Skip to main content

Cross-Disciplinarity as a Practice of Critical Linking: How Does a Scholar Relate Different ‘Bodies’? Writing from Within the Body as a Research Process

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interdisciplinarities

Part of the book series: Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies ((PSLS))

  • 237 Accesses

Abstract

Legal academic writing seldom reflects on its choice of research topic and writing style. The published text rarely incorporates thoughts about the choice of genre or format, and their fit with the research question itself. This chapter observes its own pre-writing process rather than making an argument or a claim as most academic writings do. An injury made me discard my initial plan for the chapter, and the notion of the ‘body’, which the editors had assigned me as the object of a hypothetical interdisciplinary study, became the material subject of the writing process itself. Experiencing bodily constraints changed my reading practice and necessitated different media and writing strategies. The resulting text is a personal record of reading and thinking in a particular period of time.

And were it true, we do not think all philosophy is worth one hour of pain.

—Blaise Pascal, Pensées, A Dutton, New York (1958): section 79. Retrieved August 26, 2021, from https://www.gutenberg.org/files/18269/18269-0.txt

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://twitter.com/YaelBerda/status/1329816313133477888?s=20 accessed 26 August 2021.

  2. 2.

    https://twitter.com/NegarestaniReza/status/1328010109759447040?s=20 accessed 26 August 2021.

  3. 3.

    Transcribed by https://otter.ai.

  4. 4.

    Critique of Pure Reason (1998) Cambridge University Press: section B6, p 138.

  5. 5.

    One editor asks about my sources and use of literary references. I did not have a research plan or literature review for this piece for the reasons that I have explained and also because the initial brief for the contribution was to provide a personal reflection on the writing process. I find that much thinking happens when reading, listening, watching, without a particular aim. Research questions seem to gestate in the back of the mind without overtly taking the centre stage; fragments of arguments make random sideways appearances rather than linearly or step by step. In the first year of the pandemic, my access to books in the library shrank radically. I owe immense thanks to my literary friends online who have sustained me with wonderful reading materials during my period of injury.

  6. 6.

    Cahiers, 2000 (orig 1973), ‘Affectivity’.

  7. 7.

    chica marx @mckenziewark, 3 June 2019 https://twitter.com/mckenziewark/status/1135360067040157702?s=20 accessed 5 July 2021.

  8. 8.

    See https://twitter.com/allartmarkets/status/1326863833185529856?s=20 accessed 5 July 2021.

  9. 9.

    My thanks to Liz MacFall for sharing the reference.

  10. 10.

    See https://twitter.com/EcologyMagic/status/1319551663561211904?s=20 accessed 5 July 2021.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyo Yoon Kang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kang, H.Y. (2022). Cross-Disciplinarity as a Practice of Critical Linking: How Does a Scholar Relate Different ‘Bodies’? Writing from Within the Body as a Research Process. In: Herman, D., Parsley, C. (eds) Interdisciplinarities. Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89297-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89297-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-89296-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-89297-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics