Skip to main content

Identification and Categorization of Assembly Information for Collaborative Product Realization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Towards Sustainable Customization: Bridging Smart Products and Manufacturing Systems (CARV 2021, MCPC 2021)

Abstract

Information exchange is a fundamental process for manufacturing enterprises, especially when the product data needs to be exchanged between different domains, areas, or external suppliers during the product lifecycle. Lack of standardized information management processes, undefined information requirements from both parties, and incompatible formats to exchange information lead to delays in product development and therefore, economic losses. An alternative that has demonstrated benefits when carrying product manufacturing information is the Model-based definition (MBD) approach. A preparatory step to structure an MBD application for a specific domain is to define its data content, which can be built upon a categorization of product requirements for the target domain. The presented study proposes a method that starts by studying the interactions between involved stakeholders and the related information exchanged at each stage of the development of a component, and results in a categorization of requirements to support assembly planning, enhancing product realization. Enhanced product realization can lead to shorter development time, better supplier compliance to the requirements, and fewer errors in the physical interfaces. Future work is to use the categorized requirements as a base to build an MBD structure for exchanging assembly-related information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ulrich, K.T., Eppinger, S.D.: Product Design and Development, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill/Irwin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wynstra, F., van Weele, A., Weggemann, M.: Managing supplier involvement in product development. Eur. Manag. J. 19, 157–167 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(00)00090-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Flankegård, F.T., Johansson, G., Granlund, A.: Challenges with supplier involvement in product development: a supplier’s perspective. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, pp 2179–2188. Cambridge University Press (2019). https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.224

  4. Almefelt, L., Andersson, F., Nilsson, P., Malmqvist, J.: Exploring requirements management in the automotive industry (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC/ IEEE 29148 Systems and software engineering —Life cycle processes — Requirements engineering (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rogstrand, V., Kjellberg, T.: The representation of manufacturing requirements in model-driven parts manufacturing. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 22, 1065–1072 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/09511920902741117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wiesner, S., Peruzzini, M., Hauge, J.B., Thoben, K.-D.: Requirements engineering. In: Concurrent Engineering in the 21st Century, pp 103–132. Springer (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13776-6_5

  8. Wagner, S.M., Hoegl, M.: Involving suppliers in product development: Insights from R&D directors and project managers. Ind. Mark. Manag. 35, 936–943 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., Grote, K.-H.: Engineering Design. Springer, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Becattini, N., Cascini, G., Rotini, F.: Requirements checklists: Benchmarking the comprehensiveness of the design specification. Proc. Int. Conf. Eng. Des. ICED 5, 1–10 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Salado, A., Nilchiani, R.: A categorization model of requirements based on Max-Neef’s model of human needs. Syst. Eng. 17, 348–360 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ISO (2018) ISO/TS 21619:2018 - Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Types of documents with GPS

    Google Scholar 

  13. ECSS (2009) ECSS-E-ST-10–06C Space engineering Technical requirements specification. Noordwijk

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baniassad, E., Clarke, S.: Theme: an approach for aspect-oriented analysis and design. Proc. Int. Conf. Softw. Eng. 26, 158–167 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/icse.2004.1317438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kishi, T., Noda, N.: Aspect-oriented analysis for product line architecture. Softw Prod Lines, 135–145 (2000). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4339-8_7

  16. Quintana, V., Rivest, L., Pellerin, R., et al.: Will Model-based Definition replace engineering drawings throughout the product lifecycle? a global perspective from aerospace industry. Comput. Ind. 61, 497–508 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2010.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Heemskerk, C.: A Concept for Computer Aided Process Planning for Flexible Assembly. Delft University of Technology (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Net, A.J., Van Der.: Designing and manufacturing assemblies (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Willemse, M.A., Storm, T.: Designer support for assembly decisions. Comput. Ind. 33, 245–252 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-3615(97)00030-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Demoly, F., Gomes, S., Eynard, B., et al.: Assembly-oriented product structure based on preliminary assembly process engineering. DS 58–7 Proc ICED 09, 17th Int Conf Eng Des 161–172 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rodríguez-Toro, C.A., Tate, S.J., Jared, G.E.M., Swift, K.G.: Complexity metrics for design (simplicity + simplicity = complexity). Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 217, 721–726 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1243/095440503322011461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yin, R.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th ed. SAGE Publications (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., Saldana, J.: Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications, Incorporated (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the Swedish Knowledge Foundation for funding this research within the INNOFACTURE research school, XPRES, the case company; GIMLE, a project in VINNOVA FFI Sustainable production; and, H2020-MSCA-ITN DiManD project funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 under grant agreement No. 814078.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathaly Rea Minango .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rea Minango, N., Nafisi, M., Hedlind, M., Maffei, A. (2022). Identification and Categorization of Assembly Information for Collaborative Product Realization. In: Andersen, AL., et al. Towards Sustainable Customization: Bridging Smart Products and Manufacturing Systems. CARV MCPC 2021 2021. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90700-6_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90700-6_65

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90699-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90700-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics