Skip to main content

System Level Knowledge Analysis and Keyword Extraction in Neuroscience

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Brain Informatics (BI 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12960))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Vast amounts of knowledge resources are emerging from Neuroscience research, thanks to increasingly widely available imaging and analysis technologies and open data sets. Learning, processing and keeping up to date with developments however imply steep learning curves. Advances in Neuroscience research provide insights into the human brain and the mind for brain specialists, but also inform other scientific disciplines such as to complexity science, cognitive computing, medicine in general and general technology and policy sectors. With a few exceptions however, the majority of Neuroscience research outcomes can still be accessed and leveraged mostly only by highly trained neuroscientists and brain informatics researchers in their respective specialisations, as the knowledge and skill sets required to query and manipulate such data is only meaningful for individuals with specific training. This paper identifies and addresses the need to lower the cognitive barriers to accessing Neuroscience research, as it is becoming very relevant to other fields, and to widen its accessibility to a broader range of scholars of other disciplines - such as Computer Science and Information Technology for example, reducing the efforts required in tracking innovation and facilitate knowledge acquisition. Keeping up with the state of the art is a challenge in any field, yet increasing number of researchers, students and practitioners from diverse professions and with a wide range of interests and goals, and multi disciplinary and linguistic backgrounds. The approach proposed here leverages a combination of elementary core methods from semantic technology, including simple corpus and linguistic analysis techniques, and devises a low tech instrument that can be adopted irrespective of the availability of software and level of English language proficiency to acquire the necessary familiarity to handle Neuroscience topics The same method can also be leveraged in other complex knowledge domains. A set of experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of the method is described with preliminary results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/02/18/2178094/0/en/Global-Application-Container-Market-2021-to-2026-Growth-Trends-COVID-19-Impact-and-Forecasts.html.

References

  1. Kenkel, W.: Corpus colossal: a bibliometric analysis of neuroscience abstracts and impact factor front. Integr. Neurosci 13, 18 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fleming, S.M., Frith, C.D.: Meta cognitive neuroscience: an introduction. In: Fleming, S., Frith, C. (eds.) The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45190-4_1

  3. Bonacchi, N., Gaelle, C., et al.: Data architecture for a large-scale Neuroscience collaboration. BioRxiv, pp. 827–873 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bassett, D.S., et al.: Reflections on the past two decades of Neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 21(10) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abraham, F.D.: Chapter six epistemology of the neurodynamics of mind a fractal epistemology for a scientific psychology: bridging the personal with the transpersonal (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martin, S.: Measuring cognitive load and cognition: metrics for technology-enhanced learning. In: Educational Research and Evaluation (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Education Tech. Research Dev. 68(1), 1–16 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brünken, R., Plass, J.L., Moreno, R.: (eds.) Current issues and open questions in cognitive load research. In: Plass, J.L., Moreno, R., Brünken, R. (eds.) Cognitive Load Theory, pp. 253–272. Cambridge University Press, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paas, F., Alexander, R., Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory: instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instr. Sci. 32 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta, A., Ludascher, B., Martone, M.E.: Knowledge-based integration of Neuroscience data sources. In: Proceedings. 12th International Conference on Scientific and Statistica Database Management, pp. 39–52. IEEE (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yeung, A.W.K., Tazuko, K.G., Keung, W.: The changing landscape of Neuroscience research, 2006–2015: a bibliometric study. Front. Neurosci. 11 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Keshava, R.: Growth analysis of neuroscience research in Asian Countries, 1989–2018: a scientometric study (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kocoń, J.M.: M Mapping WordNet onto human brain connectome in emotion processing and semantic similarity recognition. In: Information Processing & Management (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bassett, D.S., Sporns, O.: Network neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 20(3) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Larson, S., Martone, M.: Ontologies for neuroscience: what are they and what are they good for? Front. Neurosci. 3 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hjørland, B.: Domain analysis in information science. J. Doc. (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dines, B.: Domain analysis and description principles, techniques, and modelling languages. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Prieto-Díaz, R.: Domain analysis: an introduction. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 15 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heilman, M., Eskenazi, M.: Application of automatic thesaurus extraction for computer generation of vocabulary questions. In: Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Paré, G., Spyros, K.: Methods for literature reviews In: Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-Based Approach Internet. University of Victoria (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Leech, N.L., Collins, K.M.T.: Qualitative analysis techniques for the review of the literature. Qual. Rep. 17, 56 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Adorján, M.: Introducing corpus linguistic tools to EFL undergraduates and trainee teachers. Education 4.0 revolution: transformative approaches to language teaching and learning, assessment and campus design (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dennis, C.L.: Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 40(3), 321–332 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ganter, B.W.: Applied lattice theory: formal concept analysis. In: Grätzer, G., (ed.) General Lattice Theory, Birkhäuser (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rusko, T.: Lexical features of scientific discourse. Santalka Filologija Edukologija 22(1), 82–88 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kockaert, H., Steurs, F.: Handbook of Terminology, vol. 1. John Benjamins Publishing Co., Amsterdam (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kandrashkina, O.O., Revina. E.V.: Lexical analysis of technical terms in the field of materials science. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Squire, L., Berg, D., Bloom, F.E., Du Lac, S., Ghoshand, A., Spitzer, N.C. (eds.) Fundamental Neuroscience. Academic Press ( 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Neuroscience Online McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mahmud, M., Vassanelli, S.K., Zhong, N., (eds.) Brain Informatics: 13th International Conference, BI 2020, Padua, Italy Springer Nature (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Same as 1 (datasets from Article Corpus Colossus article)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wilkinson, S.: Focus group methodology: a review. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 1, 181–203 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Di Maio, P. (2021). System Level Knowledge Analysis and Keyword Extraction in Neuroscience. In: Mahmud, M., Kaiser, M.S., Vassanelli, S., Dai, Q., Zhong, N. (eds) Brain Informatics. BI 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12960. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86993-9_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86993-9_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86992-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86993-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics