Abstract
The rate of genetic gain in wheat improvement programs must improve to meet the challenge of feeding a growing population. Future wheat varieties will need to produce record high yields to feed an anticipated 25% more inhabitants on this planet by 2050. The current rate of genetic gain is slow and cropping systems are facing unprecedented fluctuations in production. This instability stems from major changes in climate and evolving pests and diseases. Rapid genetic improvement is essential to optimise crop performance under such harsh conditions. Accelerating breeding cycles shows promise for increasing the rate of genetic gain over time. This can be achieved by concurrent integration of cutting-edge technologies into breeding programs, such as speed breeding (SB), doubled haploid (DH) technology, high-throughput phenotyping platforms and genomic selection (GS). These technologies empower wheat breeders to keep the pace with increasing food demand by developing more productive and robust varieties sooner. In this chapter, strategies for shortening the wheat breeding cycle are discussed, along with the opportunity to integrate technologies to further accelerate the rate of genetic gain in wheat breeding programs.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Learning Objectives
-
Realise the challenges associated with increasing the rate of genetic gain in wheat.
-
Explore technologies that can reduce the length of a breeding cycle.
-
Understand the challenges associated with adapting new technologies to breeding programs.
-
Explore opportunities for integrating technologies to improve breeding efficiency.
2 Introduction
Wheat breeding programs are designed to prioritise the release of cultivars better adapted to drought and heat, and resistant or tolerant to pests and diseases, with the ultimate goal of increasing yield potential [1]. The estimated rate of genetic gain in wheat is 0.9% per year and an overall agronomic and genetic yield improvement of over 2% per year is needed to meet the increased demand. A typical wheat breeding cycle can take over 12 years for crossing, inbreeding, testing, and selection. Broadly, a breeding cycle involves three distinctive phases, starting and finishing with parental lines used for crossing. These phases include: (i) The crossing and inbreeding phase, which requires the progenies to go through six generations of self-pollination to reach homozygosity and minimise segregation of the traits of interest; (ii) The testing phase, which involves screening for biotic and abiotic traits followed by multi-environment trial evaluation. Lines that are stable across a wide range of environments and carry desirable traits can be recycled and used as parents for making new crosses; (iii) Bulking up seed of the most successful line and releasing a new cultivar available to growers. Due to the lengthy process of cultivar development, breeding programs must adopt new technologies to reduce the time required for completing breeding cycles. Therefore, efforts must focus on speeding up the rate of genetic gain by optimising the components that fit in the breeder's equation. This includes increasing the intensity and precision of selecting individuals within a population that has a high level of useful genetic variation for traits of interest, while also accelerating breeding cycles by reducing the time required to achieve a single cycle [2].
Modern wheat breeding programs have adopted several technologies and breeding strategies that are instrumental in increasing the rate of genetic gain. For example, high-throughput phenotyping platforms can be used to screen large numbers of selected candidates for target traits more precisely, which leads to enhanced selection accuracy and selection intensity [3]. The evolution of next-generation sequencing platforms has resulted in cost-effective genotyping services that have increased the efficiency and accuracy of selection in breeding programs [4]. GS in combination with high-throughput phenotyping platforms shows promise for enhancing predictive breeding approaches, particularly for complex traits such as grain quality and yield [5]. Furthermore, adopting GS in wheat breeding programs can lead to an increase in selection accuracy and intensity, while reducing the breeding cycle concurrently [6]. Shuttle breeding, and most recently ‘speed breeding’ (SB), has transformed breeding programs by shortening the crossing and inbreeding phase [7, 8]. The faster generation turnover enables evaluation of selection candidates sooner, ultimately reducing the length of the breeding cycle (Fig. 30.1). Likewise, DH technology enables the development of homozygous lines in only two plant generations and has dramatically reduced the length of breeding cycles, particularly for winter wheat programs [9].
This chapter provides an overview of the technologies and strategies available to wheat breeders for reducing the length of the breeding cycle. Furthermore, the opportunity to combine technologies to accelerate genetic gain is discussed.
3 Strategies to Shorten Breeding Cycles in Wheat
3.1 Shuttle Breeding
Shuttle breeding is an off-season field-testing technique whereby genetic material is grown in contrasting environments to turn over two plant generations per year. By implementing this simple, yet effective technique, breeders have successfully reduced the time required to complete a breeding cycle by 50% [10]. In this method, segregating populations are subject to screening, selection and simultaneous generation advancement [11]. The strategy was first developed by Norman Borlaug at the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT) Mexico in 1946. The goal was to speed up breeding cycles and develop varieties faster for the Mexican wheat farmers [12]. To achieve the two generations each year, the material is grown at two contrasting locations in terms of precipitation, altitude and latitude (Fig. 30.2). Today, the technique is still adopted by CIMMYT. In the winter season (November to April), breeding populations are grown in the Sonora Desert (Yaqui Valley, North-Western Mexico) at 39 m.a.s.l. under short days, and selection is applied for yield, agronomic type, leaf and stem rust disease, grain quality and photoperiod insensitivity. In summer (May – October), populations are grown at the Toluca station at 2649 m.a.s.l.), to ensure the crop experiences cooler temperatures during grain filling, and selection is applied for resistance to yellow rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) and speckled leaf blotch (Septoria tritici) disease [7]. In addition to the key advantage of shortening the breeding cycle, the strategy enables selection of breeding materials exposed to different soil types, temperatures, disease pressure and most importantly, photoperiod. The semi-dwarf, rust-resistant and photoperiod insensitive varieties developed by Borlaug and his colleagues resulted in widespread adoption and adaptation to the wheat mega environments of the world. The global success of these varieties is the foundation of what is known as the Green Revolution of the 1960s and 70s, transitioning CIMMYT to internationalisation [12]. Several winter wheat breeding programs have adopted shuttle breeding, for example, the material is shuttled from breeding programs in North America and Northern Europe to New Zealand [13]. The Japanese breeding program initiated shuttle breeding in the 1970s, taking advantage of the wide variation in latitude [14]. Shortly after the emergence of Ug99, a modified shuttle breeding program was implemented by CIMMYT and partners to incorporate screening of the highly virulent race of stem rust in Noro, Kenya [15]. A similar application of shuttle breeding that incorporates selection for biotic and abiotic stresses has been implemented at the International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA). For instance, winter × spring crosses are generated at Terbol Station, Lebanon (34° N; 36° E, 900 m.a.s.l.) during winter and summer and the segregating F2 material is shuttled to Sids station (29° N; 31° E, 32.2 m.a.s.l.) in Egypt during winter for early yield potential trials, the F3 material is then shuttled to Kulumsa (08° N; 39° E, 2220 m.a.s.l.) in Ethiopia during summer for rust screening, and finally, the F4 segregating populations are shuttled to Merchouch station (33.6° N; 6.7° W, 430 m.a.s.l) in Morocco during the winter season and screened for insect tolerance and disease resistance [11]. This process can generate broadly adapted inbred lines enriched with target traits prior to yield testing, thus assisting the development of robust cultivars for farmers.
3.2 Doubled Haploid Technology
A doubled haploid genotype is created when the chromosomes in haploid cells (n) are doubled. DH wheat was first developed by culturing immature haploid pollen and generating diploid homozygous plants using Colchicine (Fig. 30.3). However, this technique is limited due to several factors related to growth conditions of the donor plants, their genetic stability and anther-culture ability, resulting in a low success rate to regenerate healthy and green DH plants [9]. This has led to the search for alternative and high-throughput routes for developing DH plants more suited to applications into breeding programs. Chromosome elimination of wide crosses, such as the cross between wheat and maize (Zea mays L.), was first trialled by Zenkteler and Nitzsche [16]. Following pollination, maize chromosomes are eliminated during cell division and the haploid wheat is induced and the chromosomes are doubled using Colchicine. This technique requires less effort and tripled the success rate, providing a DH production system that is more suitable for breeding purposes. The success of this technique is underpinned by high efficiency and low genotype specificity in comparison to the anther-culture technique. The technology of DH has been integrated into many global largely winter wheat breeding programs which required the upscaling of DH production and the development of a large number of individuals necessary to increase the rate of genetic gain. The advantage of this technology is that the breeding cycle is significantly shortened due to the efficiency in developing inbred lines. The DH homozygous lines could be available for evaluation and breeding within two generations in comparison to six generations or more when using traditional self-pollination methods in the field [11] (Fig. 30.1). Despite the breakthrough in accelerating breeding cycles by rapidly developing homozygous lines, DH technology has drawbacks when implemented in breeding programs. For example, it does not allow evaluation and selection for important traits during the early segregating generations of a classical inbred line development approach. The technique requires specialised labs, is quite labour intensive and requires a high level of experience. Furthermore, there is often significant variability in successfully producing DH lines, due to the genotype dependency. However, the main limitation for DH technology to become a mainstream tool in wheat breeding programs is cost. For example, if a large-scale wheat breeding program were to generate 40,000 DH lines, at a very conservative rate of US $15 per line, it would cost US $600,000. Notably, the cost of DH production for wheat can be even higher, up to US $50 per line (see Chap. 5). Despite this, DH technology is common in breeding programs in Europe and the UK, due to the strong vernalisation requirement of winter wheat that extends generation turnover time. On the other hand, for spring wheat DH technology has been largely adopted in research and pre-breeding programs for QTL mapping studies.
3.3 Speed Breeding
SB involves growing plant populations under controlled environmental conditions that are conducive to early flowering and generation advance. The concept was inspired by research funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) at Utah State University in the 1980s, which explored the possibility of growing a fast crop of wheat on space stations [8]. This research resulted in the development of ‘USU-Apogee’ wheat which can flower within 25 days after sowing when grown under 23°C and continuous light [17]. In 2003, researchers at the University of Queensland coined the name SB, and the technique was first applied to wheat breeding for fast-tracking the introgression of yellow spot resistance. With advances in science and technology over the last few decades, techniques for SB crops have evolved [8]. In particular, advances in light-emitting diodes (LED) technology have led to the widespread availability of affordable grow-lights that provide healthy and efficient plant growth in controlled environment facilities. SB regimes that use LED lighting systems have been developed for a range of long-day or short-day crops [18]. Furthermore, LED lights with ‘tunable’ wavelengths are now available, opening the door for optimising wavelengths to further manipulate plant growth, such as plant height and flowering [19]. This technology has reduced energy consumption and costs, but also facilitated the delivery of optimal light quality in fully controlled SB facilities, resulting in improved plant growth, increased quality and enhanced seed production. SB facilities can take many shapes and forms, including growth cabinets for small-scale research, and modified glasshouses or warehouses with multi-tiered growing spaces for large-scale programs. In glasshouses fitted with supplemental lighting systems, sensor technologies coupled with automated systems can adjust the light intensity depending on the cloud cover, sky luminance and radiation. This provides an integrated light control system to promote flowering, maximise growth rate, and importantly, minimise costs associated with generation turnover.
Speed breeding enables wheat researchers and breeders to grow up to 4–6 generations per year instead of 1–3 generations in the field or under regular glasshouse conditions. Protocols have been made available [20], including a step-by-step guide for establishing large-scale facilities [18]. Exposing plants to extended photoperiods (22 h light, 2 h day) and controlled temperatures (22/17 °C, day/night) respectively, promotes early flowering and seed formation. A common feature in many rapid generation advance methods is embryo rescue, which is a laborious process. However, it is possible to avoid the need for embryo rescue using a pretreatment to break seed dormancy (e.g. 4 °C for 3 days) and achieve high germination rates [18]. For example, to short-cut generation time, spikes can be harvested green (just 2 weeks post flowering) and placed into an air-forced dehydrator at 35 °C for 3 days to artificially mature and dry the seed prior to re-sowing. The premature harvest technique is very effective when applied on a small scale, making it suitable for research and pre-breeding activities. However, for large-scale wheat breeding programs, harvest at maturity is preferred because it avoids the need for multiple harvests for populations that are typically segregating for flowering time, and as such minimises labour (Fig. 30.4). To hasten maturity, water supply can be reduced after flowering to enable harvest approximately 4 weeks later [18].
In addition to accelerating breeding cycles, SB can be used to fast-track research and pre-breeding outcomes. The tool is particularly useful to accelerate the development of populations suitable for trait dissection and mapping QTL for important traits. For example, nested-association mapping populations (NAM) suitable for dissecting drought adaptive traits were rapidly generated using SB at The University of Queensland, requiring only 18 months from crossing to development of F4-derived lines [21]. To support trait screening and selection for pre-breeding applications, a number of protocols have been developed for disease resistance traits, such as wheat rusts [22], yellow spot [23] and crown rot [24]. These techniques incorporate rapid generation advance and enable screening of large segregating populations all year round. Selected plants can be advanced to develop inbred lines or backcrossed to elite parents for trait introgression. When selection is applied in early generations, the resulting inbred lines are enriched with desirable allelic combinations, which enables more targeted and efficient field testing. To support breeding, SB can reduce the number of years required for trait dissection and introgression of new traits into elite genetic backgrounds.
The key to integrating SB into a large-scale wheat breeding program is establishing cost-effective facilities and streamlining operations. With this in mind, SB facilities have been established by private wheat breeding companies, as well as public breeding and research centres, such as CIMMYT and ICARDA. Reducing the cost per plant is important, which ultimately reduces the cost per line development through the SB facility. Ghosh et al. [18] provide detailed protocols and advice for scaling-up wheat SB protocols, including growing plants at high density (e.g. 1000 plants/m2). Such techniques can enable wheat breeding programs to generate large populations in a cost-effective manner. Other important considerations include designing low-cost and energy efficient infrastructure, adopting automation where possible (e.g. automated irrigation systems), and streamlining operations.
3.4 Genomic Selection
The implementation of GS is outlined in Chap. 5. This method was initially developed and applied to accelerate genetic gain in animal breeding. The method is based on statistical models that can predict the genetic merit of individuals based on high-resolution genome profiles, before they are tested in the field. The genetic merit of a genotype, mostly referred to as the genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV), is calculated by simultaneously estimating genome-wide DNA marker effects and then summing them for each individual. Individuals with the highest GEBV can then be selected either for extensive field evaluation or to be used as parents in the next breeding cycle [25]. The method requires a training population where the individuals within the population are phenotyped for the traits of interest and genotyped using high-density DNA markers. By combining the genetic makeup of individuals in the training population and their phenotypes, a statistical model that can estimate the association between markers and quantitative traits is initiated. It is then used to predict GEBV of genotypes in the ‘selection candidates’ that have only been genotyped using the same genome-wide DNA markers [26].
Several growing seasons are usually required for testing breeding material under different environments in conventional breeding methods, with a risk of inaccurate selection due to genotype-by-environment interaction [27]. One strategy by which GS models can help overcome this issue is to incorporate proxy traits that explain an additional amount of the phenotypic variation observed for the target trait. Incorporating such traits in GS models has been shown to improve GEBV prediction [5]. This enables a more accurate selection of superior genotypes with the desired combination of alleles without the need for phenotyping. Besides prioritising genotypes for further field testing based on their GEBV, a recurrent GS method could be applied during early generations of the line development phase. For example, recurrent GS could be used at F2 or even F1 generation to select candidates for intercrossing. This would enable more rapid enrichment of populations with desired alleles (e.g. [26, 28]). Thereafter, further shortcutting the testing phase and accelerating the breeding cycle is possible, unlike in conventional breeding methods. The shift from phenotypic selection to GS has resulted in saving resources and time. For example, GEBVs can be obtained in 2 years when GS is applied, instead of 5 years in conventional breeding [4]. In addition to shortening the breeding cycle and improving selection accuracy, GS has increased the rate of genetic gain in breeding programs by increasing selection intensity. This is possible when the number of tested lines is boosted due to reduction in replication [8]. This approach has been implemented in wheat breeding programs around the globe [27]. However, application of GS in plant breeding programs has experienced a significant shift from single-trait/single-site prediction models to multi-trait/multi-site models which incorporate genotype-by-environment effects. The shift to more complex models has enabled more accurate predictions of phenotypes which have been sparsely collected in multiple environments [29]. GS is usually applied to quantitative traits governed by a large number of genes, such as drought adaptive traits [5], grain quality [30] and grain yield [31]. Furthermore, GS has been applied to proxy traits such as flowering time, which has high heritability, is easy to measure, and has a significant impact on yield [32]. GS has been shown to be powerful for improving resistance to fusarium head blight and stem rust in wheat using large historical datasets [33]. In the early stages of GS application, research largely focused on improving selection accuracy based on optimised prediction models by accounting for variation caused by genotype-by-environment interaction in the models [34]. More recently, high-throughput phenotyping platforms that generate very large datasets, such as unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) platforms, have been used for improving GS models with enhanced accuracies [35]. GS has shifted from being the focus of research to being widely adopted into wheat breeding programs in both private and public sectors. This is due to several factors including advances in molecular biotechnology, a dramatic decrease in genotyping cost and the development of bioinformatic tools that can efficiently calculate GEBVs for very large datasets [4].
4 Integrating Breeding Technologies
A radical change and redesign of breeding programs incorporating advanced technologies holds the key to improving yield potential for our future wheat varieties. Breeding tools such as, DH, SB and GS have great potential for accelerating breeding cycles, however, their implementation on an industrial scale in mainstream wheat breeding programs is yet to see the light of day. As detailed in Sects. 30.2 and 30.3, these breeding tools can play an instrumental role in accelerating breeding cycles. Implementation of these technologies in early stages of breeding cycles enables rapid production of homozygous lines enriched with desired allele combination for field testing.
The process of DH line development usually requires two years and an additional year of self-pollination for increasing sufficient seed necessary for field trials. The rapid development of DH lines could be possible when SB is integrated at different stages of DH production systems. For example, parental lines used for haploid induction could be grown under SB. Furthermore, SB technology could be used during the self-pollination stage following chromosome doubling and the additional generation for seed bulking. The integration of SB into the DH system facilitates shortcutting time to further accelerate breeding cycles.
The adoption of GS enables the identification of superior individuals based on their GEBV, either for advanced yield testing or as parents used for crossing in the next breeding cycle [8]. The integration of GS in breeding programs has thus resulted in the emergence of highly productive wheat cultivars in a shorter time. Notably, combining these technologies targeting different stages of the breeding cycle may have an additional impact on the rate of genetic gain. For example, integrating high throughput phenotyping with GS methods has been shown to improve efficiency and outcomes for both methods [5]. GS is also employed for detecting and stacking the best haplotypes using parents with optimal genetic variation used for DH line development [36]. Implementation of SB and GS has demonstrated significant increases in the rate of genetic gain when applied separately in the breeding programs. However, combining these two technologies may result in a larger effect on shortening time required for completing a breeding cycle (Fig. 30.1). Despite the potential advantages of combining these technologies, it is yet to be employed in existing breeding programs.
To explore the potential, simulation studies have been performed. The study by Voss-Fels et al. [37] compared the rate of genetic gain for four breeding strategies, including traditional phenotypic selection, GS, the combination of SB and GS (SpeedGS), and SpeedGS with introduced diversity. Overall, genetic merit for grain yield was used to determine the amount of gain that could be achieved by implementing the different breeding tools in isolation or in combination. The results concluded that significant gains were possible using all strategies, however, breeding schemes that implemented SpeedGS displayed a 34% increase in the rate of genetic gain per unit of time when compared to conventional breeding [37]. In these simulations GS was only used to identify improved lines in the breeding cycle for advanced field testing, however, the use of GS in a rapid recurrent selection framework has been shown to hold huge potential for substantially increasing genetic gain [19, 28]. Despite these promising results from combining SB and GS, adoption of these tools by breeding programs needs further investigation. Further empirical and simulation studies are needed to determine a suitable pathway in which these technologies could be applied in the most efficient and cost-effective way to maximise investment return.
5 Key Concepts
This chapter has outlined (1) key strategies and advanced technologies that can reduce the length of a breeding cycle, (2) opportunities to integrate these technologies to further accelerate genetic gain. Widespread adoption of these enabling tools in public and private wheat breeding programs would enhance breeding efficiency and support global food security.
6 Conclusions
Crop production must increase by 50% by 2050 to meet the future demand for food. Adoption of precision farming systems that use cutting-edge technology to optimise management practices, such as fertiliser, pest and disease management will assist in meeting this goal. Most importantly, plant breeding aimed at improving the genetics of crop varieties with high performance in the face of abiotic and biotic challenges will help secure increments in crop production at a global scale. However, the development of resilient crop varieties requires a huge investment and is notoriously slow. In order to speed up the process, redesign and transformation of crop breeding programs is required. Fortunately, plant breeders now have at their disposal technologies that could become a game-changer and transform traditional plant breeding to being significantly more cost-effective and efficient in releasing high yielding and stable varieties. Employing SB, DH, high-throughput phenotyping platforms and GS in breeding programs has advantages, but could be further exploited by integrating these tools at different stages of research and breeding programs; from trait discovery to rapid introgression and population improvement, field testing and release of new cultivars. Fusing these technologies into our existing breeding programs will play a key role in rapidly improving future wheat crops.
References
Reynolds MP, Hays D, Chapman S (2010) Breeding for adaptation to heat and drought stress. In: Climate change and crop production. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 71–91
Bentley A, Mackay I (2017) Advances in wheat breeding techniques. In: Langridge P (ed) Achieving sustainable cultivation of wheat: breeding, quality traits, pests and diseases. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, Cambridge, pp 53–76
Araus JL, Kefauver SC, Zaman-Allah M, Olsen MS, Cairns JE (2018) Translating high-throughput phenotyping into genetic gain. Trends Plant Sci 23:451–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2018.02.001
Bassi FM, Bentley AR, Charmet G, Ortiz R, Crossa J (2016) Breeding schemes for the implementation of genomic selection in wheat (Triticum spp.). Plant Sci 242:23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.08.021
Rutkoski J, Poland J, Mondal S, Autrique E, Pérez LG, Crossa J, Reynolds M, Singh R (2016) Canopy temperature and vegetation Indices from high-throughput phenotyping improve accuracy of pedigree and genomic selection for grain yield in wheat. G3 6:2799–2808. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.032888
Edwards SM, Buntjer JB, Jackson R, Bentley AR, Lage J, Byrne E, Burt C, Jack P, Berry S, Flatman E, Poupard B, Smith S, Hayes C, Gaynor RC, Gorjanc G, Howell P, Ober E, Mackay IJ, Hickey JM (2019) The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 132:1943–1952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03327-y
Ortiz R, Trethowan R, Ferrara GO, Iwanaga M, Dodds JH, Crouch JH, Crossa J, Braun H-J (2007) High yield potential, shuttle breeding, genetic diversity, and a new international wheat improvement strategy. Euphytica 157:365–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9375-9
Hickey LT, Hafeez AN, Robinson H, Jackson SA, Leal-Bertioli SCM, Tester M, Gao C, Godwin ID, Hayes BJ, Wulff BBH (2019) Breeding crops to feed 10 billion. Nat Biotechnol 37:744–754. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0152-9
Srivastava P, Bains NS (2018) Accelerated wheat breeding: doubled haploids and rapid generation advance. In: Gosal SS, Wani SH (eds) Biotechnologies of crop improvement, volume 1: cellular approaches. Springer, Cham, pp 437–461
Borlaug NE (2007) Sixty-two years of fighting hunger: personal recollections. Euphytica 157:287–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9480-9
Tadesse W, Sanchez-Garcia M, Assefa SG, Amri A, Bishaw Z, Ogbonnaya FC, Baum M (2019) Genetic gains in wheat breeding and its role in feeding the world. Crop Breed Genet Genomics 1:e190005. https://doi.org/10.20900/cbgg20190005
Rajaram S (1995) Wheat breeding at CIMMYT: commemorating 50 years of research in Mexico for global wheat improvement. In: Wheat breeding at CIMMYT. CIMMYT, Ciudad Obregón, p 162
Ikeguchi S (2002) Present state of study for spring wheat breeding in canada and USA. Hokunou
Nonaka S (1979) Present state and problem of wheat and barley breeding with rapid generation advance. Recent Adv Breed 20:102–107
Singh RP, Herrera-Foessel S, Huerta-Espino J, Singh S, Bhavani S, Lan C, Basnet BR (2014) Progress towards genetics and breeding for minor genes based resistance to Ug99 and other rusts in CIMMYT high-yielding spring wheat. J Integr Agric 13:255–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60649-8
Zenkteler M, Nitzsche W (1984) Wide hybridization experiments in cereals. Theor Appl Genet 68:311–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00267883
Bugbee B, Koerner G (1997) Yield comparisons and unique characteristics of the dwarf wheat cultivar ‘USU-Apogee’. Adv Sp Res 20:1891–1894. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00856-9
Ghosh S, Watson A, Gonzalez-Navarro OE, Ramirez-Gonzalez RH, Yanes L, Mendoza-Suárez M, Simmonds J, Wells R, Rayner T, Green P, Hafeez A, Hayta S, Melton RE, Steed A, Sarkar A, Carter J, Perkins L, Lord J, Tester M, Osbourn A, Moscou MJ, Nicholson P, Harwood W, Martin C, Domoney C, Uauy C, Hazard B, Wulff BBH, Hickey LT (2018) Speed breeding in growth chambers and glasshouses for crop breeding and model plant research. Nat Protoc 13:2944–2963. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0072-z
Bhatta M, Sandro P, Smith MR, Delaney O, Voss-Fels KP, Gutierrez L, Hickey LT (2021) Need for speed: manipulating plant growth to accelerate breeding cycles. Curr Opin Plant Biol 60:101986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2020.101986
Watson A, Ghosh S, Williams MJ, Cuddy WS, Simmonds J, Rey MD, Asyraf Md Hatta M, Hinchliffe A, Steed A, Reynolds D, Adamski NM, Breakspear A, Korolev A, Rayner T, Dixon LE, Riaz A, Martin W, Ryan M, Edwards D, Batley J, Raman H, Carter J, Rogers C, Domoney C, Moore G, Harwood W, Nicholson P, Dieters MJ, Delacy IH, Zhou J, Uauy C, Boden SA, Park RF, Wulff BBH, Hickey LT (2018) Speed breeding is a powerful tool to accelerate crop research and breeding. Nat Plants 4:23–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-017-0083-8
Alahmad S, El Hassouni K, Bassi FM, Dinglasan E, Youssef C, Quarry G, Aksoy A, Mazzucotelli E, Juhász A, Able JA, Christopher J, Voss-Fels KP, Hickey LT (2019) A major root architecture QTL responding to water limitation in Durum wheat. Front Plant Sci 10:436. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00436
Riaz A, Hickey LT (2017) Rapid phenotyping adult plant resistance to stem rust in wheat grown under controlled conditions. In: Periyannan S (ed) Wheat rust diseases: methods and protocols. Springer, New York, pp 183–196
Dinglasan E, Godwin ID, Mortlock MY, Hickey LT (2016) Resistance to yellow spot in wheat grown under accelerated growth conditions. Euphytica 209:693–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1660-z
Alahmad S, Dinglasan E, Leung KM, Riaz A, Derbal N, Voss-Fels KP, Able JA, Bassi FM, Christopher J, Hickey LT (2018) Speed breeding for multiple quantitative traits in durum wheat. Plant Methods 14:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-018-0302-y
Crossa J, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Cuevas J, Montesinos-López O, Jarquín D, de los Campos G, Burgueño J, Camacho-González JM, Pérez-Elizalde S, Beyene Y, Dreisigacker S, Singh R, Zhang X, Gowda M, Roorkiwal M, Rutkoski J, Varshney RK (2017) Genomic selection in plant breeding: methods, models, and perspectives. Trends Plant Sci xx:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2017.08.011
Heffner EL, Sorrells ME, Jannink J-L (2009) Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci 49:1–12. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0512
Larkin DL, Lozada DN, Mason RE (2019) Genomic selection—considerations for successful implementation in wheat breeding programs. Agronomy 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9090479
Gaynor RC, Gorjanc G, Bentley AR, Ober ES, Howell P, Jackson R, Mackay IJ, Hickey JM (2017) A two-part strategy for using genomic selection to develop inbred lines. Crop Sci 57:2372–2386. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2016.09.0742
Ward BP, Brown-Guedira G, Tyagi P, Kolb FL, Van Sanford DA, Sneller CH, Griffey CA (2019) Multienvironment and multitrait genomic selection models in unbalanced early-generation wheat yield trials. Crop Sci 59:491–507. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2018.03.0189
Hayes BJ, Panozzo J, Walker CK, Choy AL, Kant S, Wong D, Tibbits J, Daetwyler HD, Rochfort S, Hayden MJ, Spangenberg GC (2017) Accelerating wheat breeding for end-use quality with multi-trait genomic predictions incorporating near infrared and nuclear magnetic resonance-derived phenotypes. Theor Appl Genet 130:2505–2519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-017-2972-7
Sun J, Poland JA, Mondal S, Crossa J, Juliana P, Singh RP, Rutkoski JE, Jannink J-L, Crespo-Herrera L, Velu G, Huerta-Espino J, Sorrells ME (2019) High-throughput phenotyping platforms enhance genomic selection for wheat grain yield across populations and cycles in early stage. Theor Appl Genet 132:1705–1720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03309-0
Thavamanikumar S, Dolferus R, Thumma BR (2015) Comparison of genomic selection models to predict flowering time and spike grain number in two hexaploid wheat doubled haploid populations. G3 5:1991–1998. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.115.019745
Rutkoski J, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, Bhavani S, Poland J, Jannink JL, Sorrells ME (2015) Efficient use of historical data for genomic selection: a case study of stem rust resistance in wheat. Plant Genome 8. :plantgenome2014.09.0046. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2014.09.0046
Lopez-Cruz M, Crossa J, Bonnett D, Dreisigacker S, Poland J, Jannink J-L, Singh RP, Autrique E, de los Campos G (2015) Increased prediction accuracy in wheat breeding trials using a marker × environment interaction genomic selection model. G3 5:569–582. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.114.016097
Lozada DN, Carter AH (2020) Genomic selection in winter wheat breeding using a recommender approach. Genes (Basel) 11:779. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11070779
Daetwyler HD, Hayden MJ, Spangenberg GC, Hayes BJ (2015) Selection on optimal haploid value increases genetic gain and preserves more genetic diversity relative to genomic selection. Genetics 200:1341–1348. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.178038
Voss-Fels KP, Herzog E, Dreisigacker S, Sukumaran S, Watson A, Frisch M, Hayes B, Hickey LT (2019) “SpeedGS” to accelerate genetic gain in spring wheat. In: Miedaner T, Korzun V (eds) Applications of genetic and genomic research in cereals. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 303–327
Acknowledgments
The authors give thanks to the Grain Research and Development Corporation of Australia for a Postdoctoral Research Fellowship (9177334) to SA, and a PhD scholarship (9176855) to CR. The authors would like to acknowledge Jon Falk from SU Biotec for providing images used to create Fig 30.3. and BioRender (BioRender.com), which was used to create Fig. 30.4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alahmad, S., Rambla, C., Voss-Fels, K.P., Hickey, L.T. (2022). Accelerating Breeding Cycles. In: Reynolds, M.P., Braun, HJ. (eds) Wheat Improvement. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90673-3_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90673-3_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90672-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90673-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)