Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Brexit, YouTube and the Populist Rhetorical Ethos

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Populist Rhetorics

Part of the book series: Rhetoric, Politics and Society ((RPS))

Abstract

This chapter considers how contemporary populist rhetorics make use of, and are shaped by, the affordances of online digital communications platforms. Through an assessment of approaches to the study of populist ideology, I propose a concept of the populist rhetorical ethos which I further develop through in-depth analysis of a case study: a YouTube video advocating Brexit, published online by a prominent online political YouTuber. I argue that online platforms such as YouTube give rise to new genres of communication and new kinds of “rhetorical situation” to which political content must adapt, and that these often tend in a “populist” direction, inducing rhetorics centred on claims about moral and ethical character. Digital media platforms encourage political channels which stage intense dramas of dark forces and the brave rebels fighting against them, led by charismatic rhetoricians revealing secrets and telling truths about what is “really” going on and what “they” won’t tell you, promising salvation to their heroic followers.

This chapter draws on research undertaken as part of the project “Political Ideology Rhetoric and Aesthetics in the Twenty-First Century: the Case of the ‘Alt-Right’ funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council” (AH/R001197/1). The paper benefits from the advice and comments of my partners on the project Dr. Robert Topinka and Dr. Cassian Osborne-Carey. A version was presented at International Conference in Ideology and Discourse Analysis at the University of Essex in May 2019.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, J. C. 2010. The Performance of Politics: Obama’s Victory and the Democratic Struggle for Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, J., and A. Finlayson. 2012. ‘A 40‐Year‐Old Black Man Made the Point to Me’: Everyday Knowledge and the Performance of Leadership in Contemporary British Politics. Political Studies, 61(1), 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitzer, L. F. 1968. The Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, E. 1970. The Second Persona. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 56, 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, E. 1988. Secrecy and Disclosure as Rhetorical Forms. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 74, 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, Tony. 1999. Speech to the Labour Party Conference, 28 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. 2010. Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. In Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, ed. Papacharissi, Z., 39–58. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Casey, James J. Brown Jr., and Steph, Ceraso. 2018. The Digital: Rhetoric Behind and Beyond the Screen. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 48(3), 251–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucher, T., and A. Helmond. 2018. The Affordances of Social Media Platforms. In The SAGE Handbook of Social Media, eds. Burgess, J., A. Marwick, and T. Poell, 233–253. London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buckledee, S. 2018. The Language of Brexit: How Britain Talked Its Way Out of the European Union. London, Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J., and J. Green. 2018. YouTube. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. 1969. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cap, P. 2019. ‘Britain Is Full to Bursting Point!’: Immigration Themes in the Brexit Discourse of the UK Independence Party. In Discourses of Brexit, eds. Koller, Veronika, Susanne Kopf, and Marlene Miglbauer, 69–85. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Charland, M. 1987. Constitutive Rhetoric: The Case of the Peuple Québécois. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 73(2), 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, N., W. Jennings, J. Moss, and G. Stoker G. 2018. The Good Politician: Folk Theories, Political Interaction and the Rise of Anti-Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consigny, S. 1974. Rhetoric and Its Situations. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 7(3), 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, J., and D. Pels, eds. 2003. Media and the Restyling of Politics: Consumerism, Celebrity and Cynicism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daddow, O. 2013. Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair and the Eurosceptic Tradition in Britain. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 15(2), 210–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. 2010. Blog Theory: Feedback and Capture in the Circuits of Drive. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, F. 2021. Political, Public and Media Discourses from Indyref to Brexit: The Divisive Language of Union (Rhetoric, Politics and Society). London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edbauer, Jenny. 2005. Unframing Models of Public Distribution: From Rhetorical Situation to Rhetorical Ecologies. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 35(4), 20, 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. 1982. Visible Fictions: Cinema, Television, Video. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, T. B. 1993. Norms of Rhetorical Culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, A. 2003. Making Sense of New Labour. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, A. 2012. Rhetoric and the Political Theory of Ideologies. Political Studies, 60, 751–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, A. 2018. “Dancing with Doxa”: A “Rhetorical Political Analysis” of David Cameron’s Britishness. In ‘Doing Politics’: Discursivity, Performativity and Mediation in Political Discourse, eds. Horan, G., and M. Kranert, 59–77. John Benjamins,

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, A. 2020. YouTube and Political Ideologies: Technology, Populism and Rhetorical Form. Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0032321720934630.

  • Freeden, M. 2006. Ideology and Political Theory. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbaudo, P. 2018. Social Media and Populism: An Elective Affinity? Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 745–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gries, L. 2015. Still Life with Rhetoric. Boulder: Colorado University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grube, D. 2017. Transforming a Transactional Debate: Leadership and the Rhetorical Road to Brexit. Social Alternatives, 36(3), 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, B. 2015. Fantasies of Subjugation: A Discourse Theoretical Account of British Policy on the European Union. Critical Policy Studies, 9(2), 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, N. 2018. Alex Jones’ Protégé, Paul Joseph Watson, Is About to Steal His Crackpot Crown. The Daily Beast, 22 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. 2014. The Rhetorical Foundations of Society. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. 2018. Alternative Influence: Broadcasting the Reactionary Right on YouTube. Data & Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, M. C. 1975. In Search of “the People”: A Rhetorical Alternative. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. 2017. What Is Rhetoric? Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C., and D. Shepherd. 2004. Blogging as Social Action: A Genre Analysis of The Weblog. In Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, Community and the Culture of Weblogs, eds. Gurak, Laura, Smiljana Antonijevic, Laurie Johnson, Clancy Ratliff, and Jessica Reyman. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/.

  • Miller, C., and D. Shepherd. 2009. Questions for Genre Theory from the Blogosphere. In Genres on the Internet, Issues in the Theory of Genre, eds. Giltrow, Janet, and Dieter Stein, 263–290. John Benjamins Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, B. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, B., and S. Tormey. 2014. Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style. Political Studies, 62(2), 381–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. 2004. The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C., and C. R. Kaltwasser. 2013. Populism. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies, eds. Freeden, M., L.T. Sargent, and M. Stears, 493–512. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munger, K., and J. Phillips. 2019. A Supply and Demand Framework for YouTube Politics. Unpublished Paper. Available at: https://osf.io/73jys/.

  • O’Brien, S. B. 2020. Donald Trump and the Kayfabe Presidency. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, F. 2018. The Paranoid Fantasy Behind Brexit. The Guardian, 16 Nov.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z. 2015. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, Michael. 2005. Informalization in UK Party Election Broadcasts 1966–97. Language and Literature, 14(1), 65–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, L. 2018. Parasocial Interaction in the Digital Age: An Examination of Relationship Building and the Effectiveness of YouTube Celebrities. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 7(1), 280–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. 2007. Paradiastole: Redescribing the Vices as Virtues. In Renaissance Figures of Speech, eds. Adamson, S., G. Alexander and K. Ettenhuber, 147–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiering, M. 2015. The Essential Englishman: The Cultural Nature and Origins of British Euroscepticism. In The UK Challenge to Europeanization, eds. Tournier-Sol, K., and C. Gifford. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, B. 2008. The Thin Ideology of Populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(1), 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. 2009. The Carnival of the New Screen: From Hegemony to Isonomy. In The YouTube Reader, eds. Snickars, Pelle, and Patrick Vonderau, 24–39. National Library of Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokel-Walker, C. 2019. YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars. Kingston-Upon-Thames: Canbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, J. 2004. Celebrity Politicians: Popular Culture and Political Representation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6(4), 435–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, N. 2014. Michel Meyer’s Problematology: Questioning and Society. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uricchio, W. 2009. The Future of a Medium Once Known as Television. In The YouTube Reader, eds. Snickars, Pelle, and Patrick Vonderau, 24–39. National Library of Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatz, R. E. 1973. The Myth of the Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 6(3), 154–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, P. 2003. Order Out of Chaos: Elite Sponsored Terrorism and the New World Order. Austin, TX: Alex Jones Productions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1978. Max Weber, Economy and Society, eds. Roth, G., and C. Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzl, N. 2019. “This Is About the Kind of Britain We Are”: National Identities as Constructed in Parliamentary Debates About EU Membership. In Discourses of Brexit, eds. Koller, Veronika, Susanne Kopf, and Marlene Miglbauer, 32–47. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. 1973. Television, Technology and Cultural Form. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. 2018. “We Have the Character of an Island Nation” A Discourse-Historical Analysis of David Cameron’s “Bloomberg Speech” on the European Union. In ‘Doing Politics’: Discursivity, Performativity and Mediation in Political Discourse, eds. Horan, G., and M. Kranert, 27–58. John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zappettini, F. 2019. The Brexit Referendum: How Trade and Immigration in The Discourses of the Official Campaigns Have Legitimised a Toxic (Inter)National Logic. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(4), 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zappettini, F., and M. Krzyżanowski. 2019. The Critical Juncture of Brexit in Media and Political Discourses: From National-Populist Imaginary to Cross-National Social and Political Crisis. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(4), 381–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

    Alan Finlayson

Authors
  1. Alan Finlayson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Finlayson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen S, Denmark

    Christian Kock

  2. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen S, Denmark

    Lisa Villadsen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Finlayson, A. (2022). Brexit, YouTube and the Populist Rhetorical Ethos. In: Kock, C., Villadsen, L. (eds) Populist Rhetorics. Rhetoric, Politics and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87351-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation