Skip to main content

Critical Reflections on 25 Years of Using Prefabrication and Modularisation in UK Construction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Manufacturing Processes, Intelligent Methods and Systems in Production Engineering (GCMM 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 335))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 913 Accesses

Abstract

Over 25 years the author undertook, in their role as construction planner at Tier 1 UK contractors, planning, programme management, and progress monitoring of offsite manufactured, prefabricated, and modularised elements on new-build construction projects between £0.5M and £100.0M. Based on empirical evidence, this study draws on personal experience in an industry grappling with modern methods of construction between 1995 and the present day, including involvement in the AMEC Education schools programme in the early 2000s to development of a prefabrication and modular process framework for BAM Construction (North West) almost 20 years later. A considerable lack of expertise is apparent within Government, associated bodies, and professional institutes, when it comes to applying knowledge and learning to the productivity problem, and offsite construction in particular. With a clear aim to provide a reflective account of P&M efficacy to explore value in programme delivery, the paper draws authentic experience into a research environment to allow an informed contribution to the topical conversation around offsite manufacturing, prefabrication, and modularisation, and debates its reputation as a panacea for construction’s productivity challenge. The study critically reviews 35 examples of offsite construction, including precast frames, structural timber frames, prefabricated steel roof trusses, pre-assembled brickwork panels, prefabricated mechanical and electrical service modules (corridors and risers), hotel bathroom pods, fully modular offices, unitised glazed facades, package pumping stations, and attenuation tanks. Offsite manufacturing, prefabrication, and modularisation are used with some degree of success in the construction industry, however inefficiencies are common due to haphazard allocation plus a tendency to utilise on sections of work that possess programme float. The presumption that offsite, prefabrication, and modular is always good all of the time is flawed, creates a false sense of project success, and denies the chance to honestly appraise and maximise its potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Egan, J.: Rethinking construction. Department of the Environment. Transport and the Regions (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Farmer, M.: Modernise or Die. Construction Leadership Council, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gibb, A.G.F.: Off-site Fabrication: Prefabrication, Pre-Assembly and Modularisation. Wiley, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goodier, C., Gibb, A.: Future opportunities for offsite in the UK. Constr. Manag. Econ. 25(6), 585–595 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goodier, C., Gibb, A., Mancini, M., Turck, C., Gjepali, O., Daniels, E.: Modularisation and offsite in engineering construction: an early decision-support tool. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. Civil Eng. 172(6), 3–14 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Green, B.: Productivity in Construction: Creating a Framework for the Industry to Thrive. Chartered Institute of Building, Bracknell (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. HM Government: Industrial strategy: government and industry in partnership. Construction 2025 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. HM Government: Industrial strategy: building a Britain fit for the future. Government White Paper (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. HM Government. Industrial strategy: Construction sector deal. HM Government, UK (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Housing (Temporary Accommodation) Act 1944

    Google Scholar 

  11. Latham, S M.: Constructing the team (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Barbosa, F., et al.: Reinventing Construction through a Productivity Revolution. McKinsey Global Institute, Washington, D.C. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. National Audit Office. Modernising construction (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Siebert, M., Rodrigues, L., Gillott, M., Hines, E., Rich, D.: Identifying the barriers to change in the UK housebuilding industry. Fut. Cities Environ. 4(1), 13 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smith, RE.: Prefab Architecture: A Guide to Modular Design and Construction. Wiley, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Steinhardt, D.A., Manley, K.: Adoption of prefabricated housing–the role of country context. Sustain. Cities Soc. 22, 126–135 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Trinder, B.: The first Iron bridges. Ind. Archaeol. Rev. 3(2), 112–121 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Trinder, B.: Ditherington Flax Mill, Shrewsbury—a re-evaluation. Text. Hist. 23(2), 189–223 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wolstenholme, A., et al.: Never Waste a Good Crisis: A Review of Progress since Rethinking Construction and Thoughts for Our Future, Constructing Excellence, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Woudhuysen, J., Abley, I.: Why Is Construction So Backward? Wiley Academy, Hoboken (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Pickavance .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pickavance, N. (2022). Critical Reflections on 25 Years of Using Prefabrication and Modularisation in UK Construction. In: Batako, A., Burduk, A., Karyono, K., Chen, X., Wyczółkowski, R. (eds) Advances in Manufacturing Processes, Intelligent Methods and Systems in Production Engineering. GCMM 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 335. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90532-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics