Skip to main content

Toward Inclusive Equality: Ten Years of the Human Rights Model of Disability in the Work of the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disability Law and Human Rights

Abstract

Disability is a new subject in international human rights law. With the adoption of the Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2006, a new era of human rights law began. This chapter looks at the first ten years of the CRPD Committee and its implication for equality law. The authors take a look at the legal interpretations of the CRPD through the Committee’s General Comments and legal concepts applied with emphasis on equality and anti-discrimination. The human rights model of disability is described as the new disability model which evolved in the first decade of treaty monitoring. It corresponds with a new concept of equality that the CRPD brings to international anti-discrimination law called inclusive equality. Inclusive equality is compared to earlier models i.e., formal and substantive equality. Inclusive equality and the human rights model of disability are introduced as innovative legal concepts which offer innovative and adequate answers to disability policy from a human rights perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The preamble (e) recognizes that disability is an evolving concept and that disability “results from the interaction between persons with impairments and attitudinal and environmental barriers that hinders their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others”.

  2. 2.

    In article 1 persons with disabilities are defined as “those who have long-term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairments which in interaction with various barriers may hinder their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others”.

  3. 3.

    Other articles under which the Committee mentioned the human rights model of disability in one or a couple of concluding observations are articles 7, 12, 15, 19, 24, 27, 31 and 32.

  4. 4.

    Together with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948.

  5. 5.

    The second group includes: the Convention on the Elimination of all Form of Racial Discrimination (CERD), the Convention Against All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC).

  6. 6.

    Note that this is still disputed (e.g. Broderick 2020).

References

  • Abouharb M. Rodwan, and David Cingranelli. 2007. Human Rights and Structural Adjustment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broderick, Andrea. 2020. “Of Rights and Obligations: The Birth of Accessibility.” The International Journal of Human Rights 24 (4): 393–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Licia. 2016. “Feminist Approaches to Cognitive Disability.” Philosophy Compass 11 (10): 541–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2014. Communication No. 10/2013. CRPD/C/12/D/10/2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2016. General Comment No. 4 (2016) on the Right to Inclusive Education. CRPD/C/GC/4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2017a. Concluding Observations on the Initial Report of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. CRPD/C/GBR/CO 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2017b. General Comment No. 5 (2017) on Living Independently and Being Included in the Community. CRPD/C/GC/5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2017c. “Guidelines on the Right to Liberty and Security of Persons with Disabilities.” In Report of the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Thirteenth Session (25 March–17 April 2015), Fourteenth Session (17 August–4 September 2015), Fifteenth Session (29 March–21 April 2016), Sixteenth Session (15 August–2 September 2016), edited by General Assembly, Annex 16–21. A/72/55. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2017d. Inquiry Concerning the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Carried Out by the Committee Under Article 6 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention. Report of the Committee. CRPD/C/15/R.2/Rev.2 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2018a. General Comment No. 6 (2018) on Equality and Non-Discrimination. CRPD/C/GC/6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2018b. General Comment No. 7 (2018) on the Participation of Persons with Disabilities, Including Children with Disabilities, Through Their Representative Organizations, in the Implementation and Monitoring of the Convention. CRPD/C/GC/7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degener, Theresia. 2016. “Disability in a Human Rights Context.” Laws 5 (35): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws5030035.

  • Degener, Theresia. 2017. “A Human Rights Model of Disability.” In Routledge Handbook of Disability Law and Human Rights, edited by Peter Blanck and Eilionóir Flynn, 31–50. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferri, Delia. 2010. “The Conclusion of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities by the EU/EC: A Constitutional Perspective.” In European Yearbook of Disability Law 2, edited by Lisa Waddington and Gerard Quinn, 47–72. Antwerp: Intersentia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredman, Sandra, Meghan Campbell, Shreya Atrey, Jason Brickhill, Nomfundo Ramalekana, and Sanya Samtani. n.d. Achieving Transformative Equality for Persons with Disabilities: Submission to the CRPD Committee for General Comment No. 6 on Article 5 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. http://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/CPRD-Submission-1.pdf.

  • General Assembly. 2011. Report of the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. First Session (23–27 February 2009), Second Session (19–23 October 2009), Third Session (22–26 February 2010), Fourth Session (4–8 October 2010). A/66/55. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittay, Eva. 1999. Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Anna. 2014. “Accessibility Obligations in the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Nyusti & Takacs V Hungary.” South African Journal on Human Rights 30 (2): 380–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Anna, and Angharad E. Beckett. 2020. “The Social and Human Rights Models of Disability: Towards a Complementarity Thesis.” The International Journal of Human Rights. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1783533.

  • Lord, Janet, and Michael Stein. 2017. “Charting the Development of Human Rights Law Through the CRPD.” In The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A Commentary, edited by Valentina Della Fina, Rachele Cera, and Giuseppe Palmisano, 731–48. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, Catharine A. 2012. “Substantive Equality: A Perspective.” Minnesota Law Review 96 (1): 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Jenny. 1991. Pride Against Prejudice: Transforming Attitudes to Disability. London: Women Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnovan, Maeve. 2013. “Feminism, Disability and Evolutionary Psychology: What’s Missing?” Disability Studies Quarterly 33 (4), retrieved from: https://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3872/3403.

  • Paré, Mona. 2019. “The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Its Contribution to the Development of International Human Rights Law.” Revista ESMAT 11 (17): 209–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Gerard, and Theresia Degener. 2002. Human Rights and Disability. New York and Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, Colleen. 2004. “Inclusive Equality and New Forms of Social Governance.” Supreme Court Law Review 24: 45–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzi, Lorella. 2004. “The Social Model of Disability: A Philosophical Critique.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (2): 141–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Carol. 1999. Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trömel, Stefan. 2009. “A Personal Perspective on the Drafting History of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” In European Yearbook of Disability Law 1, edited by Gerard Quinn and Lisa Waddington, 115–38. Antwerp and Portland: Intersentia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendell, Susan. 1996. The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witcher, Sally. 2013. Inclusive Equality: A Vision for Social Justice. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theresia Degener .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Degener, T., de Castro, M.GC. (2022). Toward Inclusive Equality: Ten Years of the Human Rights Model of Disability in the Work of the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. In: Felder, F., Davy, L., Kayess, R. (eds) Disability Law and Human Rights. Palgrave Studies in Disability and International Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86545-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics