Skip to main content

A Usage Model to Enrich MDSEA Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise Interoperability IX (I-ESA 2020)

Abstract

An information system supports the actors’ activities of an organization. Thus, the implementation of a new digital tool is a process of mutual transformation between organization and technology, involving changes on several dimensions. More specifically, its implementation has an impact on the practices of the actors, resulting in significant changes that can be “positive” and/or “negative” for the actors and their work activities. Our work intends to support these changes to improve interoperability projects based on MDSEA approach and encourage so-called positive changes, while facilitating the implementation of new IT solutions. We propose to understand both the variability of organizational change and the tool enhancements. Thus, we propose a usage model to characterize individuals’ “usages” and their variability and show that this model only makes sense if it fits into a broader, user-centred approach to explore existing, potential, and desired practices. We illustrate the implementation of the model and its ability to represent usage cases of a home care structure digitizing the care record.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bricon-Souf, N., Anceaux, F., Bennani, N., Dufresne, E., & Watbled, L. (2005). A distributed coordination platform for home care: Analysis, framework and prototype. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74, 809–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Leonard-Barton, D. (1988). Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy, 17(5), 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lynn Crawford, J. P. (2004). Hard and soft projects: A framework for analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, D. (2014). A set of templates for MDSEA. In Workshop on model driven services engineering architecture (MDSEA): A result of MSEE Project. Enschede.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Merlo C., Vicien G., & Ducq, Y. (2014). Interoperability modelling methodology for product design organisations. International Journal of Production Research, 52(15), 100–120, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.774484.

  6. Object Management Group, “MDA Guide Version 1.0” document number: omg/2003–05, http://www.omg.org/mda/mda_files/MDA_Guide_Version1-0.pdf.

  7. INTEROP NoE: Deliverable DTG 2.3—Report on Model Driven Interoperability (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Doumeingts, G., & Ducq, Y. (2001). Enterprise modelling techniques to improve efficiency of enterprises. International Journal of Production Planning and Control, 12(2), 146–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ammenwerth, E., Iller, C., & Mahler, C. (2006). IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 6(3).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burton-Jones, A., & Gallivan, M. J. (2007). Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: A multilevel perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 657–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fidock, J., & Carroll, J. (2012). Theorizing about the life cycle of IT Use: An appropriation perspective. In D. N. Hart & S. D. Gregor (Eds.), Information systems foundations: Theory building in information systems (pp. 79–112). ANU E Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lorenzi, N. M., & Riley, R. T. (2003). International Journal of Medical Informatics, 69, 197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Crampton, N. J. (1998).Preventing Waste at the Source. CRC Press. ISBN 10: 1566703174.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Borgiel, K., Merlo, C., & Minel, S. (2015). A multi-level activity analysis for home healthcare ICT tool redesign. In C. Weber, S. Husung, G. Cascini, M. Cantamessa, D. Marjanovic, & M. Bordegoni (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 2015) (Vol. 1, pp. 475–484). Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lyytinen, K., & Newman, M. (2008). Explaining information systems change: A punctuated socio-technical change model. European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 589–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Merlo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Merlo, C., Pilnière, V., Borgiel, K. (2023). A Usage Model to Enrich MDSEA Approach. In: Archimède, B., Ducq, Y., Young, B., Karray, H. (eds) Enterprise Interoperability IX. I-ESA 2020. Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90387-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90387-9_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90386-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90387-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics