Skip to main content

Economics, Regulatory Aspects, and Public Policies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interdisciplinary and Social Nature of Engineering Practices

Abstract

Under the assumptions that the main goal of a regulatory agency is the optimization of the socioeconomic welfare added to society by the electricity sector, developing a regulatory, economic market model of such market is fundamental. Then, it becomes possible to: evaluate the economic flows among the market agents; calculate the optimal capital investments, minimal costs, and optimal tariffs yet preserving the capital yield to investors; simulate actions using agent-based models to reduce energy and financial losses due to energy theft; identify the most effective public policies to reduce energy poverty and inequalities and their impacts on the Gini index, and more. A stochastic regulatory economic model of the smart electricity market can predict returns and risks to a more fare, free, and sustainable society. All these functions are, therefore, related to different philosophic dimensions or normative aspects previously discussed, such as social aspect: flourishing of the community, fight against inequalities; economic aspect: dealing with scarcity of energy and integration of new sources; justice or juridical aspect: accessibility and fight against energy poverty; moral aspect: care for society and care for the natural environment, sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ANEEL. (2012). Normative resolution 492- PROINFA. Tech. rep., ANEEL. Retrieved on January 15, 2020, from http://www2.aneel.gov.br/cedoc/ren2012proinfa.pdf

  • ANEEL. (2012). Resolução Normativa no 482, de 17 de abril de 2012. http://www2.aneel.gov.br/cedoc/ren2012482.pdf

  • ANEEL. (2015a). Submódulo 2.6 Perdas de Energia.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANEEL. (2015b). Submódulo 7.2 Tarifas De Referência.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANEEL. (2018). PRODIST—Módulo 7—Cálculo de Perdas na Distribuição Revisão Motivo da Revisão Instrumento de aprovação pela ANEEL.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANEEL. (2019). Calendário e Resultado dos Processos Tarifários de Distribuição. http://www.aneel.gov.br/resultado-dos-processos-tarifarios-de-distribuicao

  • Anicio, J. B., Donadel, C. B., Fredes, M. P., Varejão, F. M., Comarela, G. V., & Perim, G. T. (2009). Uma Metodologia para Refinar o Cálculo de Perdas Técnicas a partir de Estimativas de Perdas Comerciais João. In: Citenel, Citenel, Belém (p. 8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arango, H., de Abreu, J., Bonatto, B., Tahan,C., Kagan, N., & Gouvea, M. (2008a). Modeling the influence of power quality on the creation of market value. In 2008 13th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (pp. 1–5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHQP.2008.4668782, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4668782/

  • Arang, H., Abreu, J. P. G., Bonatto, B. D., Kagan, N., Tahan, C. M. V., & Gouvea, M. R. (2008b). A model for electricity markets: The impact of regulation on value. In 5th International Conference on the European Electricity Market (pp. 1–6). IEEE/PES. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4579028/

  • Arango, H., De Abreu, J. P. G., Bonatto, B. D., Tahan, C. M. V., Kagan, N., & Gouvea, M. R. (2010). The influence of quality on the creation of economic value in electricity markets. In ICHQP 2010—14th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHQP.2010.5625478

  • Arango, L. G., Deccache, E., Bonatto, B. D., Arango, H., Ribeiro, P., & Silveira, P. (2016). Impact of electricity theft on power quality. In Proceedings of International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power, ICHQP. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHQP.2016.7783346

  • Arango, L. G., Deccache, E., Bonatto, B. D., Arango, H., & Pamplona, E. (2017). Study of electricity theft impact on the economy of a regulated electricity company. Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-017-0325-z

  • Arango, L. G., Arango, H., Deccache, E., Bonatto, B. D., & Pamplona, E. O. (2019). Economic evaluation of regulatory tariff risk planning for an electric power company. Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems, 30(2), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-018-00437-8, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40313-018-00437-8

  • de Araujo, A. C. M., Sampaio, J. L., Neto, D. R., & Almeida, A. C. (2004). O Componente Social das Perdas e Inadimplência na área de concessão da CERJ. In: XVI Sendi-National Seminar on Electric Power Distribution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benso, L., Bonatto, B., Arango, H., & Carvalho, L. (2018). Socioeconomic indicators for the analysis of electricity distribution concessionaires. In 2018 Simposio Brasileiro de Sistemas Eletricos (SBSE) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodach, S., & Hamhaber, J. (2010). Energy efficiency in social housing: Opportunities and barriers from a case study in Brazil. Energy Policy, 38(12), 7898–7910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouzarovski, S., Petrova, S., & Sarlamanov, R. (2012). Energy poverty policies in the EU: A critical perspective. Energy Policy, 49, 76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brazil. (1940). Criminal Code.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortez, C. (2018). Development of the TAROT stochastic economic model for economic analysis of a regulated power distribution company. M.Sc. dissertation, Federal University of Itajuba, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortez, C., Arango, H., & Bonatto, B. D. (2018). Stochastic Tarot® model: Stochastic economic market model for risk evaluation of a regulated electricity distribution company. In 2018 Simposio Brasileiro de Sistemas Eletricos (SBSE) (pp. 1–6). IEEE/PES. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8395700

  • Cortez, C., Bonatto, B. D., Arango, H., & Castilla, M. (2020). Aggregated economic analysis of the brazilian electricity distribution companies using a regulated market economic model. Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems, 31(3), 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-020-00572-1, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40313-020-00572-1

  • Costa, V. B. F., Bonatto, B. D., & Arango, H. (2018). Economic modelling: The smart market of electricity with utilities, consumers, and prosumers. In International Conference on Industry Applications (INDUSCON) (pp. 1–7). São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danthine, J. P., & Donaldson, J. B. (2005). Intermediate financial theory. New York, NY, USA: Elsevier Academic Pres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deccache, E. (2019). Modelagem baseada em agentes da decisão de consumo de um cliente num mercado elétrico regulado em que há furto de energia elétrica. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade Federal de Itajubá.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, A., Nerini, F. F., Deane, P., & Pye, S. (2019). Strengthening the EU response to energy poverty. Nature Energy, 4(1), 2–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domingues, E.G., Abreu, J. P. G., Arango, H., Gouvêa, M. R., & Marangon Lima, J. W. (2002). The impact of power quality on the electrical market: A marginal cost approach. In Proceedings of International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power, ICHQP (pp. 76–78). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHQP.2002.1221410

  • Fabozzi, F. J., Kolm, P. N., Pachamanova, D. A., & Focardi, S. M. (2007). Robust portfolio optimization and management. New Jersey: Wiley Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senate, Federal. (2019). O Novo Arranjo Regulatório Proposto pela ANEEL para a Geração Distribuída na Consulta Pública no25 de 2019. Federal Senate, Brasília: Tech. rep.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, L. S. (2002). The microeconomics of public policy analysis. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquila, G., Pamplona, O., & de Queiroz, A. R. (2015). Impacto de políticas de incentivo para fontes de energia renovável. Novas Edições Acadêmicas.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Eguino, M. (2015). Energy poverty: An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 377–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBGE. (2017). PNAD continua 2017 income from all sources. [S.l.]. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBGE. (2019). National continuous household sample survey—Continuous PNAD. Retrieved on August 10, 2020, from https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/populacao/17270-pnad-continua.html?edicao=27258&t=resultados

  • Kobayashi, K. (2016). Optimal real-time pricing of electricity based on switched Markov chain models and welfare maximization. 4th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems, Networks, and Applications (CPSNA) (pp. 35–39). Nagoya: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leite, J. B., & Mantovani, J. R. S. (2018). Detecting and locating non-technical losses in modern distribution networks. IEEE Transactions Smart Grid, 9(2), 1023–1032. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2016.2574714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, K., Wang, C., Yang, J., & Yuan, Y. (2017). Economic dispatch with demand response in smart grid: Bargaining model and solutions. Energies 1193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madrigal, M., Rico, J. J., & Uzcategui, L. (2017). Estimation of non-technical energy losses in electrical distribution systems. IEEE Latin America Translation, 15(8), 1447–1452. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2017.7994791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamounakis, I., Efthymiopoulos, N., Vergados, D. J., Tsaousoglou, G., Makris, P., & Varvarigos, E. M. (2019). A pricing scheme for electric utility’s participation in day-ahead and real-time flexibility energy markets. Journal of Modern Power Systems in Clean Energy, 7(5), 1294–1306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, R., Genovese, A., Koh, S. L., & Brennan, A. (2019). Examining the relationship between energy poverty and measures of deprivation. Energy Policy, 130, 206–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. J. Fin., 7(1), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. D., & Petty, J. W. (2000). Value based management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlemiss, L., Ambrosio-Albalá, P., Emmel, N., Gillard, R., Gilbertson, J., Hargreaves, T., Mullen, C., Ryan, T., Snell, C., & Tod, A. (2019). Energy poverty and social relations: A capabilities approach. Energy research & social science, 55, 227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okushima, S. (2017). Gauging energy poverty: A multidimensional approach. Energy, 137, 1159–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.137, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360544217308952

  • Parente, D., & Pinho, E. (2008). Energia Social—Uma alternativa humana no combate as perdas e inadimplência. In: Sendi, Olinda (p. 7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, A. L., Agrizzi, F. H. A., Pereira, L. D. dL., Fardin, J. F., & Encarnação, L. F. (2017). Analise dos Principais Mecanismos Técnicos e Regulatórios Frente às Fontes Renováveis de Energia. In VII Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia de Produção, Ponta Grossa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, L. C., Arango, H., Bonatto, B. D., De Almeida, T. D. A., De Carvalho Filho, J. M., & Da Silveira, P. M. (2013). Implementation of an economic model for the electricity market evaluation of public policies in smart grids. In: 2013 IEEE PES Conference on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, ISGT LA 2013 (pp. 6–9). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGT-LA.2013.6554397

  • Pereira, L. C., Lusvarghi, S. A. dS., Arango, L. G., Arango, H., & Bonatto, B. D. (2015). Socioeconomic analysis of incentive public policies for the use of renewable energy per consumer class in Brazil. In 2015 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Latin America (ISGT LATAM) (pp. 57–62). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGT-LA.2015.7381130, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=7381130

  • Porto, D. (2010). Utilização da "energia não faturada" no cálculo do índice de perda de energia elétrica—uma nova abordagem. In Sendi, São Paulo (p. 6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Primc, K., & Slabe-Erker, R. (2020). Social policy or energy policy? Time to reconsider energy poverty policies. Energy for Sustainable Development, 55, 32–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primc, K., Slabe-Erker, R., & Majcen, B. (2019). Constructing energy poverty profiles for an effective energy policy. Energy Policy, 128, 727–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, J. C., Linares, P., & López, X. (2018). The policy implications of energy poverty indicators. Energy Policy, 115, 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samadi, P., Mohsenian-Rad, A., Schober, R., Wong, V. W. S., & Jatskevich, J. (2010). Optimal real-time pricing algorithm based on utility maximization for smart grid. In First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (pp. 415–420). MD: Gaithersburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Zuleta, C. C., Fernández-Gutiérrez, J. P., & Piedrahita-Escobar, C. C. (2017). Identification of the characteristics incident to the detection of non-technical losses for two Colombian energy companies. Revista Facultad de Ingenieria 2017(84), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.n84a08

  • Scarpellini, S., Hernández, M. A. S., Moneva, J. M., Portillo-Tarragona, P., & Rodríguez, M. E. L. (2019). Measurement of spatial socioeconomic impact of energy poverty. Energy Policy, 124, 320–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleich, J. (2019). Energy efficient technology adoption in low-income households in the European Union-What is the evidence? Energy Policy, 125, 196–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SECAP. (2019). Visão da SECAP sobre o setor de Energia: o caso da Micro e Minigeração Distribuída. SECAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. B. (2004). Electricity theft: A comparative analysis. Energy Policy, 32(18), 2067–2076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, X., & Qu, J. (2014). An improved real-time pricing algorithm based on utility maximization for smart grid. In 11th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (pp. 2509–2513). Shenyang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, B. K. (2012). The political economy of energy poverty: A review of key challenges. Energy for Sustainable Development, 16(3), 272–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi, T., Kawasaki, K., Fukui, Y., Takata, T., & Yano, S. (2015). Automated linear function submission-based double auction as bottom-up real-time pricing in a regional prosumers’ electricity network. Energies, 8(7), 7381–7406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.137, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360544217308952

  • Vilela, J. H. dO. (2004). Metodologia De Cálculo De Perdas Técnicas E Comerciais. In SENDI XVI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R., Liddell, C., McKenzie, P., & Morris, C. (2013). Evaluating fuel poverty policy in Northern Ireland using a geographic approach. Energy Policy, 63, 765–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Héctor Arango .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Arango, H. et al. (2022). Economics, Regulatory Aspects, and Public Policies. In: Zambroni de Souza, A.C., Verkerk, M.J., Ribeiro, P.F. (eds) Interdisciplinary and Social Nature of Engineering Practices. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 61. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88016-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88016-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88015-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88016-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics