Skip to main content

Environmental Agenda, Legislative Power and Social Participation: An In-Depth Analysis of the Commission on the Environment and Sustainable Development in Brazil

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Policies and Practices in Energy, Environment and Health Research

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

  • 819 Accesses

Abstract

The formulation of most environmental policies begins in the legislative branch. In this context, political actors propose the main initiatives that become laws and influence the implementation of environmental policy. In Brazil, since 2004, the Câmara dos Deputados [lower house of Congress] has a permanent commission that only deals with the environmental agenda, namely the Commission on the Environment and Sustainable Development. Brazil is one of the countries that hosts the greatest biodiversity in the world and, therefore, plays a very important role in global environmental governance. Thus, investigating the places where political decisions are made on the Brazilian environmental agenda is fundamental. Permanent commissions in Brazil can hold public hearings, which are spaces that allow the participation of representatives of civil society and thus encourage dialogue between different actors interested in environmental policies. In this chapter, I seek to analyze the performance of this commission since its creation, in 2004, up to 2019. The objective is to investigate the main themes discussed, the laws proposed, the more active parties and representatives and to observe that civil society groups have access to dialogue in this political field. This Brazilian legislative experience has positive aspects and may serve as an example for the formulation of similar institutions in other countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The cutoff date used in the analysis does not include the year 2020 because the global context of the COVID-19 pandemic altered the functioning of the National Congress, which meant the permanent commissions interrupted much of their work.

  2. 2.

    There are numerous examples of Brazilian political-institutional spaces that allow popular participation. Participatory budgeting, for example, was a successful initiative implemented in Porto Alegre, RS, which allowed the population to express their opinion on how public money should be spent. This initiative has been replicated elsewhere and has been the subject of much research. In the environmental field, Brazil has the National Environment Council (Conselho Nacional de Meio Ambiente, CONAMA), which brings together representatives from different sectors of society and works with its state (CONSEMAS) and municipal (COMUMAS) counterparts at the local level. They are consultative and deliberative bodies of the National Environment System (Sistema Nacional de Meio Ambiente, SISNAMA) and were established in 1981, by the National Environmental Policy.

  3. 3.

    RICD: This formal document contains the operating rules for the lower house. Theoretically, it should guide the way in which representatives develop their actions within this legislative space.

  4. 4.

    This is set out in Art. 24 of the RICD.

  5. 5.

    For more details, access https://www.camara.leg.br/comissoes/comissoes-permanentes (in Portuguese, English and Spanish).

  6. 6.

    The internal regulations of the lower house establish that no permanent commission can have more than thirteen hundredths of the total number of representatives, currently 66 of 513, and no less than three and a half hundredths, 17 of 513, disregarding fractions (Art. 25, § 2, RICD). Considering, whenever possible, the principle of party proportionality (Art. 25, § 1, RICD).

  7. 7.

    The idea of checks and balances has been discussed since Federalist Papers no. 51 [50] by James Madison, among others, but for a more recent discussion that involves the importance of this instrument in contemporary democracies, I indicate the work of Acemoglu and Robinson (2012).

  8. 8.

    Organização da Sociedade Civil de Interesse Público [Civil Society Organization of Public Interest].

References

  • Abranches SH (1988) Presidencialismo de coalizão: o dilema institucional brasileiro [Coalition presidentialism: the Brazilian institutional dilema]. Dados 31(1):5–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Robinson JA (2012) Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida A (2019) Do Plenário as Comissões: Mudança Institucional na Câmara dos Deputados [From the Plenary to the Commissions: Institutional Change in the lower house of Congress]. In: Perlin G, Santos M (eds) O Presidencialismo de Coalizão em Movimento. Edições da Câmara, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Amorim Neto O, Cox G, McCubbins M (2003) Agenda power in Brazil’s Câmara dos Deputados. World Politics 55:550–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade ALL (2018) Audiências públicas como instrumento de participação social: o caso da Comissão de Transparência, Governança, Fiscalização e Controle e Defesa do Consumidor [Public hearings as an instrument of social participation: the case of the Commission on the Transparency, Governance, Inspection and Control and Consumer Protection]. Research Report. Universidade de Brasília. Departamento de Gestão de Políticas Públicas, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Avritzer L (2002) Democracy and the public space in Latin America. Princeton University, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Avritzer L (ed) (2010) Experiências nacionais de participação social [National experiences of social participation]. Cortez Editora, Belo Horizonte

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1984) Langage et pouvoir symbolique [Language and symbolic power]. Points, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1994) Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l’action [Practical reason: on the theory of action]. Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (2000) Propos sur le Champ Politique [Commentary on the political field]. Presse Universitaire de Lyon, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasher H (2006) Listening to hearings legislative hearings and legislative outcomes. Am Politics Res 34(5):583–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bursztyn MA, Bursztyn M (2013) Fundamentos de Política e Gestão Ambiental: caminhos para a sustentabilidade [Fundamentals of Environmental Policy and Management: paths to sustainability]. Garamond, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • César JBM (2011) A audiência pública como instrumento de efetivação dos direitos sociais [The public hearing as an instrument to enforce social rights]. RVMD 5(2):356–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrêa CP (2017) Sociologia das Tomadas de Posição no Legislativo Brasileiro: uma análise sobre a Comissão de Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável da Câmara dos Deputados (2004–2015) [Position takings’ sociology in the Brazilian legislative: an analysis on the commission on the environment and sustainable development of the lower house of congress (2004–2015)]. Ph.D. Thesis—Sociology, Faculty of Art, University of Porto, Porto

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrêa CP (2018) A Composição Sociopolítica do Legislativo Brasileiro: uma análise da Comissão de Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável (2004–2015) [The socio-political composition of the Brazilian legislative: an analysis on the commission on the environment and sustainable development]. Sociologia: Revista da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto 35:85–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrêa CP, Pereira VB (2019) Tomada de posição no legislativo brasileiro: análise sociológica sobre o caso da Comissão de Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável [Position-taking in the Brazilian legislature: a sociological analysis of the case of the commission on the environment and sustainable development]. Revista Brasileira De Sociologia, SBS 7(16):179–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrêa CP, Peres P (2018) Governabilidade e Comissões: três gerações de Estudos Legislativos no Brasil [Governance and Commissions: three generations of Legislative Studies in Brazil]. In: Dantas H (ed) Governabilidade: para entender a Política Brasileira. Konrad Adenauer, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox G, McCubbins M (1993) Legislative leviathan: party government in the house. UCLA Press, Irvine

    Google Scholar 

  • Durán MC (2014) La Participación Social en el Procedimiento Legislativo [Social Participation in the Legislative Procedure]. UNED—Revista De Derecho Político 89:175–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebdon C (2002) Beyond the public hearing: citizen participation in the local government budget process. J Public Budg Account Financ Manag 14(2):273–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Eising R, Spohr S (2017) The more, the merrier? interest groups and legislative change in the public hearings of the German parliamentary committees. German Politics 26(2):314–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias N (1982) The civilizing process. In: Vol II: State formation and civilization. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueiredo AC, Limongi F (1999) Executivo e Legislativo na nova ordem constitucional [Executive and Legislative in the new constitutional order]. São Paulo, FGV

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueiredo AC, Limongi F (2005) Processo Orçamentário e Comportamento Legislativo: Emendas Individuais, Apoio ao Executivo e Programas de Governo [Budgetary process and legislative behavior: individual amendments, executive support and government programs]. Dados 48(4):737–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleury LC, Almeida J (2013) A construção da Usina Hidrelétrica de Belo Monte: conflito ambiental e o dilema do desenvolvimento [The construction of the Belo Monte Hydroelectric Power Plant: environmental conflict and the development dilema]. Ambiente e Sociedade 16(4):141–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca IF, Rezende RR, Oliveira MS, Pereira AK (2013) Audiências públicas: fatores que influenciam seu potencial de efetividade no âmbito do Poder Executivo federal [Public hearings: factors that influence their potential for effectiveness within the scope of the federal executive branch]. Revista Do Serviço Público Brasília 64(1):7–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas A (2016) O presidencialismo da coalizão [The presidentialism of the coalition]. Konrad Adenauer, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes M (2018) Committee hearings of the UK parliament: who gives evidence and does this matter? Parliam Aff 71:283–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikedinma HA (2018) Committee system and legislative process in modern legislative assemblies. Kaduna J Hum 2(1):29–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi PR (2003) Espaços públicos e práticas participativas na gestão do meio ambiente no Brasil [Public spaces and participatory practices in environmental management in Brazil]. Sociedade e Estado 18(1):137–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Kathelene L (1994) Power and influence in state legislative policymaking: the interaction of gender and position in committee hearing debates. Am Polit Sci Rev 88(3):560–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krehbiel K (1991) Information and legislative organization. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Losekann C (2012) Participação da sociedade civil na política ambiental do Governo Lula [Civil society participation in the Lula Government’s environmental policy]. Ambiente e Sociedade 15(1):179–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüchmann LHH (2007) A representação no interior das experiências de participação [Representation within the Participation Experiences]. Lua Nova 70:139–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Alier J (2010) El ecologismo de los pobres. Conflictos ambientales y lenguajes de valoración [The environmentalism of the poor: a study of ecological conflicts and valuation], 4th edn. Espiritrompa Ediciones, Lima

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco L (2014) O Procedimento de Feitura das Leis por Comissões Parlamentares [The Procedure for making laws by Parliamentary Committees]. Master’s Thesis, Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito, Rio de Janeiro, Pontifícia Universidade Católica

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman C (1970) Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira C, Mueller B (2000) Uma Teoria da Preponderância do Poder Executivo. O Sistema de Comissões no Legislativo Brasileiro [A theory of the preponderance of the Executive Power. The Commission System in the Brazilian Legislative]. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 15(43):45–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Pina APT (2020) A participação feminina na Comissão de Direitos Humanos e Minorias da Câmara dos Deputados [Female participation in the Commission on the Human Rights and Minorities of the lower house of Congress]. Conference Paper—VI Simpósio de Gênero e Políticas Públicas (online)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires R, Vaz A (2012) Participação social como método de governo? Um mapeamento das interfaces socioestatais no governo federal [Social participation as a method of government? A mapping of socio-state interfaces in the federal government]. Texto para discussão 1707. Ipea, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich G (2002) Executive decree authority in Brazil: how reactive legislators influence policy. Legis Stud Q 33(01):05–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Representative Edmilson Rodrigues (2015) Official Recording of the Public Hearing on “indigenous health in Brazil”, November 26, 2015. CMADS. Câmara dos Deputados, Brazil. https://www.camara.leg.br/evento-legislativo/42347

  • Resende CAS (2014) Participação social e atuação de grupos de interesse: um estudo sobre as audiências públicas da Comissão de Ciência e Tecnologia, Comunicação e Informática (CCTCI) da Câmara dos Deputados [Social participation and performance of interest groups: a study on the public hearings of the Commission on the Science and Technology, Communication and Informatics Commission (CCTCI) of the lower house of Congress]. Conference Paper—II Semana de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Política, UFSCar, São Carlos

    Google Scholar 

  • Resende CAS (2019) Interesses Organizados nas Comissões Parlamentares: Percepções de Grupos de Interesse e Assessores Parlamentares [Interests organized in Parliamentary Committees: perceptions of interest groups and parliamentary advisers]. In: Perlin G, Santos M (eds) O Presidencialismo de Coalizão em Movimento. Edições da Câmara, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • RICD, Regimento Interno da Câmara dos Deputados [Internal Regulations of the Câmara dos Deputados] (1989) Resolução da Câmara dos Deputados n.º 17/1989. Aprova o Regimento Interno da Câmara dos Deputados. Diário do Congresso Nacional—22/9/1989, p 3 (Publicação Original)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronei Alves Silva (2019) Official Recording of the Public Hearing on “incentives to foster the recycling industry”, August 13, 2019. CMADS. Câmara dos Deputados, Brazil. https://www.camara.leg.br/evento-legislativo/56633

  • Santos F (2002a) Partidos e Comissões no Presidencialismo de Coalizão [Parties and Commissions in the coalition presidentialism]. Dados 45(2):237–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos F (2002b) Partidos Políticos e Comissões Permanentes na Câmara dos Deputados: de 1995 a 1998 [Political Parties and Permanent Commissions in the lower house of Congress: from 1995 to 1998]. Revista Uruguaya De Ciência Política 13:188–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos F (2003) O Poder Legislativo no Presidencialismo de Coalizão [Legislative Power in the Coalition Presidentialism]. Editora UFMG, Belo Horizonte

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos MLS (2008) Teorias e métodos nos estudos sobre o Legislativo Brasileiro: uma revisão da literatura [Theories and methods in studies on the Brazilian Legislative: a literature review]. BIB 66(02):65–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos MLS, Resende CAS, Ferreira RFC (2016) Representação de Interesses na Câmara dos Deputados: um Estudo Sobre a Atuação dos Grupos de Pressão nas Comissões Parlamentares [Representation of Interests in the Chamber of Deputies: a Study on the Performance of Pressure Groups in Parliamentary Committees]. Conference Paper—VII Encontro de Administração Pública e Governança, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle K (1986) The positive theory of legislative institutions: an enrichment of social choice and spatial models. Public Choice 50:135–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souza C (2012) A que vieram as conferências nacionais? Uma análise dos objetivos dos processos realizados entre 2003 e 2010 [What are national conferences for? An analysis of the objectives of the processes carried out between 2003 and 2010]. Texto para discussão 1718. Ipea, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Yefuka Kaiabi (2015) Official Recording of the Public Hearing on “indigenous health in Brazil”, November 26, 2015. CMADS. Câmara dos Deputados, Brazil. https://www.camara.leg.br/evento-legislativo/42347

  • Young IM (2000) Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Zorzal G, Carlos E (2017) Audiências públicas do Legislativo estadual: fatores endógenos e exógenos na análise da efetividade da participação [Public hearings of the state legislature: endogenous and exogenous factors in the analysis of the effectiveness of participation]. Revista de Sociologia e Política 25(64):23–46

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Corrêa, C.P. (2022). Environmental Agenda, Legislative Power and Social Participation: An In-Depth Analysis of the Commission on the Environment and Sustainable Development in Brazil. In: Leal Filho, W., Vidal, D.G., Dinis, M.A.P., Dias, R.C. (eds) Sustainable Policies and Practices in Energy, Environment and Health Research. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86304-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics