Skip to main content

The Paradox of Fiscal Inequality in Italy: Exploratory Analyses on Property Tax Rates

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021 (ICCSA 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12954))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in the last Going for Growth report (2021) urged the Italian government to redefine the tax on the first home ownership and to review the cadastral rates. This could represent an opportunity to re-discuss the objectives of the property taxation, as a part of the general tax reform announced by the Italian government. The aim of this paper is to perform some preliminary analyses on the fiscal inequality related to luxury properties in six different Italian cities at municipal level. The proposed methodological approach is based on three steps and can be also applied to other urban contexts. A stratified sampling of data from real estate advertisements provide the basis for the calculation of the cadastral values and a set of innovative fiscal inequality indicators. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses are performed to study the relations between property prices, cadastral values and the inequality level expressed by the proposed indicators. Findings show that cadastral values are not related to property prices and that the fiscal inequality level is significant in the analysed cities, even if with some differences that highlight a chaotic fiscal situation. The regression results also highlight the random relationship between tax rates and property prices and thus suggest that redistributive policies are necessary in the Italian context. The outputs of these first exploratory analyses represent a good starting point that deserves to be carried on and developed to test the proposed methodological approach. In particular, further researches could be focused on other housing segments, such as economic properties and tenements, and the analyses could be improved by considering the different urban areas and the related sub-markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andrews, F.M., Withey, S.B.: Social Indicators of Well-being: Americans’ Perceptions of Life Quality. Springer, Berlin, (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2253-5

  2. Atkinson, A.B.: On the measurement of inequality. J. Econ. Theory 2, 244–263 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Barreca, A., Curto, R., Rolando, D.: Assessing social and territorial vulnerability on real estate submarkets. Buildings 7(4), 94 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7040094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barreca, A., Curto, R., Rolando, D.: Housing vulnerability and property prices: spatial analyses in the Turin real estate market. Sustainability 10(9), 3068 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barreca, A., Curto, R., Rolando, D.: Urban vibrancy: an emerging factor that spatially influences the real estate market. Sustainability 12(1), 346 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barreca, A., Curto, R., Rolando, D.: Is the real estate market of new housing stock influenced by urban vibrancy? Complexity (2020).https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1908698

  7. Bechini, T.: La disuguaglianza in Italia: Un’analisi multidimensionale per circoscrizioni. EyesReg-Giornale di Scienze Regionali 7, 64–69 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Breusch, T.S., Pagan, A.R.: A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econom. J. Economy. Soc. 1287–1294 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bourassa, S.C.: Land value taxation and housing development: effects of the property tax reform in three types of cities. Am. J. Econ. Sociol. 49(1), 101–111 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bourassa, S.C., Cantoni, E., Hoesli, M.: Spatial dependence, housing submarkets, and house prices. J. Real Estate Financ. Econ. 35, 143–160 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bordignon, M., Grembi, V., Piazza, S.: Who do you blame in local finance? An analysis of municipal financing in Italy. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 49, 146–163 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Curto, R., Fregonara, E., Semeraro, P.: Asking prices vs market prices: an empirical analysis. Territorio Italia 1, 53–72 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Curto, R., Fregonara, E., Semeraro, P.: How can land registry values be made fairer pending a review of valuations? Territorio Italia 1, 59–82 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Curto, R., Fregonara, E., Semeraro, P.: Market prices and property taxation in Italian real estate: a Turin case study. In: Stanghellini S., Morano P., Bottero M., Oppio A. (eds) Appraisal: From Theory to Practice. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49676-4_11

  15. Cutter, S.L., Mitchell, J.T., Scott, M.S.: Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 90, 713–737 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Diener, E.A.: A value based index for measuring national quality of life. Soc. Indic. Res. 36, 107–127 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Diener, E., Suh, E.: Measuring quality of life: economic, social, and subjective indicators. Soc. Ind. Res. 40, 189–216 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dillinger, W.: Urban Property Tax Reform Guidelines and Recommendations. The World Bank, Washington, D.C. (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Elinder, M., Persson, L.: House price responses to a national property tax reform. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 144, 18–39 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacobs, J.: The Death and Life of Great American Cities. The Failure of Town Planning. Random House, New York (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jacobs, J.: The Life of Cities. Random House, New York, NY, USA (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee, Y.J.: Social vulnerability indicators as a sustainable planning tool. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 44, 31–42 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Montgomery, J.: Urban vitality and the culture of cities. Plan. Pract. Res. 10, 101–110 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Montgomery, J.: Making a city: urbanity, vitality and urban design. J. Urban Des. 3, 93–116 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. OECD: Economic Policy Reforms 2021: going for growth In: OECD Better policies for better lives (2021). https://www.oecd.org/economy/italy-economic-snapshot/. Accessed 07 May 2021

  26. Pellegrino, S., Piacenza, M., Turati, G.: Developing a static microsimulation model for the analysis of housing taxation in Italy. Int. J. Microsimul. 4(2), 73–85 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosengard, J.K.: Property Tax Reform in Developing Countries. Springer, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5667-1

  28. Rosen, S.: Hedonic prices and explicit markets: production differentiation in pure competition. J. Polit. Econ. 82(1), 34–55 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schmidtlein, M.C., Deutsch, R.C., Piegorsch, W.W., Cutter, S.L.: A sensitivity analysis of the social vulnerability index. Risk Anal. 28, 1099–1114 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schneider, M.: The “quality of life” and social indicators research. Public Adm. Rev. 36, 297–305 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Segre, E., Rondinella, T., Mascherini, M.: Well-being in Italian regions. Measures, civil society consultation and evidence. Soc. Ind. Res. 102, 47–69 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tate, E.: Uncertainty analysis for a social vulnerability index. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 103, 526–543 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yinger, J., Bloom, H.S., Boersch-Supan, A.: Property taxes and house values: the theory and estimation of intrajurisdictional property tax capitalization. Elsevier (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yue, Y., Zhuang, Y., Yeh, A.G.O., Xie, J.Y., Ma, C.L., Li, Q.Q.: Measurements of POI-based mixed use and their relationships with neighbourhood vibrancy. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 31, 658–675 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Watkins, C.A.: The definition and identification of housing submarkets. Environ. Plan. 33, 2235–2253 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Whitehead, C.M.E.: Chapter 40 Urban housing markets: theory and policy. In: Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. 3, pp. 1559–1594. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Rolando .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Curto, R., Barreca, A., Malavasi, G., Rolando, D. (2021). The Paradox of Fiscal Inequality in Italy: Exploratory Analyses on Property Tax Rates. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021. ICCSA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12954. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86979-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86979-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86978-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86979-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics