Skip to main content

Impact of Habitat Loss and Fragmentation in Didelphid Marsupials of the Atlantic Forest

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
American and Australasian Marsupials
  • 58 Accesses

Abstract

There is a current debate about the effect of habitat configuration beyond the effect of habitat loss in fragmented landscapes. In addition, almost all information about how didelphid marsupials respond to landscape fragmentation is investigated in the context of “small mammal communities,” including small rodents. One hundred and thirty-two landscapes were analyzed, covering almost the entire extension of the Atlantic Forest in eastern South America to investigate how didelphids respond to habitat loss and if fragmentation per se exerts an additional effect on marsupial taxonomic and functional diversity. When the entire community is considered, habitat loss caused a negative effect while fragmentation per se did not affect total species richness. However, once forest-dependent species were distinguished from generalist ones, an effect of habitat configuration was detected in addition to the effect of habitat loss. Fragmentation per se significantly affects species richness in opposite directions, showing a negative effect in forest specialists and a positive effect in habitat generalists. Considering the four functional diversity metrics analyzed, only functional dispersion decreased with habitat loss, which means a decrease in species trait variability. The results showed the importance of defining species habitat dependence, since didelphid forest specialists and habitat generalists showed an opposite response to fragmentation per se.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Astúa D, Cherem JJ, Teta P (2022) Taxonomic checklist of extant American marsupials. In: Cáceres NC, Dickman CR (eds) American and Australasian marsupials: an evolutionary, biogeographical, and ecological approach. Springer Nature, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkenhol N, Pardini R, Cornelius C et al (2013) Landscape-level comparison of genetic diversity and differentiation in 0a small mammal inhabiting different fragmented landscapes of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Conserv Genet 14:355–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks-Leite C, Pardini R, Tambosi LR et al (2014) Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot. Science 345:1041–1045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bjornstad ON (2020) NCF: Spatial Covariance Functions. R package version 1.2-9. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ncf

  • Bovendorp RS, Villar N, Abreu Junior EF et al (2017) Atlantic-small mammals: a dataset of communities of rodents and marsupials of the Atlantic Forests of South America. Ecology 98(8):226–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovendorp RS, Brum FT, McCleery RA et al (2018) Defaunation and fragmentation erode small mammal diversity dimensions in tropical forests. Ecography 42(1):23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG et al (2002) Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conserv Biol 16(4):909–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bubadué JM, Hendges CD, Cherem JJ et al (2019) Marsupial versus placental: assessing the evolutionary changes in the scapula of didelphids and sigmodontines. Biol J Linn Soc 128:994–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bubadué JM, Cáceres NC, Brum M et al (2022) Evolution of skull morphology in faunivorous marsupials: a comparison between the American and Australasian lineages. In: Cáceres NC, Dickman CR (eds) American and Australasian marsupials: an evolutionary, biogeographical, and ecological approach. Springer Nature, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Cáceres NC, Napoli R, Casella J et al (2010) Mammals in a fragmented savannah landscape in south-western Brazil. J Nat Hist 44:491–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cáceres NC, Delciellos AC, Prevedello J et al (2022) Movement patterns, habitat selection, and home range of American marsupials. In: Cáceres NC, Dickman CR (eds) American and Australasian marsupials: an evolutionary, biogeographical, and ecological approach. Springer Nature, Cham

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone C, Cowlishaw G, Isaac NJB et al (2005) How far do animals go? Determinants of day range in mammals. Am Nat 165:290–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardini A, Polly D, Dawson R et al (2015) Why the long face? Kangaroos and wallabies follow the same “rule” of cranial evolutionary allometry (CREA) as placentals. Evol Biol 42:169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerezer FO, Ribeiro JRI, Graipel M et al (2020) The dark side of colouration: ecogeographical evidence supports Gloger’s rule in American marsupials. Evolution 74:2046–2058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao A, Gotelli NJ, Hsieh TC et al (2014) Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol Monogr 84:45–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delciellos AC, Ribeiro SE, Vieira MV (2017) Habitat fragmentation effects on fine-scale movements and space use of an opossum in the Atlantic Forest. J Mammal 98:1129–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delciellos AC, Prevedello JA, Figueiredo MSL et al (2022) Spatial patterns and drivers of species richness and endemism of marsupials in the Atlantic Forest in eastern South America. In: Cáceres NC, Dickman CR (eds) American and Australasian marsupials: an evolutionary, biogeographical, and ecological approach. Springer Nature, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev 81:117–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2013) Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis. J Biogeogr 40:1649–1663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2017) Ecological responses to habitat fragmentation per se. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 48:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Bennett JR et al (2019) Is habitat fragmentation bad for biodiversity? Biol Conserv 230:179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez FAZ, Lira PK, Barros CS et al (2012) Onze anos de estudo em uma paisagem fragmentada de Mata Atlântica: avaliando as características biológicas que explicam a persistência de marsupiais em pequenos fragmentos. In: Cáceres NC (ed) Os Marsupiais do Brasil: Biologia, Ecologia e Conservação, 2nd edn. Editora da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, pp 427–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher RJ, Didham RK, Banks-Leite C et al (2018) Is habitat fragmentation good for biodiversity? Biol Conserv 226:9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontúrbel FE, Candia AB, Salazar DA et al (2014) How forest marsupials are affected by habitat degradation and fragmentation? A meta-analysis. Naturwissenschaften 101:599–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galetti M, Rodarte RR, Neves CL et al (2016) Trophic niche differentiation in rodents and marsupials revealed by stable isotopes. PLoS One 11:e0152494–e0152415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olifiers NI, Gentile RI, Fiszon JT (2005) Relation between small-mammal species composition and anthropic variables in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Braz J Biol 65(3):495–501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y, Doherty TS, Jessop TS (2020) How influential are squamate reptile traits in explaining population responses to environmental disturbances? Wildl Res 47(3):249–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson HB, Fahrig L (2012) What size is a biologically relevant landscape? Landsc Ecol 27:929–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laliberté E, Legendre P (2010) A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology 91:299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laliberté E, Legendre P, Shipley B (2014) FD: measuring functional diversity from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology. R package version 1.0-12

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Nascimento H, Laurance SG et al (2006) Rapid decay of tree community composition in Amazonian forest fragments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(50):19010–19014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lira PK, Fernandez FAS, Carlos HSA et al (2007) Use of a fragmented landscape by three species of opossum in south-eastern Brazil. J Trop Ecol 23:427–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo GL, Sponchiado J, Cáceres NC et al (2017) Testing the habitat amount hypothesis for South American small mammals. Biol Conserv 209:304–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowakowski AJ, Thompson ME, Donnelly MA et al (2017) Amphibian sensitivity to habitat modification is associated with population trends and species traits. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 26(6):700–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paglia AP, Fonseca GAB, Rylands AB et al (2012) Annotated checklist of Brazilian mammals, 2nd edn. Occasional papers in conservation biology. Conservation International, Arlington, 76p

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmeirim AF, Figueiredo MSL, Grelle CE et al (2019) When does habitat fragmentation matter? A biome-wide analysis of small mammals in the Atlantic Forest. J Biogeogr 46:2811–2825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmerim AF, Santos-Filho M, Peres C (2020) Marked decline in forest-dependent small mammals following habitat loss and fragmentation in an Amazonian deforestation frontier. PLoS One 15:e0230209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardini R (2004) Effects of forest fragmentation on small mammals in an Atlantic Forest landscape. Biodivers Conserv 13:2567–2586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardini R, Marques de Souza S, Braga-Neto R et al (2005) The role of forest structure, fragment size and corridors in maintaining small mammal abundance and diversity in an Atlantic forest landscape. Biol Conserv 124:253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S et al (2020) NLME: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models R package version 3.1-147. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme

  • Pires AS, Lira PK, Fernandez FAS et al (2002) Frequency of movements of small mammals among Atlantic Coastal Forest fragments in Brazil. Biol Conserv 108:229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prevedello JA, Forero-Medina G, Vieira MV (2010) Movement behaviour within and beyond perceptual ranges in three small mammals: effects of matrix type and body mass. J Anim Ecol 79(6):1315–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purvis A, Héctor A (2000) Getting the measure of biodiversity. Nature 405:212–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Püttker T, Bueno AA, dos Santos de Barros C et al (2011) Immigration rates in fragmented landscapes: empirical evidence for the importance of habitat amount for species persistence. PLoS One 6:e27963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Püttker T, Martins TK, Bueno AA (2012) Respostas de marsupiais da Mata Atlântica à perda e fragmentação do habitat um índice de vulnerabilidade baseado em padrões de ocupação. In: Cáceres NC (ed) Os Marsupiais do Brasil: Biologia, Ecologia e Conservação, 2nd edn. Editora da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, pp 455–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP, Martensen AC, Ponzoni FJ, Hirota MM (2009) The Brazilian Atlantic forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 142:1141–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland GD, Harestad AS, Price K et al (2000) Scaling of natal dispersal distances in terrestrial birds and mammals. Conserv Ecol 4(1):16

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira EM, Camargo NF (2012) Uso do espaço vertical por marsupiais brasileiros. In: Cáceres NC (ed) Os Marsupiais do Brasil: Biologia, Ecologia e Conservação, 2nd edn. Editora da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, pp 345–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira MV, Delciellos AC (2012) Locomoção, morfologia e uso do habitat em marsupiais neotropicais: uma abordagem ecomorfológica. In: Cáceres NC (ed) Os Marsupiais do Brasil: Biologia, Ecologia e Conservação, 2nd edn. Editora da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, pp 363–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira MV, Almeida-Gomes M, Delciellos AC et al (2018) Fair tests of the habitat amount hypothesis require appropriate metrics of patch isolation: an example with small mammals in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biol Conserv 226:264–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D (2008) New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology 89:2290–2301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viveiros De Castro EB, Fernandez FAS (2004) Determinants of differential extinction vulnerabilities of small mammals in Atlantic Forest fragments in Brazil. Biol Conserv 119:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal of Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) for the support and the Post-doctoral fellowship of the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geruza L. Melo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Melo, G.L. (2022). Impact of Habitat Loss and Fragmentation in Didelphid Marsupials of the Atlantic Forest. In: Cáceres, N.C., Dickman, C.R. (eds) American and Australasian Marsupials. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88800-8_27-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88800-8_27-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88800-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88800-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics