Skip to main content

Abstract

The paper presents an intelligent information system for solving the urgent problem for determining the significance of risk in the activities of testing laboratories. The algorithm of the system functioning is based on fuzzy logic inference of the assessment of risk significance. The expediency of this approach is stipulated by the expert nature of information about the parameters of risks, the availability of subjective judgements and fuzzy knowledge. As a result of study of the object domain, the input attributes have been established – the possibility of risk and the severity of risk consequences which determine the output parameter – the significance of the risk. Based on the expert knowledge, the corresponding linguistic variables have been introduced, basic and extended term-sets have been established, membership functions have been constructed. As a result of processing and analyzing the consistency of the expert information, the optimal models of linguistic variables have been chosen. The system of production rules being in the basis of fuzzy inference of the solution – assessment of risk significance – have been created. Recommendations for risk management have been developed for each level of the risk. On the basis of this algorithm, an original program has been created which makes it possible to instantly get information about the significance of the arising risks and take necessary measures under the conditions of continuous operation of the laboratory. The illustrations of the program running have been presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaplan, R.S., Leonard, D., Mikes, A.: Novel Risks. Working Paper of Harvard Business School 20-094, pp. 1–26 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. RF Ministry of Economic Development Order of 30.05.2014 N 326. On approval of the accreditation criteria, the list of documents confirming compliance of the applicant, the accredited person with the accreditation criteria, and the list of documents in the field of standardization, compliance with the requirements of which by applicants, accredited persons ensures their compliance with the accreditation criteria (as amended RF Ministry of Economic Development Order of 19.08.2019 N 506). https://fsa.gov.ru/documents/9557/. Accessed 10 Apr 2021

  3. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 31000. Risk Management - Guidelines, ISO, 2nd ed., Geneva, Switzerland (2018). https://iso-management.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ISO-31000-2018.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2021

  4. State Standard ISO/IEC 17025. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200166732. Accessed 10 Apr 2021

  5. Filyppova, S., Bashynska, I., Kholod, B., Prodanova, L., Ivanchenkova, L., Ivanchenkov, V.: Risk management through systematization: risk management culture. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 8(3), 6047–6052 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vasilňáková, A.: Risk management in accredited testing laboratories. In: Proceedings of the 29th International DAAAM Symposium, pp. 1071–1075 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. State Standard P 51901.12˗2007 “Risk management. Procedure for failure mode and effects analysis.” http://docs.cntd.ru/document/gost-r-51901-12-2007. Accessed 10 Apr 2021

  8. Wong, S.-K.: Risk-based thinking for chemical testing. Accred. Qual. Assur. 22(2), 103–108 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eliza, R.D., Minodora, D.: Risk management in clinical laboratory. Acta Med. Marisien. 61(4), 372–377 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Runje, B., Horvatic Novak, A., Razumic, A., Piljek, P., Strbac, B., Orosnjak, M.: Evaluation of consumer and producer risk in conformity assessment decisions. In: Proceedings of the 30th DAAAM International Symposium, pp. 0054–0058 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kharlamov, M.M., Kolmykova, T.S., Tolstykh, T.O., Nesenyuk, E.S., Garina, E.P.: Analytical procedures for assessing the risks of introducing innovative technologies into the organization’s activities. In: Popkova, E.G., Sergi, B.S. (eds.) The 21st Century from the Positions of Modern Science: Intellectual, Digital and Innovative Aspects, pp. 654–662. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32015-7_73

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Yazdi, M., Kabir, S.: Fuzzy evidence theory and bayesian networks for process systems risk analysis. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 26(1), 57–86 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Asai, K., Vatada, D., Sugeno, S.: Applied Fuzzy Systems. Mir, Moscow (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Averkin, A.N., Batyrshin, I.Z., Blishun, A.F., Silov, V.B., Tarasov, V.B.: Fuzzy sets in the models of management and artificial intelligence. Nauka, Moscow (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Nurutdinova, I., Dimitrova, L.: Intelligent system for assessing organization’s possibilities to achieve sustained success. In: Abraham, A., Kovalev, S., Tarassov, V., Snasel, V., Sukhanov, A. (eds.) 2018. AISC, vol. 875, pp. 379–388. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01821-4_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Borisova, L.V., Dimitrov, V.P.: A linguistic approach to solving of the problem of technological adjustment of combines. Mordovia Univ. Bul. 27(2), 178–189 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Borisova, L., Dimitrov, V., Nurutdinova, I.: Algorithm for assessing quality of fuzzy expert information. In: Proceedings of IEEE East˗West Design and Test Symposium (EWDTS 2017), Novi Sad, Serbia, pp. 319˗322 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kofman, A.: Introduction in the Theory of Fuzzy Sets. Radio i svyaz’, Moscow (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Saaty, T.L., Kearns, K.P.: Analytical Planning. The Organization of Systems. Radio i svyaz’, Moscow (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dimitrova, L.A.: Some aspects of formalizing risk management knowledge: In: Science of the Young - The Future Of Russia. Collection of Scientific Articles of the 5th International Scientific Conference of Promising Developments of Young Scientists in 4 v’s, vol. 1, pp. 37˗40. Southwestern State University, Kursk (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dimitrov, V.P., Borisova, L.V., Nurutdinova, I.N., Bogatyreva, E.V.: Software system for inputting expert knowledge. Don State Tech. Univ. Bull. 11, 83–90 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nurutdinova, I., Dimitrova, L. (2022). Intelligent Decision Support System When Assessing Risk Significance. In: Kovalev, S., Tarassov, V., Snasel, V., Sukhanov, A. (eds) Proceedings of the Fifth International Scientific Conference “Intelligent Information Technologies for Industry” (IITI’21). IITI 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 330. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87178-9_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics