Abstract
This chapter investigates the neo-nationalist festival culture of Hungary through the example of the National Assembly of Hungarians (MOGY). MOGY is a three-day-long festival that has been organized far from all major settlements in the Great Hungarian Plain (Alföld) around the feast of Assumption of Mary in mid-August, since 2009. This festival, which emerged as a grassroots movement, offers an initiation in a “re-inventing” of national identity, accompanied by entertaining musical, literary and popular-scientific programs. The chapter discusses the steady increase and development in both the number and the importance of neo-nationalist festivals in Hungary. By receiving more and more media publicity and state support, these festivals constitute one of the most significant rituals of “banal neo-nationalism”, representing a melting pot of esoteric, ethno-pagan, pseudo-historical, neo-nationalist ideas and practices. This examination shows how the festival re-assembles and reinterprets significant segments of Hungarian culture and the concept of Hungarian authenticity and tradition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This publication is an outcome of the ERC CZ project n. LL2006 (“ReEnchEu”) funded by the Czech MŠMT and led by Dr. Alessandro Testa at the Department of Sociological Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University in Prague.
- 2.
Turul bird is the mythological bird of pre-Christian Hungarians, the clan symbol of the ruling House of Árpáds (cca. The end of ninth century to 1301).
- 3.
See more: https://szigetfestival.com/en/ Last access 19/10/2020.
- 4.
The concept of neo-nationalism (Gingrich and Banks 2006) differs considerably from earlier forms of nationalism that aggressively aimed at nation-building in the nineteenth–twentieth centuries. Neo-nationalism—as Eger and Valdez put it—is a subset of nationalism occurring within a context where national boundaries are settled and accepted domestically and internationally but are nevertheless perceived to be under threat (Eger and Valdez 2015: 127).
- 5.
http://www.magyarokszovetsege.hu/content/magyarok-szoevetsege Last access 19/10/2020.
- 6.
- 7.
Szeklers [Hung. székelyek] are a Hungarian-speaking minority of about 1 million people living in Transylvania, Romania. Their ancient writing is commonly called “Szekler runic writing”, presumably of Turkish origin.
- 8.
Pálinka is traditional Hungarian fruit brandy protected as a geographical indication of the European Union.
- 9.
- 10.
According to historical myths the leaders of the seven Hungarian tribes took a blood oath, a severe contract after conquering the territory of Carpathian Basin in 896.
- 11.
See Szilaj Csikó 2010 (25–26): 55.
- 12.
Quote from Ferenc Vukics the president of Fraternity of Hungarians from the official homepage of MOGY. http://www.bosztorpuszta.hu/csiksomlyo-es-bosztorpuszta-szivarvany-visszatert Last access 18/09/2013.
- 13.
Babba Mary is an ethnic name of Virgin Mary among Szeklers and Csángós (Hungarian minority group in Romania).
- 14.
Baranta is an invented “ancient Hungarian” martial art which was developed by Ferenc Vukics after 1990. Baranta tries to reconstruct the ancient Hungarian equestrian and melee fight based—among other things—on the kinetic elements of the stumbling folk dance. In addition to fighting tactics, Baranta places emphasis on knowledge of traditions (folk songs, folk dances, folk customs) and the development of national identity. Today, there are more than 2500 Baranta practitioners in more than 100 associations in Hungary and the neighbouring countries.
- 15.
http://www.bosztorpuszta.hu/boldogasszony-unnep Last access 18/09/2013.
- 16.
https://www.mogy2019.hu/single-post/2018/07/30/Gyogyit%25C3%25B3-faluba-jelentkezok-figyelem Last access 11/10/2019.
- 17.
http://www.bosztorpuszta.hu/gyogyito-falu-apajpusztan Last access 18/09/2013.
References
Bennett, Andy, Jodie Taylor, and, Ian Woodward. Eds. 2014. The Festivalization of Culture. Farnham: Ashgate.
Billig, Michael. 1995. Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.
Chidester, David. 2005. Authentic fakes. Religion and American popular culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Crompton, John L., and Stacey L. McKay. 1997. Motives of visitors attending festival events. Annals of Tourism Research 24 (2): 425–439.
Eger, Maureen A., and Sarah Valdez. 2015. Neo-nationalism in Western Europe. European Sociological Review 31 (1): 115–130.
Feischmidt, Margit, ed. 2014. Nemzet a mindennapokban. Az újnacionalizmus populáris kultúrája. [nation in everyday life. The popular culture of Neonationalism]. Budapest: L’Harmattan—MTA TKI.
Fejős, Zoltán, and Zsolt Szijártó, eds. 2002. Egy tér alakváltozásai. Esettanulmányok a Káli-medencéről. [transformations of a place. Case studies from the Káli-basin]. Budapest: Néprajzi Múzeum.
Foster, Michael Dylan, and Jeffrey A. Tolbert, eds. 2016. The Folkloresque: Reframing folklore in a popular culture world. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
Gingrich, Andre, and Marcus Banks. 2006. Neo-nationalism in Europe and beyond. Perspectives from social anthropology. New York & Oxford: Berghahn.
Harvey, Graham. 2007. Inventing Paganisms: Making Nature. In The invention of sacred tradition, ed. James R. Lewis and Olav Hammer, 277–290. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herzfeld, Michael. 1997. Cultural intimacy: Social poetics in the nation-state. London and New York: Routledge.
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1983. Introduction: Inventing traditions. In The invention of tradition, ed. Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hubbes, László Attila, and István Povedák. 2014. Competitive pasts. Ethno-paganism as a placebo-effect for identity reconstruction processes in Hungary and Romania? Religiski, Filozofiski Raksti 17: 133–152.
———. 2015. Már a múlt sem a régi. Új magyar, újmagyar (?) mitológia. [not even the past is what it used to be: New Hungarian or new Hungarianist mythology?]. In Már a múlt sem a régi… Az új magyar mitológia multidiszciplináris elemzése, ed. László Attila Hubbes and István Povedák, 9–28. Szeged: MTA-SZTE Vallási Kultúrakutató Csoport—MAKAT Modern Mitológiakutató Műhely.
Isnart, Cyril, and Alessandro Testa. 2020. Reconfiguring tradition(s) in Europe: An introduction to the special issue. Ethnologia Europaea 50 (1): 5–19.
Küchler, Susanne, László Kürti, and Hisham Elkadi, eds. 2011. Every Day’s a festival! Diversity on show. Wantage: Sean Kingston Publishing.
Kürti, László. 2011. The politics of festivals: Fantasies and feasts in Hungary. In Every Day’s a festival! Diversity on show, ed. Susanne Küchler, László Kürti, and Hisham Elkadi, 53–82. Wantage: Sean Kingston Publishing.
Lewis, Jamer R., and Olav Hammer, eds. 2007. The invention of sacred tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marcus, George. 2009. Multi-sited ethnography: Notes and queries. In Multi-sited ethnography: Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research, ed. Mark-Anthony Falzon, 181–196. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Máté-Tóth, András. 2019. Freiheit und Populismus. Verwundete Identitäten in Ostmitteleuropa. Berlin: Springer.
Post, Paul. 1994. The modern pilgrim. A study of contemporary Pilgrims” accounts. Ethnologia Europea 24 (2): 85–100.
Povedák, István. 2014. Invisible Borders: Christian–Neopagan syncretism in Hungary. In Religion, religiosity and contemporary culture. From mystical to (I)rational and vice versa, ed. Aleksandra Pavićević, 143–156. Belgrade: Institute of Ethnography SASA.
———. 2020a. “Give me some beautiful holy images that are Colorful, play music, and flash!” the Roma pilgrimage to Csatka, Hungary. Journal of Global Catholicism 4 (2): 36–67.
———. 2020b. The religious neo-nationalism in Hungary. In Religion, populism, Neonationalism, ed. Florian Höhne and Torsten Meireis, 289–308. Berlin: Nomos.
Pusztai, Bertalan, ed. 2003. Invented traditions and village tourism. Szeged: Jatepress.
Stausberg, Michael. 2011. Religion and tourism: Crossroads, destinations and encounters. London and New York: Routledge.
Testa, Alessandro. 2020. Intertwining processes of reconfiguring tradition: Three European case studies. Ethnologia Europaea 50 (1): 20–38.
Voigt, Vilmos. 1980. Miért hiszünk a hiedelmekben? A hiedelem paradigmatikus és szintagmatikus tengelye. [why we believe in beliefs? The paradigmatic and systematic Axis of beliefs]. In Hiedelemrendszer és társadalmi tudat I, ed. Iván Vitányi, 281–289. Budapest: Tömegkommunikációs Kutatóközpont.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Povedák, I. (2022). “Come, Look and Hear How the Past Has Been and the Future Will Be!” Festival Culture and Neo-Nationalism in Hungary. In: Nita, M., Kidwell, J.H. (eds) Festival Cultures. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88392-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88392-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88391-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88392-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)