Skip to main content

Current Issues of Multimodal and Intermodal Cargo Transportation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modern Trends and Research in Intermodal Transportation

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 400))

Abstract

Freight transport is constantly growing and the forecast is that this trend will continue in the future. The sustainable development of transport requires the development of activities, which yield higher economic and social results while at the same time reduce the negative impact on the environment. In the long term, the sustainable development of transport activities is complex and tied to enormous challenges, difficulties and barriers, related to the development of the technological environment, the social and economic development, the influence of political factors and regulations. One of the central perspectives for the development of the freight transport in Europe is the development of multimodal and intermodal transport. The present chapter reviews some essential issues about the conditions for interaction between the modes of freight transport and the main challenges this kind of transport faces. An overview has been made of the main characteristics of organization and technology in multimodal and intermodal transport, and the related to them commodal and synchro modal transport that have appeared in recent years, as well as the physical internet concept. The application and barriers for modern use of information and communication technologies in multimodal and intermodal transport has been reviewed. An overview of the development of multimodal and intermodal transport in Bulgaria in accordance with the development of international transport corridors that pass through the country is carried out. A mathematical model has been developed on the basis of multicriteria optimization with three criteria: direct costs, time and external costs. The transport scheme is presented as an oriented graph line with each point corresponding to a node and each road, connecting nodes i and j, to an oriented weighted rib (i, j) in the graph. Weight cij is directly connected to the three criteria set. We assume that on each rib transport can be carried out by three modes: waterway, road and rail. If there is no physical connection, the respective weight is assumed to be an infinitely large number. Pareto optimal solutions have been determined under conditions for integer variables and application of a weighting method. To verify the model, a specific task for providing multimodal transport has been solved with the help of Matlab R2017b software and the optimization functions built into the product have been found to be optimal under Pareto solutions, using heuristic approaches for solving a partially integer linear optimization problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. European Commission: The Guidelines for border management measures to protect health and ensure European Commission the availability of goods and essential services. Adopted by the European Commission on 16 Mar 2020. Brussels, Belgium (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mиниcтepcтвoтo нa тpaнcпopтa, инфopмaциoннитe тexнoлoгии и cъoбщeниятa: Плaн зa дeйcтвиe нa Peпyбликa Бългapия пo Cъoбщeниeтo нa Eвpoпeйcкaтa кoмиcия зa пpилaгaнeтo нa Зeлeнитe кopидopи oт Hacoкитe зa мepкитe зa yпpaвлeниeтo нa гpaницитe зa зaщитa нa здpaвeтo и ocигypявaнe нa нaличнocттa нa cтoки и ocнoвни ycлyги, C. 12. Coфия, Бългapия (2020) [in Bulgatian: Ministry of Transport, Information Technology and Communications: Action Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria under the Communication of the European Commission on the Implementation of Green Consumers from the Guidelines for Measures for Healthcare Management and Ensuring the Availability of Goods and Basic Services, p. 12. Sofia, Bulgaria (2020)]

    Google Scholar 

  3. Executive Agency “Automotive Administration”: Updated information on road traffic through the border checkpoints on the territory of the Republic of Bulgaria (2020). https://rta.government.bg/index.php?page=covid-19

  4. Sommar, R., Woxenius, J.: Time perspectives on intermodal transport of consolidated cargo. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 7, 163–182 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Macharis, C., Caris, A., Jourquin, B., Pekin, E.: A decision support framework for intermodal transport policy. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 3, 167–178 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roso, V.: The emergence and significance of dry ports: the case of the Port of Göteborg. World Rev. Intermodal Transp. Res. 2(4), 296–310 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wenhua, Q., Rezaei, J., Maknoon, Y., Tavasszy, L.: Hinterland freight transportation replanning model under the framework of synchromodality. Transp. Res. Part E 131, 308–328 (2019). ISSN 1366-5545

    Google Scholar 

  8. Adhikari, R., Agrawal, R.: An Introductory Study on Time Series Modeling and Forecasting, 68p. Cornell University (2013). https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1302/1302.6613.pdf

  9. Hwang, T., Ouyang, Y.: Freight shipment modal split and its environmental impacts: an exploratory study. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 64(1), 2–12 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2013.831799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ivanov, B., Asenov, A., Pencheva, V., Tsekov, A.: Methodology for selecting a scheme for the carriage of transit goods by car in multimodal transport. Proc. Univ. Ruse 56(4), 101–107 (2017). ISBN 1311-3321

    Google Scholar 

  11. Caris, A., Limbourg, S., Macharis, C., Lier, T., Cools, M.: Integration of inland waterway transport in the intermodal supply chain: a taxonomy of research challenges. J. Transp. Geogr. 41, 126–136 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stank, T., Roath, A.: Some propositions on intermodal transportation and logistics facility development: shippers’ perspectives. Transp. J. 37(3), 13–24 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, N., Janic, M., Wee, V. (2009). The trade-off between CO2 emissions and logistics costs based on multiobjective optimization. In: 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, 18p. Washington, USA. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/38144727

  14. Schijndel, W., Dinwoodie, J.: Congestion and multimodal transport: a survey of cargo transport operators in the Netherlands. Transp. Policy 7(4), 231–241 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Roso, V., Woxenius, J., Lumsden, K.: The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland. J. Transp. Geogr. 17(5), 338–345 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bontekoning, Y., Priemus, H.: Breakthrough innovations in intermodal freight transport. Transp. Plan. Technol. 27(5), 335–345 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/0308106042000273031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Monios, J., Bergqvist, R.: Intermodal Freight Transport and Logistics, 280p. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2017). ISBN 9781315177762

    Google Scholar 

  18. Пpиcтaнищe Бypгac EAД: Пpaвилa и oбичaи нa пpиcтaнищe Бypгac (2012) [in Bulgarian: Port of Burgas EAD: Rules and Customs Port of Burgas (2012)]. http://port-burgas.bg/media/uploads/2012/09/Customs_POB.pdf

  19. Rushton, A., Croucher, P., Baker, P.: The Handbook of Logistics and Distribution Management: Understanding the Supply Chain, Sixth edn., 912p. Kogan Page Publisher, London (2017). ISBN 978-0-7494-7679

    Google Scholar 

  20. Southworth, F., Peterson, B.: Intermodal and international freight network modeling. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 8(1–6), 147–166 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Elbert, R., Seikowsky, L.: The influences of behavioral biases, barriers and facilitators on the willingness of forwarders’ decision makers to modal shift from unimodal road freight transport to intermodal road–rail freight transport. J. Bus. Econ. 87(8), 1083–1123 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0847-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bruno, F., Sabine, S., Limbourgb, J., Carreira, L.: The impact of transport policies on railroad intermodal freight competitiveness—the case of Belgium. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 34, 230–244 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.015

  23. Bask, A., Rajahonka, M.: The role of environmental sustainability in the freight transport mode choice: a systematic literature review with focus on the EU. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 47(7), 560–602 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Щepбaнин, Ю., Ивин, E., Кypбaцкий, A., Глaзypин, A.: Экoнoмeтpичecкoe мoдeлиpoвaниe и пpoгнoзиpoвaниe cпpoca нa гpyзoвыe пepeвoзки в Poccии в 1992–2015 г. Жypнaл “Hayчныe тpyды ИHП PAH”. Toм 2017, pp. 200–217 (2017) [in Russian: Shcherbanin, Y., Ivin, E., Kurbatsky, A., Glazurin, A.: Econometric modeling and forecasting the demand for freight transportation in Russia in 1992–2015. J. Sci. Works Inst. Econ. Forecast. Russ. Acad. Sci., 200–217 (2017)]

    Google Scholar 

  25. Macher, J, Mayo, J.: U.S. Freight Rail Economics and Policy: Are we on the Right Track?, 308p. Taylor and Francis Group (2019). ISBN 978 0 3674 2834

    Google Scholar 

  26. IBM: SPSS-Statistics-Software. New York, USA (2018). https://www.ibm.com/analytics/spss-statistics-software

  27. Stoilova, S.: An approach for choosing the optimal route and type of transport for freight carriage using compromise programming. In: MATEC Web of Conferences 234 06002, BulTrans-2018—10th International Scientific Conference on Aeronautics, Automotive and Railway Engineering and Technologies (2018). https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201823406002

  28. Désirée, O., Theologitis, D., Urrutia, B.: Inland navigation developments in the EU 2016. In: Eighty-Seventh Session of the Danube Commission. Budapest, Romania (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. UNCTAD/ICC: Rules for Multimodal Transport Documents (1992). https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/tradewp4inf.117_corr.1_en.pdf

  30. Woodburn, A., Browne, M., Piotrowska, M., Allen, J.; Literature Review WM7: Scope for Modal Shift Through Fiscal, Regulatory and Organisational Change, Carried Out as Part of Work Module 1, Green Logistics Project, 53p. Green Logistics, University of Westminster and University of Leeds (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Пpиcтaнищeн кoмплeкc Pyce EAД: Пpaвилa и oбичaи нa Пpиcтaнищeн кoмплeкc Pyce EAД (2004) [in Bulgarian: Ruse Port Complex EAD: Rules and Customs of Ruse Port Complex EAD (2004)]. http://www.port-ruse-bg.com/tinymce/upload/%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B8/pravila-obichai-.doc

  32. Гoчeвa, C.: Икoнoмeтpия, Eвpoпeйcкa виpтyaлнa лaбopaтopия пo мaтeмaтикa (EBЛM). 48 c (2020) [in Bulgarian: Gocheva, S.: Econometrics, European Virtual Laboratory of Mathematics (EVLM). 48p. (2020). http://www.fmi-plovdiv.org/evlm/DBbg/bmatmenu

  33. Pencheva, V., Asenov, A., Sładkowski, A., Georgiev, I., Beloev, I., Ivanov, K.: The Danube River, multimodality and intermodality. In: Sładkowski, A. (ed.) Modelling of the Interaction of the Different Vehicles and Various Transport Modes. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, pp. 237–293 (2019). ISBN: 978-3-030-11511-1

    Google Scholar 

  34. Web Page of the Matworks Texboox. Matlab. USA (2018). https://www.mathworks.com

  35. Román, C., Arencibia, A.I., Feo-Valero, M.: A latent class model with attribute cutoffs to analyze modal choice for freight transport. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 102, 212–227 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. ARMA: Quantcademy. Autoregressive Moving Average ARMA (p, q) Models for Time Series Analysis—Part 1. QuarkGluon Ltd. (2018). https://www.quantstart.com/articles/Autoregressive-Moving-Average-ARMA-p-q-Models-for-Time-Series-Analysis-Part-1

  37. Cимeoнoв, Д., Пeнчeвa, B.: Bзaимoдeйcтвиe мeждy видoвeтe тpaнcпopт. Pyce (2001) [in Bulgarian: Simeonov, D., Pencheva, V.: Interaction Between Modes of Transport, 308p. Ruse (2001)]

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ballot, E., Montreuil, B., Meller, R.: The Physical Internet: The Network of Logistics Networks, 1st edn., La documentation Française, Paris. ISBN 978-2-11-009865-8

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fedorko, G., Husáková, N., Dudáš, G.: Design of allocation of new technological equipment within the frame of production process in company Getrag Ford Transmissions Slovakia, s.r.o. Acta Montan. Slovaca. 15, 14–22 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yanchuk, M.B., Pron, S.V., Fedyna, V.P., Cherednichenko, K.V.: The scientific-methodological approaches to transport risks management in multimodal freight transportations. Bus. Inf. 2(517), 198–209 (2021). https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2021-2-198-209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Пaвлoвa, B.: Cтaтиcтичecки изcлeдвaния в пyбличния ceктop. Учeбник зa диcтaнциoннa фopмa нa oбyчeниe. Издaтeлcки кoмплeкc УHCC, Coфия (2015) [in Bulgarian: Pavlova, V.: Statistical Surveys in the Public Sector. Textbook for Distance Learning. UNWE Publishing House, Sofia (2015)]. ISBN 978-954-644-786-9

    Google Scholar 

  42. Commission, T.: Toward a National Intermodal Transportation System, p. 60. National Commission on Intermodal Transportation, Washington, DC (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Forkenbrock, D.J.: Comparison of external costs of rail and truck freight transportation. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 35, 321–337 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Banomyong, R.: Assessing import channels for a land-locked country. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 16(2), 62–81 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ding, L., Zhang, N.: Travel mode choice model using individual grouping based on cluster analysis. Science Direct, Proc. Eng. 137, 786–795 (2016). ISSN 1877-7058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.317

  46. Witlox, F., Vandaele, E.: Determining the monetary value of quality attributes in freight transportation using a stated preference approach. Transp. Plan. Technol. 28(2), 77–92 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060500053301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Grieger, M.: Electronic marketplaces: a literature review and a call for supply chain management research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 144(2), 280–294 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Weber, T.: Cloud Computing for Business Goes Mainstream (2010). http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10097450

  49. Marchet, G., Perego, A., Perotti, S. (2009). An exploratory study of ICT adoption in the Italian freight transportation industry. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 39(9), 785–812. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030911008201

  50. Gunasekaran, A., Subramanian, N., Papadopoulos, T.: Information technology for competitive advantage within logistics and supply chains: a review. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 99, 14–33 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Patterson, K.A., Grimm, C.M., Corsi, T.M.: Adopting new technologies for supply chain management. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 39(2), 95–121 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(02)00041-8)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. European Commission: European Digital Innovation Hubs in Digital Europe Programme. Draft Working Document 25 Jan 2021. Brissels, Belgium (2021). https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/activities/edihs

  53. Mihaylov, M.: The activity of computing and information services center in unison with the mission of Ruse University. Proc. Univ. Ruse 59(9.1):86–90 (2020). ISBN 1311-3321

    Google Scholar 

  54. National Statistical Institute: Statistical Yearbook, 724p. Sofia, Bulgaria (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Executive Agency “Maritime Administration”: Statistical Data for Cargo Turnover in Ports. Sofia, Bulgaria (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Witte, A.D., Hollevoet, J., Dobruszkes, F., Hubert, M., Macharis, C.: Linking modal choice to motility: a comprehensive review. Transp. Res. Part A 49, 329–341 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  57. State Agency for Electronic Government: Open Data Portal. Sofia, Bulgaria (2021). https://data.egov.bg/

  58. Mиниcтepcтвo нa тpaнcпopтa, инфopмaциoннитe тexнoлoгии и cъoбщeниятa: Интeгpиpaнa тpaнcпopтнa cтpaтeгия в пepиoдa дo 2030 г. Coфия, Бългapия (2017) [in Bulgarian: Ministry of Transport, Information Technology and Communications: Integrated Transport Strategy in the Period Until 2030. Sofia, Bulgaria (2017)]. http://www.optransport.bg/upload/docs/Integrated_Transport_Strategy_2030_bg.pdf

  59. Schwab, K.: The Global Competitiveness Report. World Economic Forum (2018). SBN-13: 978-92-95044-76-0. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2018/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2018.pdf

  60. EU: Appendix 3, Strategy of the IGC TRACECA 2016–2026. 15p. (2016). http://www.traceca-org.org/fileadmin/fm-dam/pdfs/Appendix_3_Strategy_Master_plan_TRACECA_eng.pdf

  61. Danielis, R., Marcucci, E., Rotaris, L.: Logistics managers’ stated preferences for freight service attributes. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 41(3), 201–215 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. European Court of Auditors: Rail Freight Transport in the EU: Still not on the Right Track. European Commission, Brussels (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rand Europe: INTERMODAL (Integrated Solutions for Intermodal Transport Between the EU and the CEECs): Identification and Prioritisation of Bottlenecks, Deliverable D7. Leiden (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  64. European Commission: Handbook on the External Costs of Transport Version 2019—1.1, 332p. Brussels (2020). ISBN 978-92-76-18184-2

    Google Scholar 

  65. EcoTransIT World: Emission calculator for greenhouse gases and exhaust emissions (2021). https://www.ecotransit.org/calculation.en.html

  66. Cargopedia: Distance calculator (2021). https://www.cargopedia.bg/%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80-%D0%B7%D0%B0-%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%8F%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by contract No KП-06-H27/12 of 11.12.2018 “Modelling and elaboration of complex system for selection of transport technology in transport network” funded by the National Science Fund of the Ministry of Education and Science of Bulgaria.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Velizara Pencheva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pencheva, V., Asenov, A., Sladkowski, A., Ivanov, B., Georgiev, I. (2022). Current Issues of Multimodal and Intermodal Cargo Transportation. In: Sładkowski, A. (eds) Modern Trends and Research in Intermodal Transportation. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 400. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87120-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87120-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87119-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87120-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics