Abstract
Vast amounts of knowledge resources are emerging from Neuroscience research, thanks to increasingly widely available imaging and analysis technologies and open data sets. Learning, processing and keeping up to date with developments however imply steep learning curves. Advances in Neuroscience research provide insights into the human brain and the mind for brain specialists, but also inform other scientific disciplines such as to complexity science, cognitive computing, medicine in general and general technology and policy sectors. With a few exceptions however, the majority of Neuroscience research outcomes can still be accessed and leveraged mostly only by highly trained neuroscientists and brain informatics researchers in their respective specialisations, as the knowledge and skill sets required to query and manipulate such data is only meaningful for individuals with specific training. This paper identifies and addresses the need to lower the cognitive barriers to accessing Neuroscience research, as it is becoming very relevant to other fields, and to widen its accessibility to a broader range of scholars of other disciplines - such as Computer Science and Information Technology for example, reducing the efforts required in tracking innovation and facilitate knowledge acquisition. Keeping up with the state of the art is a challenge in any field, yet increasing number of researchers, students and practitioners from diverse professions and with a wide range of interests and goals, and multi disciplinary and linguistic backgrounds. The approach proposed here leverages a combination of elementary core methods from semantic technology, including simple corpus and linguistic analysis techniques, and devises a low tech instrument that can be adopted irrespective of the availability of software and level of English language proficiency to acquire the necessary familiarity to handle Neuroscience topics The same method can also be leveraged in other complex knowledge domains. A set of experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of the method is described with preliminary results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kenkel, W.: Corpus colossal: a bibliometric analysis of neuroscience abstracts and impact factor front. Integr. Neurosci 13, 18 (2019)
Fleming, S.M., Frith, C.D.: Meta cognitive neuroscience: an introduction. In: Fleming, S., Frith, C. (eds.) The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45190-4_1
Bonacchi, N., Gaelle, C., et al.: Data architecture for a large-scale Neuroscience collaboration. BioRxiv, pp. 827–873 (2020)
Bassett, D.S., et al.: Reflections on the past two decades of Neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 21(10) (2020)
Abraham, F.D.: Chapter six epistemology of the neurodynamics of mind a fractal epistemology for a scientific psychology: bridging the personal with the transpersonal (2020)
Martin, S.: Measuring cognitive load and cognition: metrics for technology-enhanced learning. In: Educational Research and Evaluation (2014)
Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Education Tech. Research Dev. 68(1), 1–16 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3
Brünken, R., Plass, J.L., Moreno, R.: (eds.) Current issues and open questions in cognitive load research. In: Plass, J.L., Moreno, R., Brünken, R. (eds.) Cognitive Load Theory, pp. 253–272. Cambridge University Press, New York (2010)
Paas, F., Alexander, R., Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory: instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instr. Sci. 32 (2004)
Gupta, A., Ludascher, B., Martone, M.E.: Knowledge-based integration of Neuroscience data sources. In: Proceedings. 12th International Conference on Scientific and Statistica Database Management, pp. 39–52. IEEE (2000)
Yeung, A.W.K., Tazuko, K.G., Keung, W.: The changing landscape of Neuroscience research, 2006–2015: a bibliometric study. Front. Neurosci. 11 (2017)
Keshava, R.: Growth analysis of neuroscience research in Asian Countries, 1989–2018: a scientometric study (2020)
Kocoń, J.M.: M Mapping WordNet onto human brain connectome in emotion processing and semantic similarity recognition. In: Information Processing & Management (2021)
Bassett, D.S., Sporns, O.: Network neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 20(3) (2017)
Larson, S., Martone, M.: Ontologies for neuroscience: what are they and what are they good for? Front. Neurosci. 3 (2009)
Hjørland, B.: Domain analysis in information science. J. Doc. (2002)
Dines, B.: Domain analysis and description principles, techniques, and modelling languages. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. (2019)
Prieto-DÃaz, R.: Domain analysis: an introduction. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 15 (1990)
Heilman, M., Eskenazi, M.: Application of automatic thesaurus extraction for computer generation of vocabulary questions. In:Â Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education (2007)
Paré, G., Spyros, K.: Methods for literature reviews In: Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-Based Approach Internet. University of Victoria (2017)
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Leech, N.L., Collins, K.M.T.: Qualitative analysis techniques for the review of the literature. Qual. Rep. 17, 56 (2012)
Adorján, M.: Introducing corpus linguistic tools to EFL undergraduates and trainee teachers. Education 4.0 revolution: transformative approaches to language teaching and learning, assessment and campus design (2020)
Dennis, C.L.: Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 40(3), 321–332 (2003)
Ganter, B.W.: Applied lattice theory: formal concept analysis. In: Grätzer, G., (ed.) General Lattice Theory, Birkhäuser (1997)
Rusko, T.: Lexical features of scientific discourse. Santalka Filologija Edukologija 22(1), 82–88 (2014)
Kockaert, H., Steurs, F.: Handbook of Terminology, vol. 1. John Benjamins Publishing Co., Amsterdam (2015)
Kandrashkina, O.O., Revina. E.V.: Lexical analysis of technical terms in the field of materials science. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing (2020)
Squire, L., Berg, D., Bloom, F.E., Du Lac, S., Ghoshand, A., Spitzer, N.C. (eds.) Fundamental Neuroscience. Academic Press ( 2012)
Neuroscience Online McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy
Mahmud, M., Vassanelli, S.K., Zhong, N., (eds.) Brain Informatics: 13th International Conference, BI 2020, Padua, Italy Springer Nature (2020)
Same as 1 (datasets from Article Corpus Colossus article)
Wilkinson, S.: Focus group methodology: a review. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 1, 181–203 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Di Maio, P. (2021). System Level Knowledge Analysis and Keyword Extraction in Neuroscience. In: Mahmud, M., Kaiser, M.S., Vassanelli, S., Dai, Q., Zhong, N. (eds) Brain Informatics. BI 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12960. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86993-9_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86993-9_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86992-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86993-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)