Abstract
An unexpected or inexplicable event with significance to the self that is accompanied by a strong emotional marker (which can be positive, negative, or mixed in valence).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, W. H., & Brown, J. W. (2019). The role of the anterior cingulate cortex in prediction error and signaling surprise. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12307.
Arango-Muñoz, S., & Michaelian, K. (2014). Epistemic feelings, epistemic emotions: Review and introduction to the focus section. Philosophical Inquiries, 2(1), 97–122. 10/ggd6zt
Arfini, S., Bertolotti, T., & Magnani, L. (2018). The antinomies of serendipity: How to cognitively frame serendipity for scientific discoveries. Topoi. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9571-3.
Austin, J. H. (1979). The varieties of chance in scientific research. Medical Hypotheses, 5(7), 737–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-9877(79)90035-5.
Barber, B., & Fox, R. C. (1958). The case of the floppy-eared rabbits: An instance of serendipity gained and serendipity lost. American Journal of Sociology, 64(2), 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1086/222420.
Clark, A. (2018). A nice surprise? Predictive processing and the active pursuit of novelty. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17(3), 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-017-9525-z.
Cushen, P. J., & Wiley, J. (2012). Cues to solution, restructuring patterns, and reports of insight in creative problem solving. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(3), 1166–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.03.013.
Danek, A. H. (2018). Magic tricks, sudden restructuring and the aha! Experience. In F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Ed.), Insight: On the origin of new ideas (pp. 51–79). Routledge.
Danek, A. H., Fraps, T., von Maller, A., Grothe, B., & Ollinger, M. (2014). It’s a kind of magic: What self-reports can reveal about the phenomenology of insight problem solving. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01408.
Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion. 6(3–4), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17(2), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030377.
Fazio, L. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2009). Surprising feedback improves later memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.1.88.
Friston, K., FitzGerald, T., Rigoli, F., Schwartenbeck, P., & Pezzulo, G. (2017). Active inference: A process theory. Neural Computation, 29(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1162/NECO_a_00912
Gerlain, A. (2019). How implicit is surprise? In N. Depraz & A. Celle (Eds.), Surprise at the intersection of phenomenology and linguistics (Vol. 11, pp. 77–91). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/ceb.11.
Gick, M. L., & Lockhart, R. S. (1995). Cognitive and affective components of insight. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 197–228). MIT Press.
Gilhooly, K. J., Ball, L. J., & Macchi, L. (2015). Insight and creative thinking processes: Routine and special. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2014.966758.
Glǎveanu, V. P. (2021). The possible: A sociocultural theory. Oxford University Press.
Glǎveanu, V. P. (forthcoming). What’s inside the prepared mind. In W. Ross & S. Copeland (Eds.), The art of serendipity. Palgrave.
Hélie, S., & Sun, R. (2010). Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: A unified theory and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 117(3), 994–1024. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019532.
Hohwy, J. (2013). The predictive mind (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
Jarman, M. S. (2014). Quantifying the qualitative: Measuring the insight experience. Creativity Research Journal, 26(3), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.929405.
Johnson-laird, P. N., & Oatley, K. (1992). Basic emotions, rationality, and folk theory. Cognition and Emotion, 6(3–4), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411069.
MacGregor, J. N., Ormerod, T. C., & Chronicle, E. P. (2001). Information processing and insight: A process model of performance on the nine-dot and related problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 176–201. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.27.1.176.
Makri, S., & Blandford, A. (2012). Coming across information serendipitously – Part 1: A process model. Journal of Documentation, 68, 684–705. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411211256030.
McCay-Peet, L., & Toms, E. G. (2015). Investigating serendipity: How it unfolds and what may influence it. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66, 1463–1476. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23273.
Merton, R., & Barber, E. (2004). The travels and adventures of rerendipity: A study in sociological semantics and the sociology of science. Princeton University Press.
Munnich, E., & Ranney, M. A. (2019). Learning from surprise: Harnessing a metacognitive surprise signal to build and adapt belief networks. Topics in Cognitive Science. 11(1):164–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12397.
Nevo, I., & Erev, I. (2012). On surprise, change, and the effect of recent outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00024.
Reisenzein, R., & Studtmann, M. (2007). On the expression and experience of surprise: No evidence for facial feedback, but evidence for a reverse self-inference effect. Emotion, 7(3), 612–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.612.
Rocca, E., Copeland, S., & Ralph Edwards, I. (2019). Pharmacovigilance as scientific discovery: An argument for trans-disciplinarity. Drug Safety. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-019-00826-1.
Ross, W. (2022). Heteroscalar serendipity and the importance of accidents. In W. Ross & S. Copeland (Eds.), The Art of Serendipity. Palgrave MacMillan.
Rubin, V. L., Burkell, J., & Quan-Haase, A. (2011). Facets of serendipity in everyday chance encounters: A grounded theory approach to blog analysis. Information Research, 16. Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/16-3/paper488.html
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997). A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science, 275(5306), 1593–1599. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5306.1593.
Steinbock, A. J. (2018). Surprise as emotion: Between startle and humility. In N. Depraz & A. J. Steinbock (Eds.), Surprise: An emotion? (pp. 3–21). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Yaqub, O. (2018). Serendipity: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 47, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.10.007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ross, W., Webb, M. (2022). Surprise. In: Glăveanu, V.P. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90913-0_231
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90913-0_231
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90912-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90913-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences