Skip to main content

Temperature-Effect Compensation for Leak Detectors by Using Machine Learning Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
16th International Conference on Soft Computing Models in Industrial and Environmental Applications (SOCO 2021) (SOCO 2021)

Abstract

Although Differential Pressure Decay Testing (DPDT) is less influenced by external environment than pressure decay testing, the different temperatures involved in the process still affect the leak measurements, particularly in quick changing conditions. This paper investigates the impact of air, injected air and part temperature on leak measurements and develops a compensation model based on Machine Learning (ML) algorithms that uses these temperatures as predictors, as well as other such as maximum and minimum pressure during stabilization stage. An automated machine for data capture has been developed to simulate varying conditions. The results show that under the conditions investigated, the part temperature has the greatest impact on leak measurements. For the regressive model used in the compensation model, several ML algorithms are investigated, and the best results are obtained by using multilayer perceptron, reducing the mean absolute error measured by a commercial leak detector by 91%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lafferty, J.M., Rubin, L.G.: Foundations of vacuum. Phys. Today 52, 86–87 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cincinnati Test Systems [Online]. https://www.cincinnati-test.com/pressure-decay-test/differential-pressure-decay

  3. Calcatelli, A., Bergoglio, M., Mari,D.: Leak detection, calibrations and reference flows: practical example, Vacuum 81(11–12), 1538–1544 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Juliano, T.M., MeegodaJay, J.N., Meegoda, N., Watts,D.J.: Acoustic emission leak detection on a metal pipeline buried in sandy soil. J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 4, 149–155 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Biram, J., Burrows, G.: Bubble tests for gas tightness. Vacuum 14, 221–226 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kagawa, T., et al.: Heat conduction effects of the chamber wall on the air pressure dynamics. Trans. Soc. Instrum. Control Eng. 23 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harus, L.G.: Characteristics of leak detection based on differential pressure measurement. In: Proceedings of the 6th JFPS International Symposium on Fluid Power, Tsukuba (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shi, Y., Tong, X., Cai, M.: Temperature effect compensation for fast differential pressure decay testing. Measure. Sci. Technol. 25 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oo, L.L., Youn, C., Kagawa, T.: Temperature compensation in differential pressure method for air leakage detection. In: Asia Simulation Conference 2009, Shiga (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Garcia, A., Ferrando, J.L., Arbelaiz, A., Oregi, X., Etxegoien, Z., Bilbao, A.: Soft computing analysis of pressure decay leak test detection. In: 15th International Conference on Soft Computing Models in Industrial and Environmental Applications, Burgos (Spain) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Drucker, H., Burges, C.C., Kaufman, L., Smola, A.J., Vapnik, V.N.: Support vector regression machines. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 155–161 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. FionnMurtagh: Multilayer perceptrons for classification and regression. Neurocomputing 2(5–6), 183–197 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ho, T.K.: Random decision forests. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rokach, L., Maimon, O.: Data mining with Decision Trees: Theory and Applications. World Scientific (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ostertagova, E.: Modelling using polynomial regression. Proc. Eng. 48, 500–506 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yin, S., Zhu, X., Jing, C.: Fault detection based on a robust one class support vector machine. Neurocomputing 145, 263–268 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Luis Ferrando Chacón .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chacón, J.L.F., Gangoiti, A.G., Biain, X.O., Bilbao, A., Fernandez, E., Etxegoien, Z. (2022). Temperature-Effect Compensation for Leak Detectors by Using Machine Learning Techniques. In: Sanjurjo González, H., Pastor López, I., García Bringas, P., Quintián, H., Corchado, E. (eds) 16th International Conference on Soft Computing Models in Industrial and Environmental Applications (SOCO 2021). SOCO 2021. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1401. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87869-6_51

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics