Skip to main content

Neoliberalism and Housing Affordability Crisis in Dhaka Where Market-Enabling Efforts Failed

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Accessible Housing for South Asia
  • 243 Accesses

Abstract

The rise of neoliberalism was instigated by the failures of welfare states in the western world in the 1970s. Policies were formulated to ‘extend market discipline, competition, and commodification throughout all sectors of society’ because of the diminishing profitability by the mass production concept of Fordism and increasing public budget deficits. As a result, the social good housing was commodified too and considered as an investment asset globally. Such transformation has intensely influenced the right to adequate housing endorsed by the constitutions across the world. The neoliberal policies have shaped the housing provision system worldwide, where the private market has been considered as the absolute provider of housing for all income groups according to demand but not need. From the literature, the most prominent characteristics of the neoliberal housing market have been identified as: 1. Homeownership focused housing provision to uphold asset base welfare system; 2. ‘Unlocking land values and new geographies of the cities’and 3. Affordability crisis. Thatcherism and Reaganism aggressively implemented neoliberal reforms in the 1980s which gradually influenced most of the countries in the world. Neoliberalism was introduced in developing and underdeveloped countries through Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) and measures to reduce budget deficits. Bangladesh accepted the SAP reform packages as the aid conditionality of IMF in the early 1980s and initiated denationalization of industries. The study has analysed the impacts of neoliberal policies on housing provision in Dhaka according to identified three prominent neoliberal housing market characteristics and the malfunction market enabling roles of the state that ultimately resulted in acute housing affordability crisis for limited-income households. The findings are based on secondary and grey materials, which have been analysed and validated by key personnel interviews. The findings will have some policy implications to tackle the housing affordability crisis of Dhaka.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Key informants include housing experts, developers and professionals from state housing agencies. The name and designation have not been provided here due to page limitation.

  2. 2.

    Most of the rental apartments for govt. employees as, for example, in Motijheel, Azimpur or Baily road Officer’s Colonies were developed in provincial capital Dhaka during Pakistan period. Though public rental housing contributed only 8% of total housing need of this group, such initiatives were further deprioritized when the Second Five-Year Plan (1980–1985) mentions that ‘unjustified construction of staff housing should be stopped given the resource constraints and other pressing needs’. And the Fifth Five-Year Plan envisions not on rental housing rather on construction of flats for sale on hire-purchase basis for govt. employees.

References

  • Abdullah, A. (Ed.). (1991). Modernization at Bay: Structure and change in Bangladesh. University Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afenah, A. (2009). Conceptualizing the effects of neoliberal urban policies on housing rights: An analysis of the attempted unlawful forced eviction of an informal settlement in Accra, Ghana. DPU Working Paper No. 139. London: UCL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, J. U., Sultana, H., & Faroque, A. R. (2017). Eastern housing limited: marketing strategies of a real estate company in Bangladesh. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 21(1), 86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akhter, A. (2013). A study on physical requirements of housing for low-middle income families in Dhaka City—An attempt towards affordability. Unpublished Masters thesis, Department of Architecture, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBS. (2011). Bangladesh Population Census 2011. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertuzzo, E. (2014). During the urban revolution—Conjuncture on the streets of Dhaka. In L. Stanek, et al. (Eds.), Urban revolution now (pp.49–70). Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIGD. (2017). The State of Cities 2017: Housing in Dhaka. BRAC Institute of Governance and Development, BRAC University, Dhaka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of ‘Actually Existing Neoliberalism.’ Antipode, 33(3), 349–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bult-Spiering, M., & Dewulf, G. (2006). Strategic Issues in Public–Private Partnerships. West Sussex, UK: Wiley, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARE. (2003). Land policy and administration in Bangladesh: A literature review. CARE SDU Reports and Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, D. P. G. (2001). Urban crisis in India: New initiatives for sustainable cities. Development in Practice, 11(2–3), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520120056397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choguill, C. L. (1993). Housing policy trends in Bangladesh: Meeting the needs of a low-income population. Cities, 10(4), 326–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, A. I. (1992). Urban land market in Bangladesh. In N. Islam, A. Islam (Eds.), Urban Land Management in Bangladesh (pp. 115–122). Dhaka: Ministry of Land, Government of Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, A. U. (2010). The Dhaka chamber of commerce and industry: Origin, development and role in the economy. In Commercial history of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • COHRE. (2006). Government obligation on forced evictions. http://www.cohre.org/view_page.php?page_id=101#article153.

  • Das, M. S. (2014). Easy credit and real estate bubble in Dhaka, Bangladesh—The Nexus and policy implications for Bangladesh Bank. World Review of Business Research, 4(3), 162–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, S. (2004). Slums of Mumbai: Crying for bottoms-up approach. In Mumbai City development strategies (Eds.), Indian Merchants’ Chamber Economic Research and Training Foundation, Mumbai (pp. 13–44).

    Google Scholar 

  • Doling, J. (2002). The south and east Asia housing policy model. In M. R. Agus, J. Doling, & D.-S. Lee (Eds.), Housing policy systems in South and East Asia (pp. 178–188). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Doling, J., & Ford, J. (2007). A union of home owners, editorial. European Journal of Housing and Planning, 7(2), 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doling, J., & Ronald, R. (2010). Homeownership and asset-based welfare. Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 25, 165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorling, D. (2014). All that is solid: The great housing disaster. Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Intelligence Unit. (2015). Worldwide Cost of Living Report, London, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farzana, F. (2009). Shortages of middle-income owner-occupied housing in Dhaka—Failures of government or market? Plan plus, 5, 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farzana, F. (2017). Dhaka: An example of landuse succession where market forces supersede planning regulations. Jahangirnagar University Planning Review, 14(June), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, J. (2002). Neoliberalism and socialisation in the contemporary city: Opposites, complements and instabilities. In N. Brenner & N. Theodore (Eds.), Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe (pp. 58–79). Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haque, H. K. N. (2012). The political economy of urban space: Land and real estate in Dhaka City. IGS Working Paper Series No. 03/2012. Institute of Governance Studies, BRAC University, Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2004). The ‘new’ imperialism: Accumulation by dispossession. Socialist Register, 40, 63–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A short history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson, S. (2012). The new urban enclosures. City, 16(5), 500–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek-Smit, M. C. (1998). Housing finance in Bangladesh—Improving access to housing finance by middle and lower income groups. Prepared for Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operatives, GOB and UNDP/UNCHS (Habitat).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, K. H. (n.d.). Public policies on urban and housing in Bangladesh—The context governance. Ministry of Housing and Public Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka. C:\DOCUME-1\ADMINI-1\LOCALS-1\Temp\Public-Policies-on-Urban-and-Housing-inBangladesh-Works-Secretary-l.doc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, S. (2013). Migration, urbanization and poverty in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh (Humanities), 58(2), 369–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hundt, D. (2015). Neoliberalism, the developmental state and civil society in Korea. Asian Studies Review, 39(3), 466–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2015.1052339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, N., Mahbub, A., Nazem, N. I., Angeles, G., & Lance, P. (2006). Slums of urban Bangladesh: Mapping and census, 2005. Centre for Urban Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabir, A. H. (2012). Neoliberal hegemony and the ideological transformation of higher education in Bangladesh. Critical Literacy: Theories and Practice, 6(2), 2–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadi, J., & Ronald, R. (2014). Market-based housing reforms and the ‘right to the City’: The variegated experiences of New York, Amsterdam and Tokyo. International Journal of Housing Policy, 14(3), 268–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2014.928098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Forrest, R., & Tam, W. K. (2003). Home-ownership in East and South East Asia: Market, state and institutions. In R. Forrest & J. Lee (Eds.), Housing and social change: East-west perspectives (pp. 20–45). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J., Fang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2009). Access to housing in urban China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(4), 914–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morshed, M. M. (2013). Illegality of private subdivision and access to land for housing by the urban poor in Dhaka. Habitat International, 44, 386–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahrin, K. (2008). Violation of land use plan and its impact on community life in Dhaka City. Jahangirnagar Planning Review, 6, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuruzzaman, M. (2004). Neoliberal economic reforms, the rich and the poor in Bangladesh. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 34(1), 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. In N. Brenner & N. Theodore (Eds.), Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in Western Europe and North America (pp. 33–57). Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Quadir, F. (2000). The political economy of pro-market reforms in Bangladesh: Regime consolidation through economic liberalization. Contemporary South Asia, 9(2), 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, K. K. (2008). Development of housing finance and its impact on socio-economic uplift in the emerging economy in Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the IFC Conference on “Measuring financial innovation and its impact”, Basel, 26–27 August 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M. A. U., et al., (2011). Can an enabling approach promote the transformation for scaling-up pro-poor housing initiatives in Bangladesh?. In: 12th Naerus Conference 2011, Madrid, Spain, 20–22 October 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • REHAB. (2012). A comprehensive study on the real estate sector of Bangladesh. Real Estate and Housing Association of Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolnik, R. (2013). Late neoliberalism: The financialization of homeownership and housing rights. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 1058–1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronald, R. (2008). The ideology of home ownership: Homeowner societies and the role of housing. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ronald, R., Lennartz, C., & Kadi, J. (2016). What ever happened to asset-based welfare? Shifting approaches to housing wealth and welfare security. Policies and Politics, 45(2), 173–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savas, E. S. (2000). Privatization and public–private partnerships. Chatam House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, R. K., & Tisdell, C. (Eds.). (2004). Economic globalization: Social conflicts, labor and environmental issues. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elger Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, H. B. (2009). Property-based redevelopment and gentrification: The case of Seoul. Geoforum, 40(5), 906–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shumi, S. (2006). Commercialization impact of Dhanmondi residential area. Unpublished BURP Thesis, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (2002). New urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode, 34(3), 427–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobhan, R. (1991). The decade and stagnation: The state of the Bangladesh economy in 1980s. University Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Songsore, J., McGranahan, G., & Kjellen, M. (2004). Tenure, housing and environmental management among families in the greater accra metropolitan area (ACCRA) of Ghana. Research Review Supplement, 15, 69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Daily Star. (2018, May 12). Why Bangladesh’s inequality is likely to rise.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipple, A. G. (1994). The need for new urban housing in sub-Saharan Africa: Problem or opportunity. Journal of African Affairs, 93, 587–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. P., Shao, L., Murie, A., & Cheng, J. (2012). The maturation of the neo-liberal housing market in urban China. Housing Studies, 27(3), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2012.651106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, M. (2009). Planning for the future of asset-based welfare? New Labour, Financialized economic agency and the housing market. Planning, Practice and Research, 24(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450902742148.

  • Westfall, M. S., & de Villa, V. A. (2001). Urban indicators for managing cities. © Asian Development Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/276. License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.

  • Wong, T.-C. (2006). Revitalizing Singapore’s Central City through gentrification: The role of waterfront housing. Urban Policy and Research, 24(2), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2005). End of MFA quotas: Key issues and strategic options for Bangladesh readymade garment industry. The World Bank Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F. (2015). Commodification and housing market cycles in Chinese cities. International Journal of Housing Policy, 15(1), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2014.925255

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Farzana, F. (2022). Neoliberalism and Housing Affordability Crisis in Dhaka Where Market-Enabling Efforts Failed. In: Kundu, A., Ponce Dentinho, T., Magsi, H., Basu, K., Bandyopadhyay, S. (eds) Accessible Housing for South Asia. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88881-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics