Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Selection of the Best Software Project Management Model via Interval-Valued Neutrosophic AHP

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques for Emerging Conditions and Digital Transformation (INFUS 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 308))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1489 Accesses

Abstract

The number of software projects has increased in recent years due to technological advancements. In addition to the other factors such as the qualifications of the staff, budget, leadership, the success of the projects also highly depends on how they are managed. There are various software project management models such as Waterfall, Prototype, Spiral, Incremental, Iterative and Agile, which have been applied in different types of software projects. Each has advantages and disadvantages over the other. Hence, any of them does not have absolute superiority over the others. Therefore, it is important to determine the most suitable one. In addition, depending on the sector, the conditions change and a solution methodology for the new problem environment is required. One of the biggest sectors, the banking sector, is specifically considered in this study. Conforming to the multi-criteria structure of the selection problem, Interval-Valued Neutrosophic Analytic Hierarchy Process (IVN-AHP) which is capable of providing solutions in fuzzy multi-criteria decision making environment is utilized in this study with the pairwise comparisons provided by the experts in the sector. Finally, the alternative software project management models are ranked, and the best one is obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Prolopisko, A.: Software Development Life-Cycle(SDLC). https://medium.com/@artjoms/software-development-life-cycle-sdlc-6155dbfe3cbc. Accessed 22 Mar 2021

  2. Khan, M.A., Parveen, A., Sadiq, M.: A method for the selection of software development life cycle models using analytic hierarchy process. In: International Conference on Issues and Challenges in Intelligent Computing Techniques (ICICT) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Java T Point Software Engineering page. https://www.javatpoint.com/software-engineering-prototype-model. Accessed 22 Mar 2021

  4. Mishra, A., Dubey, D.A.: Comparative study of different software development life cycle models in different scenerios. In: International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, vol. 1, no. 5 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bhuvaneswari, T., Prabaharan, S.: A survey of software development life cycle models. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mob. Comput. 2(3), 262–267 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Papadopoulos, G.: Moving from traditional to agile software development methodologies also on large, distributed projects. In: International Conference on Strategic Innovative Marketing, IC-SIM 2014, September 1–4, Madrid, Spain (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hovorushchenko, T., Krasiy, A: The selecting an appropriate software life cycle model on the basis of the specifications analysis. In: Computer Science & Engineering 2013 (CSE-2013), 21–23 November 2013, Lviv, Ukraine (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kilic, H.S., Zaim, S., Delen, D.: Development of a hybrid methodology for ERP system selection: the case of Turkish Airlines. Decis. Support Syst. 66, 82–92 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bolturk, E., Kahraman, C.: A novel interval-valued neutrosophic AHP with cosine similarity measure. Soft. Comput. 22(15), 4941–4958 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3140-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nabeeh, N.A., Abdel-Basset, M., El-Ghareeb, H.A., Aboelfetouh, A.: Neutrosophic multi-criteria decision making approach for iot-based enterprises. IEEE Access 7, 59559–59574 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Industrial Engineering Department, Marmara University, 34722, Istanbul, Turkey

    Nisa Cizmecioglu, Huseyin Selcuk Kilic, Zeynep Tugce Kalender & Gulfem Tuzkaya

Authors
  1. Nisa Cizmecioglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huseyin Selcuk Kilic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zeynep Tugce Kalender
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gulfem Tuzkaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gulfem Tuzkaya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Cengiz Kahraman

  2. Industrial Engineering Department, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Selcuk Cebi

  3. Department of Industrial Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Sezi Cevik Onar

  4. Department of Industrial Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Basar Oztaysi

  5. Industrial Engineering Department, Galatasaray University, Istanbul, Turkey

    A. Cagri Tolga

  6. Department of Industrial Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Irem Ucal Sari

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cizmecioglu, N., Kilic, H.S., Kalender, Z.T., Tuzkaya, G. (2022). Selection of the Best Software Project Management Model via Interval-Valued Neutrosophic AHP. In: Kahraman, C., Cebi, S., Cevik Onar, S., Oztaysi, B., Tolga, A.C., Sari, I.U. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques for Emerging Conditions and Digital Transformation. INFUS 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 308. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85577-2_46

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation