Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Climate Change and Consumer Behavior

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interdisciplinary Approaches to Climate Change for Sustainable Growth

Part of the book series: Natural Resource Management and Policy ((NRMP,volume 47))

Abstract

Fighting climate change and its detrimental effects on the environment and the society has become a key priority for many governments. With the Paris Climate Agreement, many countries worldwide have committed to cut greenhouse gas emission and reach climate neutrality by mid-century, setting the roadmap for a sustainable economic growth. However, this ambitious goal will not be achieved without the contribution of the consumers. Indeed, everyday consumption decisions, especially food-related ones, can play a relevant role in alleviating pressure on the environment. Reducing meat consumption and choosing food products with sustainability labels are just two of many examples of how consumers can become more environmentally friendly. Although people have become increasingly aware and sensitive about sustainability-related issues, they sometimes fail to behave accordingly. This chapter describes some of the key factors underlying consumers’ intention–behavior gap and discusses their main implications for designing effective demand-side policies geared at leveraging sustainable consumption decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., et al. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allcott, H., & Greenstone, M. (2012). Is there an energy efficiency gap? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(1), 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. W., Wilson, M., Ng, S. H., et al. (2000). Values and beliefs of vegetarians and omnivores. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 405–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, G. (2010). Why aren’t we saving the planet? A psychologist’s perspective. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, G., & Sale, L. (2011). Shopping to save the planet? Implicit rather than explicit attitudes predict low carbon footprint consumer choice. International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, 7(4), 211–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, S., Lief, D., Adamoulas, M., et al. (2011). Investigating the possible negative effects of self-efficacy upon golf putting performance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12, 434–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, S., Woodman, T., Fakehy, M., & Dempsey, C. (2016). The role of performance feedback on the self-efficacy performance relationship. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 5, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, D., Courtemanche, C., Heutel, G., et al. (2017). Time preferences and consumer behavior. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 55(2–3), 119–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, M., Cowan, C., McCarthy, M., et al. (2005). The convenience consumer and foodrelated lifestyles in Great Britain. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 11(3), 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlingame, B., & Dernini, S. (2011). Sustainable diets: The Mediterranean diet as an example. Public Health Nutrition, 14, 2285–2287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, J. A. (1992). Health, wealth and time preference. Project Appraisal, 7(1), 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmi, N., & Arnon, S. (2014). The role of future orientation in environmental behavior: Analyzing the relationship on the individual and cultural levels. Society and Natural Resources, 27(12), 1304–1320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavaliere, A., De Marchi, E., & Banterle, A. (2014). Healthy–unhealthy weight and time preference. Is there an association? An analysis through a consumer survey. Appetite, 83, 135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavaliere, A., De Marchi, E., & Banterle, A. (2016). Does consumer health-orientation affect the use of nutrition facts panel and claims? An empirical analysis in Italy. Food Quality and Preference, 54, 110–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, S. J. (1998). Attachment and time preference—Relations between early stress and sexual behavior in a sample of American University women. Human Nature, 10(1), 51–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colasante, A., D’Adamo, I., & Morone, P. (2021). Nudging for the increased adoption of solar energy? Evidence from a survey in Italy. Energy Research and Social Science, 74(101978), 2214–6296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creutzig, F., Roy, J., Lamb, W. F., et al. (2018). Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. Nature Climate Change, 8, 260–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darre, E., Cadenazzi, M., Mazzilli, S. R., et al. (2019). Environmental impacts on water resources from summer crops in rainfed and irrigated systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 232, 514–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Marchi, E., Caputo, V., Nayga, R. M., Jr., et al. (2016). Time preferences and food choices: Evidence from a choice experiment. Food Policy, 62, 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Marchi, E., Cavaliere, A., & Banterle, A. (2020). Consumers’ choice behavior for cisgenic food: Exploring the role of time preferences. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43(2), 866–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2013). Flash Eurobarometer 367. Attitudes of Europeans towards building the single market for green products. Retrieved from https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/s1048_367?locale=it

  • European Environment Agency. (2010). The European environment—state and outlook 2010. European Environment Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2011) The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture: managing systems at risk. In: O. Dubois (Ed.) Earthscan, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, B. (2008). Can evaluative conditioning change attitudes toward mature brands? New evidence from the implicit association test. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 178–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graça, J., Calheiros, M. M., & Oliveira, A. (2015). Attached to meat? (Un) Willingness and intentions to adopt a more plant-based diet. Appetite, 95, 113–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunert, K. G. (2011). Sustainability in the food sector: A consumer behaviour perspective. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 2(3), 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunert, K. G., Hieke, S., & Wills, J. (2014). Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy, 44, 177–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gussow, J. D., & Clancy, K. (1986). Dietary guidelines for sustainability. Journal of Nutrition Education, 18(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J., Kharecha, P., Sato, M., et al. (2013). Assessing “Dangerous Climate Change”: Required reduction of carbon emissions to protect young people, future generations and nature. PLoS One, 8(12), e81648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P. G., Schilling, M., & Malthesen, M. S. (2019). Nudging healthy and sustainable food choices: three randomized controlled field experiments using a vegetarian lunch-default as a normative signal. Journal of Public Health, 43(2), 392–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, W., Rauch, W., & Gawronski, B. (2007). And deplete us not into temptation: Automatic attitudes, dietary restraint, and self-regulatory resources as determinants of eating behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 497–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollands, G. J., Bignardi, G., Johnston, M., et al. (2017). The TIPPME intervention typology for changing environments to change behaviour. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(8), 0140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Aalto University, D-mat ltd. (2019). 1.5-Degree lifestyles: Targets and options for reducing lifestyle carbon footprints. Technical report. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. In R. K. Pachauri & L. A. Meyer (Eds.), Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Core Writing Team. IPCC, 151 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2018). Summary for policymakers. In V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, Portner, et al. (Eds.), Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. World Meteorological Organization, 32 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPSOS. (2020). Climate change and consumer behavior. Global changes in consumer behavior in response to climate change. An Ipsos survey for the World Economic Forum, Jan 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Jachimowicz, J. M., Duncan, S., Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2019). When and why defaults influence decisions: a meta-analysis of default effects. Behavioural Public Policy, 3(2), 159–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeswani, H. K., Burkinshaw, R., & Azapagic, A. (2015). Environmental sustainability issues in the food–energy–water nexus: Breakfast cereals and snacks. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2, 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. J., Shu, S., Dellaert, B., Fox, C., Goldstein, D., Häubl, G., & Weber, E. (2012). Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture. Marketing Letters, 23, 487–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012). Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: Evidence from the two-factor consideration of future consequences-14 scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1272–1287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy, M. (2009). Why we love dogs, eat pigs and wear cows: An introduction to carnism. Conari Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kildal, C. L., & Syse, K. L. (2017). Meat and masculinity in the Norwegian Armed Forces. Appetite, 112, 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorek, S., & Fuchs, D. (2013). Strong sustainable consumption governance—Precondition for a degrowth path? Journal of Cleaner Production, 38, 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCollough, J. (2010). Consumer discount rates and the decision to repair or replace a durable product: A sustainable consumption issue. Journal of Economic Issues, 44(1), 183–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, D., & Kinzelbach, W. (2015). Food security and sustainable resource management. Water Resources Research, 51(7), 4966–4985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Hofer, M. V. (2014). Product differentiation and consumer preferences for sustainable food. Georg-August-Universitä at Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2020). Meat consumption (indicator). Retrieved from https://data.oecd.org/agroutput/meat-consumption.htm

  • OECD, FAO. (2019). OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2018–2027. OECD Publishing/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ă–lander, F., & Thøgersen, J. (2014). Informing versus nudging in environmental policy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37(3), 341–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisch, L. A., Sunstein, C. R., Andor, M. A., Doebbe, F. C., Meier, J., & Haddaway, N. R. (2021). Mitigating climate change via food consumption and food waste: A systematic map of behavioral interventions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci, E. C., & Banterle, A. (2020). Do major climate change-related public events have an impact on consumer choices? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 126, 109,793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockstrom, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., et al. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothgerber, H. (2013). Real men don’t eat (vegetable) Quiche: Masculinity and the justification of meat consumption. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14(4), 363–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Sabate, R., & SabatĂ©, J. (2019). Consumer attitudes towards environmental concerns of meat consumption: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(7), 1220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, H., Gomez, S. F., Ribas-Barba, L., et al. (2016). Monetary diet cost, diet quality, and parental socioeconomic status in Spanish youth. PLoS One, 11, e0161422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staats, H. J., Wit, A. P., & Midden, C. Y. H. (1996). Communicating the greenhouse effect to the public: Evaluation of a mass media campaign from a social dilemma perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 45, 189–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockstrom, J., et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347, 1259855e1–1259855e10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., et al. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Why nudge? The politics of libertarian paternalism. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thøgersen, J. (2005). How may consumer policy empower consumers for sustainable lifestyles? Journal of Consumer Policy, 28, 143–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thøgersen, J. (2021). Consumer behavior and climate change: Consumers need considerable assistance. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thøgersen, J., Jørgensen, A.-K., & Sandager, S. (2012). Consumer decision making regarding a “green” everyday product. Psychology and Marketing, 29, 187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torma, G., Thøgersen, J. (2021). A systematic literature review on meta sustainability labeling e What do we (not) know? Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeir, I., Weijters, B., De Houwer, J., et al. (2020). Environmentally sustainable food consumption: a review and research agenda from a goal-directed perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G., & King, D. (2008). The hot topic: What we can do about global warming. Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, P. (2018). Demand-side policy: Global evidence base and implementation patterns. Energy & Environment, 29, 706–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, E. U. (2017). Breaking cognitive barriers to a sustainable future. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 0013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willett, W., Rockstrom, J., Loken, B., et al. (2019). Food in the anthropocene: The EATeLancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet, 393, 447–492.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Milan, Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Milan, Italy

    Elisa De Marchi, Alessia Cavaliere & Alessandro Banterle

Authors
  1. Elisa De Marchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alessia Cavaliere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alessandro Banterle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessia Cavaliere .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Milan, Milan, Italy

    Sara Valaguzza

  2. Kleinman Center for Energy Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, USA

    Mark Alan Hughes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

De Marchi, E., Cavaliere, A., Banterle, A. (2022). Climate Change and Consumer Behavior. In: Valaguzza, S., Hughes, M.A. (eds) Interdisciplinary Approaches to Climate Change for Sustainable Growth. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 47. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87564-0_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation