Skip to main content

Transformations in International Law on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit-Sharing and Domestic Implementation. Introduction, Synthesis, Observations, Recommendations and Conclusions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Transformations in the Use of Biodiversity for Research and Development

Part of the book series: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ((IUSGENT,volume 95))

  • 313 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter describes the new rules on access to genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge (aTK). The Nagoya Protocol, an instrument of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), created globally binding rules in order to operationalize its third objective, i.e. the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising from the utilization of genetic resources (GR) and aTK. The chapter starts by describing the new transformations that have changed the landscape for research and development (R&D) based on genetic resources and aTK. Further, it identifies implementation issues that were unresolved in the negotiations leading to the adoption of the Protocol and those that have emerged during the implementation phase, and shows which challenges they present for the implementation process. An example of such issues is the current disagreement between the providers of GR and their users as to whether Digital Sequence Information falls under the definition of ‘genetic resources’ and consequently the scope of the access and benefit-sharing (ABS) legislation. Besides, it summarizes each chapter. For chapters with case study examination the focus is laid on how the laws are coping with the ABS obligations of the Protocol, how the salient (unresolved and emerging) issues identified are addressed and whether conformity with the Nagoya Protocol is paid attention to. For general themes, challenges, opportunities and lessons from practical experiences are identified and solutions for enriching the implementation process proposed. Finally, the chapter produces some synthesis, observations and recommendations and reaches some conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kamau (2014), p. 143; Reichman et al. (2016), p. 39ff.

  2. 2.

    Kamau, ibid.

  3. 3.

    The international debates since the early 1980s implicated intellectual property rights especially patents for the erosion of genetic resources, biodiversity loss and biopiracy of traditional knowledge. For more see Dutfield and Suthersanen (2020), p. 463ff. Also Reichman et al. (2016), p. 52ff.

  4. 4.

    Kamau (2014).

  5. 5.

    Scholtz (2008), p. 288; Cabrera Medaglia and Welch (2018), p. 182ff.

  6. 6.

    See also Reichman et al. (2016), p. 43.

  7. 7.

    Cabrera Medaglia and Welch (2018), p. 181ff.

  8. 8.

    Kamau (2014), pp. 146–158.

  9. 9.

    Ibid. For details see Kamau et al. (2010).

  10. 10.

    For details of the process leading to the Nagoya Protocol see Kamau et al. (2010), pp. 248–250. For an in-depth explanation of and commentary on the Nagoya Protocol see Greiber et al. (2012) and Morgera et al. (2014).

  11. 11.

    Prip and Rosendal (2015).

  12. 12.

    Muller et al. December (2019); Winter (2021).

  13. 13.

    Laird et al. (2020); Scholz et al. (2020).

  14. 14.

    Schloen (2019).

  15. 15.

    Schloen (2019, p. 128).

  16. 16.

    Ibid.

  17. 17.

    Winter (2019, p. 109).

  18. 18.

    Schloen (2019).

  19. 19.

    Winter (2019).

  20. 20.

    Ibid.

  21. 21.

    Malaysian Act of 2017, s. 4.

  22. 22.

    For a thorough scrutiny of the implementation (‘due diligence’) model of the Regulation and suggestion for an alternative (‘integrative’) model see Godt et al. (2020).

  23. 23.

    Ruiz Muller (2015) attributes the failure of achieving benefit-sharing to the bilateral system and advocates for “bounded openness”.

  24. 24.

    Since the adoption of the NP in 2010 Ethiopia has granted 983 permits for research purposes and 13 for commercial purposes (with 13 access agreements signed), pers. comms (15 November 2020) with Ashenafi Ayenew Hailu, NFP, EBI. Kenya on the other hand has granted 148 permits in the same period, all for non-commercial purposes, pers. comms (7 January 2021) with Joyce Imende, ABS Desk Officer, NEMA.

  25. 25.

    See Kamau and Winter (2009), p. 371ff. For a summary of details see Kamau (Ch. on Kenya) in this volume.

  26. 26.

    E.g. International Chamber of Commerce (17 December 2012), p. 6. For examples of challenges such rights cause on the agricultural breeding sector and suggested cut-off points see Kamau et al. (2018), pp. 30–34.

  27. 27.

    Commission Guidance document on the scope of application and core obligations of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014, OJ 2021/C 13/01.

  28. 28.

    Ibid, p. 9.

  29. 29.

    Ibid, p. 10.

  30. 30.

    Implied in Beck in this volume. Also pers. comms (anonymous, during our international conference on ABS in Bremen), 20 September 2018.

  31. 31.

    See Kamau (2019), pp. 7–10. The book is open access and can be seen at https://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/BfN/service/Dokumente/skripten/Skript564.pdf.

  32. 32.

    See foreword by the Executive Secretary of the CBD, Ms. Elizabeth Maruma Mrema, in this volume.

References

Books and Book Chapters

  • Dutfield G, Suthersanen U (2020) Global intellectual property law, 2nd edn. Edward Elgar, UK and USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Godt C, Šušnjar D, Wolff F (2020) Umsetzung des Nagoya Protokolls in EU- und nationales Rechts. Ein Alternativvorschlag zur Umsetzung der EU VO 511/2014, 1. Auflage. Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiber T et al (2012) An explanatory guide to the Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit-sharing. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamau EC (2014) Valorisation of genetic resources, benefit sharing and conservation of biological diversity. In: Dilling O, Markus T (eds) Ex Rerum Natura Ius? – Sachzwang und Problemwahrnehmung im Umweltrecht, Nomos, pp 143–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamau EC (2019) Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol. Fulfilling new obligations among emerging issues. Bundesamt für Naturschutz (BfN), Bonn. https://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/BfN/service/Dokumente/skripten/Skript564.pdf. Accessed 16 Nov 2020

  • Kamau EC, Winter G (2009) Genetic resources, traditional knowledge & the law. Solutions for access and benefit sharing. Earthscan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morgera E, Tsioumani E, Buck M (2014) Unraveling the Nagoya Protocol. A commentary on the Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit-sharing to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Brill Nijhoff

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller MR (2015) Genetic information as natural resources. Implications for the Convention on Biological Diversity. Routledge, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman JH, Uhlir PF, Dedeurwaerdere T (2016) Governing intergrated genetic resources, data, and literature. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schloen M (2019) The persistence of ABS contractual obligations in the context of agricultural breeding. In: Kamau EC (ed) Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol. Fulfilling new obligations among emerging issues. BfN-Skripten 564, pp 125–129. https://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/BfN/service/Dokumente/skripten/Skript564.pdf

  • Winter G (2019) ABS regulation in the European Union. In: Kamau EC (ed) Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol. Fulfilling new obligations among emerging issues. BfN-Skripten 564, pp 105–110. https://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/BfN/service/Dokumente/skripten/Skript564.pdf

Articles

  • Cabrera Medaglia J, Welch F-P (2018) Current status and future research agenda on benefit-sharing in international sustainable development law. J Korean Law 17:179–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamau EC, Fedder B, Winter G (2010) The Nagoya Protocol on access to genetic resources and benefit sharing: what is new and what are the implications for provider and user countries and the scientific community? LEAD J 6(3):246–262. http://www.lead-journal.org/2010.htm. Accessed 11 Dec 2020

  • Laird S, Wynberg R, Rourke M, Humphries F, Ruiz Muller M, Lawson C (2020) Rethink the expansion of access and benefit sharing. Science 367(6483):1200–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prip C, Rosendal GK (2015) Access to genetic resources and benefit-sharing from their use (ABS) – state of implementation and research gaps. Report number: FNI Report 5/2015. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22287.18088

  • Scholtz W (2008) Common heritage: saving the environment for humankind or exploiting resources in the name of eco-imperialism? Comp Int Law J South Afr 41(2):273–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz AH, Hillebrand U, Freitag J, Cancio I, Dos S, Ribeiro C, Haringhuizen G, Oldham P, Saxena D, Seitz C, Thiele T, van Zimmeren E (2020) Finding compromise on ABS & DSI in the CBD: requirements & policy ideas from a scientific perspective. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35180.80001

  • Winter G (2021) Problems and solutions of access to genetic resources and benefit sharing: a theoretical perspective - Part II. LEAD J 17(0):1–15. http://www.lead-journal.org/content/a1706.pdf

Legislations

  • Convention on Biological Diversity, 1992. https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2020

  • Commission Guidance document on the scope of application and core obligations of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the compliance measures for users from the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilisation in the Union, OJ 2021/C 13/01

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2010. https://www.cbd.int/abs/doc/protocol/nagoya-protocol-en.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2020

  • General Assembly resolution 1803 (XVII) of 14 December 1962. https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/ga_1803/ga_1803.html. Accessed 14 Dec 2020

Online Material

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evanson Chege Kamau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kamau, E.C. (2022). Transformations in International Law on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit-Sharing and Domestic Implementation. Introduction, Synthesis, Observations, Recommendations and Conclusions. In: Chege Kamau, E. (eds) Global Transformations in the Use of Biodiversity for Research and Development. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 95. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88711-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88711-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88710-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88711-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics