Abstract
The elementary idea of intersecting circles to express combinations of concepts was already present in Ramón Llull and Leibniz, while Venn is credited with the breakthrough that only with the intersection of two circles can we express all the required classes that arise by combining S and P in Boolean algebra. However, Aaron Schuyler published his popular manual Principles of Logic for High Schools and Colleges in 1869, ten years before Venn’s work. Reading Venn’s Symbolic Logic, we notice some similarities to this textbook, probably justified in the spirit of the age, as Venn never cited Schuyler. This American author made the same mistake as Venn in stating that the representation of the universal negative (E) was the only unambiguous diagram and shows how to represent the classes SP, S¬P, P¬S and ¬SP within the regions of the intersection of two circles. He also drew an original and novel diagram by eliminating the region between S and P from the Euler diagram that represents the universal negative proposition. Furthermore, their diagrams can be of great help in understanding the differences between Venn and Hamilton’s proposals on the fundamental structure of propositions. Finally, Schuyler was one of the few 19th century authors who took the step of expressing propositions with a negative subject, something that did not make sense for Aristotelian logic, but it did for symbolic logic. For all these reasons, we consider Aaron Schuyler to be a good candidate for the missing link between Euler and Venn diagrams.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aznar, M.B.L.: Diagramas lógicos de Marlo para el razonamiento visual y heterogéneo: válidos en lógica matemática y aristotélica. University of Huelva, Spain (2020). http://rabida.uhu.es/dspace/handle/10272/19769
Boole, G.: An Investigation of the Laws of Thought, on which are Founded the Mathematical Theories of Logic and Probabilities. Dover, New York (1854)
Carroll, L.: The Game of Logic. Macmillan, London (1886)
De Rijk, L. M.: Logica Modernorum: the origin and early development of the theory of supposition, vol. 2. Van Gorcum, Assen (1967)
Descartes, R., Tweyman, S.: Meditations on First Philosophy: In Focus. Routledge, London (1993)
Euler, L.: Lettres à une Princesse d’Allemagne. Emile Saisset, Charpentier, Paris (1843)
Gardner, M.: Logic Machines and Diagrams. McGraw-Hill, New York (1958)
Hamilton, W.: Lectures on Metaphysics and Logic, vol. IV. William Blackwood and Sons, Edinburgh, London (1860)
Harley, R.: The Stanhope demonstrator. Mind 4(14), 192–210 (1879). https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/os-4.14.192
Jevons, W.: The Substitution of Similars, The True Principle of Reasoning, Derived from a Modification of Aristotle's Dictum. Macmillan and Co., London (1869)
Kullman, D.E.: Aaron Schuyler 1828–1913. http://sections.maa.org/ohio/ohio_masters/schuyler.html. Accessed 10 Apr 2021
Laita, L.M.: Influences on Boole’s logic: the controversy between William Hamilton and Augustus De Morgan. Ann. Sci. 36(1), 45–65 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1080/00033797900200121
Lombraña, J.V.: Historia de la Lógica. Universidad de Oviedo, Gijón (1989)
Loomis, E.: Life and appreciation of Dr. Aaron Schuyler. Cornell University, USA (1936)
Mays, W., Henry, D.P.: Jevons and logic. Mind 62(248), 484–505 (1953). https://doi.org/10.2307/2964507
Oriol, M., Gambra, M.: Lógica Aristotélica. Dykinson, Madrid (2015)
Schuyler, M.A.: Principles of Logic for High School and Colleges. Wilson, Hinkle & Co., Cincinnati (1869)
Venn, J.: Symbolic Logic. MacMillan, London (1881)
Whately, R.: Elements of Logic. Harper and Brothers Publishers, New York (1853)
Wilson, W.D.: An Elementary Treatise on Logic: Designed for Use of Schools and Colleges as Well as for Private Study and Use. D. Appleton, New York (1856)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Aznar, M.B.L., Gadea, W.F., Acosta, G.C. (2021). Aaron Schuyler: The Missing Link Between Euler and Venn Diagrams?. In: Basu, A., Stapleton, G., Linker, S., Legg, C., Manalo, E., Viana, P. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12909. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86062-2_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86062-2_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86061-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86062-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)