Skip to main content

Development and Inequality

The Agrarian Question

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Change
  • 29 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the changing place of the peasantry in the Global South and its relation to development. While the world’s urban population surpassed rural population for the first time in 2007, peasants still make up a significant part of humanity. With between 1.3 and 3 billion population, peasants are to play a central role in shaping what countries of the Global South will look like in the next decades. It is therefore essential to address the place of the peasantry in the study of social change in order to understand how development impacts society. This chapter reviews the literatures on the agrarian question, and on paths of development, from modernization theory to the sociology of development. It then discusses the impact of development dynamics on the peasantry today both at the global and local scales. While phenomena such as land grabs, northern agricultural subsidies, and climate change have been transforming agriculture in the Global South, and pushing peasants off their land, other factors such as semi-proletarianization, remittance transfers, and sluggish industrialization hamper the possibility of a development path similar to that followed by industrialized countries. In this context, development is largely measured through income levels. The chapter thus introduces and intervenes in the current debate on global poverty reduction, the ways in which we measure development, and the place of the peasantry in the Global South today. It examines how development is measured in the economics and sociology literatures on the rise of global middle class and the decline of global poverty. It contends that although income level is surely an important metric, development sociology allows us to observe social change in a more detailed manner by looking at dynamics in the forms of income, such as, subsistence farming, sharecropping, and wage-labor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akram-Lodhi, A. H. (2012). Contextualising land grabbing: Contemporary land deals, the global subsistence crisis and the world food system. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne d’études Du Développement, 33(2), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2012.690726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram-Lodhi, A. H., & Kay, C. (Eds.). (2008). Peasants and globalization: Political economy, rural transformation and the agrarian question (Reprint ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alden Wily, L. (2012a). The global land grab: The new enclosures. In D. Bollier & S. Helfrich (Eds.), The wealth of the commons: A world beyond market and state. Levellers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alden Wily, L. (2012b). Looking back to see forward: The legal niceties of land theft in land rushes. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3–4), 751–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.674033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, G. (1994). The long twentieth century: Money, power, and the origins of our times. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borras, S. M., Jr., & Franco, J. C. (2012). Global land grabbing and trajectories of agrarian change: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Agrarian Change, 12(1), 34–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00339.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brautigam, D. (2011). The Dragon’s gift: The real story of China in Africa. OUP Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chayanov, A. V. (1966). In D. Thorner, B. Kerblay, & R. E. F. Smith (Eds.), Theory of peasant economy. American Economic Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotula, L. (2012). The international political economy of the global land rush: A critical appraisal of trends, scale, geography and drivers. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3–4), 649–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.674940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, S. (2013). Situating private equity capital in the land grab debate. In The new enclosures: Critical perspectives on corporate land deals. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, D. K. (2009). Globalisation and an emerging global middle class. Economic Affairs, 29(3), 89–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0270.2009.01927.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K. W. (2003). Land policies for growth and poverty reduction. World Bank Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabble, S., Ratzmann, N., Hoorens, S., Khodyakov, D., & Yaqub, O. (2015, February 12). The rise of a global middle class: Global societal trends to 2030: Thematic report 6. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-rise-of-a-global-middle-class%3A-Global-societal-Drabble-Ratzmann/8cf67fc1cb81ddfcbb9a7132490f71c7ae7e9c87

  • Fanon, F., Sartre, J.-P., & Bhabha, H. K. (2005). The wretched of the earth (R. Philcox, Trans.; Reprint edition). Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRAIN. (2008). Seized: The 2008 land grab for food and financial security. GRAIN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayadev, A., Lahoti, R., & Reddy, S. G. (2015). The middle muddle: Conceptualizing and measuring the global middle class. Available at SSRN 2694624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautsky, K. (1988). The agrarian question (Vol. 1–2 volumes). Zwan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, C. (2016). Neoliberalism and rural change: Land and capital concentration, and the precariousness of labour. In S. Springer, K. Birch, & J. MacLeavy (Eds.), Handbook of neoliberalism. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, C., & Akram-Lodhi, A. H. (2021). The diversity of classical agrarian Marxism. In A. H. Akram-Lodhi, K. Dietz, B. Engels, & B. M. McKay (Eds.), Handbook of critical agrarian studies (pp. 25–33). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knauss, S. (2019). The myth of the global middle class, globalisation’s fallback success story. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne d’études Du Développement, 40(2), 182–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2019.1520692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koo, H. (2016). The global middle class: How is it made, what does it represent? Globalizations, 13(4), 440–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2016.1143617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavers, T. (2012). ‘Land grab’as development strategy? The political economy of agricultural investment in Ethiopia. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(1), 105–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V. I. (1899). The development of capitalism in Russia: The process of formation of a home market for large-scale industry.. https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1899/devel/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M. (2009). Land reform in developing countries: Property rights and property wrongs. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, K. (2013). Human development report 2013. The rise of the south: Human Progress in a diverse world. (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2294673). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2294673.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. (2008). Development and social change: A global perspective. Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. (2013). Land grabbing as security mercantilism in international relations. Globalizations, 10(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2013.760925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B. (2012). The haves and the have-nots: A brief and idiosyncratic history of global inequality (Reprint ed.). Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B. (2016). Global inequality: A new approach for the age of globalization. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2006). The Kuznets curve: Yesterday and tomorrow. In A. V. Banerjee, R. Benabou, & D. Mookherjee (Eds.), Understanding poverty. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preobrazhensky, Y. (1967). The new economics. Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjaastad, E., & Cousins, B. (2009). Formalisation of land rights in the south: An overview. Land Use Policy, 26(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, J., Olivier, C., & Burgis, T. (2008, November 19). Daewoo to cultivate Madagascar land for free. Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. (2018). World urbanization prospects: The 2018 revision.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-systems analysis: An introduction. In World-systems analysis. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822399018.

  • Watts, M. (2021). The agrarian question. In A. H. Akram-Lodhi, K. Dietz, B. Engels, & B. M. McKay (Eds.), Handbook of critical agrarian studies (pp. 53–66). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheary, J. (2009). The global middle class is here: Now what? World Policy Journal, 26(4), 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoomers, A. (2010). Globalisation and the foreignisation of space: Seven processes driving the current global land grab. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(2), 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066151003595325

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antoine Dolcerocca .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Dolcerocca, A. (2023). Development and Inequality. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87624-1_176-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87624-1_176-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87624-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87624-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics