Skip to main content

Criminal Legal System Response to Intimate Partner Violence

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Domestic Violence
  • 36 Accesses

Abstract

In 1978, John Rideout became the first man in the United States to be prosecuted for raping his wife while they were living together. Although acquitted, the fact that he was even prosecuted signaled a change in the winds with respect to the prosecutorial response to allegations of marital rape and sexual assault. Just over 20 years later, in 1999, Jessica Gonzales tried unsuccessfully to get the Castle Rock, Colorado Police Department to enforce a valid restraining order against her estranged husband. He had taken their three daughters from her front yard without any prior arrangement, violating the terms of the order. She made several attempts to get them to find and arrest him; each time they refused and told her to “call back later if the girls did not show.” Eventually she went to the police station after midnight in a final attempt to enforce the order. At 3:20 AM, her estranged husband, Simon Gonzales, appeared at the police station and started a gunfight with the police that resulted in his death. His vehicle contained the bodies of the couples’ three daughters. These two cases illustrate the centuries’ long struggle for equal treatment of victims of intimate partner violence. This entry will summarize the history of intimate partner violence along with the corresponding and sometimes maddening history of the criminal/legal response to it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersen, L. (2011). Give the ladies a chance: Gender and partisanship in the Prohibition Party, 1869–1912. Journal of Women’s History, 23(2), 137–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Intimate partner violence: definitions. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/definitions.html

  • Corcoran, J., Stephenson, M., Perryman, D., & Allen, S. (2001). Perceptions and utilization of a police–social work crisis intervention approach to domestic violence. Families in Society, 82(4), 393–398. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, M. R., Holliday, C. N., Hameeduddin, Z., Shah, R., Miller, J., Dantzler, J., & Goodmark, L. (2019). “You do not think of me as a human being”: Race and gender inequities intersect to discourage police reporting of violence against women. Journal of Urban Health, 96(5), 772–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-019-00359-z. PMID: 31214974; PMCID: PMC6814672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diez, C., Kurland, R. P., Rothsman, E., Blair-Merritt, M., Fleegler, E., Xuan, Z., Galea, S., Ross, C. S., Kalesan, B., Goss, K., & Siegel, M. (2017). State Intimate partner violence-related firearms Laws and Intimate partner homicide rates in the United States 1991-2015. Annals of Internal Medicine, 167(8), 536–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domestic Violence Courts (n.d.) http://www.criminal.justice.iresearchnet.com/typesofcrime/domestic-violence/domestic-violence-courts/

  • Feder, L. (1998). Police handling of domestic and nondomestic assault calls: Is there a case for discrimination? Crime & Delinquency, 44(2), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128798044002009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, E. (2011). When domestic violence and sex-based discrimination collide: Civil rights approaches to combating domestic violence and its aftermath. DePaul Journal for Social Justice, 4, 335. Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jsj/vol4/iss2/5

  • Gover, A. R., Boots, D. P., & Harper, S. B. (2021). Courting justice: Tracing the evolution and future of domestic violence courts. Feminist Criminology, 16(3), 366–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085120987638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, L., Blais, J., & Bourgon, G. (2016). Do domestic violence courts work? A meta-analytic review examining treatment and study quality. Justice Research and Policy, 172(2), 75–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, C. R. (1986). Gender-based discrimination in police reluctance to respond to domestic assault complaints. The Georgetown Law Journal, 75(2), 667–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, S. J., Zhang, Y., Hayes, B. E., & Bills, M. A. (2020). Mandatory arrest for domestic violence and repeat offending: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L., Davidoff, E., & DeSilva, A. R. (2020). Motivation for police support of domestic violence response team implementation with advocates. Violence Against Women, 27(9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, D., & Prohaska, A. (2015). Police officer gender and attitudes toward intimate partner violence: How policy can eliminate stereotypes. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 10(1), 77–90. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.kdla.idm.oclc.org/scholarly-journals/police-officer-gender-attitudes-toward-intimate/docview/1692045507/se-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, C. D., Sullivan, J. P., Backer, B. L., & Kaufman, J. S. (2020). New approaches to policing high risk intimate partner victims and offenders. National Institute of Justice Journal, 282, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, D. A., Havig, K., Natale, A., & Pharris, A. (2020). Intimate partner violence: Innovations in theory to inform clinical practice, policy, and research. Social Sciences, 9(71), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, W. J., Katz, C. M., & Choate, D. E. (2016). Assessing the Impact of Police-Worn Cameras in arresting, prosecuting, and convicting suspects of Intimate Partner Violence. Police Quarterly, 0(0), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyton, K., Sierra-Arevalo, M., & Rand, D. C. (2019). A field experiment on community policing police legitimacy. PNAS, 116(40), 19884–19898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Practical Implications of Current Domestic Violence Research: For law enforcement, prosecutors, and judges. (2009). United States Office of Justice Programs, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L., & Berk, R. (1984). The Minneapolis domestic violence experiment. National Policing Institute. https://www.policinginstitute.org/publication/the-minneapolis-domestic-violence-experiment/

  • Smith, S. G., Chen, J., Basile, K., Merrick, M., Wang, J., Patel, N., Wallina, M., & Jain, A. (2017). The National Intimate Partner and sexual violence survey; 2010–2012 state report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs-statereportbook.pdf.

  • Tutty, L. M., & Babins-Wagner, R. (2019). Outcomes and recidivism in mandated batterer intervention before and after introducing a specialized domestic violence court. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(5), 1039–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, K. (2020). Implementing domestic ViolencePpolicy: When accountability trumps Mission. Journal of Women and Social Work, 35(4), 533–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willie, T. C., Kershaw, T., Perler, R., Caplon, A., Katague, M., & Sullivan, T. R. (2021). Associations between state intimate partner violence-related firearm [policies and injuries among women and men who experience intimate partner violence. Injury Epidemiology, 8(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Dale Wilson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Wilson, B.D. (2023). Criminal Legal System Response to Intimate Partner Violence. In: Shackelford, T.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Domestic Violence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85493-5_344-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85493-5_344-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85493-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85493-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics