Skip to main content

Complexity of Manipulative Interference in Participatory Budgeting

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithmic Decision Theory (ADT 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13023))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A general framework for approval-based participatory budgeting has recently been introduced by Talmon and Faliszewski [17]. They use satisfaction functions to model the voters’ agreement with a given outcome based on their approval ballots. We adopt two of their satisfaction functions and focus on two types of rules. That is, rules that maximize the overall voters’ satisfaction and greedy rules that iteratively extend a partial budget by an item that maximizes the satisfaction in each incremental step. An important task in participatory budgeting is to study different forms of manipulative interference that may occur in practice. We investigate the computational complexity of different problems related to determining the outcome of a given rule and give a very general formulation of manipulative interference problems. A special focus is on problems dealing with a varying cost of the items and a varying budget limit. The results range from polynomial-time algorithms to completeness in different levels of the polynomial hierarchy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example the Chamberlin-Courant rule for approval ballots, studied by Skowron and Faliszewski [16].

  2. 2.

    Also known as a Knapsack variant in related literature (see Kellerer et al. [10]).

References

  1. Arora, S., Barak, B.: Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aziz, H., Lee, B.E., Talmon, N.: Proportionally representative participatory budgeting: axioms and algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 23–31. IFAAMAS (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aziz, H., Shah, N.: Participatory budgeting: models and approaches. In: Rudas, T., Péli, G. (eds.) Pathways Between Social Science and Computational Social Science. CSS, pp. 215–236. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54936-7_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Baumeister, D., Boes, L., Seeger, T.: Irresolute approval-based budgeting. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 1774–1776. IFAAMAS (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cabannes, Y.: Participatory budgeting: a significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environ. Urbanization 16(1), 27–46 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Faliszewski, P., Rothe, J.: Control and bribery in voting. In: Brandt, F., Conitzer, V., Endriss, U., Lang, J., Procaccia, A. (eds.) Handbook of Computational Social Choice, chap. 7, pp. 146–168. Cambridge University Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H, Freeman and Company, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goel, A., Krishnaswamy, A.K., Sakshuwong, S., Aitamurto, T.: Knapsack voting for participatory budgeting. ACM Trans. Econ. Comput. 7(2), 1–27 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Jain, P., Sornat, K., Talmon, N.: Participatory budgeting with project interactions. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 386–392. ijcai.org (2020)

  10. Kellerer, H., Pferschy, U., Pisinger, D.: Knapsack Problems. Springer, Berlin (2004) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24777-7

  11. Krentel, M.W.: The Complexity of Optimization Problems. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 36(3), 490–509 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Lackner, M., Skowron, P.: Approval-based multi-winner rules and strategic voting. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 340–346. ijcai.org (2018)

  13. Rey, S., Endriss, U., de Haan, R.: Designing participatory budgeting mechanisms grounded in judgment aggregation. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 692–702. ijcai.org (2020)

  14. Rey, S., Endriss, U., de Haan, R.: Shortlisting rules and incentives in an end-to-end model for participatory budgeting. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. ijcai.org (August 2021), to appear

  15. Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., Röcke, A.: Participatory budgeting in Europe: potentials and challenges. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 32(1), 164–178 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Skowron, P., Faliszewski, P.: Chamberlin-courant rule with approval ballots: approximating the MaxCover problem with bounded frequencies in FPT time. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 60, 687–716 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Talmon, N., Faliszewski, P.: A Framework for approval-based budgeting methods. In: Proceedings of the 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, pp. 2181–2188. AAAI Press (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank all reviewers for their helpful comments. Supported in part by DFG grant BA 6270/1-1 and by the project “Online Participation,” funded by the NRW Ministry for Innovation, Science, and Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linus Boes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Baumeister, D., Boes, L., Hillebrand, J. (2021). Complexity of Manipulative Interference in Participatory Budgeting. In: Fotakis, D., Ríos Insua, D. (eds) Algorithmic Decision Theory. ADT 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13023. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87756-9_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87756-9_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87755-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87756-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics