Skip to main content

Comparison Between Filtering Estimation with Evidence and Prediction Filtering Without Evidence to Predict a Robot Localization States

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics 2021 (AISI 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies ((LNDECT,volume 100))

  • 661 Accesses

Abstract

Today, robotics has experienced a very interesting technological revolution, given the diversity of applications that use autonomous robots in several areas, such as mining exploration. However, prediction with great precision of robot localizations remains a research subject that is always in continuous improvement. In this context, our study consists of a robot, which can move within an area of 15 tiles. It is equipped with a sensing system, which detects obstacles in four directions: north, south, east, and west. The sensors have an error rate of eā€‰=ā€‰25%. The first step of this study is to model our system by Hidden Markov Model to predict the Robot localization states using the comparison between the Filtering estimation method with Evidence and the Prediction Filtering without Evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boudnaya, J., Haytoumi, A., Eddayer, O., Mkhida, A.: Prediction of robot localization states using hidden Markov models. In: Masrour, T., Cherrafi, A., El Hassani, I. (eds.) A2IA 2020. AISC, vol. 1193, pp. 253ā€“262. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51186-9_18

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Baltzakis, H., Trahanas, P.: Hybrid mobile robot localization using switching state-space models. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Washington, pp. 366ā€“373 (2002)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Aycard, O., Laroche, P., Charpillet, F.: Mobile robot localization in dynamic environments using places recognition. In: Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Belgium, pp. 3135ā€“3140 (1998)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Oishi, S., Inoue, Y., Miura, J., Tanaka, S.: SeqSLAM++: view-based robot localization and navigation. Robot. Auton. Syst. 112, 13ā€“21 (2019)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Colle, E., Galerne, S.: A robust set approach for mobile robot localization in ambient environment. Auton. Robot. 43(3), 557ā€“573 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-018-9727-4.hal-01758277

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Merriaux, P., Dupuis, Y., Boutteau, R., Vasseur, P., Savatier, X.: Robust robot localization in a complex oil and gas industrial environment. J. Field Robot. 35(2), 213ā€“230 (2018). hal-01535781

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Pagetti, C.: Module de sĆ»retĆ© de fonctionnement. Chaine de Markov, pp. 34ā€“41. ENSEEIHT 3ĆØme TR-Option SE (2012)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Hafez, O.A., Arana, G.D., Joerger, M., Spenko, M.: Quantifying robot localization safety: a new integrity monitoring method for fixed-lag smoothing. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2020)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Atiya, S., Hager, G.: Real-time vision-based robot localization. Technical report, University of Pennsylvania (1990)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Colle, E., Galerne, S.: Amulti hypothesis set approach form obile robot localization using heterogeneous measurements provided by the internet of things. Robot. Auton. Syst. 96, 102ā€“113 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2017.05.016.hal-01621289

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Eddy, S.R.: Hidden Markov models. Sequences Topol.: Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6, 361ā€“365 (1996)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Practical tutorial- Robot localization using Hidden Markov Models. https://dtransposed.github.io/blog/Robot-Localization. Accessed 20 Jan 2020

Download references

Acknowledgments

In the term of this paper, we thank the Laboratory of Mechanic, Mechatronics and Control (L2MC) of the ENSAM MEKNES. We do not forget both our colleagues and experts for the information source. In addition, we thank the steering committee of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics (AISI 2021) for allowing us to communicate our works and results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Boudnaya, J., Cherrat, M., Gharib, I., Mkhida, A. (2022). Comparison Between Filtering Estimation with Evidence and Prediction Filtering Without Evidence to Predict a Robot Localization States. In: Hassanien, A.E., SnĆ”Å”el, V., Chang, KC., Darwish, A., Gaber, T. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics 2021. AISI 2021. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 100. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89701-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics