Skip to main content

Bermúdez on Self-Consciousness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Time, Identity and the Self: Essays on Metaphysics

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 442))

  • 196 Accesses

Abstract

In this discussion, I argue that José Luis Bermúdez has not shown that there is a paradox in our concept of self-consciousness. The deflationary theory is an implausible theory of self-consciousness. A more plausible theory, “the simple theory”, is not paradoxical. However, I do think there is a puzzle about the connection between self-consciousness and ‘I’-thoughts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The terminology is from Gareth Evans, see (Evans, 1982, 185).

  2. 2.

    However, there is something (especially) odd about the ‘A’-users. Anscombe writes as if they were like us in having thoughts, sensations, etc. But if an ‘A’-user has a pain, he cannot utter “A is in pain” simply in virtue of feeling the pain. Rather, he must first observe pain-like behaviour, notice that it is exhibited by the body whose ‘A’-inscribed wrist he can see, and then judge “A is in pain” (Anscombe, 1981, 24). But does this make any sense? If he can feel pain, why can he not ascribe it to himself on that basis? Or should the ‘A’-users be understood as insensate zombies?

References

  • Anscombe, G. E. M. (1981). The first person. In Metaphysics and the philosophy of mind. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermúdez, J. L. (1998). The paradox of consciousness. Boston: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, H. (1967). Indicators and quasi-indicators. American Philosophical Quarterly, 9, 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (1982). The varieties of reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. (1979). The Essential indexical. Noûs, 3, 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, S. (1982). Self-reference and self-awareness. In Identity, cause, and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1972). The blue and brown books. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Garrett, B., Joven Joaquin, J. (2022). Bermúdez on Self-Consciousness. In: Joaquin, J.J. (eds) Time, Identity and the Self: Essays on Metaphysics. Synthese Library, vol 442. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85517-8_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics