Skip to main content

A Pilot Study of Using Brain-Computer Interfaces in Classrooms for Promoting Formal Educational Activities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2021, Volume 3 (FTC 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 360))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) are known for their power to change people’s beliefs about themselves. They have a unique ability to “look into one’s thoughts,” which often motivates users to perform certain actions and behaviours. This motivational aspect could be useful to formal education, as teachers are constantly looking for novel technologies to keep students motivated, engaged, and creative. In this paper we explore the potential of an Electroencephalography (EEG)-based BCI system to improve the academic performance of young students. We conducted a study at a middle school in an “educational priority zone” in France with 28 6th grade students divided into two groups. We compared the standard science course they learn from to its “enhanced” version, which incorporated the BCI system. Our results show that the group who underwent the “enhanced” course obtained better results (average grade 7,15/9 vs 6,03/9 for control group). We further discuss the possibility for BCIs to become effective tools to promote the formal educational activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this study we mainly cite European Union reports and the reports related to education in France, as the study took place in French college.

  2. 2.

    https://nathalie-soetaert.canoprof.fr/eleve/6G2 - in French.

References

  1. Millán, J.R., Mouriño, J.: Asynchronous BCI and local neural classifiers: An overview of the adaptive brain interface project. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 11(2), 159–161 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2003.814435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Farwell, L.A., Donchin, E.: Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related potentials. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 70, 510–523 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Moore, M., Tomori, O.: The neurally controllable internet browser (BrainBrowser). In: CHI 2003 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA 2003), pp. 796–797. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2003). https://doi.org/10.1145/765891.765997

  4. Lecuyer, A., Lotte, F., Reilly, R.B., Leeb, R., Hirose, M., Slater, M.: Brain-computer interfaces, virtual reality, and videogames. Computer 41(10), 66–72 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2008.410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kosmyna, N.: Brain-computer interfaces in the wild: lessons learned from a large-scale deployment. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 4161–4168 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2019.8913928

  6. Kosmyna, N., Tarpin-Bernard, F., Rivet, B.: Towards brain computer interfaces for recreational activities: piloting a drone. In: Abascal, J., Barbosa, S., Fetter, M., Gross, T., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2015. LNCS, vol. 9296, pp. 506–522. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22701-6_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Kosmyna, N., Tarpin-Bernard, F., Rivet, B.: Conceptual priming for in-game BCI training. ACM Trans. Comput.-Human Interact. 22(5), 1–25 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2808228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zuckerman, O., Arida, S., Resnick, M.: Extending tangible interfaces for education: digital montessori-inspired manipulatives. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2005), pp. 859–868. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2005). https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055093

  9. Resnick, M., et al.: Digital manipulatives: new toys to think with. In: Clare-Marie, K., Lund, A., Coutaz, J., Karat, J. (Eds.) Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1998), pp. 281–287. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA (1998). https://doi.org/10.1145/274644.274684

  10. Key Data on Learning and Innovation through ICT at Schools in Europe (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lechelt, Z., Rogers, Y., Marquardt, N., Shum, V.: ConnectUs: a new toolkit for teaching about the internet of things. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA 2016), pp. 3711–3714. ACM, New York, NY, USA, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2890241

  12. Social and Migratory Inequalities at School. Report (2016). http://www.cnesco.fr/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/1610927_Rapport_Cnesco_Inegalites-4.pdf

  13. Survey of schools: ICT in Education, First report (2013). https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/survey-schools-ict-education

  14. 2nd Survey of Schools: ICT in Education (2019). https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/2nd-survey-schools-ict-education

  15. OECD: Innovating Education and Educating for Innovation: The Power of Digital Technologies and Skills. OECD Publishing, Paris (2016). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264265097-en

  16. A teacher in France: a solitary profession? Report (2013). https://www.oecd.org/fr/edu/scolaire/France-DEPP_NI_2014_23_TALIS_2013_Enseignant_France_metier_solitaire_333502.pdf

  17. Kosmyna, N., Gross, A., Maes, P.: The thinking cap 2.0: preliminary study on fostering growth mindset of children by means of electroencephalography and perceived magic using artifacts from fictional sci-fi universes. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference (IDC 2020). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 458–469 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3392063.3394424

  18. Kosmyna, N., Scheirer, C., Maes, P.: The thinking cap: fostering growth mindset of children by means of electroencephalography and perceived magic of harry potter universe. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 242, pp. 1–6 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451732

  19. Horn, M.S., Solovey, E.T., Jordan Crouser, R. Jacob, R.J.K.: Comparing the use of tangible and graphical programming languages for informal science education. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2009), pp. 975–984. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518851

  20. Zuckerman, O., Resnick, M.: A physical interface for system dynamics simulation. In: CHI 2003 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA 2003). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 810–811 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1145/765891.766005

  21. Fleck, S., Baraudon, C., Frey, J., Lainé, T., Hachet, M.: “Teegi, il est trop beau”: Exemple d’évaluation du potentiel pédagogique d’une interface tangible interactive pour enfants en contexte scolaire. In: AFIHM. 29ème conférence francophone sur l’Interaction Homme-Machine, Aug 2017, Poitiers, France. ACM, IHM-2017, p. 12, (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sphero website. http://www.sphero.com/starwars/bb8

  23. Emotiv website. https://www.emotiv.com/epoc/

  24. Kosmyna, N., Tarpin-Bernard, F., Rivet, B.: Adding human learning in brain--computer interfaces (BCIs): towards a practical control modality. ACM Trans. Comput.-Human Interact. 22(3), 1–37 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2723162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Baude, D., Jusserand, Y., Sache, M.: “Sciences et Technologie”, 6e * Manuel de l'élève. Edition Bordas (2016). http://www.editions-bordas.fr/ouvrage/sciences-et-technologie-6e-manuel-numerique-eleve-ed-2016

  26. Canoprof website. https://www.reseau-canope.fr

  27. Roboprog websit. http://www.physicsbox.com/indexrobotprogen.html

  28. OpenBCI. https://openbci.com

  29. Unicorn headset. https://www.unicorn-bi.com

  30. Mbot website. http://www.a4.fr/automatisme-et-robotique/automatisme-et-robots-avec-picaxe/mbot.html

  31. Thymio website. https://www.thymio.org/en:thymio

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nataliya Kosmyna .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kosmyna, N., Soetaert, N., Scheirer, C. (2022). A Pilot Study of Using Brain-Computer Interfaces in Classrooms for Promoting Formal Educational Activities. In: Arai, K. (eds) Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2021, Volume 3. FTC 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 360. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89912-7_46

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics