Abstract
Facial reconstruction is a technique that can be used to estimate individual faces from human skulls. The presentation of 3D facial reconstructions as photo-realistic depictions of people from the past to public audiences varies widely due to differing methods, the artists’ CGI skillset, and access to VFX software required to generate plausible faces.
This chapter describes three digital methods for the addition of realistic textures to 3D facial reconstructions; a 2D photo-composite method, a 3D digital painting and rendering method, and a previously undescribed hybrid 2.5D method.
These methods are compared and discussed in relation to artistic proficiency, morphological accuracy and practitioner bias.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams EM, Erolin C (2021) The devil is in the details: developing a modern methodology for detailed medical illustrations. J Vis Commun Med 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453054.2021.1921566
Angelopoulou E (1999) The reflectance spectrum of human skin. Technical reports (CIS), p 584. https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1616&context=cis_reports
Autodesk (2014a) Open and navigate Hypershade [Online]. Available at: https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/maya/learn-explore/caas/CloudHelp/cloudhelp/2015/ENU/Maya/files/Asts-Open-and-navigate-Hypershade-htm.html
Autodesk (2014b) XGen overview [Online]. Available at: https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/maya/learn-explore/caas/CloudHelp/cloudhelp/2015/ENU/Maya/files/GUID-47644337-40F0-4766-BD3B-4104F9F9B7E2-htm.html
Autodesk (2016) Lambert [Online]. Available at: https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/maya/learn-explore/caas/CloudHelp/cloudhelp/2016/ENU/Maya/files/GUID-97B781A0-7F21-42D4-B040-8EB967CB8563-htm.html
Autodesk Arnold (n.d.-a) Standard surface [Online]. Available at: https://docs.arnoldrenderer.com/display/A5AFMUG/Standard+Surface
Autodesk Arnold (n.d.-b) Displacement [Online]. Available at: https://docs.arnoldrenderer.com/display/A5AFMUG/Displacement
Brinkmann R (2008) The art and science of digital compositing: techniques for visual effects, animation and motion graphics. Morgan Kaufmann
Bruce V, Healey P, Burton M, Doyle T, Coombes A, Linney A (1991) Recognising facial surfaces. Perception 20(6):755–769. https://doi.org/10.1068/p200755
Buti L, Gruppioni G, Benazzi S (2017) Facial reconstruction of famous historical figures: between science and art. Studies. Forensic Biohist 75:191
Challoner A, Erolin C (2013) Creating pathology models from MRI data: a comparison of virtual 3D modelling and rapid prototyping techniques. J Vis Commun Med 36(1–2):11–19. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453054.2013.790011
Charlier P, Froesch P, Benmoussa N, Morin S, Augias A, Ubelmann Y, Weil R, Morin S, Straub F, Deo S (2019) Computer-aided facial reconstruction of “Mary-Magdalene” relics following hair and skull analyses. Clin Med Insights 12:1179550618821933. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179550618821933
Christ R, Guevar J, Poyade M, Rea PM (2018) Proof of concept of a workflow methodology for the creation of basic canine head anatomy veterinary education tool using augmented reality. PLoS One 13(4):e0195866. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195866
Claes P, Vandermelen D, De Greef S, Williems G, Clement J, Suetens P (2010) Computerized craniofacial reconstruction: conceptual framework and review. Forensic Sci Int 201(1–3):138–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.03.008
Clark JG (2020) Face-to-face with a medieval Abbot. Available at: https://www.stalbanscathedral.org/Blogs/learn-with-us/face-to-face-with-a-medieval-abbot
Crossland Z (2009) Acts of estrangement. The post-mortem making of self and other. Archaeol Dialog 16(1):102–125. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203809002827
Denham T (n.d.) What is UV mapping & unwrapping? Concept art empire. https://conceptartempire.com/uv-mapping-unwrapping/. Accessed 01/06/2021
Dewey-Hagborg H (2012–2013) Stanger visions. https://deweyhagborg.com/projects/stranger-visions. Accessed 01/06/2021
Dewey-Hagborg H (2017) Radical love: Chelsea Manning. https://deweyhagborg.com/projects/radical-love. Accessed 01/06/2021
Erickson WB, Lampinen JM, Frowd CD, Mahoney G (2016) When age-progressed images are unreliable: the roles of external features and age range. Sci Justice 57(2):136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2016.11.006
Erolin C (2019) Interactive 3D digital models for anatomy and medical education. In: Rea P (ed) Biomedical visualisation. Advances in experimental medicine and biology, vol 1138. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14227-8_1
Erolin C, Jarron M, Csetenyi LJ (2017) Zoology 3D: creating a digital collection of specimens from the D′ Arcy Thompson zoology museum. Dig Appl Archaeol Cult Herit 7:51–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2017.11.002
Fernandes CMS, de Sena Pereira FDA, da Silva JVL, da Costa Serra M (2013) Is characterizing the digital forensic facial reconstruction with hair necessary? A familiar assessors’ analysis. Forensic Sci Int 229(1–3):164–1e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.03.036
Frowd CD, Skelton F, Atherton C, Pitchford M, Hepton G, Holden L, McIntyre AH, Hancock PJ (2012) Recovering faces from memory: the distracting influence of external facial features. J Exp Psychol 18(2):224. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027393
Iscan MY, Steyn M (2013) The human skeleton in forensic medicine. Charles C Thomas Publisher
Jędrzejewski Z, Loranger B, Clancy JA (2020) Virtual anatomy museum: facilitating public engagement through an interactive application. In: Rea P (ed) Biomedical visualisation. Springer, Cham, pp 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43961-3_1
Jensen HW, Marschner SR, Levoy M, Hanrahan P (2001) A practical model for subsurface light transport. In: Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pp 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1145/383259.383319
Johnson H (2016) Craniofacial reconstruction and its socio-ethical implications. Mus Soc Iss 11(2):97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/15596893.2016.1204598
Kähler K, Haber J, Seidel HP (2003) Reanimating the dead: reconstruction of expressive faces from skull data. ACM Trans Graphics (TOG) 22(3):554–561. https://doi.org/10.1145/882262.882307
Kayser M (2015) Forensic DNA phenotyping: predicting human appearance from crime scene material for investigative purposes. Forensic Sci Int Genet 18:33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.02.003
Knight O, Carter CR, Loranger B, Rea PM (2019) Recommended workflow methodology in the creation of an interactive application for patient’s diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. In: Rea P (ed) Biomedical visualisation. Springer, Cham, pp 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24281-7_8
Lampinen JM, Erickson WB, Frowd C, Mahoney G (2015) Mighty Morphin’age progression: how artist, age range, and morphing influences the similarity of forensic age progressions to target individuals. Psychol Crime Law 21(10):952–967. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1077245
Lee WJ, Wilkinson CM, Hwang HS (2012) An accuracy assessment of forensic computerized facial reconstruction employing cone-beam computed tomography from live subjects. J Forensic Sci 57(2):318–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01971.x
Lewis MB (1997) Familiarity, target set and false positives in face recognition. Eur J Cogn Psychol 9(4):437–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/713752567
Mahoney G, Wilkinson C (2010) Computer generated facial depiction. In: Wilkinson CM, Rynn C (eds) Craniofacial identification. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 222–237
Maniam P, Schnell P, Dan L, Portelli R, Erolin C, Mountain R, Wilkinson T (2020) Exploration of temporal bone anatomy using mixed reality (HoloLens): development of a mixed reality anatomy teaching resource prototype. J Vis Commun Med 43(1):17–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453054.2019.1671813
Martínez-Labarga C, Carbone R, Ridolfi V, Parrino M, Vitali S, Bravi L, Rickards O, Falconi M (2021) Craniofacial reconstruction of Raphael Sanzio from Urbino: face and features of a “mortal god”. Dig Appl Archaeol Cult Herit e00190
Miranda GE, Wilkinson C, Roughley M, Beaini TL, Melani RFH (2018) Assessment of accuracy and recognition of three-dimensional computerized forensic craniofacial reconstruction. PLoS One 13(5):e0196770. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196770
Nagano K, Fyffe G, Alexander O, Barbic J, Li H, Ghosh A, Debevec PE (2015) Skin microstructure deformation with displacement map convolution. ACM Trans Graph 34(4):109–1. https://ict.usc.edu/pubs/Skin%20Microstructure%20Deformation%20with%20Displacement%20Map%20Convolution.pdf
Osgood R (2018) Facing Magwitch: the Rat Island prisoners. Sanctuary 47:18–19. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/915742/Sanctuary_2018_web_secured.pdf
Parsons D, MacCallum K (2021) Current perspectives on augmented reality in medical education: applications, affordances and limitations. Adv Med Educ Pract 12:77. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S249891
Prag J, Neave RAH (1997) Making faces. British Museum Press, London
Roughley M (2020) Pores, pimples and pathologies: 3D capture and detailing of the human skin for 3D medical visualisation and fabrication. In: Rea P (ed) Biomedical visualisation. Springer, Cham, pp 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47483-6_8
Roughley M, Wilkinson C (2019) The affordances of 3D and 4D digital technologies for computerized facial depiction. In: Rea P (ed) Biomedical visualisation. Springer, Cham, pp 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14227-8_7
Shrimpton SL (2018) Facial creation: using compositing to conceal identity. Doctoral thesis, Liverpool John Moores University
Smith K (2018) Portraits, likenesses, composites? Facial difference in forensic art. In: Skinner P, Cock E (eds) Approaches to facial difference: past and present. Bloomsbury, London, pp 84–111. ISBN: 9781350028296
Smith K, Wilkinson C, Roughley M, Balachandran S, Swaney M, Garcia JR (2019) One of us? Navigating ‘rehumanisation’ questions in the depiction and display of two ancient Egyptians from the Johns Hopkins archaeological museum. International Association of Craniofacial Identification Conference, Baton Rouge. http://10.0.51.84/RG.2.2.36529.33122
Smith K, Roughley M, Harris S, Wilkinson C, Palmer E (2020) From ta-Kesh to ta-Kush: the affordances of digital, haptic visualisation for heritage accessibility. Dig Appl Archaeol Cult Herit 19:e00159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2020.e00159
Stephan CN, Claes P (2016) Craniofacial identification: techniques of facial approximation and craniofacial superimposition. In: Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology. Routledge, pp 444–457
Šulek N, Poyade M, Ferguson E (2020) A methodology for visualising growth and development of the human temporal bone. In: Rea P (ed) Biomedical visualisation. Advances in experimental medicine and biology, vol 1262. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43961-3_8
Suppersberger Hamre S, Ersland GA, Daux V, Parson W, Wilkinson C (2017) Three individuals, three stories, three burials from medieval Trondheim, Norway. PLoS One 12(7):e0180277. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180277
Taylor KT (2000) Forensic art and illustration. CRC Press
Vanezis M, Vanezis P (2000) Cranio-facial reconstruction in forensic identification—historical development and a review of current practice. Med Sci Law 40(3):197–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/002580240004000303
Vermeulen L (2012) Manual forensic facial reconstruction. In: Wilkinson C, Rynn C (eds) Craniofacial identification. Cambridge University Press, pp 184–192
Webster NL (2017) High poly to low poly workflows for real-time rendering. J Vis Commun Med 40(1):40–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453054.2017.1313682
Wilkinson C (2005) Computerized forensic facial reconstruction. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 1(3):173–177. https://doi.org/10.1385/FSMP:1:3:173
Wilkinson C (2010) Facial reconstruction–anatomical art or artistic anatomy? J Anat 216(2):235–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01182.x
Wilkinson C (2018) Archaeological facial depiction for people from the past with facial differences. In: Skinner P, Cock E (eds) Approaching facial difference past and present. Bloomsbury, London
Wilkinson C (2020) Cognitive bias and facial depiction from skeletal remains. Bioarchaeol Int 4(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.5744/bi.2020.1001
Wilkinson C, Roughley M (2019) Facial depiction of “Bernie”, man from the bog. In: Bauerochse A, Hassmann H, Püschel K, Jopp-van Well E, Jahn W, Schultz M (eds) Bernie – the bog body from Bernuthsfeld: results of the interdisciplinary research and reconstruction of an early medieval find complex from East Frisia. VML Verlag Marie Leidorf, pp 273-277. Rahden/Westf 9783896468499
Wilkinson C, Rynn C, Peters H, Taister M, Kau CH, Richmond S (2006) A blind accuracy assessment of computer-modeled forensic facial reconstruction using computed tomography data from live subjects. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2(3):179–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-006-0007-9
Wilkinson C, Roughley M, Moffat R, Monckton D, MacGregor M (2019) In search of Robert Bruce, part I: craniofacial analysis of the skull excavated at Dunfermline in 1819. J Archaeol Sci Rep 24:556–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.02.018
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roughley, M., Liu, C.Y.J. (2022). Digital 2D, 2.5D and 3D Methods for Adding Photo-Realistic Textures to 3D Facial Depictions of People from the Past. In: Rea, P.M. (eds) Biomedical Visualisation. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1356. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87779-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87779-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87778-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87779-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)