Abstract
Why does the notion of imposter syndrome persists in higher education, who acknowledges feelings of imposterism, and how does imposter phenomenon affect work practices (Breeze in Imposter Syndrome as a Public Feeling. Feeling Academic in the Neoliberal University. Springer, 2018)? The inquiry is framed empirically through participant narratives from an ‘insider’ research study (Trowler in Doing Insider Research into Higher Education. Amazon Kindle, 2012) carried out in a research-intensive university in Australia exploring relationships at the so-called teaching-research nexus (e.g. Neumann in Australian Journal of Education 40:5–18, 1996). Critical auto-ethnographic reflections (Boylorn and Orbe in Critical Autoethnography: Intersecting Cultural Identities in Everyday Life. Volumen 13 de Writing Lives—Ethnographic Narratives. Left Coast Press, 2013; Denzin in Interpretive Autoethnography. Sage, London, 2014) influenced by Archers’ (The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012) notion of reflexivity are included. A playful adoption of mythic archetypes suggests that imposterism is better viewed as agile, malleable or mercurial tendencies, where feelings, position the ‘imposter’ in a diversity of liminal spaces, thereby, creating a critical awareness of strategies for academic staff (Hutchins and Rainbolt in Human Resource Development International 20:194–214, 2017).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Addison, Michelle. Social Games and Identity in the Higher Education Workplace: Playing with Gender, Class and Emotion. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
Archer, Margaret. The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Badley, Graham Francis. Composing Academic Identities: Stories That Matter? Qualitative Inquiry 22, no. 5 (2016): 377–385.
Barcan, Ruth. Academic Life and Labour in the New University: Hope and Other Choices. Farnham: Ashgate, 2013.
Black, Alie, and Gail Crimmins, and Linda Henderson. Positioning Ourselves in Our Academic Lives: Exploring Personal/Professional Identities, Voice and Agency. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 40, no. 4 (2019): 530–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2017.1398135.
Bosanquet, Agnes, and Cathy Rytmeister. A Career in Activism: A Reflective Narrative of University Governance and Unionism. The Australian Universities’ Review 59, no. 2 (2017): 79–88. Availability: https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=076350674251566;res=IELAPA.
Bourdieu, P. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press. 1990.
Boylorn, Robyn, and Mark Orbe. Critical Autoethnography: Intersecting Cultural Identities in Everyday Life. Volumen 13 de Writing Lives—Ethnographic Narratives. Left Coast Press, 2013.
Breeze, Maddie. Imposter Syndrome as a Public Feeling. Feeling Academic in the Neoliberal University. Springer, 2018. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-64224-6_9.
Breeze, Maddie, and Yvette Taylor. Feminist Collaborations in Higher Education: Stretched Across Career Stages. Gender and Education (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2018.147119.
Campbell, Joseph. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1949.
Clance, Pauline, and Suzanne Imes. The Imposter Phenomenon in High Achieving Women: Dynamics and Therapeutic Intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, no. 15 (1978): 241–247.
Connell, Raewyn. Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Australia: Allen & Unwin, 2007.
Connell, Raewyn. The Good University: What Universities Actually Do and Why It’s Time for Radical Change. Clayton, VIC: Monash University Publishing, 2019.
Denzin, Norman. Interpretive Autoethnography. London: Sage, 2014.
Duffy, Meaghan. “Does the Myth of the Solo Genius Scientist Contribute to Imposter Syndrome?” Dynamic Ecology. January 18, 2015. https://dynamicecology.wordpress.com/.
Gabriel, Yannis. Interpretation, Reflexivity and Imagination in Qualitative Research, Qualitative Methodologies in Organization Studies (2018): 137–157.
Goffman, Erving. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. London: Penguin Books, 1963.
Greenwood, Royston, and Bob Hinings. Understanding Strategic Change: The Contribution of Archetypes. The Academy of Management Journal 36, no. 5 (1993): 1052–1081.
Grenfell, Michael. Interview, personal communication. Trinity College, the University of Dublin (TCD). The University of Sydney, (2013), November 15.
Hutchins, Holly. Outing the Imposter: A Study Exploring Imposter Phenomenon Among Higher Education Faculty. New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development 27, no. 2 (2015): 3–12.
Hutchins, Holly, and Hiliary Rainbolt. What Triggers Imposter Phenomenon Among Academic Faculty? A Critical Incident Study Exploring Antecedents, Coping, and Development Opportunities. Human Resource Development International 20, no. 3 (2017): 194–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2016.1248205.
Jung, Carl. ‘Conclusion’, in Read, H., Fordham, M., and Adler, G. (Eds.), The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, Volume 9 (Part 2): Aion: Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self. London, UK: Routledge, 1969.
Jung, Carl. ‘The Introverted Type’, in Read, H., Fordham, M., and Adler, G. (Eds.), The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, Volume 6: Psychological Types. London, UK: Routledge, 1971.
Langford, Joe, and Pauline Rose Clance. The Imposter Phenomenon: Recent Research Findings Regarding Dynamics, Personality and Family Patterns and their Implications for Treatment. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 30, no. 3 (1993): 495–501. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.30.3.495.
Lee, Jo-Anne, and John Lutz. Situating: Critical Essays for Activists and Scholars. McGill-Queen’s Press—MQUP, 2005.
Lewis, Melinda. A Tale of Shedding and Growing Skin in Higher Education Close Up Research. Presented at the Higher Education Close Up 7 Conference, ‘Higher Education Close Up Research Making a Difference’. Lancaster, UK (2014): July 21–23.
Lewis, Melinda, and Bruce Stenlake. ‘A Working Guide Towards Debiasing Higher Education Through the Affordances of Indigenous Cultural Competence Curricula’, in Hill, B., Harris, J., and Bacchus, R. Teaching Aboriginal Cultural Competence. Springer (in press).
Long, Colin, Nic Kimberley, and Fabian Cannizzo. “Casualisation of University Workforce Is a National Disgrace”. Sydney Morning Herald, August 4, 2018. https://www.smh.com.au/education/casualisation-of-university-workforce-is-a-national-disgrace-20180803-p4zvcm.html.
Matthews, Gail, and Pauline Rose Clance. Treatment of the Impostor Phenomenon in Psychotherapy Clients.Psychotherapy in Private Practice 3, no. 1 (1985): 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1300/J294v03n01_09.
Mayes, Clifford. Reflecting on the Archetypes of Teaching. Teaching Education 10, no. 2 (1999): 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047621990100202.
Mbembe, Joseph A. Decolonizing the University: New Directions. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 15, no. 1 (2016): 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022215618513.
Moore, Amber. “Blackboxing It: A Poetic Min/d/ing the Gap of Imposter Experience in Academia. Poetry and Social Justice Special Issue of Art/Research International: A Transdisciplinary Journal 3, no. 1 (2018): 30–52. https://doi.org/10.18432/ari29358.
Neumann, Ruth. Researching the Teaching-Research Nexus: A Critical Review. Australian Journal of Education 40, no. 1 (1996): 5–18.
Parkman, Anna. The Imposter Phenomenon in Higher Education: Incidence and Impact. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice 16, no. 1 (2016): 50–60.
Rudge, Trudy. (Re)thinking Violence in Heath Care Settings: A Critical Approach. London: Routledge, 2016.
Slank, Shanna. Rethinking Imposter Phenomenon. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (2019): 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-019-09984-8.
Trowler, Paul. Doing Insider Research into Higher Education. Amazon Kindle, 2012.
Waite, K. ‘Bourdesian Reflexivity in Insider Research in Higher Education: Considering Participants as a Critical Audience’, in Albright, J., Hartman, D., and Widin, J. (Eds.), Bourdieu’s Field Theory and the Social Sciences. Springer, 2017. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-5385-6_11.
Waite, K., T. Anderson, and M. Bawa. (2012). Breaking Through the Marzipan Layer—Gender and Inclusion in Higher Education Pedagogy and Curriculum. slideshare.net: Linkedin.
Acknowledgements
This research was approved by the Human Ethics Committee at the University of Sydney (HREC approval 2013/759). All research participants gave informed consent prior to data collection and interview. We are indebted to the women and men who shared their stories and insights, allowing us into their lives for our lessons and inspirations. Melinda Lewis gratefully acknowledges Professor Goodyear for supervision during an earlier phase of the research.
Funding
There was no direct funding supporting this work, however, Melinda Lewis was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award Scholarship 2012–2015 to undertake fieldwork research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lewis, M., Quinnell, R. (2022). Marginalising Imposterism: An Australian Case Study Proposing a Diversity of Tendencies that Frame Academic Identities and Archetypes. In: Addison, M., Breeze, M., Taylor, Y. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Imposter Syndrome in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86570-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86570-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86569-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86570-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)