Abstract
The global problem of mankind, for more than a year, is the epidemic of coronavirus, which forces the authorities to take unprecedented measures to prevent the spread of Covid-19 virus. During this period, all sectors of the economy are affected, more or less. In this paper, we aim to analyse the water distribution, sanitation, waste management, decontamination activities before the pandemic (2008?2018), but especially during the pandemic, in order to develop economic and social measures. In order to achieve the objectives, the results of the questionnaire launched online, between May and June 2020, will be analysed.
The elaboration of the set of measures for this economic sector will be carried out taking into account the extraordinarily abrupt dynamics from day to day of the data on the spread of infections, doubled by the actions of the authorities for isolating the population at home and implicitly the severe restriction of economic activities, which makes the set of measures proposed at the end of this paper to give resilience to this economic sector.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aartsen, M., Koop, S., Hegger, D., Goswami, B., Oost, J, Leeuwen, K. V.: Connecting water science and policy in India: lessons from a systematic water governance assessment in the city of Ahmedabad. Reg. Nal Environ. Chang. 18, 2445–2457 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1363-1.
Albu, L. L.: Academician: macroeconomic impact assessments of Covid-19, Romanian Academy, department of economic, legal and sociological sciences, institute of economic forecasting (2020)
Banacu, C.S., Busu, M., Ignat, R., Trica, C.L.: Entrepreneurial innovation impact on recycling municipal waste. a panel data analysis at the EU level. Sustain. 11(18), 5125 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185125.
Best Environmental Management Practice in the tourism sector: Waste sorting and sending for recycling, https://ec.europa.eu/environment/emas/takeagreenstep/pdf/BEMP-6.2-FINAL.pdf (2017).
Burlacu, S., Vasilache, P.C., Velicu, E.R., Curea, S.C., Margina, O.: Management of water resources at global level. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Economics and Social Sciences, pp. 998–1009. Sciendo. (2020)
Crețu, R.F.: Drug Industry Medical and Waste, Supplement of “Quality-access to success” Journal Vol. 18, S2, The journal is published by the Romanian Society for Quality Assurance, CNCSIS recognized, category B+ and it is included in SCOPUS, EBSCO, PROQUEST, CABELL'S, pp. 160–165, din 490 p., anul 2017, ISSN 1582–2559, http://www.srac.ro/calitatea/arhiva/supliment/2017/Q-asContents_Vol.18_S2_March-2017.pdf (2017).
Crețu, R.F., Cretu, R.C.: Company value and structure of the corporate governance under the circumstances of diversification and economic instability, International Conferance sustainable development in conditions of economic instability Satu Mare Academy Comercial, 21–22 june 2013, CIBERNETICA MC Bucharest 2013, ISBN 978-606-8288-19-2 (2013).
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, European Green Pact, Brussels, 11.12.2019, COM (2019), 640 final (2019).
Directive (EU) 2018/851 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 2008/98 / EC on waste (2018).
Directive 2008/98 / EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of Directive (EU) 2018/851 of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives.
Government Emergency Ordinance no. 196/2005 on the Environmental Fund.
Government Emergency Ordinance no. 74/2018 of July 17, 2018 for the amendment and completion of Law no. 211/2011 on the waste regime.
Guerrieri, V.G., Lorenzoni, L.S., Werning, I.: Macroeconomic Implications of COVID-19: Can Negative Supply Shocks Cause Demand Shortages?, NBER Working Paper 29618 (2020).
Institutions responsible for collecting data on the quantities of waste generated and managed—Bucharest Environmental Protection Agency, respectively Ilfov Environmental Protection Agency.
Local institutions responsible for ensuring sanitation in Bucharest—Bucharest City Hall and the mayoralties of the 6 sectors.
Minju, K.: Leontief Input–Output Model (Application of Linear Algebra to Economics) Archived 2014-12-15 at the Wayback Machine (2014).
National Waste Management Strategy and National Waste Management Plan.
Rahmasary, A.N., Robert, S., Chang, I.-S., Jing, W., Park, J., Bluemling, B., Koop, S., Leeuwen van, K.: Overcoming the Challenges of Water, Waste and Climate Change in Asian Cities, Environmental Management, volume 63, pp. 520–535, https://link.springer.com/article/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01137-y.10 (2019).
Robu, V., Anghel, I., Serban, E.C.: Economic-financial analysis of the company. Economic Publishing House, Bucharest (2014)
Robu, V., Anica-Popa, A., Curea, S.C.: Economic-financial analysis of the company. vol. I. ASE Publishing House, Bucharest (2017)
Rodriguez, D.J., Serrano, H.A., Delgado, A., Nolasco, D., Saltiel, G.: Wastewater? From Waste to Resource, World Bank Water Global Practice, https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/water/publication/wastewater-initiative (2020).
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the implementation of the Circular Economy Action Plan, Brussels, 26.1.2017 COM (2017), 33 final.
Romania's National Strategy for Sustainable Development 2030.
Study on the evaluation of the guarantee system, component of the waste management system in Romania, coordinator Cristian Teodor et al., Bucharest, Ministry of Environment.
www.inss.ro, accessed on May 15, 2020, Data from the National Institute of Statistics 2008–2018.
www.mfinante.ro, Data from the Ministry of Public Finance.
www.eurostat.ro, Eurostat data.
www.piarom.ro, Data from the Patronage of Local Investors in Romania.
www.onrc.ro, Data of the National Office of the Trade Register.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Annex
Annex
1. What category of stakeholders do you belong to? | ||
(a) sanitation service operators | 4 | 1.4% |
(b) operators of drinking water distribution services | 7 | 2.4% |
(c) population | 277 | 96.2% |
288 | 100.0% | |
2. What do you think about the effectiveness of the waste management system during the Covid-19 pandemic? | ||
(a) not very good | 97 | 33.7% |
(b) good | 180 | 62.5% |
(c) very good | 11 | 3.8% |
288 | 100.0% | |
3. What do you think of the current price/quality ratio of waste collection services? | ||
(a) large | 51 | 17.7% |
(b) medium | 219 | 76.0% |
(c) small | 18 | 6.3% |
288 | 100.0% | |
4. Could the differentiation of tariffs for selective waste collection lead to an increase in recycling during the Covid-19 pandemic? | ||
(a) yes, in an insignificant percentage | 98 | 34.0% |
(b) no | 65 | 22.6% |
(c) yes, in a significant percentage | 125 | 43.4% |
288 | 100.0% | |
5. What do you think is the degree to which the current waste management system ensures the protection of the environment and the health of the population? | ||
(a) low | 129 | 44.8% |
(b) medium | 140 | 48.6% |
(c) high | 19 | 6.6% |
288 | 100.0% | |
6. Do you consider that the implementation of an integrated waste management system (selective collection, sorting, composting and controlled storage) will contribute to improving the quality of the environment? | ||
(a) yes | 263 | 91.3% |
(b) no | 10 | 3.5% |
(c) I don't know/I didn't think | 15 | 5.2% |
288 | 100.0% | |
7. Do you consider that the sanitation services in the county will be efficient with the implementation of the new system? | ||
(a) yes | 210 | 72.9% |
(b) no | 18 | 6.3% |
(c) I don't know/I didn't think | 60 | 20.8% |
288 | 100.0% | |
8. Do you consider that a sustained information campaign among the population is useful for the successful implementation of the integrated waste management system, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic? | ||
(a) yes | 246 | 85.4% |
(b) no | 18 | 6.3% |
(c) I don't know/I didn't think | 24 | 8.3% |
288 | 100.0% | |
9. If your answer is yes, which institutions do you think should be involved? | ||
(a) Environmental Protection Agency | 213 | 74.0 |
(b) The school | 33 | 11.5 |
(c) Environmental Guard | 42 | 14.6 |
288 | 100 | |
10. How does the Covid-19 pandemic affect the water distribution, sanitation, waste management, decontamination activities sector? | ||
(a) directly by increasing the amount of waste and the high degree of contamination | 127 | 44.1 |
(b) indirectly, by increasing the tariffs for sanitation services | 62 | 21.5 |
(c) cumulatively | 99 | 34.4 |
288 | 100 | |
11. Do you know the content of a River Basin Management Plan? | ||
(a) yes | 17 | 5.9% |
(b) no | 75 | 60.8% |
(c) I will be interested | 96 | 33.3% |
288 | 100.0% | |
12. What specific measures under a basin management plan do you consider to be a priority during the Covid-19 pandemic? | ||
(a) ecological measures | 177 | 61.5% |
(b) social measures | 48 | 16.7% |
(c) economic measures | 63 | 21.9% |
288 | 100.0% | |
13. Do you agree with the estimated costs of the water distribution, sanitation, waste management, decontamination activities during the Covid-19 pandemic? | ||
(a) yes | 69 | 24.0% |
(b) no | 72 | 25.0% |
(c) I don't know | 147 | 51.0% |
288 | 100,0% | |
14. Can you identify other sources of funding for the implementation of additional measures imposed during the Covid-19 pandemic period in the water distribution, sanitation, waste management, decontamination activities? | ||
(a) yes | 88 | 30.6% |
(b) no | 102 | 35.4% |
(c) in an insignificant percentage | 98 | 34.0% |
288 | 100.0% | |
15. Do you think it is important to be informed and consulted about the additional measures taken during the pandemic in the water distribution, sanitation, waste management, decontamination activities? | ||
(a) yes | 252 | 87.5% |
(b) no | 12 | 4.2% |
(c) I don't know | 24 | 8.3% |
288 | 100.0% | |
16. Do you consider that there is available and sufficient information for the population during the pandemic related to the analysed sector? | ||
(a) yes | 61 | 21.2% |
(b) no | 106 | 36.8% |
(c) too little, insignificant | 121 | 42.0% |
288 | 100.0% | |
17. What information methods do you prefer and find most effective for your active involvement in environmental issues during the Covid-19 pandemic? | ||
(a) Website | 199 | 69.1% |
(b) brochures/leaflets | 33 | 11.5% |
(c) e-mail | 56 | 19.4% |
288 | 100.0% | |
18. What is the respondent's highest level of education? | ||
(a) high school studies | 123 | 42.7% |
(b) university studies | 112 | 38.9% |
(c) master studies | 53 | 18.4% |
288 | 100.0% | |
19. What is your age? | ||
18–35 years old | 251 | 87.2% |
36–50 years | 29 | 10.1% |
51–65 years old | 7 | 2.4% |
over 65 years | 1 | 0.3% |
288 | 100.0% | |
20. What is your environment of residence? | ||
(a) rural | 90 | 31.3% |
(b) urban | 194 | 67.4% |
(c) I prefer not to answer | 4 | 1.4% |
288 | 100.0% | |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stela, F.M., Floretina, C.R., Lenuta, T.C. (2021). Effects of the Covid-19 Pandemic on the Water Distribution, Sanitation, Waste Management, Decontamination Activities Sector. In: Dima, A.M., Anghel, I., Dobrea, R.C. (eds) Economic Recovery After COVID-19. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86641-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86641-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86640-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86641-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)