Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Patterns for a Hybrid Campus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hybrid Learning Spaces

Part of the book series: Understanding Teaching-Learning Practice ((UTLP))

Abstract

This chapter discusses good practices to create more hybrid learning opportunities on campus by designing and connecting available spaces appropriately. First, we explore the frameworks of hybrid pedagogy, blended spaces, and seamless learning to identify key dimensions for hybrid spaces. We consider how to dissolve dichotomies within spaces. We also discuss the interplay of different spaces, such as the physical, digital, informational, conceptual and social space. Second, we explore how existing spaces can be transformed into hybrid spaces. For this, we use the identified dimensions as design variables for different scenarios and space planning. We present a case study that shows how the use of spatial dimensions can help to plan and implement hybrid spaces on university campuses for design thinking. Third, we distill the lessons learnt and generalize about existing solutions. We describe the results as a design pattern that balances pedagogical, technological, and organizational forces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aaen, J. H., & Nørgård, R. T. (2016). Participatory academic communities: A transdisciplinary perspective on participation in education beyond the institution. Conjunctions Transdisciplinary Journal of Cultural Participation, 2(2), 67–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., & Angel, S. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benyon, D. (2014). Spaces of interaction, places for experience. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Information, 7(2), 1–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benyon, D., & Mival, O. (2012). Blended spaces for collaborative creativity. In Proceedings of workshop on designing collaborative interactive spaces AVI2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benyon, D., & Mival, O. (2015). Blended spaces for collaboration. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 24(2–3), 223–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benyon, D., & Mival, O. (2016). Designing blended spaces for collaboration. In Human computer confluence transforming human experience through symbiotic technologies (p. 18).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bligh, B., & Pearshouse, I. (2011). Doing learning space evaluations. In A. Boddington & J. Boys (Eds.), Re-shaping learning: A critical reader: The future of learning spaces in post-compulsory education (pp. 3–18). Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boys, J. (2011). Towards creative learning spaces: Re-thinking the architecture of post-compulsory education. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, P. -S., Kuo, Y. -H., Huang, Y. -M., & Chen, T. -S. (2008). The ubiquitous learning evaluation method based on meaningful learning. In International conference on computers in education 2008, Taipei, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., Nørgård, R. T., & Mor, Y. (2020). Hybrid learning spaces – Design, data, didactics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1039–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriadis, Y., Goodyear, P., & Retalis, S. (2009). Design patterns for augmenting E-learning experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. A., & Goodyear, P. (2016). Models of learning space: Integrating research on space, place and learning in higher education. Review of Education, 4, 149–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2008). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest, C. R., Moore, R. A., Jariwala, A. S., Fasse, B. B., Linsey, J., Newstetter, W., & Quintero, C. (2014). The invention studio: A university maker space and culture. Advances in Engineering Education, 4(2), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, C. C. V. (2014, June). Learning from others: A five years experience on teaching empathic design. In: Y. K. Lim, K. Niedderer, J. Redstrm, E. Stolterman, A. Valtonen (Eds.), Proceedings of design research society biennial international conference DRS 2014: Designs big debates (pp. 16–19). Ume Institute of Design, Ume University, Ume, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1995). Design patterns: Elements of reusable object-oriented software. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 82–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., & Yang, D. F. (2009). Patterns and pattern languages in educational design. In L. Lockyear, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications, and technologies (pp. 167–187). IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hilli, C., Nørgård, R. T., & Aaen, J. H. (2019). Designing hybrid learning spaces in higher education. Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, 15, 66–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G.-J., Tsai, C.-C., & Yang, S. J. H. (2008). Criteria, strategies and research issues of context-aware ubiquitous learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, B., Fox, A., & Winograd, T. (2002). The interactive workspaces project: Experiences with ubiquitous computing rooms. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 1(2), 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazmer, M. (2005). Cats in the classroom: Online learning in hybrid space. First Monday, 10(9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlert, C., & Cooper, S. (2017). Space for creative thinking: Design principles for work and learning environments. Callwey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohls, C. (2019). Hybrid learning spaces for design thinking. Open Education Studies, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0017

  • Kohls, C., & Köppe, C. (2017) Hybrid learning spaces. In Proceedings of VikingPLoP 2017, Viking pattern languages of programs. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohls, C., & Panke, S. (2009). Is that true...? Thoughts on the epistemology of patterns. In Proceedings of the 16th conference on pattern languages of programs. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohls, C., & Wedekind, J. (2011). Investigations of E-learning patterns: Context factors, problems and solutions. Information Science Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kohls, C., Nørgård, R. T., & Warburton, S. (2017). Sharing is caring. In Proceedings of the 22nd European conference on pattern languages of programs (EuroPLoP ‘17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 34, 6 p. https://doi.org/10.1145/3147704.3147741.

  • Kohls, C., Köppe, C., Pedersen, A. Y., & Dalsgaard, C. (2018). Outside in and inside out: new hybrid education patterns. In Proceedings of EuropPLoP 2018. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9 p. https://doi.org/10.1145/3282308.3282330.

  • Köppe, C., & Middelkoop, R. (2020). On using hybrid pedagogy as guideline for improving assessment design. HLS-D3 at EC-TEL 2019. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2712/paper04.pdf

  • Köppe, C., Kohls, C., Pedersen, A. Y., Nørgård, R. T., & Inventado, P. S. (2018a). Hybrid collaboration patterns. In: 25th Conference on pattern languages of programs (PLoP). ACM international conference proceeding series, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köppe, C., Nørgård, R. T. & Pedersen, A. Y. (2018b). Towards a pattern language for hybrid education. In Proceedings of the VikingPLoP 2017 conference, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3158491.3158504.

  • Köppen, E., & Meinel, C. (2015). Empathy via design thinking: Creation of sense and knowledge. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking research. Understanding innovation (pp. 15–28). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (1996). Guiding principles for creating seamless learning environments for undergraduates. College Student Development, 37(2), 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milrad, M., Wong, L.-H., Sharples, M., Hwang, G.-J., Looi, C.-K., & Ogata, H. (2013). Seamless learning: An international perspective on next generation technology enhanced learning. In Z. L. Berge & L. Y. Muilenburg (Eds.), The handbook of mobile learning (pp. 95–108). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mor, Y., Warburton, S., Nørgård, R. T., & Ullmo, P. A. (2016). MOOC design workshop: Educational innovation with empathy and intent. In K. Verbert, M. Sharples, T. Klobučar (Eds.), Adaptive and adaptable learning. EC-TEL 2016. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 9891. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panke, S., Kohls, C., & Gaiser, B. (2016). Social media strategies for seamless learning: Approaches and metrics. In S. N. Şad & M. Ebner (Eds.), Digital tools for seamless learning. IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, A. Y., Nørgård, R. T., & Köppe, C. (2018). Patterns of inclusion: Fostering digital citizenship through hybrid education. Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 225–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quillien, J. (2012). Clever digs. How workspaces can enable thought. Culicidae Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinmann, G. (2017). Design-based Research. In D. Schemme & H. Novak (Hrsg.), Gestaltungsorientierte Forschung – Basis für soziale Innovationen. Erprobte Ansätze im Zusammenwirken von Wissenschaft und Praxis (S 49–61). Bertelsmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M., McAndrew, P., Weller, M., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E., Hirst, T., Mor, Y., Gaved, M., & Whitelock, D. (2012). Innovating pedagogy 2012. The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stommel, J. (2012). Hybridity, part 2: What is hybrid pedagogy. http://www.digitalpedagogylab.com/hybridped/hybridity-pt-2-what-is-hybrid-pedagogy/

  • Streitz, N. A., Geißler, J., Holmer, T., Konomi, S. I., Müller-Tomfelde, C., Reischl, W., & Steinmetz, R. (1999). I-LAND: An interactive landscape for creativity and innovation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 120–127. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, P. (2008). Learning spaces in higher education: An under-researched topic. Review of Education, 6(3), 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile assisted seamless learning? A critical review of literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2364–2381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L.-H., Milrad, M., & Specht, M. (2015). Seamless learning in the age of Mobile connectivity. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S. J. H. (2006). Context aware ubiquitous learning environments for peer-to-peer collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 91(1), 188–201.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cologne Institute for Digital Ecosystems, TH Köln, University of Applied Sciences Cologne, Gummersbach, Germany

    Christian Kohls, Dennis Dubbert & Guido Münster

Authors
  1. Christian Kohls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dennis Dubbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guido Münster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Kohls .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Innovation and Learning Design Kibbutzim College of Education,, Technology and the Arts, Tel-Aviv, Israel

    Einat Gil

  2. Consultant, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Yishay Mor

  3. Department of Signal Theory, Communications and Telematics Engineering, GSIC/EMIC Research Group, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain

    Yannis Dimitriadis

  4. Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Christian Köppe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kohls, C., Dubbert, D., Münster, G. (2022). Patterns for a Hybrid Campus. In: Gil, E., Mor, Y., Dimitriadis, Y., Köppe, C. (eds) Hybrid Learning Spaces. Understanding Teaching-Learning Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88520-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88520-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88519-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88520-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation