Skip to main content

Predicting Molecule Toxicity Using Deep Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovations and Developments of Technologies in Medicine, Biology and Healthcare (EMBS ICS 2020)

Abstract

Knowledge about certain features of molecules is crucial in many fields such as drug design. Toxicity of a compound gives information on the degree to which it can be harmful to a living organism. Experimental evaluation of a molecule’s toxicity requires specialised staff and equipment and generates high costs. Deep learning is a tool used in many fields and can also be helpful in the case of predicting the molecule’s toxicity. For the dataset we used a free database called ‘SMILES Toxicity’ which is available on kaggle. This dataset consists of 6698 non-toxic molecules and 964 toxic ones. Its imbalance creates the problem called ‘overfitting’. In this article, we describe several methods for overcoming the overfitting problem. We developed two models with well-balanced true positives to false positives ratio. With the first model, we achieved 96% accuracy on the training set, 89% on the validation set and 65% on the test set. The second model scored the following values of accuracy: 80% on the training set, 78% on the validation set and 77% on the test set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Parasuraman, S.: Toxicological screening. J. Pharmacol. Pharmacotherap. 2(2), 74–79, (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, J., Cheong, H.-H., Siu, S.W.I.: BESTox: a convolutional neural network regression model based on binary-encoded SMILES for acute oral toxicity prediction of chemical compounds. In: Martín-Vide, C., Vega-Rodríguez, M.A., Wheeler, T. (eds.) AlCoB 2020. LNCS, vol. 12099, pp. 155–166. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42266-0_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Karim, A.: Toxicity prediction by multimodal deep learning. In: Ohara, K., Bai, Q. (eds.) Knowledge Management and Acquisition for Intelligent Systems, pp. 142–152. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hirohara, M., Saito, Y., Koda, Y., Sato, K., Sakakibara, Y.: Convolutional neural network based on smiles representation of compounds for detecting chemical motif. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Genome Informatics (GIW 2018): Bioinformatics, vol. 19. BMC Bioinformatics (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fanconi, C.: Smiles toxicity, August 2019. https://www.kaggle.com/fanconic/smiles-toxicity

  6. Smith, L.N.: Cyclical learning rates for training neural networks. In: 2017 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), pp. 464–472 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konrad M. Duraj .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Duraj, K.M., Piaseczna, N.J. (2022). Predicting Molecule Toxicity Using Deep Learning. In: Piaseczna, N., Gorczowska, M., Łach, A. (eds) Innovations and Developments of Technologies in Medicine, Biology and Healthcare. EMBS ICS 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1360. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88976-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics