Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of the literature on power relations in global sourcing which goes beyond the prevalent focus on the dyadic business-to-business relation. The move through the various theories of power leads to my major claim which is that power dynamics in GVCs must be understood in the context of institutions in various fields and at different levels. While economic logic can explain certain patterns of power asymmetries, the power dynamics among actors at particular times and locations will be shaped by the specifics of the context. Therefore, universal claims concerning the character of power relations in global sourcing must be qualified by considerations for definite contexts. The overview applies Steven Luke’s ‘three faces of power’ to the agential dimensions of power, the neo-institutionalist’s differentiation of regulative, normative, and cognitive institutions, and neo-Gramscian perspective on the emergence and reproduction of the so-called neoliberal historical bloc which provides the previously mentioned institutions with some sort of coherence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
In the terminology of Gereffi: market-based coordination.
- 2.
Fleming and Spicer call this ‘power of manipulation’ (2007, p.16). As I will argue, the more interesting source for this power are routines, not the direct exercise of power (first face) or the manipulation of interests (third face of power), though in reality the mixture of these different forms of power may result in the mentioned ‘non-decisions’.
- 3.
Lukes calls his third face ‘power as domination’. I find this term not very precise; it blurs the line to the previous two faces of power.
- 4.
- 5.
In Neo-Marxist discourses the term structure is more used than the term institution. There is much confusion about the difference of these terms. My take on the issue is that in case an institution structures human behavior and/or meaning making, it can be called a structure. Since many institutions have this quality, the term structure needs to be differentiated according to the scale and scope of human behavior/meaning making that is being structured. The larger the scale and scope of an institution’s structuring capability is, the more appropriate it is to call this institution a structure. In line with Ernesto Laclau's critique of structural/essentialist Marxism (1990), I reject the notion of a closed structure.
References
Akinsanya, A. A. (1980). The expropriation of multinational property in the third world. Praeger.
Allen, J. (2016). Topologies of power. Routledge.
Anner, M. (2019). Squeezing workers’ rights in global supply chains: Purchasing practices in the Bangladesh garment export sector in comparative perspective. Review of International Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1625426
Arrighi, G., Silver, B., & Brewer, B. (2003). Industrial convergence, globalization, and the persistence of the North-South divide. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38, 3–31.
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. (1963). Decisions and nondecisions: An analytical framework. American Political Science Review, 57(3), 641–651.
Bair, J., & Palpacuer, F. (2015). CSR beyond the corporation: Contested governance in global value chains. Global Networks, 15, S1–S19.
Bair, J., & Werner, M. (2011). Commodity chains and the uneven geographies of global capitalism: A disarticulations perspective. Environment and Planning a: Economy and Space, 43(5), 988–997. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43505
Barrientos, S., & Smith, S. (2007). Do workers benefit from ethical trade? Assessing codes of labour practice in global production systems. Third World Quarterly, 28(4), 713–729.
Bello, D. C., Lohtia, R., & Sangtani, V. (2004). An institutional analysis of supply chain innovations in global marketing channels. Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 5–64.
Biel, R. (2000). The new imperialism: Crisis & contradictions in North/South relations. Zed Books.
Boin, A., ’t Hart, P., & McConnell, A. (2009). Crisis exploitation: Political and policy impacts of framing contests. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(1), 81–106.
Bronfenbrenner, K. (2000). Raw power: Plant-closing threats and the threat to union organizing. Multinational Monitor, 21(12), 24–29.
Bruff, I. (2014). The rise of authoritarian neoliberalism. Rethinking Marxism, 26(1), 113–129.
Cantú Rivera, H. (2019). National action plans on business and human rights: Progress or mirage? Business and Human Rights Journal, 4(2), 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2018.33
Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 167–199.
Coe, N. (2012). Geographies of production II: A global production network A-Z. Progress in Human Geography, 36(3), 389–402.
Coe, N. M., & Yeung, H. W. (2019). Global production networks: Mapping recent conceptual developments. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(4), 775–801.
Cox, A., Sanderson, J., & Watson, G. (2000). Power regimes: Mapping the DNA of business and supply chain relationships. Earlsgate Press.
Cox, R. W. (1987). Production, power and world order: Social forces in the making of history. Columbia University Press.
Crehan, K. A. F. (2016). Gramsci’s common sense: Inequality and its narratives. Duke University Press.
Crook, T. R., & Combs, J. G. (2007). Sources and consequences of bargaining power in supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 546–555.
Crozier, M., Samuel, P. H., & Watanuki, J. (1975). The crisis of democracy: On the governability of democracies. New York University Press.
Dallas, M., Ponte, S., & Sturgeon, T. J. (2017). A typology of power in global value chains (Working Paper in Business and Politics No. 92). Copenhagen Business School.
Devlin, R., & Ffrench-Davis, R. (1995). The great Latin American debt crisis. Revista De Economia Politica, 15(3), 117–142.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
Eckhardt, J., & Poletti, A. (2018). Introduction: Bringing institutions back in the study of global value chains. Glob Policy, 9, 5–11.
Ellickson, R. C. (1998). Law and economics discovers social norms. Journal of Legal Studies, 27(S2), 537–552.
Epstein, G. A. (2005). Introduction: Financialization and the world economy. In G. A. Epstein (Ed.), Financialization and the world economy. Edward Elgar.
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2007). Contesting the corporation. University of Cambridge Press.
Foster, J. B., & McChesney, R. W. (2017). The endless crisis: How monopoly-finance capital produces stagnation and upheaval from the USA to China. New York University Press.
Froud, J., Haslam, C., Johal, S., & Williams, K. (2000). Shareholder value and financialization: Consultancy promises, management moves. Economy and Society, 29(1), 80–110.
Fuller, C., & Phelps, N. A. (2018). Revisiting the multinational enterprise in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 18, 139–161.
Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500049805
Gill, S. (Ed.). (1993). Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Gill, S. (1995a). The global panopticon? The neo-liberal state, economic life and democratic surveillance. Alternatives, 20, 1–49.
Gill, S. (1995b). Globalisation, market civilisation, and disciplinary neoliberalism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 24, 399–423.
Gramsci, A. (2011). Prison notebooks (Volumes 1, 2 & 3) (Edited and translated by J. A. Buttigieg with A. Callari). Columbia University Press.
Hale, S., Leggett, W., & Martell, L. (Eds). (2004). The third way and beyond: Criticisms, futures and alternatives. Manchester University Press.
Heigl, M. (2009). Der Staat in der Privatisierung: eine strategisch-relationale Analyse am Beispiel Mexikos. Nomos.
Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., & Yeung, H. (2002). Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290210150842
Herr, H., & Priewe, J. (2005). The macroeconomics of development and poverty reduction: Strategies beyond the Washington consensus. Nomos.
Herr, H., Schweisshelm, E., & Vu, T.-M. (2016). The integration of Vietnam in the global economy and its effects for Vietnamese economic development (Working Paper No. 44). International Labour Office, Global Labour University.
Hess, M. (2008). Governance, value chains and networks: An afterword. Economy and Society, 37(3), 452–459.
Hollingsworth, J. R. (2000). Doing institutional analysis: Implications for the study of innovations. Review of International Political Economy, 7(4), 595–644.
Höpner, M., & Jackson, G. (2006). Revisiting the Mannesmann takeover: How markets for corporate control emerge. European Management Review, 3, 142–155.
Jessop, B. (2009). The state and power. In S. Clegg & M. Haugaard (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of power (pp. 367–382). Sage.
Kebir, S. (1991). Gramsci’s zivilgesellschaft. VSA.
Kelly, S. (2012). Smallholder business models for agribusiness-led development. Food and Agriculture Organization.
Kohli, A. (2020). Imperialism and the developing world: How Britain and the United States shaped the global periphery. Oxford Scholarship Online.
Krücken, G., Mazza, C., Meyer, R. E., & Walgenbach, P. (2017). New themes in institutional analysis: Topics and issues from European research. Edward Elgar.
Kumar, A. (2020). Monopsony capitalism: Power and production in the twilight of the sweatshop age. Cambridge.
Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. Verso.
Lazonick, W. (2016). The value-extracting CEO: How executive stock-based pay undermines investment in productive capabilities (Working Paper No. 54). Institute for New Economic Thinking.
Levy, D. (2008). Political contestation in global production networks. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 943–963.
Lukes, S. (1974/2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). Palgrave.
Manne, H. (1965). Mergers and the market for corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 73, 110–120.
Martin, J. (2002). Antonio Gramsci: Critical assessments of leading political philosophers: Contemporary applications (Vol. IV). Routledge.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Moore, M. (2017). The enforcement of workers’ rights through conditional or promotional trade agreements: A comparison of US and EU social chapters. In C. Scherrer (Ed.), Enforcement instruments for social human rights along supply chains (pp. 155–185). Rainer Hampp Verlag.
Munir, K. A. (2002). Being different: How normative and cognitive aspects of institutional environments influence technology transfer. Human Relations, 55(12), 1403–1428.
Offe, C. (1972). Strukturprobleme des kapitalistischen staates.
Olds, K., & Thrift, N. (2005). Cultures on the brink: Reengineering the soul of capitalism—on a global scale. In A. Ong & S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 270–290). Blackwell.
Ornstein, N., & Elder, S. (1978). Interest groups, lobbying and policymaking. D.C., Congressional Quarterly Press.
Palan, R., Murphy, R., & Chavagneux, C. (2010). Tax havens: How globalization really works. Cornell University Press.
Panagariya, A. (2004). TRIPs and the WTO: An uneasy marriage. In K. Maskus (Ed.), The WTO, intellectual property rights and the knowledge economy. Edward Elgar.
Penha, T. A. M., Belik, W., João Matos, F., & Oliveira, G. M. (2018). Measuring value capture along the Brazilian melon value chain. In C. Scherrer & S. Verma (Eds), Labor and globalization. Decent work deficits in southern agriculture: Measurements, drivers and strategies (pp. 106–132). Rainer Hampp Verlag.
Pipkin, S., & Fuentes, A. (2017). Spurred to upgrade: A review of triggers and consequences of industrial upgrading in the global value chain literature. World Development, 98, 536–554.
Polaski, S. (2004). Job anxiety is real—And it’s global (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Policy Brief No. 30, Campaign Edition).
Raj-Reichert, G. (2015). Exercising power over labour governance in the electronics industry. Geoforum, 67, 89–92.
Richter, J. (2001). Holding corporations accountable: Corporate conduct, international codes, and citizen action. Zed Books.
Robinson, W. I. (2004). Global crisis and Latin America. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 23(2), 135–153.
Scherrer, C. (2001). Double hegemony? State and class in American foreign economic policymaking. Amerikastudien, 46(4), 573–591.
Scherrer, C., & Beck, S. (2017). The promises of new instruments for the promotion of decent work. In V. Xaxa, D. Saha, & R. Singha (Eds.), Work, institutions and sustainable livelihood (pp. 251–274). Palgrave Macmillan.
Scherrer, C., & Radon, K. (Eds.). (2019). Occupational safety and health challenges in southern agriculture. Rainer Hampp Verlag.
Schneider, A. (2019). Bound to fail? Exploring the systemic pathologies of CSR and their implications for CSR research. Business & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319856616
Schubert, S. (2019). Die umsetzung der leitprinzipien der vereinten nationen für wirtschaft und menschenrechte durch nationale aktionspläne. Springer.
Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale University Press.
Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the art of resistance: Hidden transcripts. Yale University Press.
Scott, W. R. (1981). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Prentice Hall.
Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Sage.
Selwyn, B. (2015). Commodity chains, creative destruction and global inequality: A class analysis. Journal of Economic Geography, 15, 253–274.
Shah, A. (2016). Destructive creation: Analyzing contemporary socio-ecological conflicts as frontiers auf capitalist development (New Research in GPE Working Paper 1).
Sturgeon, T. J. (2009). From commodity chains to value chains: Interdisciplinary theory building in an age of globalization. In J. Bair (Ed.), Frontiers of commodity chain research (pp. 110–135). Stanford University Press.
Sum, N.-L. (2010). Wal-Martization and CSR-ization in developing countries. In P. Utting (Ed.), Corporate social responsibility and regulatory governance: Towards inclusive development? (pp. 50–76). Palgrave Macmillan.
Taglioni, D., & Winkler, D. (2016). Making global value chains work for development. The World Bank.
Touboulic, A., Chicksand, D., & Walker, H. (2014). Managing imbalanced supply chain relationships for sustainability: A power perspective. Decision Sciences, 45(4), 577–619.
Van Staveren, I. (2020). The misdirection of bankers’ moral compass in the organizational field of banking. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44, 507–526.
Vergara-Camus, L., & Kay, C. (2017). The agrarian political economy of left-wing governments in Latin America: Agribusiness, peasants, and the limits of neo-developmentalism. Journal of Agrarian Change, 17, 415–437.
Yi, Fu. (2020). The consumption trap. https://www.echo-wall.eu/chinese-whispers/consumption-trap
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scherrer, C. (2022). Embeddedness of Power Relations in Global Value Chains. In: Teipen, C., Dünhaupt, P., Herr, H., Mehl, F. (eds) Economic and Social Upgrading in Global Value Chains. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87320-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87320-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87319-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87320-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)