Skip to main content

Dummett on Reasons to Act and Bringing About the Past

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Time, Identity and the Self: Essays on Metaphysics

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 442))

  • 196 Accesses

Abstract

My intention in this discussion is to outline and criticise some of the main ideas in Michael Dummett’s classic article “Bringing about the Past”. From Dummett’s remarks we can (I think) reconstruct two sceptical arguments designed to show that it can never be rational to attempt to bring about past events. Dummett is critical of both arguments. Though I am happy with Dummett’s reply to the first sceptical argument, I disagree with his reply to the second.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Dummett’s discussion at this point is somewhat opaque (Dummett, 1964, 346–348). J. H. Sobel’s discussion clarifies matters (Sobel, 1966). For a different interpretation, see Stalnaker (1975) and Bledin (2019).

  2. 2.

    I assume throughout that the chief only dances in order to influence the men’s behaviour (e.g., he is not a “fitness fanatic”) and that the chief’s desire is to bring it about that the men fought bravely, as opposed to the egocentric desire to bring it about that he (the chief) caused the men to fight bravely.

References

  • Black, M. (1956). Why cannot an effect precede its cause? Analysis, 16(3), 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bledin, J. (2019). Fatalism and the logic of unconditionals. Noûs, 54(1), 126–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M. A. E. (1954). Can an effect precede its cause? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 28, 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M. A. E. (1964). Bringing about the Past. The Philosophical Review, 73(3), 338–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flew, A. (1954). Can an effect precede its cause? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 28, 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorovitz, S. (1964). Leaving the past alone. The Philosophical Review, 73(3), 360–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, H. (2018). Fatalism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Winter 2018 edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, J. H. (1966). Dummett on fatalism. The Philosophical Review, 75(1), 78–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R. C. (1975). Indicative conditionals. Philosophia, 5(3), 269–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Garrett, B., Joven Joaquin, J. (2022). Dummett on Reasons to Act and Bringing About the Past. In: Joaquin, J.J. (eds) Time, Identity and the Self: Essays on Metaphysics. Synthese Library, vol 442. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85517-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics