Abstract
As the contributions to this Volume illustrate, trust is used in a wide range of contexts and with a variety of meanings in higher education. In line with this, the approaches to ‘trust’ used in the various chapters of this Volume vary widely, from structural versions, to existential and psychological ones, with varieties in between. In addition, the relation between social trust and trust at the individual level has been discussed in a number of chapters. While trust at both levels has remained high in Norway and other Nordic countries, in other countries, including the UK, both have declined. The de-cline in levels of trust in the UK has been accompanied by the emergence of an audit culture designed to augment trust, but which, at its core, creates alternatives to trust, favouring external standards, control and sanctions. This changes the disposition of trustworthiness to one of compliance to rules and regulations: it allows expertise to be placed not in the wise and the worthy, but in the hands of technicians and pragmatists, as is further discussed in this chapter.
Among the phenomena that characterize the early twenty-first century, the most significant must be the disappearance of the landmarks that society uses to find its bearings, and the increasing difficulty that individuals have in visualizing an optimistic future for themselves – a feeling exacerbated by following a daily spectacle of wars and mass migrations
Winand (2018: 221)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gross, K. (2015). Truth, transparency and trust: Treasured values in higher education. New England Journal of Higher Education, posted February 23. https://nebhe.org/journal/truth-transparency-and-trust-treasured-values-in-higher-education/. Accessed 1.1.2019.
Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. Wiley.
Maassen, P. (2017). The university’s governance paradox. Higher Education Quarterly, 71(3), 290–298.
Maassen, P., Gornitzka, Å., & Fumasoli, T. (2017). University reform and institutional autonomy: A framework for analysing the living autonomy. Higher Education Quarterly, 71(3), 239–250.
Naidoo, R., & Jamieson, I. (2005). Towards a research agenda on the impact of student consumerism in higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 267–281.
Pew Research Center. (2019). Trust and Distrust in America. Report published July 2019. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2019/07/PEW-RESEARCH-CENTER_TRUST-DISTRUST-IN-AMERICA-REPORT_2019-07-22-1.pdf. Accessed 12.11.2020.
Rothstein, B. (2011). The quality of Government. Corruption, social trust and inequality in international perspective. University of Chicago Press.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy. Markets, state, and higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. (Eds.). (2011). Accountability in higher education: Global perspectives on trust and power. Routledge.
Winand, J. (2018). Universities and the “democracy of the gullible”. The UNESCO courier, 1, 21-23. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261279. Accessed 1.1.2019.
Žalec, B. (2013). Trust, accountability, and higher education. Synthesis Philosophica, 28(1–2), 65–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gibbs, P., Maassen, P. (2021). Coda. In: Gibbs, P., Maassen, P. (eds) Trusting in Higher Education . Higher Education Dynamics, vol 57. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87037-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87037-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87036-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87037-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)