Abstract
The article examines the problem of managing a democratic socio-economic system in the face of a shortage of a vital commodity (such as the COVID-19 vaccine). The citizens’ approval of the actions of the authorities to increase the production and supply of this product contributes to political stability. The possibilities of increasing the supply of a vital commodity depend on random factors. In the face of such uncertainty, in the age of artificial intelligence, the management of a socio-economic system can be based on machine learning and adaptation. In this case, it is necessary to take into account the activity of the elements of the system associated with the presence of their own goals, which do not necessarily coincide with the goal of the system as a whole. These elements can influence adaptation and machine learning procedures to achieve their goals. The research is carried out on a three-level model of a democratic socio-economic system. At its top level is a member of society - a citizen who evaluates the politician who is at the middle level of the system. In turn, the politician can influence the increase in the supply of a vital commodity, including both its purchase on the market and production at a local plant belonging to the lower level of the system. Political stability is guaranteed if the citizen regularly approves the actions of the politician to increase the supply of vital goods. But the plant’s management knows its own production potential better than the politician. Thus, this leadership can manipulate the volume of its own production in order to gain more support from the politician. A politician may also manipulate the opportunities available to him in order to achieve personal goals. To avoid manipulation of the supply of a vital product under conditions of uncertainty, a socio-economic management mechanism is proposed, including an economic and political mechanism. The economic mechanism includes a procedure for adaptive forecasting of the production of a vital commodity, as well as a procedure for supporting this production. The political mechanism includes a procedure for machine self-learning of a citizen, as well as a procedure for assessing the activity of a politician. Sufficient conditions for the synthesis of the optimal mechanism of socio-economic management are found, in which random opportunities to increase the supply of a vital commodity are fully used, including both purchases on the market and production at a local plant. An example of such a socio-economic mechanism is considered on the example of the supply of the COVID-19 vaccine to England.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Soros, G.: The Crisis of Global Capitalism. Little, Brown & Company, USA (1998)
Lipman-Blumen, J.: The Allure of Toxic Leaders. Oxford University Press, USA (2004)
Schultz, V.: Oligarchy, ontology, cycles, and change in a globalizing world. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya 2, 3–15 (2009)
Boddy, C., Ladyshewsky, R., Galvin, P.: Leaders without ethics in global business: corporate psychopaths. J. Public Aff. 10, 121–138 (2010)
Tsyganov, V.: Limits of global growth, stagnation, creativity and international stability. AI Soc. 29(1), 259–266 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0483-x
Tsyganov, V.: Socio-political stability, voter’s emotional expectations, and information management. AI Soc. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01017-8
Blanchet, M., Rinn, T., Thaden, G., Thieulloy, G.: Industrie 4.0 - the new industrial revolution. How Europe will succeed. Roland Berger Strategy, MĂĽnchen (2014)
Borodin, D., Gurlev, I., Klukvin, A.: Adaptive mechanisms for sustainable development. Syst. Sci. 30, 89–95 (2004)
Tsyganov, V.: Learning mechanisms in digital control of large-scale industrial systems. In: Proceedings of the Global Smart Industry Conference, pp. 1–6. IEEE, Chelyabinsk (2018)
AI governance: a holistic approach to implement ethics into AI. White Paper. World Economic Forum Homepage. https://www.weforum.org. Accessed 12 Apr 2021
Gill, K.S.: Prediction paradigm: the human price for instrumentalism. AI Soc 35, 3 (2020)
Creating a digital society. EU Homepage. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/creating-digital-society. Accessed 19 Oct 2020
Tsyganov, V.: Intelligent information technologies in social safety. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 1084, 270–284 (2019)
De Fine Licht, K., de Fine Licht, J.: Artificial intelligence, transparency, and public decision-making. AI Soc. 35(4), 917–926 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00960-w
De Laat, P.B.: Algorithmic decision-making based on machine learning from big data: can transparency restore accountability? Philos. Technol. 31, 525–541 (2018)
Spiegelhalter, D.: Should we trust algorithms? Harv. Data Sci. Rev. 2(1), 1–12 (2020)
Recht, B.: Reflections on the learning-to-control renaissance. In: Proceedings of the 21st IFAC World Congress, p. 4707. Elsevier, Berlin (2020)
Tsyganov, V.: Emotional expectations and social stability. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(30), 112–117 (2018)
Burkov, V., Gubko, M., Kondratiev, V., Korgin, N., Novikov, D.: Mechanism Synthesis and Management. NOVA Publishers, New York (2013)
Bagamaev, R., Gurlev, I.: Adaptive mechanism for mastering capital and improving international stability. IFAC-PapersOnLine 16, 42–45 (2005)
Arifovic, J., Ledyard, J.: A behavioral model for mechanism design: individual evolutionary learning. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 78, 375–395 (2011)
Kossiakoff, A., Sweet, W., Seymour, S., Biemer, S.: Systems Engineering: Principles and Practice. John Wiley, New York (2011)
Dibrivniy, O., Onyshchenko, V., Grebenyuk, V.: Forecasting based on the trend model and adaptive Brown’s model. In: 14th International Conference on Advanced Trends in Radioelectronics, Telecommunications and Computer Engineering, pp. 944–947. Lviv University, Ukraine (2018)
Auster, S.: Asymmetric awareness and moral hazard. Games Econ. Behav. 82, 503–521 (2013)
Schultz, V.: Humanitarian high technologies in political system of society. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya 8, 85–93 (2012)
Diallo, S.Y., Shults, F.L., Wildman, W.J.: Minding morality: ethical artificial societies for public policy modeling. AI Soc. 36(1), 49–57 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01028-5
Tsyganov, V.: Models of voters and the politicians in a digital society under uncertainty. IFAC PaperOnline 52(25), 275–280 (2019)
Ahuja, S., Reddy, V., Marques, O.: Artificial intelligence and COVID-19: a multidisciplinary approach. Integr. Med. Res. 9, 100434 (2020)
Naudé, W.: Artificial intelligence vs COVID-19: limitations, constraints and pitfalls. AI Soc. 35(3), 761–765 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00978-0
Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the UK. GOV.UK Homepage. https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/vaccinations. Accessed 12 Apr 2021
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tsyganov, V.V. (2021). Adapting, Learning, and Control the Supply of a Vital Commodity Such as COVID-19 Vaccine. In: Kravets, A.G., Shcherbakov, M., Parygin, D., Groumpos, P.P. (eds) Creativity in Intelligent Technologies and Data Science. CIT&DS 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1448. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87034-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87034-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87033-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87034-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)