Skip to main content

Embeddedness of Power Relations in Global Value Chains

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Economic and Social Upgrading in Global Value Chains

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the literature on power relations in global sourcing which goes beyond the prevalent focus on the dyadic business-to-business relation. The move through the various theories of power leads to my major claim which is that power dynamics in GVCs must be understood in the context of institutions in various fields and at different levels. While economic logic can explain certain patterns of power asymmetries, the power dynamics among actors at particular times and locations will be shaped by the specifics of the context. Therefore, universal claims concerning the character of power relations in global sourcing must be qualified by considerations for definite contexts. The overview applies Steven Luke’s ‘three faces of power’ to the agential dimensions of power, the neo-institutionalist’s differentiation of regulative, normative, and cognitive institutions, and neo-Gramscian perspective on the emergence and reproduction of the so-called neoliberal historical bloc which provides the previously mentioned institutions with some sort of coherence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the terminology of Gereffi: market-based coordination.

  2. 2.

    Fleming and Spicer call this ‘power of manipulation’ (2007, p.16). As I will argue, the more interesting source for this power are routines, not the direct exercise of power (first face) or the manipulation of interests (third face of power), though in reality the mixture of these different forms of power may result in the mentioned ‘non-decisions’.

  3. 3.

    Lukes calls his third face ‘power as domination’. I find this term not very precise; it blurs the line to the previous two faces of power.

  4. 4.

    https://www.themarketingblender.com/b2b-marketing-budget/.

  5. 5.

    In Neo-Marxist discourses the term structure is more used than the term institution. There is much confusion about the difference of these terms. My take on the issue is that in case an institution structures human behavior and/or meaning making, it can be called a structure. Since many institutions have this quality, the term structure needs to be differentiated according to the scale and scope of human behavior/meaning making that is being structured. The larger the scale and scope of an institution’s structuring capability is, the more appropriate it is to call this institution a structure. In line with Ernesto Laclau's critique of structural/essentialist Marxism (1990), I reject the notion of a closed structure.

References

  • Akinsanya, A. A. (1980). The expropriation of multinational property in the third world. Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. (2016). Topologies of power. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anner, M. (2019). Squeezing workers’ rights in global supply chains: Purchasing practices in the Bangladesh garment export sector in comparative perspective. Review of International Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1625426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, G., Silver, B., & Brewer, B. (2003). Industrial convergence, globalization, and the persistence of the North-South divide. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38, 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. (1963). Decisions and nondecisions: An analytical framework. American Political Science Review, 57(3), 641–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bair, J., & Palpacuer, F. (2015). CSR beyond the corporation: Contested governance in global value chains. Global Networks, 15, S1–S19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bair, J., & Werner, M. (2011). Commodity chains and the uneven geographies of global capitalism: A disarticulations perspective. Environment and Planning a: Economy and Space, 43(5), 988–997. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrientos, S., & Smith, S. (2007). Do workers benefit from ethical trade? Assessing codes of labour practice in global production systems. Third World Quarterly, 28(4), 713–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello, D. C., Lohtia, R., & Sangtani, V. (2004). An institutional analysis of supply chain innovations in global marketing channels. Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 5–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biel, R. (2000). The new imperialism: Crisis & contradictions in North/South relations. Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boin, A., ’t Hart, P., & McConnell, A. (2009). Crisis exploitation: Political and policy impacts of framing contests. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(1), 81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, K. (2000). Raw power: Plant-closing threats and the threat to union organizing. Multinational Monitor, 21(12), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruff, I. (2014). The rise of authoritarian neoliberalism. Rethinking Marxism, 26(1), 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantú Rivera, H. (2019). National action plans on business and human rights: Progress or mirage? Business and Human Rights Journal, 4(2), 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2018.33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 167–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, N. (2012). Geographies of production II: A global production network A-Z. Progress in Human Geography, 36(3), 389–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, N. M., & Yeung, H. W. (2019). Global production networks: Mapping recent conceptual developments. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(4), 775–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A., Sanderson, J., & Watson, G. (2000). Power regimes: Mapping the DNA of business and supply chain relationships. Earlsgate Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. W. (1987). Production, power and world order: Social forces in the making of history. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crehan, K. A. F. (2016). Gramsci’s common sense: Inequality and its narratives. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, T. R., & Combs, J. G. (2007). Sources and consequences of bargaining power in supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 546–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M., Samuel, P. H., & Watanuki, J. (1975). The crisis of democracy: On the governability of democracies. New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallas, M., Ponte, S., & Sturgeon, T. J. (2017). A typology of power in global value chains (Working Paper in Business and Politics No. 92). Copenhagen Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, R., & Ffrench-Davis, R. (1995). The great Latin American debt crisis. Revista De Economia Politica, 15(3), 117–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, J., & Poletti, A. (2018). Introduction: Bringing institutions back in the study of global value chains. Glob Policy, 9, 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson, R. C. (1998). Law and economics discovers social norms. Journal of Legal Studies, 27(S2), 537–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, G. A. (2005). Introduction: Financialization and the world economy. In G. A. Epstein (Ed.), Financialization and the world economy. Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2007). Contesting the corporation. University of Cambridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. B., & McChesney, R. W. (2017). The endless crisis: How monopoly-finance capital produces stagnation and upheaval from the USA to China. New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froud, J., Haslam, C., Johal, S., & Williams, K. (2000). Shareholder value and financialization: Consultancy promises, management moves. Economy and Society, 29(1), 80–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, C., & Phelps, N. A. (2018). Revisiting the multinational enterprise in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 18, 139–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500049805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S. (Ed.). (1993). Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S. (1995a). The global panopticon? The neo-liberal state, economic life and democratic surveillance. Alternatives, 20, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S. (1995b). Globalisation, market civilisation, and disciplinary neoliberalism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 24, 399–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (2011). Prison notebooks (Volumes 1, 2 & 3) (Edited and translated by J. A. Buttigieg with A. Callari). Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, S., Leggett, W., & Martell, L. (Eds). (2004). The third way and beyond: Criticisms, futures and alternatives. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heigl, M. (2009). Der Staat in der Privatisierung: eine strategisch-relationale Analyse am Beispiel Mexikos. Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., & Yeung, H. (2002). Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290210150842

  • Herr, H., & Priewe, J. (2005). The macroeconomics of development and poverty reduction: Strategies beyond the Washington consensus. Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herr, H., Schweisshelm, E., & Vu, T.-M. (2016). The integration of Vietnam in the global economy and its effects for Vietnamese economic development (Working Paper No. 44). International Labour Office, Global Labour University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, M. (2008). Governance, value chains and networks: An afterword. Economy and Society, 37(3), 452–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, J. R. (2000). Doing institutional analysis: Implications for the study of innovations. Review of International Political Economy, 7(4), 595–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höpner, M., & Jackson, G. (2006). Revisiting the Mannesmann takeover: How markets for corporate control emerge. European Management Review, 3, 142–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2009). The state and power. In S. Clegg & M. Haugaard (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of power (pp. 367–382). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kebir, S. (1991). Gramsci’s zivilgesellschaft. VSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S. (2012). Smallholder business models for agribusiness-led development. Food and Agriculture Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A. (2020). Imperialism and the developing world: How Britain and the United States shaped the global periphery. Oxford Scholarship Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krücken, G., Mazza, C., Meyer, R. E., & Walgenbach, P. (2017). New themes in institutional analysis: Topics and issues from European research. Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A. (2020). Monopsony capitalism: Power and production in the twilight of the sweatshop age. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W. (2016). The value-extracting CEO: How executive stock-based pay undermines investment in productive capabilities (Working Paper No. 54). Institute for New Economic Thinking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. (2008). Political contestation in global production networks. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 943–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1974/2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manne, H. (1965). Mergers and the market for corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 73, 110–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (2002). Antonio Gramsci: Critical assessments of leading political philosophers: Contemporary applications (Vol. IV). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. (2017). The enforcement of workers’ rights through conditional or promotional trade agreements: A comparison of US and EU social chapters. In C. Scherrer (Ed.), Enforcement instruments for social human rights along supply chains (pp. 155–185). Rainer Hampp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munir, K. A. (2002). Being different: How normative and cognitive aspects of institutional environments influence technology transfer. Human Relations, 55(12), 1403–1428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1972). Strukturprobleme des kapitalistischen staates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olds, K., & Thrift, N. (2005). Cultures on the brink: Reengineering the soul of capitalism—on a global scale. In A. Ong & S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 270–290). Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, N., & Elder, S. (1978). Interest groups, lobbying and policymaking. D.C., Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palan, R., Murphy, R., & Chavagneux, C. (2010). Tax havens: How globalization really works. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagariya, A. (2004). TRIPs and the WTO: An uneasy marriage. In K. Maskus (Ed.), The WTO, intellectual property rights and the knowledge economy. Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penha, T. A. M., Belik, W., João Matos, F., & Oliveira, G. M. (2018). Measuring value capture along the Brazilian melon value chain. In C. Scherrer & S. Verma (Eds), Labor and globalization. Decent work deficits in southern agriculture: Measurements, drivers and strategies (pp. 106–132). Rainer Hampp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipkin, S., & Fuentes, A. (2017). Spurred to upgrade: A review of triggers and consequences of industrial upgrading in the global value chain literature. World Development, 98, 536–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polaski, S. (2004). Job anxiety is real—And it’s global (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Policy Brief No. 30, Campaign Edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj-Reichert, G. (2015). Exercising power over labour governance in the electronics industry. Geoforum, 67, 89–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, J. (2001). Holding corporations accountable: Corporate conduct, international codes, and citizen action. Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. I. (2004). Global crisis and Latin America. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 23(2), 135–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, C. (2001). Double hegemony? State and class in American foreign economic policymaking. Amerikastudien, 46(4), 573–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, C., & Beck, S. (2017). The promises of new instruments for the promotion of decent work. In V. Xaxa, D. Saha, & R. Singha (Eds.), Work, institutions and sustainable livelihood (pp. 251–274). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, C., & Radon, K. (Eds.). (2019). Occupational safety and health challenges in southern agriculture. Rainer Hampp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A. (2019). Bound to fail? Exploring the systemic pathologies of CSR and their implications for CSR research. Business & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319856616

  • Schubert, S. (2019). Die umsetzung der leitprinzipien der vereinten nationen für wirtschaft und menschenrechte durch nationale aktionspläne. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the art of resistance: Hidden transcripts. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1981). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, B. (2015). Commodity chains, creative destruction and global inequality: A class analysis. Journal of Economic Geography, 15, 253–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, A. (2016). Destructive creation: Analyzing contemporary socio-ecological conflicts as frontiers auf capitalist development (New Research in GPE Working Paper 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturgeon, T. J. (2009). From commodity chains to value chains: Interdisciplinary theory building in an age of globalization. In J. Bair (Ed.), Frontiers of commodity chain research (pp. 110–135). Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sum, N.-L. (2010). Wal-Martization and CSR-ization in developing countries. In P. Utting (Ed.), Corporate social responsibility and regulatory governance: Towards inclusive development? (pp. 50–76). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taglioni, D., & Winkler, D. (2016). Making global value chains work for development. The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touboulic, A., Chicksand, D., & Walker, H. (2014). Managing imbalanced supply chain relationships for sustainability: A power perspective. Decision Sciences, 45(4), 577–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Staveren, I. (2020). The misdirection of bankers’ moral compass in the organizational field of banking. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44, 507–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergara-Camus, L., & Kay, C. (2017). The agrarian political economy of left-wing governments in Latin America: Agribusiness, peasants, and the limits of neo-developmentalism. Journal of Agrarian Change, 17, 415–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, Fu. (2020). The consumption trap. https://www.echo-wall.eu/chinese-whispers/consumption-trap

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Scherrer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Scherrer, C. (2022). Embeddedness of Power Relations in Global Value Chains. In: Teipen, C., Dünhaupt, P., Herr, H., Mehl, F. (eds) Economic and Social Upgrading in Global Value Chains. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87320-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87320-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87319-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87320-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics