Abstract
The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in the last Going for Growth report (2021) urged the Italian government to redefine the tax on the first home ownership and to review the cadastral rates. This could represent an opportunity to re-discuss the objectives of the property taxation, as a part of the general tax reform announced by the Italian government. The aim of this paper is to perform some preliminary analyses on the fiscal inequality related to luxury properties in six different Italian cities at municipal level. The proposed methodological approach is based on three steps and can be also applied to other urban contexts. A stratified sampling of data from real estate advertisements provide the basis for the calculation of the cadastral values and a set of innovative fiscal inequality indicators. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses are performed to study the relations between property prices, cadastral values and the inequality level expressed by the proposed indicators. Findings show that cadastral values are not related to property prices and that the fiscal inequality level is significant in the analysed cities, even if with some differences that highlight a chaotic fiscal situation. The regression results also highlight the random relationship between tax rates and property prices and thus suggest that redistributive policies are necessary in the Italian context. The outputs of these first exploratory analyses represent a good starting point that deserves to be carried on and developed to test the proposed methodological approach. In particular, further researches could be focused on other housing segments, such as economic properties and tenements, and the analyses could be improved by considering the different urban areas and the related sub-markets.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andrews, F.M., Withey, S.B.: Social Indicators of Well-being: Americans’ Perceptions of Life Quality. Springer, Berlin, (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2253-5
Atkinson, A.B.: On the measurement of inequality. J. Econ. Theory 2, 244–263 (1970)
Barreca, A., Curto, R., Rolando, D.: Assessing social and territorial vulnerability on real estate submarkets. Buildings 7(4), 94 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7040094
Barreca, A., Curto, R., Rolando, D.: Housing vulnerability and property prices: spatial analyses in the Turin real estate market. Sustainability 10(9), 3068 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093068
Barreca, A., Curto, R., Rolando, D.: Urban vibrancy: an emerging factor that spatially influences the real estate market. Sustainability 12(1), 346 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010346
Barreca, A., Curto, R., Rolando, D.: Is the real estate market of new housing stock influenced by urban vibrancy? Complexity (2020).https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1908698
Bechini, T.: La disuguaglianza in Italia: Un’analisi multidimensionale per circoscrizioni. EyesReg-Giornale di Scienze Regionali 7, 64–69 (2017)
Breusch, T.S., Pagan, A.R.: A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econom. J. Economy. Soc. 1287–1294 (1979)
Bourassa, S.C.: Land value taxation and housing development: effects of the property tax reform in three types of cities. Am. J. Econ. Sociol. 49(1), 101–111 (1990)
Bourassa, S.C., Cantoni, E., Hoesli, M.: Spatial dependence, housing submarkets, and house prices. J. Real Estate Financ. Econ. 35, 143–160 (2007)
Bordignon, M., Grembi, V., Piazza, S.: Who do you blame in local finance? An analysis of municipal financing in Italy. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 49, 146–163 (2017)
Curto, R., Fregonara, E., Semeraro, P.: Asking prices vs market prices: an empirical analysis. Territorio Italia 1, 53–72 (2012)
Curto, R., Fregonara, E., Semeraro, P.: How can land registry values be made fairer pending a review of valuations? Territorio Italia 1, 59–82 (2014)
Curto, R., Fregonara, E., Semeraro, P.: Market prices and property taxation in Italian real estate: a Turin case study. In: Stanghellini S., Morano P., Bottero M., Oppio A. (eds) Appraisal: From Theory to Practice. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49676-4_11
Cutter, S.L., Mitchell, J.T., Scott, M.S.: Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 90, 713–737 (2000)
Diener, E.A.: A value based index for measuring national quality of life. Soc. Indic. Res. 36, 107–127 (1995)
Diener, E., Suh, E.: Measuring quality of life: economic, social, and subjective indicators. Soc. Ind. Res. 40, 189–216 (1997)
Dillinger, W.: Urban Property Tax Reform Guidelines and Recommendations. The World Bank, Washington, D.C. (1992)
Elinder, M., Persson, L.: House price responses to a national property tax reform. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 144, 18–39 (2017)
Jacobs, J.: The Death and Life of Great American Cities. The Failure of Town Planning. Random House, New York (1961)
Jacobs, J.: The Life of Cities. Random House, New York, NY, USA (1969)
Lee, Y.J.: Social vulnerability indicators as a sustainable planning tool. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 44, 31–42 (2014)
Montgomery, J.: Urban vitality and the culture of cities. Plan. Pract. Res. 10, 101–110 (1995)
Montgomery, J.: Making a city: urbanity, vitality and urban design. J. Urban Des. 3, 93–116 (1998)
OECD: Economic Policy Reforms 2021: going for growth In: OECD Better policies for better lives (2021). https://www.oecd.org/economy/italy-economic-snapshot/. Accessed 07 May 2021
Pellegrino, S., Piacenza, M., Turati, G.: Developing a static microsimulation model for the analysis of housing taxation in Italy. Int. J. Microsimul. 4(2), 73–85 (2011)
Rosengard, J.K.: Property Tax Reform in Developing Countries. Springer, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5667-1
Rosen, S.: Hedonic prices and explicit markets: production differentiation in pure competition. J. Polit. Econ. 82(1), 34–55 (1974)
Schmidtlein, M.C., Deutsch, R.C., Piegorsch, W.W., Cutter, S.L.: A sensitivity analysis of the social vulnerability index. Risk Anal. 28, 1099–1114 (2008)
Schneider, M.: The “quality of life” and social indicators research. Public Adm. Rev. 36, 297–305 (1976)
Segre, E., Rondinella, T., Mascherini, M.: Well-being in Italian regions. Measures, civil society consultation and evidence. Soc. Ind. Res. 102, 47–69 (2011)
Tate, E.: Uncertainty analysis for a social vulnerability index. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 103, 526–543 (2013)
Yinger, J., Bloom, H.S., Boersch-Supan, A.: Property taxes and house values: the theory and estimation of intrajurisdictional property tax capitalization. Elsevier (2016)
Yue, Y., Zhuang, Y., Yeh, A.G.O., Xie, J.Y., Ma, C.L., Li, Q.Q.: Measurements of POI-based mixed use and their relationships with neighbourhood vibrancy. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 31, 658–675 (2017)
Watkins, C.A.: The definition and identification of housing submarkets. Environ. Plan. 33, 2235–2253 (2001)
Whitehead, C.M.E.: Chapter 40 Urban housing markets: theory and policy. In: Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. 3, pp. 1559–1594. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Curto, R., Barreca, A., Malavasi, G., Rolando, D. (2021). The Paradox of Fiscal Inequality in Italy: Exploratory Analyses on Property Tax Rates. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021. ICCSA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12954. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86979-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86979-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86978-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86979-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)