Abstract
Diagnosis and prognosis of mechanical components are important for critical rotating machinery found in the power generation, mining, and aviation industries. Data-driven diagnosis and prognosis methods have much potential; however, their performance is dependent on the quality of historical data . Usually only limited historical data are available for newly commissioned parts and for parts that do not go through a full degradation cycle before being replaced. Physics-based diagnosis and prognosis methods require assumptions of the underlying physics; the governing equations need to be derived and solved; and the model needs to be calibrated for the underlying system. Physics-based methods require extensive domain knowledge and could have modelling biases due to missing physics. Hybrid methods for diagnosis and prognosis of mechanical components have the potential for improving the accuracy and precision of remaining useful life (RUL) estimation when historical fault data are scarce. This is because hybrid methods combine data-driven and physics-based models to alleviate the shortcomings of the respective methods. For these reasons, hybrid methods are getting more attention in the condition monitoring community as a solution for diagnosis and prognosis tasks. Therefore, in this chapter, we present a review of the state-of-the-art implementations of physics-based, data-driven, and hybrid methods for diagnosis and prognosis. The methods are organised using a condition monitoring framework and contributions of various techniques are discussed. We identify gaps in the hybrid diagnosis and prognosis field that could be the focus of future research projects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
An, D., Kim, N.H., Choi, J.H.: Practical options for selecting data-driven or physics-based prognostics algorithms with reviews. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 133, 223–236 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.09.014
Bishop, C.M.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, New York (2006)
Carden, E.P., Fanning, P.: Vibration based condition monitoring: a review. Struct. Health Monit. 3(4), 355–377 (2004)
Chen, J., Yuan, S., Qiu, L., Wang, H., Yang, W.: Online prognosis of fatigue crack propagation based on Gaussian weight-mixture proposal particle filter. Ultrasonics 82, 134–144 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2017.07.016
Coppe, A., Haftka, R.T., Kim, N.H., Yuan, F.G.: Uncertainty reduction of damage growth properties using structural health monitoring. J. Aircr. 47(6), 2030–2038 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C000279
Coppe, A., Pais, M.J., Haftka, R.T., Kim, N.H.: Using a simple crack growth model in predicting remaining useful life. J. Aircr. 49(6), 1965–1973 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031808
Corbetta, M., Saxena, A., Giglio, M., Goebel, K.: An investigation of strain energy release rate models for real-time prognosis of fiber-reinforced laminates. Compos. Struct. 165, 99–114 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.002
Corbetta, M., Sbarufatti, C., Giglio, M., Saxena, A., Goebel, K.: A Bayesian framework for fatigue life prediction of composite laminates under co-existing matrix cracks and delamination. Compos. Struct. 187, 58–70 (2018a). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.035
Corbetta, M., Sbarufatti, C., Giglio, M., Todd, M.D.: Optimization of nonlinear, non-Gaussian Bayesian filtering for diagnosis and prognosis of monotonic degradation processes. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 104, 305–322 (2018b). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.012
Corrado, N., Durrande, N., Gherlone, M., Hensman, J., Mattone, M., Surace, C.: Single and multiple crack localization in beam-like structures using a Gaussian process regression approach. JVC/J. Vibr. Control 24(18), 4160–4175 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546317721418
Cubillo, A., Perinpanayagam, S., Esperon-Miguez, M.: A review of physics-based models in prognostics: application to gears and bearings of rotating machinery. Adv. Mech. Eng. 8(8), 1–21 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016664660
Elshamy, M., Crosby, W.A., Elhadary, M.: Crack detection of cantilever beam by natural frequency tracking using experimental and finite element analysis. Alex. Eng. J. 57(4), 3755–3766 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2018.10.002
Gao, Z., Liu, X.: An overview on fault diagnosis, prognosis and resilient control for wind turbine systems. Processes 9(2), 1–19 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020300
ISO 13381-1. Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines — prognostics — Part 1: General Guidelines (2015). https://www.iso.org/standard/51436.html
Jia, F., Lei, Y., Lin, J., Zhou, X., Lu, N.: Deep neural networks: a promising tool for fault characteristic mining and intelligent diagnosis of rotating machinery with massive data. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 72–73, 303–315 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.10.025
Jouin, M., Gouriveau, R., Hissel, D., Péra, M.C., Zerhouni, N.: Particle filter-based prognostics: review, discussion and perspectives. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 72, 2–31 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.11.008
Kaloop, M.R., Hu, J.W.: Stayed-cable bridge damage detection and localization based on accelerometer health monitoring measurements. Shock. Vib. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/102680
Keprate, A., Ratnayake, R.M.C., Sankararaman, S.: Adaptive Gaussian process regression as an alternative to FEM for prediction of stress intensity factor to assess fatigue degradation in offshore pipeline. Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 153, 45–58 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2017.05.010
Khan, S., Yairi, T.: A review on the application of deep learning in system health management. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 107, 241–265 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.024
Le, T.T., Chatelain, F., Bérenguer, C.: Hidden Markov models for diagnostics and prognostics of systems under multiple deterioration modes. In: Safety and Reliability: Methodology Applications - Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2014, pp. 1197–1204 (2015)
Lee, G.-Y., et al.: Machine health management in smart factory: a review. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 32(3), 987–1009 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-018-0201-1
Lei, Y., Li, N., Guo, L., Li, N., Yan, T., Lin, J.: Machinery health prognostics: a systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 104, 799–834 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.016
Liao, L., Köttig, F.: Review of hybrid prognostics approaches for remaining useful life prediction of engineered systems, and an application to battery life prediction. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 63(1), 191–207 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2014.2299152
Saidi, L., Ben Ali, J., Benbouzid, M., Bechhofer, E.: An integrated wind turbine failures prognostic approach implementing Kalman smoother with confidence bounds. Appl. Acoust. 138(April), 199–208 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.04.005
Sanchez, H., Sankararaman, S., Escobet, T., Frost, S., Goebel, K.: Analysis of two modeling approaches for fatigue estimation and remaining useful life predictions of wind turbine blades. In: European Conference of The Prognostics and Health Management Society, pp. 1–11 (2016)
Sankararaman, S., Goebel, K.: Uncertainty in prognostics and health management: an overview. In: European Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, pp. 1–11 (2014)
Saxena, A.: Conference slides: prognostics tutorial. In: Annual Conference of the PHM Society (PHM2010) (2010)
Saxena, A., Celaya, J., Saha, B., Saha, S., Goebel, K.: Metrics for offline evaluation of prognostic performance. Int. J. Prognostics Health Manage. 1(1), 1–20 (2010)
Serafini, J., Bernardini, G., Porcelli, R., Masarati, P.: In-flight health monitoring of helicopter blades via differential analysis. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 88, 436–443 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.03.039
Sikorska, J.Z., Hodkiewicz, M., Ma, L.: Prognostic modelling options for remaining useful life estimation by industry. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 25(5), 1803–1836 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.11.018
Valeti, B., Pakzad, S.N.: Remaining useful life estimation of wind turbine blades under variable wind speed conditions using particle filters, pp. 1–10 (2017)
Wang, B., Member, S., Lei, Y., Li, N., Li, N.: A hybrid prognostics approach for estimating remaining useful life of rolling element bearings. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 69(1), 401–412 (2020)
Wang, Y., Xiang, J., Markert, R., Liang, M.: Spectral kurtosis for fault detection, diagnosis and prognostics of rotating machines: a review with applications. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 66–67, 679–698 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.04.039
Zaidan, M.A., Harrison, R.F., Mills, A.R., Fleming, P.J.: Bayesian hierarchical models for aerospace gas turbine engine prognostics. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(1), 539–553 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.007
Zeng, J., Chen, K., Ma, H., Duan, T., Wen, B.: Vibration response analysis of a cracked rotating compressor blade during run-up process. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 118, 568–583 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.09.008
Zhang, W., Li, C., Peng, G., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z.: A deep convolutional neural network with new training methods for bearing fault diagnosis under noisy environment and different working load. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 100, 439–453 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.06.022
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ellis, B., Stephan Heyns, P., Schmidt, S. (2022). Diagnosis and Prognosis of Mechanical Components Using Hybrid Methods. In: Hammami, A., Heyns, P.S., Schmidt, S., Chaari, F., Abbes, M.S., Haddar, M. (eds) Modelling and Simulation of Complex Systems for Sustainable Energy Efficiency. MOSCOSSEE 2021. Applied Condition Monitoring, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85584-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85584-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85583-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85584-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)