century Contexts, 23(1), 1–28.
Moers, E. (1976). Literary women. Garden City, New York: Doublesday.
Morton, T. (2016). Frankenstein and ecocriticism. In A. Smith (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Frankenstein (pp. 143–157). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mousley, A. (2016). The Posthuman. In A. Smith (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Frankenstein (pp. 158–172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mulvey-Roberts, M. (2000). The corpse in the corpus: Frankenstein, rewriting Wollstonecraft and the abject. In M. Eberle-Sinatra (Ed.), Mary Shelley’s fictions: From Frankenstein to Falkner (pp. 197–210). New York: Macmillan.
Mulvey-Roberts, M. (2016). Dangerous bodies: Historicising the gothic corporeal. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Priestman, M. (2018). Prometheus and Dr. Dawrin's vermicelli: Another stir to the Frankenstein broth. In J. Weiner, B. Eldon Stevens, & B. M. Rogers (Eds.), Frankenstein and its classics: The modern Prometheus from antiquity to science fiction (pp. 42–58). London: Bloomsbury.
Robinson, C. E. (2016). Frankenstein Its composition and publication. In A. Smith (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Frankenstein (pp. 13–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ruston, S. (2005). Shelley and vitality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Seymour, M. (2000). Mary Shelley. London: John Murray.
Shelley, M. (With Hindle, M.) (1992). Frankenstein or the modern Prometheus. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1831).
Shelley, M. (with Butler, M.) (1998). Frankenstein or the modern Prometheus: The 1818 text. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1818).
Smith, A. (2016a). Introduction. In A. Smith (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Frankenstein (pp. 1–10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, A. (2016b). Scientific Contexts. In A. Smith (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Frankenstein (pp. 69–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sterrenburg, L. (1979). Mary Shelley’s monster: Politics and psyche in Frankenstein. In G. Levine & U. C. Knoepflmacher (Eds.), The endurance of Frankenstein: Essays on Mary Shelley’s novel (pp. 143–171). Berkley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
Young, E. (2008). Black Frankenstein: The making of an American metaphor. London: New York University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Lisica, F. (2022). Frankenstein. In: Glăveanu, V.P. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90913-0_89
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90913-0_89
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90912-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90913-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences