Skip to main content

Permutation-Constrained Common String Partitions with Applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
String Processing and Information Retrieval (SPIRE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12944))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We introduce and study a new combinatorial problem based on the famous Minimum Common String Partition (MCSP) problem, which we call Permutation-constrained Common String Partition (PCSP for short). In PCSP, we are given two sequences/genomes s and t with the same length and a permutation \(\pi \) on [k], the question is to decide whether it is possible to decompose s and t into k blocks that conform with the permutation \(\pi \). The main result of this paper is that if s and t are both d-occurrence (i.e., each letter/gene appears at most d times in s and t), then PCSP is FPT. We also study a variant where the input specifies whether each matched pair of block needs to be preserved as is, or reversed. With this result on PCSP, we show that a series of genome rearrangement problems are FPT as long as the input genomes are d-occurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bulteau, L., Fellows, M., Komusiewicz, C., Rosamond, F.: Parameterized string equations. arXiv arXiv:2104.14171 (2021)

  2. Bulteau, L., Fertin, G., Jean, G., Komusiewicz, C.: Sorting by multi-cut rearrangements. In: Bureš, T., et al. (eds.) SOFSEM 2021. LNCS, vol. 12607, pp. 593–607. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67731-2_43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bulteau, L., Fertin, G., Komusiewicz, C., Rusu, I.: A fixed-parameter algorithm for minimum common string partition with few duplications. In: Darling, A., Stoye, J. (eds.) WABI 2013. LNCS, vol. 8126, pp. 244–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40453-5_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bulteau, L., Fertin, G., Rusu, I.: Sorting by transpositions is difficult. SIAM J. Discret. Math. 26(3), 1148–1180 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1137/110851390

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bulteau, L., Komusiewicz, C.: Minimum common string partition parameterized by partition size is fixed-parameter tractable. In: Proceedings of 25th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2014, pp. 102–121. SIAM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Caprara, A.: Sorting permutations by reversals and Eulerian cycle decompositions. SIAM J. Discret. Math. 12(1), 91–110 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1137/S089548019731994X

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, X., et al.: Assignment of orthologous genes via genome rearrangement. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 2(4), 302–315 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2005.48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Christie, D.A.: Sorting permutations by block-interchanges. Inf. Process. Lett. 60(4), 165–169 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-0190(96)00155-X

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Christie, D.A., Irving, R.W.: Sorting strings by reversals and by transpositions. SIAM J. Discret. Math. 14(2), 193–206 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1137/S0895480197331995

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Chrobak, M., Kolman, P., Sgall, J.: The greedy algorithm for the minimum common string partition problem. ACM Trans. Algorithms 1(2), 350–366 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1145/1103963.1103971

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Damaschke, P.: Minimum common string partition parameterized. In: Crandall, K.A., Lagergren, J. (eds.) WABI 2008. LNCS, vol. 5251, pp. 87–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87361-7_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Ganczorz, M., Gawrychowski, P., Jez, A., Kociumaka, T.: Edit distance with block operations. In: Proceedings of ESA 2018, LIPIcs, vol. 112, pp. 33:1–33:14. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldstein, A., Kolman, P., Zheng, J.: Minimum common string partition problem: hardness and approximations. Eur. J. Combin. 12, R50 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang, H., Zhu, B., Zhu, D., Zhu, H.: Minimum common string partition revisited. J. Comb. Optim. 23(4), 519–527 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-010-9370-2

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lafond, M., Zhu, B., Zou, P.: Genomic problems involving copy number profiles: Complexity and algorithms. In: Proceedings of CPM 2020, LIPIcs, vol. 161, pp. 22:1–22:15. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lafond, M., Zhu, B., Zou, P.: The tandem duplication distance is NP-hard. In: Proceedings of STACS 2020, LIPIcs, vol. 154, pp. 15:1–15:15. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mahajan, M., Rama, R., Raman, V., Vijaykumar, S.: Approximate block sorting. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. 17(2), 337–356 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129054106003863

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Makaroff, C., Palmer, J.: Mitochondrial DNA rearrangements and transcriptional alternatives in the male sterile cytoplasm of Ogura radish. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 1474–1480 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Qingge, L., He, X., Liu, Z., Zhu, B.: On the minimum copy number generation problem in cancer genomics. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics, BCB 2018, pp. 260–269. ACM Press, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3233547.3233586

  20. Sturtevant, A.: A crossover reducer in drosophila melanogaster due to inversion of a section of the third chromosome. Biol. Zent. Bl. 46, 697–702 (1926)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sturtevant, A., Dobzhansky, T.: Inversions in the third chromosome of wild races of Drosophila pseudoobscura, and their use in the study of the history of the species. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 22, 448–450 (1936)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zheng, C., Kerr Wall, P., Leebens-Mack, J., de Pamphilis, C., Albert, V.A., Sankoff, D.: Gene loss under neighborhood selection following whole genome duplication and the reconstruction of the ancestral Populus genome. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 7(03), 499–520 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Binhai Zhu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lafond, M., Zhu, B. (2021). Permutation-Constrained Common String Partitions with Applications. In: Lecroq, T., Touzet, H. (eds) String Processing and Information Retrieval. SPIRE 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12944. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86692-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86692-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86691-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86692-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics